Jump to content

Talk:Gilgit-Baltistan: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 78: Line 78:
:::::::::Oh, My apologies. Aksai Chin was part of India since independence (1947) and was lost to China in [[Sino-Indian War|1962 war]](apologies again it is not 1965). However, India never recognized it being territory of China. Claiming sovereignty over territory and terming it Aksai Chin which roughly translated to 'Snatched by China'. Therefore, I was asking why it was not written since 1962?? [[User:Ankraj giri|`~ᴀɴᴋʀᴀᴊ ɢɪʀɪ🎇✨]] 16:10, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
:::::::::Oh, My apologies. Aksai Chin was part of India since independence (1947) and was lost to China in [[Sino-Indian War|1962 war]](apologies again it is not 1965). However, India never recognized it being territory of China. Claiming sovereignty over territory and terming it Aksai Chin which roughly translated to 'Snatched by China'. Therefore, I was asking why it was not written since 1962?? [[User:Ankraj giri|`~ᴀɴᴋʀᴀᴊ ɢɪʀɪ🎇✨]] 16:10, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
::::::::::It was part of India in the Indian government's view, but not in the Chinese government's, especially not after the second world war, and more especially the Chinese revolution, when the dust had settled on China's turbulent times. The Indians had no clue of the Chinese road construction in the later 1950s, until the Americans informed them. Please read [[Neville Maxwell]]'s ''India's China War''. It was that remote. In any case, contemporary maps don't refer to history. Maps of India don't say "since 1947." [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#B8860B">Fowler&amp;fowler</span>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#708090">«Talk»</span>]] 18:31, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
::::::::::It was part of India in the Indian government's view, but not in the Chinese government's, especially not after the second world war, and more especially the Chinese revolution, when the dust had settled on China's turbulent times. The Indians had no clue of the Chinese road construction in the later 1950s, until the Americans informed them. Please read [[Neville Maxwell]]'s ''India's China War''. It was that remote. In any case, contemporary maps don't refer to history. Maps of India don't say "since 1947." [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#B8860B">Fowler&amp;fowler</span>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#708090">«Talk»</span>]] 18:31, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 19 February 2024 ==

{{edit extended-protected|Gilgit-Baltistan|answered=no}}
I WANT TO ADD UPDATE SOME INFORMATION SPECIALLY OF ITS CHIEF SECRETARY NAME [[User:ChutendraChodi|ChutendraChodi]] ([[User talk:ChutendraChodi|talk]]) 11:28, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:28, 19 February 2024


Mala mamga in gilgit Urdu ma

Urdu 118.107.131.115 (talk) 04:03, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 23 November 2022

The political status of Gilgit-Baltistan should be changed from "administrative territory" to "dependent territory," since the territory has never been officially incorporated into Pakistan. The following two statements in the article verify that fact: "While administratively controlled by Pakistan since the First Kashmir War, Gilgit-Baltistan has never been formally integrated into the Pakistani state and does not participate in Pakistan's constitutional political affairs." "Officially, the Pakistan government had rejected Gilgit-Baltistani calls for integration with Pakistan on the grounds that it would jeopardise its demands for the whole Kashmir issue to be resolved according to UN resolutions." Atelerixia (talk) 02:36, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. CMD (talk) 02:43, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Administrative Map of Pakistan that was published by the CIA in 2020 contains the following important statement: "Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan are not constitutionally part of Pakistan." Atelerixia (talk) 06:49, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How come CIA becomes authority for Pak and India. 2A00:23C5:26BC:3901:3057:44BD:A301:6CFD (talk) 03:08, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

pakistan govt occupied gilgit area by forces from local's 2022

Pakistan Forces Face Massive Protests From Gilgit-Baltistan Locals, And Pakistani News channel not showing this Report in there cannels because they are corrupt,they know that if they report this Topic at there cannels, they will Ban, The protestors stopped the Pak security personnel and their vehicles and also did the barricading, saying that they won't be allowing the Pakistani security forces to use their land.

It is pertinent to mention that Pakistan has been forcing troops from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Punjab provinces into PoK's Gilgit-Baltistan to establish their camps there. Its been Pakistan's modus operandi to first establish army camps in the minerals riched region of Gilgit Baltistan and then exploit the region without giving due credit or jobs to the locals. Here is Prove akistan Forces Face Massive Protests From Gilgit-Baltistan Locals 124.29.232.65 (talk) 08:20, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 March 2023

Karakuram Cooperative Bank Ltd Karakuram Cooperative Bank Ltd Chief Executive Officer Ghulam Muhammad Chief Risk Officer Fahad Zafar 118.107.141.37 (talk) 00:07, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Lightoil (talk) 01:37, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Early History - typo

Second sentence in 4th paragraph ... "In the late 600s CE, the rising Tibetan Empire wrestled control of the region from the Chinese." should read "In the late 600s CE, the rising Tibetan Empire wrested control of the region from the Chinese." The correct phrase is "wrested control". See https://plainenglish.com/expressions/wrest-control/ Vwhopper (talk) 17:46, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The map of the disputed Kashmir region that is currently shown in Wikipedia article titled "Gilgit-Baltistan"

The map of the disputed Kashmir region that is currently shown is out of date and should be replaced by the following map:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/51/Kashmir_Region_November_2019.jpg Atelerixia (talk) 07:26, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think it is out of date? I updated both maps. There is no difference, only the one currently in place is higher-def than the other. Best, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 15:33, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Look at the Kashmir Region map. It is clearly out of date. It shows "Northern Areas" instead of "Gilgit-Baltistan," "North-West Frontier Province" instead of "Khyber Pakhtunkhwa," and the former Indian state of Jammu & Kashmir, which has now been divided into the two Indian union territories of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh. Atelerixia (talk) 01:55, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for noticing. Someone is playing games with the file, reverting it to an older version which affects all the Kashmir related pages. Please keep checking the image file’s history. Pinging @Abecedare, RegentsPark, and Vanamonde93: I vaguely remember them complaining about Demchuk and claiming a moral duty about something or other. Maybe it was on my user talk page. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 02:40, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Here is that post Fowler&fowler«Talk» 02:44, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you again @Atelerixia: for noticing. You’ve done stalwart work. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 02:53, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So, Fowler&Fowler, how can this map https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/51/Kashmir_Region_November_2019.jpg replace the outdated one that presently appears in all the Kashmir-related pages? Who can make the necessary change? Atelerixia (talk) 07:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Atelerixia: The one that currently appears on this page, for example, is this version which does not have the
Northern Areas and other older names. If you see it has been changed again to an older version (and has thus affected all the pages in which it is being use), please inform me. Thanks Fowler&fowler«Talk» 12:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why Aksai Chin is not mentioned since 1965? `~ᴀɴᴋʀᴀᴊ ɢɪʀɪ🎇✨ 06:10, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what that means. Please rephrase in a manner that makes the context clear. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 09:27, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, My apologies. Aksai Chin was part of India since independence (1947) and was lost to China in 1962 war(apologies again it is not 1965). However, India never recognized it being territory of China. Claiming sovereignty over territory and terming it Aksai Chin which roughly translated to 'Snatched by China'. Therefore, I was asking why it was not written since 1962?? `~ᴀɴᴋʀᴀᴊ ɢɪʀɪ🎇✨ 16:10, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It was part of India in the Indian government's view, but not in the Chinese government's, especially not after the second world war, and more especially the Chinese revolution, when the dust had settled on China's turbulent times. The Indians had no clue of the Chinese road construction in the later 1950s, until the Americans informed them. Please read Neville Maxwell's India's China War. It was that remote. In any case, contemporary maps don't refer to history. Maps of India don't say "since 1947." Fowler&fowler«Talk» 18:31, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 19 February 2024

I WANT TO ADD UPDATE SOME INFORMATION SPECIALLY OF ITS CHIEF SECRETARY NAME ChutendraChodi (talk) 11:28, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gilgit-Baltistan&oldid=1208895822"