User talk:Bluemarine: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:42, 27 July 2007

Welcome

Hello, Bluemarine, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -GTBacchus^(talk) 05:49, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Identity

I am in fact Matt Sanchez. Matthew.a.sanchez@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluemarine (talk • contribs) 07:13, March 26, 2007 (UTC)

Section header/formatting added by El on ka 00:36, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Caution

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Matt Sanchez, you will be blocked from editing. Aatombomb 01:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editing an article about yourself

There seems to be some indication that you are in fact Matt Sanchez. If so, please review and follow Wikipedia's policies on editing one's own biography and on conflict of interest. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 16:38, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The two problematical items you mentioned on my talk page aren't in the article anymore, so hopefully they are no longer an issue. As you know, it's pretty much impossible to keep inaccuracies out of an article; the best that can be hoped for is that they are promptly removed. (In that regard, I just removed a category, in the article, related to one of the two items you mentioned.)

In general, negative information about a person if it lacks a reliable source can be removed "on sight", per WP:BLP. If you do need to remove such information in the future, and run into any resistance, please feel free to drop me a note; I'll be happy to help on that or anything else I can.

As far as anything else, please note that I'm just another editor here. I do hope you find the policies above to reasonable. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 19:18, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just want to add to what John Broughton said--I'm really trying to work on getting this article NPOV, and the insertion of unrelated images and unsourced anecdotes are just making it harder (not to mention probably inviting more anonymous attack edits). I happen to think there is no need for this article at all; that it was tossed up as a blogosphere-directed hit, but as long as it's here I want to make it as fair as is possible. FYI, John Broughton is extremely fair and isn't part of the groups inserting weasel words and libelous statements. Seriously, take his advice. :) --Beth C. 20:59, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Matt, first I think words such as 'escorts' are giving you the benefit of the doubt to begin with: maybe nothing more than a full-body massage happens in exchange for $300/hour. However, I find it strange that in articles you allegedly wrote and said "I'm not denying it" and "it happened over ten years ago" that you would turn around and now deny it completely, conveneniently as a "don't ask, don't tell" military investigation has opened up. For someone who has courted controversy, this about-face when the wind changes direction is quite stunning.→ R Young {^yakł_talk} 05:20, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:MattSanchez.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MattSanchez.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:07, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Violations of policy

Please stop adding information to the article Matt Sanchez.

Per Wikipedia:Autobiography, It is difficult to write neutrally about yourself. Therefore, it is considered proper on Wikipedia to let others do the writing. Instead, contribute material or make suggestions on the article's talk page and let independent editors write it into the article itself.

In particular, unreferenced (and quite possibly unverifiable) statements such as these, which you added, are inappropriate:

An autodidact, Sanchez has been able to both acquire several languages and pen articles in those languages

Lovingly referred to as Refer Mechs, Marines claim the jack of all trades combat engineers have the most important job in the Corps: Keeping the beer

Matt Sanchez was known for being especially muscular. His fellow Marines asked him to move a refrigeration unit without a crane. Rumor has it, that he did just that. There are also reports that his arms (19") did not fit well into his Marine camies and that the sleeves needed to be tailored to accommodate his girth.

Please let other editors evaluate what is appropriate to add to your article: It is impossible for you to have a neutral point of view. And please not the per WP:NOT, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collector of facts; we don't put everything that is known about a person into that person's biography.

If you continue to add information to your own, article, you may be blocked for violating Wikipedia policy. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 21:11, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2007

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Matt Sanchez. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Real96 06:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBT studies, you will be blocked from editing. WjBscribe 23:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

There's no neutrality here. The bloggers are breaking their own rules. I added a different interview with Kevin McCullough. You have not been at all neutral. The LGBT community wishes to publicly assassinate me, and you insist that I have no neutrality.

I suggest we post the longer, more thorough Kevin McCullough advertisement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluemarine (talk • contribs) 07:08, March 28, 2007 (UTC)

Name-Calling

Jihadist because people have issued a fatwa because gay men, like yourself, who have a personal bias against me because you feel threatened by someone who doesn't agree with you.

My face is everywhere online. 00:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)Matt Sanchez

Matt,

Why do you insist on calling everyone a name ('jihadists,' 'these fags') that you don't agree with? First, I wouldn't be surprised if you were 'straight' but that would make you 'gay-for-pay' which means you performed gay acts for money...i.e. 'prostitution.' You said yourself that 'pornography is prostitution' which by YOUR definition makes you a (fill in the blank).

Notably, you call people 'faceless cowards' when in fact their faces appear online. Hmmm. You complain of bias but you break every rule to push an agenda which is itself biased, contorted, distorted, and totally unsupportable. I think you must be enjoying the attention. If so, keep it up.→ R Young {^yakł_talk} 04:29, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT and some of the other homo bloggers have been extremely biased. I'm sure you've noticed their bias. Bluemarine 23:56, 26 March 2007 (UTC)Matt Sanchez[reply]

Nomination for deletion

I nominated an article that you created, Matt Sanchez, for deletion. If you think that the article is salvageable, or that I'm mistaken, please comment on its deletion page. Please see the Guide to deletion if you have any questions about Wikipedia's deletion process. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chidom (talk • contribs) 15:50, April 1, 2007 (UTC).

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Lerner bio.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Lerner Bio.jpg. The copy called Image:Lerner Bio.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 14:18, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Max blumenthal.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Max Blumenthal.jpg. The copy called Image:Max Blumenthal.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 14:47, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Bjorn1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bjorn1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:06, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Jamesbake.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Jamesblake.jpg. The copy called Image:Jamesblake.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 14:02, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Sanchez

DYK info like that doesn't go on the article page. Plus, that info needs to be sourced. Further, unless you are an admin, you shouldn't add the protected templates. Please stop adding this to the article. MECU≈talk 14:16, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:SanchezWithCoulter-w.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:SanchezWithCoulter-w.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU≈talk 14:24, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page

Hi. Please do not use your talk page (this page here) as a draft space for your articles. It is needed for others to communicate with you. You have unlimited draft space in your user space; just create pages like User:Bluemarine/My New Article. Sandstein 18:21, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please read your messages! You are disrupting this talk page by posting the article about you on it. If you want to experiment with it, please to this somewhere else in your user space! Sandstein 18:48, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this warning, or you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia

Most of your image uploads lack any source and/or licencing information. Please clean these images up immediately by adding the correct tags, or have them deleted by adding the {{db-author}} tag. If you fail to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia because of persistent copyright violations. Sandstein 18:30, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to your question, please see WP:TAGS. In short, if the image is copyrighted by someone else, you must provide a fair use tag (see how-to). If you created the image, then the tag you apply to the image determines its licence. In either case, you must specify the source of the image (e.g. a weblink, or "own work"). Sandstein 05:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, offline publication, article improvement contests, and other tasks.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
We've developed a variety of guidelines for article structure and content, template use, categorization, and other issues that you may find useful.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Carom 18:35, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to [[Template:Highssp]] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.

Template:Do not delete

— superbfc [ talk | cont ] — 18:41, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ridiculous, if anything I have been far too blatant. I've never once denied my identity. Who are you?Matt Sanchez 03:28, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cpl Tyler Rock

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Cpl Tyler Rock, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Smokizzy 00:21, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

Perhaps if you didn't spend your time gay-baiting, people would have more sympathy for you. From your posts here, you clearly have a lot to learn about politics. Aatombomb 01:47, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Attombomb you're such a cowardly effete. Matthew Sanchez 03:23, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Matt, you should read WP:Civil. People can be blocked for comments like the one's you're making on the Talk page of your article.Wjhonson 03:10, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Matt, I second this comment by Wjhonson. Please watch the personal attacks. I understand how this is a complicated issue, to say the least, but personal attacks are not tolerated, from anyone. --Joanne B 03:59, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joanne, please check the myriad comments that WhJohnson is making toward me. Matt Sanchez 04:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Matt, even so, please stay civil yourself. Others can be warned and eventually blocked for incivility and personal attacks as well, but you'll need to be more specific than to point to his contributions in general. Kind regards, --Joanne B 04:29, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[Warning removed- not appropriate- WjBscribe 04:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)][reply]

Another nameless oneMatthew Sanchez 03:24, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[Warning removed- not appropriate- WjBscribe 04:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)][reply]

Who are you and why aren't you signing off?Matthew Sanchez 03:25, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You need to read the vandals who keep reposting on the entry on me. Matthew Sanchez 03:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Matt Sanchez

I see from your recent actions that you are unhappy with coverage about you on Wikipedia at Matt Sanchez. We take very seriously any comments from the subjects of articles that their content are untrue or not presented neutrally. Having looked at the article, I can see why you are concerned. I would like to discuss the contents of the article with you and the others involved so that a mutually agreed version can be reached. Int he meantime please do not edit war over the article.

I see you are keeping a draft of the article below, I am going to move it for you to User:Bluemarine/Sandbox, a dedicated page where you can edit it. This will allow this page to be used just for messages to you... WjBscribe 04:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have protected the page to prevent further edit warring and so your concerns can be discussed fully. Note that my protection of the page is not necessarily an endorsement of its content at the time of protection. Please join in the discussions at Talk:Matt Sanchez so we can agree a version that conveys the relevant information neutrally and that you feel is as fair to you as possible. Thank you. WjBscribe 04:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It really is in your interest for you to comment on the article's talkpage about your issues with this article so we can work towards a version that is neutral and balanced. WjBscribe 04:18, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

General note: Personal attack on Jeff Gannon. using TW

May 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors, as you did here: Jeff Gannon. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Gamaliel (Orwellian Cyber hell master) 20:13, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIV (April 2007)

The April 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 13:34, 6 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

License tagging for Image:AravosisJohn.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AravosisJohn.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:06, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:DanaMilbanks.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DanaMilbanks.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AUTO

Matt, per WP:AUTO, may I please strongly advise that you avoid editing your bio at Matt Sanchez? The better way to handle this is to edit your sandbox version and then ask for those changes to be rolled in to the main bio. Thanks, El on ka 00:56, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OOOPPPSSS

sorry, but I couldn't access my sandbox Matt Sanchez 01:10, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vengeful nature

Matt is compiling a history of being vindictive and angry. His comments on articles he's edited including his own prove that. I think he should be banned from Wikipedia until he can contribute in a civil and respectful way. If this behavior continues I will go to the editors of Wikipedia to see what they can do. Fair warning.

All trolls are requested to sign their normally anonymous postings. Thank you Matt Sanchez 05:45, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Sanchez Radio Program

Unspecified source for Image:Bjorn.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bjorn.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:01, 20 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 20:01, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Cpl Rock.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Cpl Rock.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Strangerer (Talk) 09:40, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AndrewSullivan.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:AndrewSullivan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Yonatan ^talk 14:37, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Morocco.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Morocco.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XV (May 2007)

The May 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:26, 9 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Signing posts on talk pages

Remember to sign posts on talk pages with four tildes. Especially note that when creating or posting in more than one section at a time, it is helpful to sign in each section where you post. --Aleta 21:45, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: Talk:Matt Sanchez. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Throttle down the personal attacks. Regardless of your personal history with some of the other editors, calling them "screwed up fags" and "disgusting sodomites" is NOT acceptable. Another editor just came off of an involuntary wikibreak due to incivility; if you don't calm down, you'll be doing the same. Horologium t-c 01:45, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not the first time either. He personally attacked me too on several occasions. Aatombomb 03:58, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tone, avoiding personal attacks

You really need to watch your tone when contributing. I realise that you are under a lot of pressure (from one attack site in particular) and that the present content of your article here causes you stress, but you need to be careful in how you express yourself. Baiting other editors is not helpful... WjBscribe 05:09, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And so we're utterly clear, however much you may feel provoked, attacks such as these- [1] and [2] on another editor are completely unacceptable. As is using derogatory terms about others' sexual orientation. Attacks of that nature in future, regardless of provocation, will result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of time. WjBscribe 05:17, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problems

Image:Dinkins.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it appears to be a copy of the official portrait. There is insufficient documentation of the source, and I assume you did not actually paint this portrait yourself, as the current license tag claims. -- Beland 09:57, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lerner1.jpg has been listed for deletion because it is not used in any articles. Also, there is no supporting documentation for the claim that this image is available under the GFDL (such as a URL pointing to a declaration from Columbia University of this license for this image). -- Beland 09:57, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007)

The June 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 13:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

User:Mattsanchez

Could you confirm whether this account is yours? WjBscribe 16:21, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User identifying as Blue Marine and Matt Sanchez

I don't have proof that you are or aren't Matt Sanchez but your pervasive and prolific posting on multiple topics are disruptive and that you are the subject of the article easily borders on violating WP protocols. Please read up on Wikipedia:Autobiography and Wikipedia:Disruptive editing. Please note: I'm not accusing you of either of these but I believe your voluminous comments on the talk pages fly in the face of the policies and do violate the spirit of cooperation needed to produce good articles.

I suggest that you

1. "chill" and when you do repost keep it civil and productive. If another editor(s) are adding unverified statements or information supported only by blogosphere rumors it will be deleted. It might not happen immediately but there are a lot of folks watching the page so it should happen rather soon. 2. Focus instead on adding the material you think is missing and should be included. Providing the weblink directly to the source and it's easy enough for someone else to start to sort it out. 3. Work on some other articles. Biographies of living people are notoriously back and forth processes that take time. You may have noticed that I have yet to make a big edit on yours since I haven't had the time to read through everything that's already happened and I've been working on other articles. You can do the same, although you're a near-expert on yourself you could easily contribute to other articles just as well. Benjiboi 20:21, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop personal attacks

Posting "I'm just a paranoid, conspiracy, unhappy, unattractive homosexual who has lost too much money on escorts who obviously aren't interested in me"[3] violate Wikipedia's civility and personal attacks policies. Please stop. Benjiboi 20:06, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More personal attacks

Please stop your personal attacks. They are unwarranted and violate WP policies. You have called me a "gay porn groupie" and "homosexual with an ax to grind" adding "There's nothing "balanced and neutral" about this guy." In addition you collectively called the article editors "catty gay men" and "sodomites." If you are unable to constructively and peacefully participate in the talk pages processes avoiding disruptive behavior and personal attacks then you should put your energies into other articles of interest to you. Benjiboi 21:05, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Enough

Our policies against personal attacks are not optional. I am extremely loathed to prevent someone about whom we have an article from editing this website, but if you continue in these attacks you will leave me no choice. There is absolutely no need for you to comment on other contributors, your speculations about people's sexual orientation or pornographic preference are out of line. Consider this the last warning you will receive, another personal attack and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of time - you can make representations about your article via email if that happens. WjBscribe 21:17, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with WJBscribe. On the one hand, I very much want Sanchez to be able to continue to participate at the talkpage of his own bio. On the other, Sanchez has engaged in multiple personal attacks and sexual slurs. Numerous requests, both on- and off-wiki, have been made to Sanchez to cease with this behavior, and yet he continues. If it happens again, I would support a block. --El on ka 21:42, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 304: / Line 304: @@
 ===Enough===
 Our policies against personal attacks are not optional. I am extremely loathed to prevent someone about whom we have an article from editing this website, but if you continue in these attacks you will leave me no choice. There is absolutely no need for you to comment on other contributors, your speculations about people's sexual orientation or pornographic preference are out of line. Consider this the last warning you will receive, another personal attack and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of time - you can make representations about your article via email if that happens. <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|scribe]]</span> 21:17, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
+: I concur with WJBscribe.  On the one hand, I very much want Sanchez to be able to continue to participate at the talkpage of his own bio.  On the other, Sanchez has engaged in multiple personal attacks and sexual slurs.  Numerous requests, both on- and off-wiki, have been made to Sanchez to cease with this behavior, and yet he continues.  If it happens again, I would support a block. --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 21:42, 27 July 2007 (UTC)