Jump to content

Talk:Pixar: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
Line 79: Line 79:


:@[[User:Madyoshi01|Madyoshi01]], it's no longer rumored. [https://twitter.com/Minions_Fanboy/status/1763047118070239376?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet Info here.] [[User:ZX2006XZ|ZX2006XZ]] ([[User talk:ZX2006XZ|talk]]) 20:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
:@[[User:Madyoshi01|Madyoshi01]], it's no longer rumored. [https://twitter.com/Minions_Fanboy/status/1763047118070239376?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet Info here.] [[User:ZX2006XZ|ZX2006XZ]] ([[User talk:ZX2006XZ|talk]]) 20:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
::As @[[User:Geraldo Perez|Geraldo Perez]] has said, a personal blog and an unverified Twitter account are not reliable sources; and as I've told you there, your sources beyond that are unreliable at best. I know this is a good faith edit, but none of your sources are valid.
::The film has to be officially announced to be properly listed. Iger's words regarding Toy Story 5 are an example of this. I'm not saying the film doesn't exist, it wouldn't be the first time a film's development gets leaked before a proper announcement. But, as it stands now, it's not properly announced, and considering this, it shouldn't be part of any article.
::Wait until a proper announcement. [[User:Madyoshi01|Madyoshi01]] ([[User talk:Madyoshi01|talk]]) 21:20, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:20, 1 March 2024

Former good articlePixar was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 21, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
February 24, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 23, 2008Good article nomineeListed
March 14, 2022Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 3, 2021.
Current status: Delisted good article

edit war re inclusion of class action suit

Pixar First Live-Action/CGI Film

List of Films Wall-E 148.252.133.215 (talk) 13:48, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pixar First Stop–Motion Film

List of Film Disney Pixar Aardman's Stage Fright 148.252.132.140 (talk) 07:16, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What does it mean? This has nothing to with them. Also, WP:NOTFORUM LancedSoul (talk) 08:12, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article missing information or otherwise not making sense.

In the section starting with "The two companies attempted to reach a new agreement for ten months and failed...", a series of dates are listed then an apparent result is mentioned, but neither seems to match the objective of the start of the paragraph. Danlo88 (talk) 19:59, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request: two typos

In the lead, "Disney announced it's acqusition" should read "Disney announced its acquisition" 99.146.242.37 (talk) 04:09, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Ducks" has not been officially announced.

@ZX2006XZ To be short, no one has officially confirmed this project's existence. Until that happens, it remains a rumor. DanielRPK and WorldofReel are not reputable sources to confirm or deny, it needs to come from someone close to production or Disney/Pixar themselves. That's as simple as it is, really.

Beyond this article, the mention of this project's existence is also featured in List of Pixar films and List of Walt Disney Pictures films. It should be removed from there as well. Madyoshi01 (talk) 02:12, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Madyoshi01, it's no longer rumored. Info here. ZX2006XZ (talk) 20:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As @Geraldo Perez has said, a personal blog and an unverified Twitter account are not reliable sources; and as I've told you there, your sources beyond that are unreliable at best. I know this is a good faith edit, but none of your sources are valid.
The film has to be officially announced to be properly listed. Iger's words regarding Toy Story 5 are an example of this. I'm not saying the film doesn't exist, it wouldn't be the first time a film's development gets leaked before a proper announcement. But, as it stands now, it's not properly announced, and considering this, it shouldn't be part of any article.
Wait until a proper announcement. Madyoshi01 (talk) 21:20, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]