Jump to content

Criticism of the Latter Day Saint movement: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Qworty (talk | contribs)
Qworty (talk | contribs)
→‎Failed prophesies: "many," not "some"
Line 207: Line 207:


====Failed prophesies====
====Failed prophesies====
Critics contend that Joseph Smith could not be a genuine [[prophet]] because some of his prophecies did not come true,<ref>http://www.irr.org/mit/jsfalpro.html</ref> for example:
Critics contend that Joseph Smith could not be a genuine [[prophet]] because many of his prophecies did not come true,<ref>http://www.irr.org/mit/jsfalpro.html</ref> for example:


* A prediction that Christ would return to the Earth in 1891<ref>History of the Church, Vol. 2, page 182</ref>
* A prediction that Christ would return to the Earth in 1891<ref>History of the Church, Vol. 2, page 182</ref>

Revision as of 00:07, 12 December 2007

Criticism of the Latter Day Saint movement encompasses criticism of the doctrines, practices, and histories of the various denominations within the movement, including The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (the largest and most prominent, hereafter referred to as the LDS Church), and other branches including various fundamentalist denominations.

The movement was criticized in its early years in New York and Pennsylvania, and criticism continued with severe persecution in Missouri, and finally led to the assassination of Joseph Smith in Illinois. After Smith's death, the Succession Crisis ensued, and various denominations of the movement came into existence and they levied criticisms against each other, mostly regarding authority or doctrine. In the late 1800's, many criticized the LDS denomination, the largest branch, for its practice of polygamy, and federal legislators actively began passing laws designed to cripple the LDS church. Throughout the history of the movement, critics have questioned the veracity of Smith's revelations, and the historicity of the Book of Mormon and the Book of Abraham. Notable 20th century critics include Jerald and Sandra Tanner, who published The Changing World of Mormonism. In recent years, the internet has provided a new forum for critics, including sites such as Exmormon.org. In modern times, criticism often focuses on claims of intolerant attitudes, racism, sexist policies, and secrecy.

Movement-wide criticisms

Criticism of sacred texts

Book of Abraham

Critics claim that Joseph Smith fraudulently represented the Book of Abraham, a sacred Mormon text, as a divine document.[1][2] Both non-LDS and LDS scholars have concluded that translations of surviving papyri that are portions of the source of the Book of Abraham are unrelated to the content of the book's text.[3] Joseph Smith came into the possession of several Egyptian papyri, from which he claimed to translate the Book of Abraham,[4][5] part of the modern Pearl of Great Price. The papyri were lost for many years, but in the late 1960s, portions of the papyri were discovered, accompanied by a bill of sale from Emma Smith (Smith's wife). The extant papyri, as well as the facsimiles preserved by Smith in the Pearl of Great Price, have been translated by modern Egyptologists, and have been conclusively shown to be common Egyptian funerary documents unrelated to the content of the Book of Abraham.[6] Church scholars rebut these claims, by pointing out that Smith may have simply been using the papyri as inspiration; see Book of Abraham.

Criticisms of the Book of Mormon

Archaeology

Critics argue that aspects of the Book of Mormon narrative do not agree with modern archaeology and point out that mainstream archaeologists and anthropologists view the Book of Mormon as a work of fiction.[7] The Book of Mormon contains an account of peoples who, in succeeding groups between 2200 BC and 600 BC, traveled from the Middle East and settled in the Americas. According to David Persuitte, the following accounts in the Book of Mormon are disputed by modern science[8]:

Apologists acknowledge these limitations on archaeological evidence and point out that a lack of archaeological evidence for the Exodus does not thwart general Jewish and Christian acceptance of that event.[9] Apologists respond further that there is a notable difference between Old World and New World archaeology in terms of epigraphic data, iconographic data, continuity of culture, and toponyms. See Archaeology and the Book of Mormon.

Genetics

Critics claim that the conventional Mormon view that Native Americans are solely descended from Hebrews in Jerusalem is inconsistent with genetic findings.[10][11] In the late 1990s, scientists developed techniques to determine a person's ethnic background and history. Thus, it is possible to compare genetic evidence of the ethnic background of Native Americans with hypotheses of the origin of Book of Mormon peoples. The Book of Mormon suggests that most or all Native Americans descend from Middle Eastern peoples. Studies show that Native Americans have very distinctive DNA genetic markers inconsistent with this hypothesis.[12] Most genetic studies show strong relations between Native Americans and Siberian peoples.[13]

Apologists counter that this takes an overly simplistic approach to a complex problem, and that so many factors confound the approach and data that DNA evidence put forth thus far would not stand up under peer review.[14] In addition, apologists do not dispute that other peoples may have been present in the Americas; these DNA tests challenge only one of several theories of Native American origins held among Mormons. The limited geography model, for example, leaves the door open for other peoples to inhabit the Americas concurrent with Book of Mormon civilization. See Genetics and the Book of Mormon.

Linguistics

Critics contend that certain linguistic properties of the Book of Mormon provide evidence that the book was written by Joseph Smith, rather than translated from plates of gold.[15] For example, the book contains linguistic similarities to the King James Bible. In some cases, passages of scripture in the Bible are duplicated in the Book of Mormon. Sometimes the source is acknowledged, as in the book of 2 Nephi, where 18 chapters of Isaiah are quoted. The English text is copied nearly verbatim from the Authorized Version, with minor changes in the majority of verses. In other cases, the source is not acknowledged, as in the case of seemingly anachronistic borrowings.

Apologists respond that these are direct or indirect citations from the Brass Plates - a compiled source of all the known prophets through about 600 BC; these plates shared content with the modern Bible, in addition to containing other books unknown to the Bible. See Linguistics and the Book of Mormon.

Plagiarism

Critics claim that the Book of Mormon, published in 1830, was partially plagiarized from an earlier book, View of the Hebrews, published in 1823. They contend the Book of Mormon contains concepts that are identical or nearly identical to View of the Hebrews.[16][17] B.H. Roberts (1857-1933), an LDS scholar and Book of Mormon apologist, wrote "Book of Mormon Difficulties: A Study," later published as Studies of the Book of Mormon, in which he noted various parallels; see View of the Hebrews.

Credibility of witnesses

Critics claim that because the Three Witnesses to the Book of Mormon (Martin Harris, Oliver Cowdery, and David Whitmer) left the church during Joseph Smith's lifetime and called Smith a fallen prophet, their testimony as published in the introduction to the Book of Mormon should be called into question.[18] Harris and Cowdery later returned to the fellowship of the church, although critics dispute the sincerity of their conversion.[19]

Apologists respond that while the three witnesses each believed Smith became a fallen prophet at a certain point in time, none of them denied their testimony of the Book of Mormon or denied that Smith was a true prophet when he translated the book;[citation needed] see Three Witnesses.

Criticisms of Joseph Smith

Critics allege that Joseph Smith invented Mormonism in order to gain money, women, and power.[20][21][22][23][24] Apologists deny those allegations; see Joseph Smith.

Conflicting accounts of the First Vision

Critics claim that the existence of contradictory accounts of the First Vision proves that Smith fabricated the vision.[25] These critics point out evidence that Joseph Smith did not speak about the First Vision until a decade after it was said to have occurred.[26] Furthermore, the first published account came 22 years after it was said to have occurred, in 1842, shortly before Smith's death. Some of the accounts only mention a visitation by an angel, while others detail a visit by God the Father and Jesus Christ (as separate beings), as in Smith's 1838 account, the current officially accepted account by the LDS church.[27] The earliest known account written by Joseph Smith himself indicates a visitation by one personage, Jesus Christ. Other details of this account differ from the official version.[28]

Apologists respond that the varying accounts were intended for different audiences for different purposes, and as such Smith only spoke of the parts of the vision that were appropriate in that setting. See First Vision.

Failed prophesies

Critics contend that Joseph Smith could not be a genuine prophet because many of his prophecies did not come true,[29] for example:

  • A prediction that Christ would return to the Earth in 1891[30]
  • The mission of David Patten, who died before he could fulfill the prophecy[31]
  • The overthrow of the United States government and breakup of Congress for the wrongs committed on the Saints in Missouri[32][33]
  • The finding of treasure in Salem, Massachusetts[34]
  • Pestilence, Hail, Famine & Earthquake to Destroy the Wicked in the United States within the lifetime of the generation of Joseph Smith[35]

"Money Digging" activities

Critics claim that Joseph Smith's documented "money digging" activities[36] lend support to the theory that he fabricated the Book of Mormon.[37] He claimed to use a variety of methods to find treasure, including revelation through seer stones, and divining rods. In 1826, after a former business partner accused him of not coming through on a promise to find treasure, Smith was arrested, tried, and found guilty by a justice of the peace in Bainbridge, New York.[38]

Mormon apologists respond that "money digging", other magic, and divining practices were common during the life of Joseph Smith[citation needed], or that it was a necessary part of his development in discerning good from evil.[39] Additionally, apologists claim that the account of the arrest and conviction was fabricated, or mischaracterized in order to defame Smith.[40]

Kinderhook Plates

Critics, including Fawn Brodie,[41] the Tanners, and the Institute of Religious Research[42] call Smith's ability to translate into question by pointing to a hoax involving the Kinderhook plates, artifacts planted in 1843 in an Indian mound near Kinderhook, Illinois. Designed to appear ancient, the plates were a forgery created by certain men from Kinderhook who were hoping to trick their Mormon neighbors in Nauvoo. These critics cite the following statement to demonstrate that Smith was making fraudulent translations: page 372 of the History of the Church (DHC) reads: "I [Joseph Smith] have translated a portion of them, and find they contain the history of the person with whom they were found. He was a descendant of Ham, through the loins of Pharaoh, king of Egypt, and that he received his kingdom from the Ruler of heaven and earth".[43]

Mormon apologists claim the statement was actually written by William Clayton, Smith's scribe.[44]

Mormonism claimed to be a cult

Some critics refer to Mormonism as a cult[45] (for a definition of cult in this context see Unmasking the Cults[46]), citing historical events such as the Mountain Meadows Massacre,[47] and the Blood oaths in temple ordinances before 1990 that require death penalties for disobedience. Apologists respond that the Blood Oaths have been removed from the Endowment, and that critics use subjective definitions of the term cult[48] in "order to further [the critics'] message."

Nature of God

Main article: Nature of God

Mormons have been criticized for adopting an interpretation of the Trinity that is not recognized by most other Christian faiths.[49][50] Mormons believe that God the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are three different beings united in purpose, love, and perfection; they also believe that the Father (and Christ after his resurrection) has a physical body (see Godhead (Latter Day Saints)). In contrast, Trinitarian theology teaches that God is one eternal spirit subsisting in three aspects; that the Father does not have a physical body; and that Jesus first assumed a physical body when he was born of the Virgin Mary, though he was coeternal with the Father and the Holy Spirit. See Nature of God.

Salvation: faith vs. works

Evangelical Christians criticize the Latter Day Saint view of salvation, which holds that there is no such thing as salvation without work,[citation needed] contrary to evangelical belief that salvation can be obtained by faith alone.[citation needed]

View of heaven

Other Christians criticize the faith's conception of heaven and immortality, arguing that the bible only permits heaven and hell, and does not support the 3-kingdom system described by LDS teachings (the Celestial Kingdom, the Terrestrial Kingdom, and the Telestial Kingdom).[citation needed]

Authority

Critics claim that Mormoms are wrong to deny the priestly authority of other Christian denominations.[51] Joseph Smith claimed that other Christian denominations do not have authority to act in God's name because of apostasy, which the church teaches occurred not long after the deaths of the original apostles, and that this was prophesied in the Bible (see 2 Thessalonians 2:3 and Great Apostasy). Critics cite comments by church leader Bruce R. McConkie who wrote, "Mormonism is Christianity; Christianity is Mormonism; they are one and the same, they are not to be distinguished from each other in the minutest detail...". [52]

Closed canon

Due to the conventional Christian belief that the Canon of scripture is closed (though the precise number of books in the Bible is disputed among different denominations), Christian critics[who?] take issue with Latter Day Saints' acceptance of additional scripture. Many Protestants[who?] consider the Bible the only infallible authority. In contrast, Latter Day Saints believe that the Book of Mormon, the Pearl of Great Price and the Doctrine and Covenants are also the word of God, and encourage that all four "Standard Works" be read and studied, in addition to new revelations given to current prophets (within their respective denominations). They also believe that if additional, authentic scripture is found, it too should be embraced as the Word of God (e.g. Paul's Letter to the Laodiceans, which has never been found but referred to by Paul in Colossians 4:16, see also Epistle to the Laodiceans).

Criticisms specific to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

Criticisms of doctrinal changes

Critics claim that the LDS church changed some of its core doctrines for political, rather than spiritual purposes.[53]

Priesthood policy reversal in 1978

Critics claim that the church's 1978 reversal of the policy of not allowing blacks to hold the priesthood was not divinely inspired as the church claimed, but simply a matter of political convenience.[54] One critic points out that this reversal of policy occurred as the LDS church began to expand outside the United States into countries such as Brazil that have large, ethnically mixed populations and as the church prepared to open a new temple in São Paulo, Brazil.[55]

Apologists respond that the policy was a practice supported by scriptural arguments, not a doctrine,[56] and despite several church leaders throughout the 1950s and 1960s supporting its reversal, the policy was kept in place through 1978 because the Quorum of the Twelve felt a revelation was needed to change it.[57] See Blacks and Mormonism.

Polygamy discontinued in 1890

Critics argue that the church's 1890 reversal its policy on Polygamy was done for political, not divine, reasons, citing the fact that it happened in the midst of a lengthy battle with the federal government over property seizures and statehood.[58] Critics point to the fact that soon after the church received the revelation that Polygamy was prohibited, Utah again applied for statehood, and this time the federal government did not object to starting the statehood process. Six years later, the process completed and Utah became a state in 1896.[59] Critics also point out that soon after the church renounced polygamy, the federal government reduced its legal efforts to seize church property.[60]

Apologists do not dispute that the change was a direct result of federal intervention and respond that the church was left with no choice. The 1887 Edmunds–Tucker Act was crippling the church and "something dramatic had to be done to reverse [the] trend."[61] After the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the act in 1890, church president Wilford Woodruff issued the Manifesto. Woodruff noted in his journal that he was "acting for the temporal salvation of the Church".[62] See 1890 Manifesto.

Criticisms of past teachings

Adam and God are the same

Brigham Young taught on several occasions during the mid-1800s that God and Adam are the same being.[63][64] Apostle Franklin D. Richards accepted the doctrine as taught by Young, stating in a Conference held in June 1854 that "the Prophet and Apostle Brigham has declared it, and that it is the word of the Lord" (emphasis in original).[65] However, at the time of its first introduction, other leaders disagreed with the doctrine, including Apostle Orson Pratt, who expressed that disagreement publicly.[66] The church has since officially repudiated this doctrine. See Adam-God theory.

Some sins not atonable

Brigham Young introduced the doctrine that there are some sins that cannot be atoned for through Jesus Christ.[67][68] He taught that the only way to atone for such sins, a person would have to give up his or her life. The LDS church has since officially repudiated this doctrine. Additional rebuttal information is at Blood Atonement.

Masonic rituals

Critics allege that Joseph Smith copied parts of the temple endowment from Masonic rituals, and that this undermines the church's claim that the rituals were divinely inspired.[69] Critics point to the fact that Joseph Smith was himself a Freemason[70] to support this argument.

Ceremonies changed

Critics claim that the church's revision of the temple endowment ceremony over the years[71] was done to obscure provocative practices of the early church.[72]

Apologists acknowledge changes to the endowment ceremony and point out that Joseph Smith told Brigham Young the ceremony was "not arranged perfectly", and challenged him to organize and systemize it, which Young continued to do throughout his presidency.[73]

Baptism for the dead

See also: Baptism for the dead: Christian opposition.

Some critics claim that Baptism for the Dead is not justified by the Bible.[74][75] Apologists believe that 1 Corinthians 15:29 refers to this practice,[76] as well as Malachi 4:5–6; John 5:25; 1 Peter 4:6.[77] For additional rebuttal information, see Baptism for the Dead.

Baptism of Holocaust victims

See also: Mormonism and Judaism: Baptism for the dead.

Holocaust survivors and other Jewish groups criticized the LDS church in 1995, after discovering that the church baptized more than 300,000 Jewish holocaust victims.[78] [79] After that criticism, church leaders put a policy in place to stop the practice, with an exception for baptisms specifically requested or approved by victims' relatives.[80]

Jewish organizations again criticized the church in 2002 and 2004 for failing to honor the 1995 agreement.[81] Church officials said that the post-1995 baptisms were isolated incidents where individual church members inadvertently failed to follow church policy.

Finances

Some critics fault the church for not disclosing financial information to church members.[82][83] Investigative reporters independently researched church finances in 1999 and estimated the annual revenue at $5 billion, and the total assets at $25 to $30 billion.[84]

Most church revenue comes from tithes and fast offerings contributed by church members. These donations are transferred from local units directly to church headquarters in Salt Lake City, where the funds are centrally managed. In the United States, churches are not required by law to disclose financial information, and some other churches, such as the Vatican do not disclose information.[citation needed] Most protestant denominations and local Catholic dioceses do provide full financial disclosure to members.[citation needed]

The church employs an internal audit department that provides its certification at each annual general conference that church contributions are collected and spent in accordance with church policy. In addition, the church engages a public accounting firm (currently Deloitte & Touche) to perform annual audits in the United States of its not-for-profit,[85] for-profit,[86] and educational[87][88] entities.

Coerced Tithing

Some critics claim that the LDS church places too much emphasis on money, pointing out that the church denies certain privileges (such as a temple admission) to members that do not contribute 10% of their income (called a tithe) to the church.[89] Some critics call this "coerced tithing" because admission to the Celestial Kingdom requires participation in certain ceremonies, and many of those ceremonies are performed only within LDS temples.[90][91]

Access to historical documents

Critics complain that throughout the 20th century the church denied scholars access to many key church documents, and claim that to this day it refuses to publish Joseph Smith's diary.[92]

Apologists acknowledge this past lack of access and point out that the Joseph Smith Papers project will provide access to Smith's journals.[93]

Suppression of Dissent

Critics claim that the LDS church retaliates against members that publish truthful information that undermines church policies,[94] citing excommunications of scientist Simon Southerton[95] and biographer Fawn Brodie.[96] Critics claim that the church suppresses intellectual freedom, citing the 1993 excommunication of "The September Six", including gay LDS historian D. Michael Quinn, and author Lavina Anderson.[97] Anderson was the first to reveal that the LDS church keeps files on LDS scholars, documenting their questionable activities, and critics claim that "No other sizable religion in America monitors its followers in this way".[98] Critics also point to the fact that the American Association of University Professors, since 1998, has put LDS-owned Brigham Young University on its list of universities that do not allow tenured professors sufficient freedom in teaching and research.[99] Apologists reply that the LDS church, like any private organization, is entitled to determine its own membership, and that all excommunicated members were excommunicated only after a formal disciplinary hearing.

Distortion of history

Critics allege the church distorts its history in order to portray itself in a more favorable light.[100] For example, Jerald and Sandra Tanner allege that when the work History of the Church is compared to the original manuscripts from which it is drawn, "more than 62,000 words" can be identified that were either added or deleted,[101] including systematic removal of events that portray Joseph Smith in a negative light.[102] Apologists do not deny the existence of differences and attribute them to extensive annotations and edits by B. H. Roberts when he compiled the volumes (see article History of the Church).

Critics also cite the selective use of Brigham Young's statements, presented in a manner to give the illusion that he was in favor of blacks joining the priesthood.[103] Critics also argue that the church attempted to discredit documented evidence that Joseph Smith was arrested, tried, and found guilty by a justice of the peace in Bainbridge, New York, in 1826.[104] Certain changes within the church's religious texts have also been highlighted by critics, such as the title page of the 1830 edition of the Book of Mormon that described Joseph Smith as "Author and Proprietor" of the book, which was revised in subsequent editions to be "Translator",[105] and the description of Oliver Cowdery's skill at using the divining rod found in the 1829 edition of the Book of Commandments, which does not appear in the corresponding section of the 1835 edition of the Doctrine and Covenants.[106] Some critics allege that the church distorts history by omission, noting that the widely distributed church manual Teachings of the Presidents of the Church: Brigham Young, omits any mention of Young's polygamy, and that the book's chronological summary of Young's life includes the date of his first marriage, the date of the first wife's death, and the date of the second legal marriage, but omits mention of Young's dozens of other marriages.[107] Apologists reply that LDS historians are gradually becoming more objective, see New Mormon history.

Scholarship questioned

Critic Matthew Paulsen claims that the research activities of the Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies (FARMS) are not subjected to peer review, that FARMS limits peer review only to members of the LDS church, and that FARMS's primary goal is to defend the LDS faith rather than promote truthful scholarship.[108] FARMS is a research institute within church-owned Brigham Young University. Molecular biologist Simon Southerton, a former LDS bishop and author of Losing a Lost Tribe: Native Americans, DNA, and the Mormon Church said, "I was amazed at the lengths that FARMS went to in order to prop up faith in the Book of Mormon. I felt that the only way I could be satisfied with FARMS explanations was to stop thinking.... The explanations of the FARMS researchers stretched the bounds of credibility to breaking point on almost every critical issue".[109] For apologist rebuttal, see FARMS.

Sexual repression

Critics claim that the church takes a repressive stance towards sexuality, which may be psychologically unhealthy.[110] [111] [112] Critics claim that the repressive attitude of the church may - in extreme cases - lead to suicide, as in the case of 16-year old Kip Eliason, who committed suicide because of the stresses that resulted when his LDS bishop told him that masturbation was sinful.[113] [114]

Critics also point out that LDS church leaders said in 1982 that oral sex is prohibited,[115] although that pronouncement has not been repeated since then.

Sexism

Some critics argue that the LDS Church treats women as inferior to men.[116] Other critics claim sexism in the LDS church is demonstrated by absence of women in leadership roles, sexual abuse, lack of career opportunities, and poor family planning policies.[117] Critics claim that, rather than increasing the responsibilities of women, the LDS church has recently decreased the autonomy that Mormon women had in areas such as welfare, leadership, training, publishing, and policy setting.[118] Critics also point to comments such as those made by LDS leader Bruce R. McConkie, who wrote that a "woman's primary place is in the home, where she is to rear children and abide by the righteous counsel of her husband".[119]

Apologists respond that while the church does teach that mothers are "primarily responsible for the nurture of their children", it also teaches that fathers and mothers are "equal partners" in the family.[120] Church leaders also encourage women to obtain education and skills. Additional rebuttal information is found at Women and Mormonism.

Some critics point to comments by certain church leaders as evidence that women are subject to different rules regarding entry into heaven. 19th-century leader Erastus Snow preached: "No woman will get into the celestial kingdom, except her husband receives her, if she is worthy to have a husband; and if not, somebody will receive her as a servant".[121]

Apologists respond that the church has no such doctrine and that such comments do not represent the official position of the church; see Women and Mormonism.

Racism

Critics point out the church's former practice of denying the priesthood to blacks of African descent, which ended in 1978, as evidence that past LDS church policies were racist in nature. Before the change in policy, most adult while males in the LDS Church were given the priesthood and denying the priesthood to blacks prevented them from officiating in ordinances and from participating in LDS temple ceremonies.[122] Critics cite quotes from church leaders such as Brigham Young who said, "You must not think, from what I say, that I am opposed to slavery. No! The negro is damned, and is to serve his master till God chooses to remove the curse of Ham...".[123] Those critics also illustrate church racism by quoting sections of the Book of Mormon which describe dark skin as a sign of a curse and a mark from God to distinguish a more righteous group of people from a less righteous group, and by citing passages describing white skin as "delightsome" while dark skin is portrayed as un-enticing.[citation needed]

Joseph F. Smith, president of the church, published his views that people with dark skin were less faithful in the pre-existence, and as such, did not warrant the blessings of the priesthood.[124][125] Many other church leaders, historical and modern have spoken in favor of segregation and restrictions of the priesthood for men of African descent.[126][127]

Apologists respond that these leaders were a product of their time and locale and that many leaders, including Joseph Smith, David O. McKay,[128] and even initially Brigham Young, were not opposed to blacks receiving the priesthood. See Blacks and Mormonism.

Continuing racial issues

Although the current LDS church policy now admits blacks to the priesthood, some black members are critical of the church because the church refuses to issue a written repudiation of racist doctrines, despite formal requests by black members to do so.[129] One critical black church member contends that the church "refuses to acknowledge and undo its racist past, and until it does that, members continue to suffer psychological damage from it" and that "the church has not done enough to rectify its racist past".[130] For apologists' viewpoint, see Blacks and Mormonism.

Polygamy

Critics claim that after the church publicly renounced polygamy in 1890, church authorities continued to authorize some plural marriages.[131]

Apologists acknowledge post-manifesto polygamy and point out that after the Second Manifesto in 1906, anyone entering into a new plural marriage was excommunicated.

Critics argue that early church leaders established the practice of polygamy in order to justify behavior that would otherwise be regarded as immoral.[132] Others[133] criticize Joseph Smith for marrying at least 32 women during his lifetime, including several under the age of 16.[134] He also entered into polyandrous marriages (that is, he married women who were already married to other men)[135] that he warned some potential spouses of eternal damnation if they did not consent to be his wife,[136] and that, in at least two cases, he married orphan girls that had come to live at his home.[137]

Apologists point out that there is little evidence of sexual relations in Smith's plural marriages and argue that they were likely dynastic in nature. Todd Compton, a non-apologetic LDS historian whose research on Smith's marriages is a primary source for critics, also holds this view.[138] Compton also points out that Protestant denominations contemporary with early Mormonism also practiced polygamy, for example the early Anabaptists, and that Martin Luther himself sanctioned the practice.[138][139] See Joseph Smith, Jr. and polygamy.

Homophobia

Critics contend that the LDS church is homophobic.[140][141] One critic cites a gay LDS church member who said, "I cannot comprehend our Father in Heaven endowing certain of his children with the unique characteristics of a gay person, then rejecting them".[142] Other critics point out that the LDS church actively campaigns against same-sex marriage statutes, including donating $500,000 in 1998 towards a campaign to defeat such a referendum in Alaska.[143]

The church accepts homosexual members and acknowledges homosexual tendencies may not be a choice.[144] However, homosexual behavior (just like extramarital heterosexual activity) is considered sinful.[145]

Historian D. Michael Quinn hypothesized that early church leaders had a more tolerant view of homosexuality, and that several early church leaders and prominent members, including Louise B. Felt, May Anderson, Evan Stephens, and Joseph Fielding Smith (1899-1964), may have either had homosexual tendencies or were involved in homosexual relationships.[146] Apologists do not dispute that some early members may have had homosexual tendencies, but they call Quinn's claim of tolerance a distortion of church history. They deny any acceptance from previous leaders of homosexual behavior, and state the current leadership of the church “is entirely consistent with the teachings of past leaders and with the scriptures.”[147] Additional details about the church's view of these criticisms are found at Homosexuality and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Criticisms specific to denominations other than LDS

See Criticisms of Fundamentalist branch.

Footnotes

  1. ^ Larson, Charles M. (1992). His Own Hand Upon Papyrus: A New Look at the Joseph Smith Papyri. Institute for Religious Research. ISBN 0802412343. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  2. ^ Tanner, Jerald and Sandra (1979). The Changing World of Mormonism. p. 329-363 publisher=Moody Press. ISBN 0962096326. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help); Missing pipe in: |page= (help); line feed character in |page= at position 8 (help)
  3. ^ Ostling, Richard and Joan (1999). Mormon America. Harper Collins. pp. 278–285. ISBN 0060663715.
  4. ^ Joseph Smith stated in his History of the Church, "...with W.W. Phelps and Oliver Cowdery as scribes, I commenced the translation of some of the characters or hieroglyphics, and much to our joy found that one of the rolls contained the writings of Abraham, another the writings of Joseph of Egypt, etc. — a more full account of which will appear in its place, as I proceed to examine or unfold them..." History of the Church, Vol. 2, Ch. 17, p. 236.
  5. ^ Smith additionally stated that he, "...was continually engaged in translating an alphabet to the Book of Abraham, and arranging a grammar of the Egyptian language as practiced by the ancients."History of the Church, Vol. 2, Ch. 17, p. 238
  6. ^ Tanner, Jerald and Sandra (1979). The Changing World of Mormonism. Moody Press. p. 329-362. ISBN 0802412343.
  7. ^ Wolverton, Susan (2004). Having Visions: The Book of Mormon : Translated and Exposed in Plain English. Algora. pp. 84–85. ISBN 0875863108.
  8. ^ Persuitte, David (2000). Joseph Smith and the Origins of the Book of Mormon (2nd Edition). McFarland & Company. p. 102. ISBN 078640826X.
  9. ^ Ash, Michael R. "Archaeological Evidence and the Book of Mormon". www.fairlds.org. [1]. Accessed 7 December 2007.
  10. ^ Kleiman, Yaakov (2004). DNA and Tradition: The Genetic Link to the Ancient Hebrews. Devora. p. 88. ISBN 1932687130.
  11. ^ Southerton, Simon G. (2004). Losing a Lost Tribe: Native Americans, DNA, and the Mormon Church. Signature Books. ISBN 1560851813.
  12. ^ Murphy, Thomas W. "Lamanite Genesis, Genealogy, and Genetics." In Vogel, Dan and Brent Metcalfe, eds. American Apocrypha: Essays on the Book of Mormon Salt Lake City: Signature, 2002: 47-77. ISBN 1-56085-151-1
  13. ^ Beringian Standstill and Spread of Native American Founders
  14. ^ Whiting, Michael F (2003), DNA and the Book of Mormon: A Phylogenetic Perspective, Provo, Utah: Maxwell Institute, at 24–35.
  15. ^ Beckwith, Francis (2002). The New Mormon Challenge. Zondervan. p. 367-396. ISBN 0310231949.
  16. ^ Brodie, Fawn M. (1995). No Man Knows My History: The Life of Joseph Smith. Vintage. ISBN 0679730540.
  17. ^ Persuitte, David (2000). Joseph Smith and the Origins of the Book of Mormon (2nd Edition). McFarland & Company. ISBN 078640826X.
  18. ^ http://www.irr.org/mit/bomwit1.html
  19. ^ http://www.irr.org/mit/bomwit1.html
  20. ^ Bennett, John C. (2000). The History of the Saints: Or An Exposé of Joe Smith and Mormonism. University of Illinois Press. pp. 40–49, 72–78, 155–171. ISBN 025202589X.
  21. ^ Brodie, Fawn M. (1995). No Man Knows My History: The Life of Joseph Smith. Vintage. ISBN 0679730540.
  22. ^ MacKinney, Jonathan (2006). Revelation Plain And Simple. Xulon Press. p. 494. ISBN 1600342809.
  23. ^ http://www.bibletopics.com/biblestudy/162-4.htm
  24. ^ "Weisberg, Jacob: article in Slate". Retrieved 2007-12-04.
  25. ^ Tanner, Jerald and Sandra (1979). The Changing World of Mormonism. Moody Press. pp. 148–171. ISBN 0802412343.
  26. ^ Palmer, Grant H. (2002), An Insider's View of Mormon Origins, Signature Books, ISBN 156085157: "The earliest allusion, oral or written, to the first vision is the brief mention that was transcribed in June 1830 and originally printed in the Book of Commandments." Palmer, 235.
  27. ^ In the Pearl of Great Price: Joseph Smith History 1:16-17
  28. ^ Tanner, Jerald and Sandra (1979). The Changing World of Mormonism. Moody Press. pp. 148–171. ISBN 0802412343.
  29. ^ http://www.irr.org/mit/jsfalpro.html
  30. ^ History of the Church, Vol. 2, page 182
  31. ^ Doctrine & Covenants 114:1
  32. ^ History of the Church, Vol. 5, p. 394
  33. ^ Millennial Star, Vol. 22, p. 455. See also History of the Church (HC), Vol. 6, p. 116
  34. ^ Doctrine & Covenants Section 111
  35. ^ History of the Church, Vol. 1, pp. 315-316
  36. ^ Joseph Smith's "money digging" activities are documented by a number of scholars, including Dan Vogel (Vogel, Dan (1994), "The Locations of Joseph Smith's Early Treasure Quests", Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 27 (3): 197–231),195
  37. ^ Tanner, Jerald and Sandra (1979). The Changing World of Mormonism. Moody Press. p. 67-91. ISBN 0802412343. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  38. ^ As detailed in The Salt Lake City Messenger, August, 1971. See also http://www.utlm.org/onlinebooks/changech4.htm
  39. ^ Encyclopedia of Mormonism, Vol.2, in the article "History of the Church" as quoted by Jeff Lindsay at http://www.jefflindsay.com/LDSFAQ/FQ_prophets.shtml#convict
  40. ^ http://www.jefflindsay.com/LDSFAQ/FQ_prophets.shtml#convict
  41. ^ Brodie, Fawn M. (1995). No Man Knows My History: The Life of Joseph Smith ). Vintage. ISBN 0679730540.
  42. ^ http://www.irr.org/mit/kinderhook-plates.html
  43. ^ DHC 5:372
  44. ^ Diane Wirth, writing in Review of Books on the Book of Mormon (4: 210), discredits the DHC account by writing: “Joseph Smith’s supposed statement that the Kinderhook plates were authentic and that they were the ‘records of the descendants of Ham,’ came from the journal of William Clayton, who wrote in the first person, as though from the mouth of Joseph Smith. A first-person narrative was apparently a common practice of this time period when a biographical work was being compiled. Since such words were never penned by the Prophet, they cannot be uncritically accepted as his words or his opinion.”
  45. ^ Walter, Martin (2003). Kingdom of the Cults. Bethany House. p. 193-260. ISBN 0764228218.
  46. ^ Gomes, Alan W. (1995). Unmasking the Cults. Zondervan. p. 7-25. ISBN 0310704413.
  47. ^ Walter, Martin (2003). Kingdom of the Cults. Bethany House. p. 205-206. ISBN 0764228218.
  48. ^ Is Mormonism a Cult by Kim Siever, page 1
  49. ^ "A Comparison Between Christian Doctrine and Mormon Doctrine". Retrieved 2006-06-18.
  50. ^ Beckwith, Francis (2002). The New Mormon Challenge. Zondervan. p. 268-333. ISBN 0310231949.
  51. ^ "Mormon Research Ministries article on authority". {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |accessDate= ignored (|accessdate= suggested) (help)
  52. ^ Mormon Doctrine, by Bruce McConkie, pg 513
  53. ^ Tanner, Jerald and Sandra (1979). The Changing World of Mormonism. Moody Press. ISBN 0802412343. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  54. ^ Tanner, Jerald and Sandra (1979). The Changing World of Mormonism. Moody Press. p. 319-328. ISBN 0802412343.
  55. ^ Ostling, Richard and Joan (1999). Mormon America. Harper Collins. p. 95.
  56. ^ Prince, Gregory A. (2005). David O. McKay and the Rise of Modern Mormonism. Salt Lake City, Utah: University of Utah Press. pp. 79–80. ISBN 0780874808223. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: invalid prefix (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  57. ^ Prince, Gregory A. (2005). David O. McKay and the Rise of Modern Mormonism. Salt Lake City, Utah: University of Utah Press. p. 80. ISBN 0780874808223. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: invalid prefix (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  58. ^ Tanner, Jerald and Sandra (1979). The Changing World of Mormonism. Moody Press. p. 258-285. ISBN 0802412343.
  59. ^ Ostling, Richard and Joan (1999). Mormon America. Harper Collins. pp. 78–79.
  60. ^ Ostling, Richard and Joan (1999). Mormon America. Harper Collins. pp. 78–79.
  61. ^ Rood, Ron and Thatcher, Linda. "Statehood". Brief History of Utah. historytogo.utah.gov. [2].
  62. ^ Wilford Woodruff Diary, 1890-09-25.
  63. ^ Ostling, Richard and Joan (1999). Mormon America. Harper Collins. p. 331. ISBN 0060663715.
  64. ^ Young, Brigham (April 9, 1852), "Self-Government—Mysteries—Recreation and Amusements, not in Themselves Sinful—Tithing—Adam, Our Father and Our God", in Watt, G.D., Journal of Discourses by Brigham Young, President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, His Two Counsellors, the Twelve Apostles, and Others, vol. 1, Liverpool: F.D. & S.W. Richards, 1854, pp. 46–53, <http://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cgi-bin/docviewer.exe?CISOROOT=/JournalOfDiscourses3&CISOPTR=9599 >
  65. ^ Millennial Star 16:534, 28 August 1854.
  66. ^ Journal of Thomas Evans Jeremy Sr., September 30, 1852 ("Also he did not believe that Father Adam had flesh and bones, when he came to the garden of Eden, but he and his wife Eve were spirits, and that God formed their bodies out of the dust of the ground, and the (sic) became a living souls. He also said that he believed that Jesus Christ and Adam are brothers in the Spirit, and that Adam is not the God that he is praying unto."). See generally, Bergera 1980.
  67. ^ Ostling, Richard and Joan (1999). Mormon America. Harper Collins. p. 332. ISBN 0060663715.
  68. ^ Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, Vol 4 p. 53
  69. ^ Tanner, Jerald and Sandra (1979). The Changing World of Mormonism. Moody Press. p. 534-547. ISBN 0802412343. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  70. ^ Tanner, Jerald and Sandra (1979). The Changing World of Mormonism. Moody Press. p. 535. ISBN 0802412343. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  71. ^ Buerger, David John (2002), The Mysteries of Godliness: A History of Mormon Temple Worship (2nd ed.), Salt Lake City: Signature Books, ISBN 1560851767, pp. 139-40
  72. ^ Tanner, Jerald (1979). The Changing World of Mormonism. Moody Press. ISBN 0802412343. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  73. ^ "FAIR Topical Guide: Changes in Ceremony". Retrieved 2007-12-06.
  74. ^ McElveen, Floyd C. (1997). The Mormon Illusion: What the Bible Says About the Latter-Day Saints. Kregel Publications. pp. 110–112. ISBN 0825431921. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  75. ^ http://www.irr.org/mit/baptdead.html
  76. ^ "29 Else what shall they do which are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all? why are they then baptized for the dead?" (1 Corinthians 15:29)
  77. ^ See "Baptism for the Dead" at lds.org.
  78. ^ "New York Times: Again, Jews Fault Mormons Over Posthumous Baptisms".
  79. ^ Bushman, Claudia L. (2006). Contemporary Mormonism: Latter-Day Saints in Modern America. Greenwood Press. p. 86.
  80. ^ Agreement with the LDS Church
  81. ^ Summary of Jewish concerns about LDS baptisms
  82. ^ Ostling, Richard and Joan (1999). Mormon America. Harper Collins. pp. 113–129. ISBN 0060663715.
  83. ^ Tanner, Jerald and Sandra (1979). The Changing World of Mormonism. Moody Press. p. 36. ISBN 0802412343.
  84. ^ Ostling, Richard and Joan (1999). Mormon America. Harper Collins. pp. 395–400. ISBN 0060663715.
  85. ^ "Why Deseret Trust Company?" http://www.lds.org/deserettrust/why.html. Accessed 15 May 2007.
  86. ^ Belo Corp Form 8-K. http://sec.edgar-online.com/1995/04/10/00/0000950134-95-000692/Section3.asp. Accessed 16 May 2007.
  87. ^ "Financial Planning". finserve.byu.edu. http://finserve.byu.edu/files/archives/Handouts/November%202005/Finance%20Section%20Draft%207-Without%20Requirements.doc. Accessed 16 May 2007.
  88. ^ "Finance". accredit.byu.edu. See page 9 of pdf document available at http://accredit.byu.edu/resources/selfstudy/Standard_7.pdf?lms=30. Accessed 16 May 2007.
  89. ^ Ostling, Richard and Joan (1999). Mormon America. Harper Collins. p. 178. ISBN 0060663715.
  90. ^ "Mormon Research Ministry criticism of tithing". {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |accessDate= ignored (|accessdate= suggested) (help)
  91. ^ "The Mormon Curtain article on tithing". {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |accessDate= ignored (|accessdate= suggested) (help)
  92. ^ Tanner, Jerald and Sandra (1979). The Changing World of Mormonism. Moody Press. p. 37. ISBN 0802412343.
  93. ^ Tad Walch (2005-04-04). "Miller funding Joseph Smith project". Deseret Morning News. Retrieved 2007-12-06. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work= (help)
  94. ^ Ostling, Richard and Joan (1999). Mormon America. Harper Collins. pp. 351–370. ISBN 0060663715.
  95. ^ "Critical website discusses excommunication of Southerton". Retrieved 2007-12-07.
  96. ^ Wolverton, Susan (2004). Having Visions: The Book of Mormon : Translated and Exposed in Plain English. Algora. p. 321. ISBN 0875863108.
  97. ^ Ostling, Richard and Joan (1999). Mormon America. Harper Collins. pp. 351–370. ISBN 0060663715.
  98. ^ Ostling, Richard and Joan (1999). Mormon America. Harper Collins. pp. 351–370. ISBN 0060663715.
  99. ^ "AAUP report" (PDF).
  100. ^ Tanner, Jerald and Sandra (1979). The Changing World of Mormonism. Moody Press. ISBN 0802412343. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  101. ^ Jerald & Sandra Tanner, Changes in Joseph Smith's History, Salt Lake City: Utah Lighthouse Ministry, 1965.
  102. ^ Tanner, Jerald and Sandra (1979). The Changing World of Mormonism. Moody Press. pp. 29–34. ISBN 0802412343. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  103. ^ Tanner, Jerald and Sandra (2004). Curse of Cain? Racism in the Mormon Church. Utah Lighthouse Ministry. p. Chapter 10, part 2, p. 311. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  104. ^ Tanner, Jerald and Sandra (1979). The Changing World of Mormonism. Moody Press. p. 67-72. ISBN 0802412343.
  105. ^ Tanner, Jerald and Sandra (1979). The Changing World of Mormonism. Moody Press. p. 129. ISBN 0802412343.
  106. ^ Tanner, Jerald and Sandra (1979). The Changing World of Mormonism. Moody Press. p. 86-87. ISBN 0802412343.
  107. ^ Ostling, Richard and Joan (1999). Mormon America. Harper Collins. p. 248. ISBN 0060663715.
  108. ^ Paulson, Matthew A. (2000). Breaking the Mormon Code: A Critique of Mormon Scholarship. Wingspan Press. pp. 27–29. ISBN 1595940677.
  109. ^ Gruss, Edmond C. (2006). What Every Mormon (and Non-Mormon) Should Know. Xulon Press. p. 119. ISBN 1600341632.
  110. ^ "Ex-mormon article on history of LDS stances on sexuality". {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |accessDate= ignored (|accessdate= suggested) (help)
  111. ^ Laake, Deborah (1994). Secret Ceremonies: A Mormon Woman's Intimate Diary of Marriage and Beyond. Dell Publishing. ISBN 0688093043.
  112. ^ McDannell, Colleen (1995). Material Christianity: Religion and Popular Culture in America. Yale University Press. pp. 214–218. ISBN 0300074999.
  113. ^ "Affirmation article in Kip Eliason suicide". {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |accessDate= ignored (|accessdate= suggested) (help)
  114. ^ Ed Decker (1982). The God Makers (VHS). Jeremiah Films.
  115. ^ "Ex-mormon article on history of LDS stances on sexuality". {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |accessDate= ignored (|accessdate= suggested) (help)
  116. ^ Ostling, Richard and Joan (1999). Mormon America. Harper Collins. pp. 159–172.
  117. ^ Bushman, Claudia L. (2006). Contemporary Mormonism: Latter-Day Saints in Modern America. Greenwood Press. p. 113. ISBN 027598933X.
  118. ^ Bushman, Claudia L. (2006). Contemporary Mormonism: Latter-Day Saints in Modern America. Greenwood Press. p. 113. {{cite book}}: Text "ISBN 027598933X" ignored (help)
  119. ^ "Ex-Mormon web site critical of LDS church". Retrieved 2007-12-04.
  120. ^ The Family: A Proclamation to the World
  121. ^ "UTLM web site describing LDS treatment of women". Retrieved 2007-12-04.
  122. ^ Ostling, Richard and Joan (1999). Mormon America. Harper Collins. pp. 94–108.
  123. ^ Tanner, Jerald and Sandra (1979). The Changing World of Mormonism. Moody Press. p. 304 (New York Herald, May 4, 1855, as cited in Dialogue, Spring 1973, p.56). ISBN 0802412343.
  124. ^ Tanner, Jerald and Sandra (2004). Curse of Cain? Racism in the Mormon Church. Utah Lighthouse Ministry.
  125. ^ "Web site with detailed documentation of racist acts in LDS history". Retrieved 2007-12-05.
  126. ^ Tanner, Jerald and Sandra (2004). Curse of Cain? Racism in the Mormon Church. Utah Lighthouse Ministry.
  127. ^ "Web site with detailed documentation of recent racist LDS polices". Retrieved 2007-12-05.
  128. ^ David O. McKay and the Rise of Modern Mormonism. Salt Lake City, Utah: University of Utah Press. 2005. p. 60. ISBN 0780874808223. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: invalid prefix (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  129. ^ Ostling, Richard and Joan (1999). Mormon America. Harper Collins. pp. 103–105.
  130. ^ Smith, Darron (2004). Black and Mormon. p. 7. ISBN 025202947X. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |pulbisher= ignored (|publisher= suggested) (help)
  131. ^ Quinn, Michael (1997). The Mormon Hierarchy: Extensions of Power. Signature Books. pp. 182–183, 790–810. ISBN 1560850604.
  132. ^ Tanner, Jerald and Sandra (1979). The Changing World of Mormonism. Moody Press. p. 226-257. ISBN 0802412343.
  133. ^ Ostling, Richard and Joan (1999). Mormon America. Harper Collins. pp. 60–63.
  134. ^ Compton, Todd (1997). In Sacred Loneliness: The Plural Wives of Joseph Smith. Signature Books. ISBN 156085085X.
  135. ^ Compton, Todd (1997). In Sacred Loneliness: The Plural Wives of Joseph Smith. Signature Books. ISBN 156085085X.
  136. ^ Compton, Todd (1997). In Sacred Loneliness: The Plural Wives of Joseph Smith. Signature Books. pp. 486–534, 457–472, 342–363. ISBN 156085085X.
  137. ^ Compton, Todd (1997). In Sacred Loneliness: The Plural Wives of Joseph Smith. Signature Books. pp. 457–485. ISBN 156085085X.
  138. ^ a b "Todd Compton responds to the Jerald and Sandra Tanner's 'review' of his book on Joseph Smith's plural marriages". Retrieved 2007-12-07.
  139. ^ Compton, Todd (1997). In Sacred Loneliness: The Plural Wives of Joseph Smith. Signature Books. p. 640. ISBN 156085085X.
  140. ^ Thumma, Scott (2004). Gay Religion. Rowman Altamira. pp. 99–113. ISBN 0759103267.
  141. ^ "Affirmation: a Gay and Lesbian Mormon organization". Retrieved 2007-12-06.
  142. ^ Ostling, Richard and Joan (1999). Mormon America. Harper Collins. p. 368. ISBN 0060663715.
  143. ^ Ostling, Richard and Joan (1999). Mormon America. Harper Collins. p. 172. ISBN 0060663715.
  144. ^ Holland, Jeffrey R. "Helping Those Who Struggle with Same-Gender Attraction". Ensign, October 2007, pp. 42-45. See [3]
  145. ^ "God Loveth His Children". Retrieved 2007-12-07.
  146. ^ Quinn, D. Michael (2001). Same-Sex Dynamics Among Nineteenth-Century Americans: A Mormon Example. University of Illinois Press. pp. 195–264. ISBN 0252069587.
  147. ^ George L. Mitton, Rhett S. James A Response to D. Michael Quinn's Homosexual Distortion of Latter-day Saint History Review of Same-Sex Dynamics among Nineteenth-Century Americans: A Mormon Example by D. Michael Quinn Provo, Utah: Maxwell Institute, 1998. Pp. 141–263

References

  • Beckwith, Francis (2002). The New Mormon Challenge. Zondervan. p. 367-396. ISBN 0310231949.
  • Bennett, John C. (2000). The History of the Saints: Or An Exposé of Joe Smith and Mormonism. University of Illinois Press. ISBN 025202589X.
  • Brodie, Fawn M. (1995). No Man Knows My History: The Life of Joseph Smith. Vintage. ISBN 0679730540.
  • Compton, Todd (1997). In Sacred Loneliness: The Plural Wives of Joseph Smith. Signature Books. ISBN 156085085X.
  • Krakauer, John (2003). Under the Banner of Heaven: A Story of Violent Faith. Doubleday. ISBN 0385509510.
  • Ostling, Richard and Joan (1999). Mormon America. Harper Collins. ISBN 0060663715.
  • Persuitte, David (2000). Joseph Smith and the Origins of the Book of Mormon (2nd Edition). McFarland & Company. ISBN 078640826X.
  • Quinn, D. Michael (1994). The Morman Hierarchy: Origins of Power. Signature Books. ISBN 1560850566.
  • Quinn, D. Michael (1997). The Morman Hierarchy: Extensions of Power. Signature Books. ISBN 1560850604.
  • Tanner, Jerald and Sandra (1979). The Changing World of Mormonism. Moody Press. ISBN 0802412343. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  • Tanner, Jerald and Sandra (1987). Mormonism - Shadow or Reality?. Utah Lighthouse Ministry. ISBN 9993074438. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  • Wolverton, Susan (2004). Having Visions: The Book of Mormon : Translated and Exposed in Plain English. Algora. ISBN 0875863108.

Critical websites

Apologetic websites

See also

Notable critics

Notable apologists

Other Criticisms

Miscellaneous