Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 353: Line 353:
* {{UserAFC|1=EmeraldRange}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
* {{UserAFC|1=EmeraldRange}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:I've been involved in some AfD discussions and made a few of my own articles (mostly about [[Administrative Divisions of Myanmar]]) and after helping with some Drafts in [[WP:MYANMAR]] recently, want to help clear some of the backlog, especially for Myanmar-related AfC which can often rely on Burmese language sources. [[User:EmeraldRange|'''<span style="color:#307F37;">EmeraldRange</span>''']] ([[User talk:EmeraldRange|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/EmeraldRange|contribs]]) 00:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
:I've been involved in some AfD discussions and made a few of my own articles (mostly about [[Administrative Divisions of Myanmar]]) and after helping with some Drafts in [[WP:MYANMAR]] recently, want to help clear some of the backlog, especially for Myanmar-related AfC which can often rely on Burmese language sources. [[User:EmeraldRange|'''<span style="color:#307F37;">EmeraldRange</span>''']] ([[User talk:EmeraldRange|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/EmeraldRange|contribs]]) 00:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

====[[User:Siagoddess]]====
* {{UserAFC|1=Siagoddess}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:I have been on Wikipedia for some time now. I would like to experience reviewing articles on AFC [[User:Siagoddess|Siagoddess]] ([[User talk:Siagoddess|talk]]) 18:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:40, 31 October 2023

This page is for requesting access to the AFC Helper script. If you wish to discuss this list, its requirements, or AFCH in general, please do so at the main talk page.

Requests

Note - All archived requests older than one month can be found at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants/Old Requests.
Please note that we generally do not notify users when their request has been reviewed, so please watch this page for updates to your request.
Please refrain from closing requests if you are not an administrator.
(add request)

September

NPR (Sept)

Hey, I'd love to help the project. I'm a fairly prolific editor, and recently was invited to become a page reviewer, and this side piqued my interest. Ortizesp (talk) 22:39, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ortizesp, as of quite recently, users with the NPR flag automatically have access to AFC. You should be able to enable the script in preferences and start reviewing! Happy editing :D Justiyaya 15:09, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Noted, much appreciated for the info! Ortizesp (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dear AfC, I have recently dipped my toes into improving the quality of and helping research and reformat some drafts submitted at AfC. I am a prolific article creator, having created over 400 short/stub articles (biographies, and particularly biographies of women as I am quite active on Women in Red) over the past 5 years I have been on Wikipedia; several of those article have gone on to sprout and become larger articles. I would like to help with the immense backlog this WikiProject has, especially in the area of biographies on women. Unfortunately, it is true that I have never actively participated in AfD (which was a mandatory requirement to enter this project a few years ago but I see now that it is optional), but I have been a thorough spectator over the years – my reluctance in putting my two cents in has been because I naturally tend to avoid heated edit conflicts/arguments that many AfD discussions tend to become. In all other regards, I look forward to any questions any administrators may have about my editing/article creation approach. Thank you for considering me. Kindest regards, Spinster300 (talk) 12:40, 25 September 2023 (UTC).[reply]
Dear Primefac, I would like you to note that Drmies has kindly added me to Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers; thus, given the updated permission for new page reviewers in May 2023, I am now able to make use of the AfC Helper script. However, I will wait for your as-per-protocol go-ahead here before beginning to review any drafts. Thank you and kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 13:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC).[reply]
Hello, in the past few days, I have come to review two drafts just to test the waters. I have improved many others yet waiting for review. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 18:26, 29 September 2023 (UTC).[reply]
@Spinster300. Thanks for applying for AFC. Now that you're approved for NPR you are automatically approved for AFC. Feel free to consider your AFC application accepted and review as many drafts as you'd like. Just be careful: your autopatrol means your draft accepts skip NPP review, so you are the only set of eyes unless you unpatrol it. Happy editing. –Novem Linguae (talk) 02:21, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Novem Linguae, thank you for your kind message! I have already put some work in after receiving these rights (feel free to check my AFC log). And thank you for keeping me forewarned; I will be sure to reach out to more experienced editors, or mark the page un-patrolled if I think it needs better combing through. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 10:51, 30 October 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Inactive (Sept)

I used to review AFC articles semi-frequently and find myself with a lot of free time in the near future. It would be nice to be re-added to help out again as I get more active on Wikipedia again. <RetroCraft314 /> 16:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:25, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have been a reviewer in the past but was removed after a stretch of inactivity. I would like to be re-added so I can continue to help with AfC again. StartOkayStop (talk) 19:09, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:04, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I formerly had permanent AFC rights. I was blocked 6 months ago for block evasion. However, I was in good faith at the time of the block. I was one of the top AFC reviewers and spent most of the time at AFC. I was only blocked because of our policy concerns. Now my block has been uplifted. So please give me access to the AFC script again. Thank you Akevsharma (talk) 03:28, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is correct: the block evasion was very minor (to the point that I felt a block was unnecessary) and there was no whiff of UPE, so unless there are other concerns I'd recommend reïnstating. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:13, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Re-requesting (had lapsed), as i have been inactive. Hope to come back and help out. Kaizenify (talk) 01:26, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I was an active AFC reviewer, and then got purged. May I be reinstated? awkwafaba (📥) 20:05, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wanted to get back into helping out with AfC, after an awfully long break. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 20:26, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Also, get your butt back on IRC. Primefac (talk) 10:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello!

I used to review articles on AFC, however due to being busy with school had resulted in me being on the inactive list. I am starting to figure out my schedule a bit better, so now I have time again to review some articles at AFC. Would I be able to help out again? Thank you. つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 15:43, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done a bit ago, clearly forgot to mark this one. Primefac (talk) 09:58, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New (Sept)

I wish to review drafts being created for WikiProject Protista. —Snoteleks (Talk) 16:57, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 06:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reason for requesting afc helper script rights

I have been working on taking promotional drafts out and i think this could benefit me •Cyberwolf• 15:09, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, fails minimum editing requirements. Primefac (talk) 07:58, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think i have gain experience in reviewing new pages and fixing issues in the pages till now and would like to assist in AFC review as there are many backlogs.Citadeol(talk) 11:12, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion.
I was a probationary reviewer a while back and would like to be re-approved. I reviewed almost twenty drafts without incident while I was active. Toadspike (talk) 11:58, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done (as probationary). Primefac (talk) 10:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My AfD stats improved since July, and I feel I am good enough to participate in AfC. Brachy08 (Talk) 04:37, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How am I doing so far? Brachy08 (Talk) 04:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to request AFC script rights because I feel I have the appropriate knowledge of policy and I could definitely help out the article backlog. I think I have a ok enough knowledge of deletion policy. Seawolf35 (talk) 23:28, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to have access to the AFCH script, I lost the rights to review drafts when I had my permissions removed. dxneo (talk) 08:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Primefac (talk) 10:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to help clear the backlog of pending AfC requests (especially in October) and benefit Wikipedia in this way by helping review pages which have been stuck in the process for months.
And yes, my mainspace edit count is over 500, I checked. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 10:39, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 Stupid stuff I did 12:33, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Interested in AFC for science articles, it seems that there are less people qualified. So far I have a reasonable number of edits, plus one GA -- Triboelectric effect. My main expertise is in Materials Science/Physics and a few other areas -- see more info on my page. Ldm1954 (talk) 17:08, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to request access to the AFCH script to help with the draft backlog, whenever possible. I mostly deal with newly made drafts, so this access might help. Signed, 64andtim (any problems?) 05:59, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am requesting AFC rights to help out clear some articles from the backlog, especially with in sports. I have gotten my fair share of experience in page creation and deletion and believe this would be a nice way to help out Wikipedia some more. Klinetalk to me!contribs 18:12, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:25, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to assist with AFC both to help clear up the backlog and help with assisting newer users on article creation. —darling (talk) 14:52, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:25, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have been patrolling new pages and have been a participant in AFD,. I have also used CSD and PROD to weed out non notable articles. I would like to extend my contribution to AFC reviewing. Thanks. Noneate (talk) 16:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:25, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October

NPR (Oct)

I'm a big fan of the AfC process for new users and I have a track record of creating high quality AfCs. I would like to assist in clearing the backlog. Presently, I have one article in the AfC draft submission. MicrobiologyMarcus (talk) 16:31, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Inactive (Oct)

Would like to reapply for rights due to my right being removed due to inactivity, and also I want to sign up for the backlog.Wingwatchers (talk) 16:38, 29 October 2023 (UTC) Wingwatchers (talk) 16:38, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 17:06, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I feel out of the habit of helping at AfC a while ago, but would like to get back involved, starting with November backlog Lajmmoore (talk) 21:13, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New (Oct)

Looking forward to helping clear the backlog. I'm autopatrolled with 8000+ edits. Nowa (talk) 01:17, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:25, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'd like to get access to the AFCH script. I've been helping out in #wikipedia-en-help connect on and off for over a year, and I've got a pretty solid understanding of the policies of enwiki. Phuzion (talk) 02:33, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:25, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Have been a member of Wikipedia for a few years, and in the last two years have made over 500 edits. I believe I now have a strong understanding of what is required for notability and an article to be accepted. I have primarily worked on sports-related articles and would prefer to primarily review sports/football-related articles. The primary reason I want to do this is to speed up the rate at which football articles are reviewed to improve the coverage of the sport. Yoblyblob (talk) 13:34, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Yoblyblob All other considerations apart, I would like to see a greater track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:15, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Two pages deleted, three others draftified, with 0% success at AFD, indicates a lack of knowledge of the notability guidelines. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to have my name added to the list of active reviewers. I have been actively involved in counter-vandalism, providing assistance in various venues, resolving disputes, and contributing to AFD, all while addressing copyright violations. Saurabh{Talk} 06:22, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I would like to help with the AfC backlog. I usually stick to copy editing and fixing citation errors, but participated in the August GAN drive and rather enjoyed helping people with their articles. ~ Argenti Aertheri(Chat?) 02:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Argenti Aertheri All other considerations apart, I would like to see a greater track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:17, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum numeric criteria. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have been working on taking promotional drafts out and i think this could benefit me

Also yes i have the require ments~~ •Cyberwolf• 17:56, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyberwolf434344 All other considerations apart, I would like to see a greater track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:17, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now. While you do have a solid CSD record for a (relatively) new user, G11s are easy to spot and are in some ways the lowest rung of the "notability" ladder. Your lack of AFD participation, plus a few deleted pages, has me concerned you do not have a solid understanding (yet) of the notability policies in a broader sense. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to become a participant so I can help clear out some of the backlog. I have thoroughly read the instructions and over the past six months I have been on Wikipedia, I have read all the notability guidelines. FatCat96 (talk) 04:48, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, have previously been an AFC script user, but dropped off for lack of time ... hoping to contribute to new article reviews again. Thanks! Somej (talk) 07:32, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Somej All other considerations apart, I would like to see a greater track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:19, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done (as a probationary reviewer, per the previous request). Primefac (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Interested in helping out with this process- I have >3500 edits and some AfD experience :) GraziePrego (talk) 07:50, 8 October 2023 (UTC) GraziePrego (talk) 07:50, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Great thank you very much- how do I get added to the participant list? GraziePrego (talk) 01:17, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
By making sure I'm actually paying attention when I do requests! Should be sorted now, thanks for the ping. Primefac (talk) 07:53, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I would like to become an article reviewer on Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation — Preceding unsigned comment added by KINGHB190 (talkcontribs) 12:21, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All other considerations apart, I would like to see a track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 12:28, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, so to qualify for the reviewing of articles I need to get involved in discussions about deletion. This is fair enough as it will show my views on what makes an appropriate article. King HB 12:33, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@KINGHB190 I suggest that you don't go a-hunting for articles to nominate, but a solid record of offering relevant opinions that generally match the eventual outcome will hone your skills. New to AfD, you might start with those where others have offered opinions in order to learn. I am not the final arbiter here, just offering my opinion. I'm very happy that you see the need to involve yourself in AfD. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 12:38, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yes, I did not intend to go a-hunting for articles but rather to take a look at nominations in wikiprojects I am part of. King HB 12:42, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:03, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I am pleased to put forth my request to become an AfC reviewer. I have some experience in reviewing things, like pending edits, and I have read the guidelines for AfC reviewing. I would love to be able to use my skills to help review drafts created by our amazing newcomer editors. Thank you for the consideration! Cheers, Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 21:03, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Cocobb8 All other considerations apart, I would like to see a track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:09, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good! I will try to get involved there first, and will get back to you! Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 21:11, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Cocobb8 I suggest that you don't go a-hunting for articles to nominate, but a solid record of offering relevant opinions that generally match the eventual outcome will hone your skills. New to AfD, you might start with those where others have offered opinions in order to learn. I am not the final arbiter here, just offering my opinion. I'm very happy that you see the need to involve yourself in AfD. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:13, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok! I will go step by step and learn that way ! Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 21:16, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now; you do not have enough evidence of the "soft" criteria (notability, deletion, etc) to join the project at this point in time. Primefac (talk) 10:03, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have a pending AfC request, and figured that I could help pay things forward with clearing the backlog of other articles by handling some of the easier NN declines & providing feedback, leaving experienced folks more time to deal with things closer to the line. I've been around on and off since 2005, have ECP, occasionally patrol ECP requests, and have participated at AfD before. I am aware that I fall slightly short of the 500 mainspace edits count, so will gracefully accept not being approved yet if it's a hard requirement. lizthegrey (talk) 01:04, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum requirements. Primefac (talk) 09:59, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am an Extended confirmed user who is working since this June 14th. I contributed around 3100 edits and created about 95 pages yet. Looking forward for a small recognition by Wikipedia to feel motivated. I hope that i am that eligible to be a AfC reviewer, rest is upon my ideals and old users. Thanks Syed A. Hussain Quadri (talk) 13:14, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done I have numerous concerns about the age of your account, how fast you are moving and that you don't quite understand the purpose of this right. It's not a "recognition" to help you "feel motivated" (see WP:HATCOLLECT). In addition, it's important for AfC reviewers to be able to communicate clearly with new editors and I find some of your talk page comments difficult to understand. For instance, I have no idea what you're trying to express by rest is upon my ideals and old users. Spicy (talk) 20:41, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I've been editing Wikipedia on and off for 3 years, have around 2500 edits, participate consistently in AFDs, created around 15 pages (including one using the AFC process!) and was a former AFC Reviewer under the username "ArsenalGhanaPartey." I would love to get working on the backlog again. TheInevitables (talk) 20:02, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@TheInevitables Forgive me, your user talk page suggest you to be semi-retired from Wikipedia with effect from October 2023?
I find your AfD statistics somewhat confusing, Perhaps your user renaming, assuming that to be what it was, has caused anomalous results? 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:15, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, apologies for my mistake. That was a tag that was on my user talk page for around a year that I simply neglected to remove.
My AfD statistics seem to have been altered, yes. They don't seem to be accurate, and I have participated significantly more often in AfD discussions than they seem to suggest. TheInevitables (talk) 22:38, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'd quite like to join this wikiproject. I'm auto-patrolled with dozens of created pages and over 2,000 edits. SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 13:22, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@SerAntoniDeMiloni All other considerations apart, I would like to see a track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:11, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I’ve been on Wikipedia quite awhile and I’ve been looking for something to help out in, and I think I’ve found it. I’ve read the reviewing instructions thoroughly and believe I am capable of reviewing articles for creation! I look forward to hearing back from someone. Kind regards, --✠ Robertus Pius ✠ (TalkContribs) 21:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Robertus Pius All other considerations apart, I would like to see a track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:11, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done for now. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, I'm not seeing enough experience with AfD, CSD/PROD or article creation to be confident that you have a strong grasp on the notability criteria. Feel free to re-apply in the future. Spicy (talk) 20:03, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Though I've been involved at CSD, AFD and PROD, reviewing of AFC submissions would probably give me a deeper understanding of more advanced notability criteria, especially on borderline cases. There is a large backlog, but I'll make sure to start with easier reviews. NotAGenious (talk) 08:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@NotAGenious:  Done — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:30, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I'd love to help with the AFC submissions. I have read the instructions and criteria and understood them. Cheers! Kilaseell - Message me! - 23:05, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@KilaseellAll other considerations apart, I would like to see a track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. I'd like to help at AFC. I have some experience with deletion. Made mistakes here and there, nominated some of my own articles for deletion (after learning ambassadors are not inherently notable), and I think generally it's been positive and the numbers ought to be okayish. I also have some content work including a single GA. Heavy Grasshopper (talk) 11:29, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Heavy Grasshopper:  Done — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:37, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to help review afc drafts. - Wil540 art (talk) 17:47, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I want to help approve articles for wikipedia, I have participated in numerus AFD Discussions, I currently have 1,542 live edits(92.8%), Have Created 20 Pages(6 deleted - from my earlier wikipedia contributions), The wikiprojects i am part of can be found here. I currently have a few articles in the AFC waiting for review although that is not the purpose for my requesting. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 02:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wanted to get back into helping out with AfC, after an awfully long break. ~ Indiacup 10:01, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: user blocked. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 16:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Would like to be able to help out: in particular, have come across Draft:Alessandro Castellani which needs a bit of love, but shouldn't be too far off replacing the current redirect. UndercoverClassicist T·C 09:53, 29 October 2023 (UTC) UndercoverClassicist T·C 09:53, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to help out with the November backlog drive. I have some experience at AfD and I've interacted extensively with new editors through recent changes patrol and, more recently, CopyPatrol. SamX [talk · contribs] 17:47, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to help review afc drafts. Fred114 23:56, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
@Fred114: All other considerations apart, I would like to see a track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:48, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Fred114: thanks for your interest in helping out, but unfortunately you don't meet the minimum requirements for this permission at this point.  Not done for now. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:40, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would be interested in participating in the November backlog drive. I have extensive experience at AFD, CS, and Prod. Reywas92Talk 14:15, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Reywas92:  Done — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:30, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I want to participate in the November 2023 drive so I'm requesting access, at least for a short timeframe. I admit I have limited experience with creating articles and at AfD. However, I feel that my work at the Teahouse, doing recent changes patrol, and on speedy deletion qualifies me for AfC helper. Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her)My Talk Page 16:58, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Novo Tape:  Done (probationary) — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Gladly help with the backlog especially where is concerns music-related articles. Karst (talk) 17:28, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Karst:  Done — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:35, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I believe I meet all the requirements for reviewing articles. I have created numerous articles and learned from my participation in AfD discussions and nominations. I will stick with easier reviews until building more experience. Would it be possible to add me to the list of participants? KeepItGoingForward (talk) 22:59, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have been editing Wikipedia on and off for around 3 years, but recently have become much more active, creating several artiles. I have noticed several articles in Afc that heavily rely on Russian sources, and I think I can help with clearing that backlog, especially articles about Russian military history. I also would like to take part in November backlog drive. F.Alexsandr (talk) 23:12, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've been involved in some AfD discussions and made a few of my own articles (mostly about Administrative Divisions of Myanmar) and after helping with some Drafts in WP:MYANMAR recently, want to help clear some of the backlog, especially for Myanmar-related AfC which can often rely on Burmese language sources. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 00:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have been on Wikipedia for some time now. I would like to experience reviewing articles on AFC Siagoddess (talk) 18:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]