User talk:Talleyrand6: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:28, 17 June 2024

Welcome!

Hello, Talleyrand6! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 18:26, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Talleyrand6! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! DHSchool2003Student (talk) 01:59, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Archived Sections

All of the sections I just archived can be found here at User talk:Talleyrand6/Archive 1 DHSchool2003Student (talk) 02:10, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
		Thank you for the superb and high quality maps you've created. From the US, to Italy , to Australia—your map making skills are highly appreciated and make this site much better. Here's to more fantastic work 🍻! Aficionado538 (talk) 23:27, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aficionado538 (talk) 23:27, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:2019 Swiss Federal election Council.svg

Hello. Could you fix this image, as it has "2022" at the top. Also, could you remove the parliamentary diagram, as it's unnecessary. Cheers, Number 5 7 22:20, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, the chart stays.

But I will renumber. Talleyrand6 (talk) 23:11, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The chart is already in the article in the results table – there's no need to have it twice. There was recently a discussion about infobox maps becoming unnecessarily complex, and this is one of the things that contributes towards that. Please remove it. If it's not removed, then I will remove the maps and replace them with simpler ones like File:Elections federales suisses 2019 Conseil national.svg. Thanks, Number 5 7 01:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sure, there might be some "discussion" promoting simpler maps (which I've seen absolutely none of, and in fact quite a lot of discussion supporting higher quality maps), but I must say that threatening to replace a pretty nice map all things considered (well, duh, I made it) with a pretty low quality map is certainly a thing one can do. It's quite a comical idea to me, to be honest. I'll concede that the chart is actually quite redundant in the grand scheme of the article, so I'll remove it. Talleyrand6 (talk) 02:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2020 PA

We gave it our best fight patriot but the feds caught us eventually o7 Ohaiyoan124 (talk) 00:19, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Literally 1984 Talleyrand6 (talk) 00:21, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back

Saw it on Twitter, congrats. 沁水湾 (talk) 15:10, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back. Thanks for your recent edit at 2024 British Columbia general election. I am not sure if the party will release riding specific data concerning the 2024 Alberta New Democratic Party leadership election. If so, that might be an article that could use your expertise, should you have the time and interest in the topic. Of course, it is three months away before we will have any results. Anyway, happy editing.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 18:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Map Style

Oh my gosh, I absolutely loved the new U.S. Presidential Election map style you created. It's so good, and I hope others can see what I saw in the style. Thank you so much for sharing!! Lostfan333 (talk) 23:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 02:05, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Part of the block is due to off-site canvasing that was brought to my attention in my role as a CU. I am willing to share the information with any functionary who wishes to review the blocks per policy. -- Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 02:11, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block Appeal

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Talleyrand6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'll make this brief. As I understand I was placed on thin ice. All of my actions over the last few days have kept that in mind. Nothing that I have done or am suspected of doing has been with the intent of further breaking Wikipedia rules. That said, I want to challenge the block on the grounds that these are unfair assertions. I have not and did not disruptively edit over the course of this conflict. I made one edit this entire time and it was to the 1988 French Legislative Election and I did so fully within my right and fully within Wikipedia guidelines. Secondly, I want to see evidence of me having canvased anyone for their support in any action for the events which took place today or yesterday. If you appeal to my Twitter page, I will report that there has been no canvassing on my part. All of my posts were made in good faith in order to document this dispute on Wikipedia to other users on that website. I ask for due process to know where I went wrong with my documentation and I kindly ask to know on what grounds you you believe that to be canvassing. Again, despite aspirations to my character and my previous ban, I wish to say that nothing was done knowingly in violation of any Wikipedia rules. If they were so, it was without my knowing. Wishing for a swift resolution, yours in editing, Talleyrand6 (talk) 02:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I'll make this brief. As I understand I was placed on thin ice. All of my actions over the last few days have kept that in mind. Nothing that I have done or am suspected of doing has been with the intent of further breaking Wikipedia rules. That said, I want to challenge the block on the grounds that these are unfair assertions. I have not and did not disruptively edit over the course of this conflict. I made one edit this entire time and it was to the 1988 French Legislative Election and I did so fully within my right and fully within Wikipedia guidelines. Secondly, I want to see evidence of me having canvased anyone for their support in any action for the events which took place today or yesterday. If you appeal to my Twitter page, I will report that there has been no canvassing on my part. All of my posts were made in good faith in order to document this dispute on Wikipedia to other users on that website. I ask for due process to know where I went wrong with my documentation and I kindly ask to know on what grounds you you believe that to be canvassing. Again, despite aspirations to my character and my previous ban, I wish to say that nothing was done knowingly in violation of any Wikipedia rules. If they were so, it was without my knowing. Wishing for a swift resolution, yours in editing, [[User:Talleyrand6|Talleyrand6]] ([[User talk:Talleyrand6#top|talk]]) 02:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I'll make this brief. As I understand I was placed on thin ice. All of my actions over the last few days have kept that in mind. Nothing that I have done or am suspected of doing has been with the intent of further breaking Wikipedia rules. That said, I want to challenge the block on the grounds that these are unfair assertions. I have not and did not disruptively edit over the course of this conflict. I made one edit this entire time and it was to the 1988 French Legislative Election and I did so fully within my right and fully within Wikipedia guidelines. Secondly, I want to see evidence of me having canvased anyone for their support in any action for the events which took place today or yesterday. If you appeal to my Twitter page, I will report that there has been no canvassing on my part. All of my posts were made in good faith in order to document this dispute on Wikipedia to other users on that website. I ask for due process to know where I went wrong with my documentation and I kindly ask to know on what grounds you you believe that to be canvassing. Again, despite aspirations to my character and my previous ban, I wish to say that nothing was done knowingly in violation of any Wikipedia rules. If they were so, it was without my knowing. Wishing for a swift resolution, yours in editing, [[User:Talleyrand6|Talleyrand6]] ([[User talk:Talleyrand6#top|talk]]) 02:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I'll make this brief. As I understand I was placed on thin ice. All of my actions over the last few days have kept that in mind. Nothing that I have done or am suspected of doing has been with the intent of further breaking Wikipedia rules. That said, I want to challenge the block on the grounds that these are unfair assertions. I have not and did not disruptively edit over the course of this conflict. I made one edit this entire time and it was to the 1988 French Legislative Election and I did so fully within my right and fully within Wikipedia guidelines. Secondly, I want to see evidence of me having canvased anyone for their support in any action for the events which took place today or yesterday. If you appeal to my Twitter page, I will report that there has been no canvassing on my part. All of my posts were made in good faith in order to document this dispute on Wikipedia to other users on that website. I ask for due process to know where I went wrong with my documentation and I kindly ask to know on what grounds you you believe that to be canvassing. Again, despite aspirations to my character and my previous ban, I wish to say that nothing was done knowingly in violation of any Wikipedia rules. If they were so, it was without my knowing. Wishing for a swift resolution, yours in editing, [[User:Talleyrand6|Talleyrand6]] ([[User talk:Talleyrand6#top|talk]]) 02:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Talleyrand6 (talk) 02:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 132: / Line 132: @@
 :Part of the block is due to [[WP:CANVAS|off-site canvasing]] that was brought to my attention in my role as a [[WP:Checkuser|CU]]. I am willing to share the information with any [[WP:FUNC|functionary]] who wishes to review the blocks per policy. -- [[User:Guerillero|Guerillero]] <sup>[[User_talk:Guerillero|<span style="color: green;">Parlez Moi</span>]]</sup> 02:11, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
+== Block Appeal ==
+{{unblock|I'll make this brief. As I understand I was placed on thin ice. All of my actions over the last few days have kept that in mind. Nothing that I have done or am suspected of doing has been with the intent of further breaking Wikipedia rules. That said, I want to challenge the block on the grounds that these are unfair assertions. I have not and did not disruptively edit over the course of this conflict. I made one edit this entire time and it was to the 1988 French Legislative Election and I did so fully within my right and fully within Wikipedia guidelines. Secondly, I want to see evidence of me having canvased anyone for their support in any action for the events which took place today or yesterday. If you appeal to my Twitter page, I will report that there has been no canvassing on my part. All of my posts were made in good faith in order to document this dispute on Wikipedia to other users on that website. I ask for due process to know where I went wrong with my documentation and I kindly ask to know on what grounds you you believe that to be canvassing. Again, despite aspirations to my character and my previous ban, I wish to say that nothing was done knowingly in violation of any Wikipedia rules. If they were so, it was without my knowing. Wishing for a swift resolution, yours in editing, [[User:Talleyrand6|Talleyrand6]] ([[User talk:Talleyrand6#top|talk]]) 02:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)}} [[User:Talleyrand6|Talleyrand6]] ([[User talk:Talleyrand6#top|talk]]) 02:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)