Talk:Dahiya doctrine: Difference between revisions
m Reverted edit by 2A02:A020:9:DD46:48CB:5AE4:EB20:E5F8 (talk) to last version by Torr3 |
→Biased introduction: Reply |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
This research article that I found: [https://doaj.org/article/0054f51ec9e2480d868fb173989892db "The analysis of Dahiya doctrine in the context of Israel’s further security claim"], considers the Dahiya doctrine to be a "deterrence model" that is based on "harming military infrastructure of the organizations and their civil elements and forcing them to change their behaviors". Now someone go clean up this mess, I don't have edit permission. [[User:Torr3|Torr3]] ([[User talk:Torr3|talk]]) 03:57, 6 December 2023 (UTC) |
This research article that I found: [https://doaj.org/article/0054f51ec9e2480d868fb173989892db "The analysis of Dahiya doctrine in the context of Israel’s further security claim"], considers the Dahiya doctrine to be a "deterrence model" that is based on "harming military infrastructure of the organizations and their civil elements and forcing them to change their behaviors". Now someone go clean up this mess, I don't have edit permission. [[User:Torr3|Torr3]] ([[User talk:Torr3|talk]]) 03:57, 6 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
:Agreed. A definitional statement like this (defining it as specifically targeting ''civilian'' infrastructure) needs ''much'' better sourcing than a literal aside from a single book, especially when it is contradicted by every Israeli articulation of the doctrine in the rest of the article. The article cannot be considered neutral POV as it stands. [[User:FabBol|FabBol]] ([[User talk:FabBol|talk]]) 16:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Questionable chapter on the 2023 Israel-Hamas war == |
== Questionable chapter on the 2023 Israel-Hamas war == |
Revision as of 16:20, 15 December 2023
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dahiya doctrine article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
Removed references available on Archive.org
Most original references were removed by Israeli newspapers but are still available from archive.org. Can please someone with the proper editing rights fix it? (e.g. 3 --> 3, 4 --> 4, 6 --> 6) ED3202 (talk) 04:40, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
"Was, not were"
Sorry, i don't have the tenure to edit this article, but the Dahieh neighbourhood in Beirut was heavily damaged, not were heavily damaged. Maybe someone can edit it. Itsameno (talk) 12:38, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Biased introduction
November 30 edit note says `Removed OR wording not mentioned in listed RS. Changed wording to actual intent listed in RS.` But the user just made their own OR wording not found in the referenced source. Perhaps not original research, but it certainly sounds dubious and biased to me. The source just refers to the Dahiya doctrine as "the threat to destroy civilian infrastructure of hostile regimes". But then the source uses Hizballah as an example of such a regime, and Hizballah isn't has never been a "regime", so that's a bit strange.
This research article that I found: "The analysis of Dahiya doctrine in the context of Israel’s further security claim", considers the Dahiya doctrine to be a "deterrence model" that is based on "harming military infrastructure of the organizations and their civil elements and forcing them to change their behaviors". Now someone go clean up this mess, I don't have edit permission. Torr3 (talk) 03:57, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed. A definitional statement like this (defining it as specifically targeting civilian infrastructure) needs much better sourcing than a literal aside from a single book, especially when it is contradicted by every Israeli articulation of the doctrine in the rest of the article. The article cannot be considered neutral POV as it stands. FabBol (talk) 16:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Questionable chapter on the 2023 Israel-Hamas war
The "2023 Israel-Hamas war" chapter is not good.
1. Why should I trust, a left-wing opinion magazine and this "Local Call" outlet that doesn't even have their own Wikipedia article, on something of this importance?
2. It's WP:NPOV in my view. "confirmed the deliberate process used to carry out strikes on civilians in unprecedented numbers", well, the article also quotes an IDF spokesman who says the AI system allows them to do minimal damage to the enemy. That seems more plausible to me. And the whole sentence that I just quoted is really unfair and misleading in my view. The whole chapter seems to cherry pick statements, without giving it sufficient context, in order to make Israel appear as bad as possible.
Controversial topics require a high degree of rigor and strict adherence to neutrality. Torr3 (talk) 04:17, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
The "Criticism" chapter
Can we have someone other than a 9/11 truther be the voice of criticism? Torr3 (talk) 04:27, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Start-Class Palestine-related articles
- High-importance Palestine-related articles
- WikiProject Palestine articles
- Start-Class Israel-related articles
- High-importance Israel-related articles
- WikiProject Israel articles
- Start-Class Lebanon articles
- High-importance Lebanon articles
- WikiProject Lebanon articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class Middle Eastern military history articles
- Middle Eastern military history task force articles