Jump to content


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Divining rod)
A dowser, from an 18th-century French book about superstitions

Dowsing is a type of divination employed in attempts to locate ground water, buried metals or ores, gemstones, oil, claimed radiations (radiesthesia),[1] gravesites,[2] malign "earth vibrations"[3] and many other objects and materials without the use of a scientific apparatus. It is also known as divining (especially in water divining),[4] doodlebugging[5] (particularly in the United States, in searching for petroleum or treasure)[6] or water finding, or water witching (in the United States).

A Y-shaped twig or rod, or two L-shaped ones called dowsing rods or divining rods are normally used, and the motion of these are said to reveal the location of the target material. The motion of such dowsing devices is generally attributed to random movement, or to the ideomotor phenomenon,[7][8][9] a psychological response where a subject makes motions unconsciously.

The scientific evidence shows that dowsing is no more effective than random chance.[10][11] It is therefore regarded as a pseudoscience.


Early divination and religion[edit]

Dowsing for metal ore, from 1556 "De re metallica libri XII" book
Use of a divining Rod observed in Great Britain in the late 18th century

Dowsing originated in ancient times, when it was treated as a form of divination. The Catholic Church, however, banned the practice completely.[12]

Reformer Martin Luther perpetuated the Catholic ban, in 1518 listing divining for metals as an act that broke the first commandment (i.e., as occultism).[12][13]

Old texts about searching for water do not mention using the divining twig, and the first account of this practice was in 1568.[14][15] Sir William F. Barrett wrote in his 1911 book Psychical Research that:

...in a recent admirable Life of St. Teresa of Spain, the following incident is narrated: Teresa in 1568 was offered the site for a convent to which there was only one objection, there was no water supply; happily, a Friar Antonio came up with a twig in his hand, stopped at a certain spot and appeared to be making the sign of the cross; but Teresa says, "Really I cannot be sure if it were the sign he made, at any rate he made some movement with the twig and then he said, ' Dig just here '; they dug, and lo ! a plentiful fount of water gushed forth, excellent for 'drinking, copious for washing, and it never ran dry.' " As the writer of this Life remarks: "Teresa, not having heard of dowsing, has no explanation for this event", and regarded it as a miracle. This, I believe, is the first historical reference to dowsing for water.[16][17]

In 1662, divining with rods was declared to be "superstitious, or rather satanic" by a Jesuit, Gaspar Schott, though he later noted that he was not sure that the devil was always responsible for the movement of the rod.[18] In southern France in the 17th century, it was used to track criminals and heretics. Its abuse led to a decree of the inquisition in 1701, forbidding its employment for purposes of justice.[19]

An epigram by Samuel Sheppard, from Epigrams theological, philosophical, and romantick (1651) runs thus:

Some Sorcerers do boast they have a Rod,
Gather'd with Vowes and Sacrifice,
And (borne about) will strangely nod
To hidden Treasure where it lies;
Mankind is (sure) that Rod divine,
For to the Wealthiest (ever) they incline.

— Virgula divina

Modern dowsing[edit]

Dowsing practices used in an attempt to locate metals are still performed much like they were during the 16th century.[20] The 1550 edition of Sebastian Münster's Cosmographia contains a woodcut of a dowser with forked rod in hand walking over a cutaway image of a mining operation. The rod is labeled in Latin and German; "Virgula Divina Glück-Rüt" ('Rod Divine, Luck-Rod'), but there is no text accompanying the woodcut. By 1556, Georgius Agricola's treatment of mining and smelting of ore, De Re Metallica, included a detailed description of dowsing for metal ore.[21]

...There are many great contentions between miners concerning the forked twig, for some say that it is of the greatest use in discovering veins, and others deny it. ... All alike grasp the forks of the twig with their hands, clenching their fists, it being necessary that the clenched fingers should be held toward the sky in order that the twig should be raised at that end where the two branches meet. Then they wander hither and thither at random through mountainous regions. It is said that the moment they place their feet on a vein the twig immediately turns and twists, and so by its action discloses the vein; when they move their feet again and go away from that spot the twig becomes once more immobile. ...[22]

In the 16th century, German deep mining technology was in enormous demand all over Europe. German miners were licensed to live and work in England;[23] particularly in the Stannaries (tin mines) of Devon and Cornwall and in Cumbria. In other parts of England, the technique was used in the royal mines for calamine. By 1638 German miners were recorded using the technique in silver mines in Wales.[24]

The Middle Low German name for a forked stick (Y-rod) was Schlag-Ruthe[25][26] ('striking rod').[27] This was translated in the sixteenth century Cornish dialect to duschen[28][clarification needed] (duschan according to William Barrett[27]) (Middle English, 'to strike, fall'[29]). By the seventeenth century the English term dowsing was coming into common use.[30]

In the lead-mining area of the Mendip Hills in Somerset, England in the 17th century the natural philosopher Robert Boyle, inspired by the writings of Agricola, watched a practitioner try to find "latent veins of metals". Boyle saw the hazel divining rod (virgula divinatoria) stoop in the hands of the diviner, who protested that he was not applying any force to the twig; Boyle accepted the man's genuine belief but himself remained unconvinced.[31] Towards the end of the century, in 1691 the philosopher John Locke, who was born in the English West Country, used the term deusing-rod for the Old Latin name virgula divina.[32] So, dowse is synonymous with strike, hence the phrases: to dowse/strike a light,[33] to dowse/strike a sail.[34]

Dowsing was conducted in South Dakota in the late 19th and early 20th centuries to help homesteaders, farmers and ranchers locate water wells on their property.[35]

The military have occasionally resorted to dowsing techniques. In the First World War Gallipoli campaign, sapper Kelly[who?] became well known for finding water for the British troops.[36] In the late 1960s during the Vietnam War, some United States Marines used dowsing when locating weapons and tunnels.[37] As late as in 1986, when 31 soldiers were taken by an avalanche during an operation in the NATO drill Anchor Express in Vassdalen, Norway, the Norwegian army attempted to locate soldiers buried in the avalanche using dowsing as a search method.[38]

Dowsing is still used by some farmers and water engineers in Britain; however, many of the country's utilities have distanced themselves from the practice.[39][40][41][42][43]

Postulated mechanisms[edit]

Early attempts at an explanation of dowsing were based on the notion that the divining rod was physically affected by emanations from substances of interest. The following explanation is from William Pryce's 1778 Mineralogia Cornubiensis:

The corpuscles... that rise from the Minerals, entering the rod, determine it to bow down, in order to render it parallel to the vertical lines which the effluvia describe in their rise. In effect the Mineral particles seem to be emitted from the earth; now the Virgula [rod], being of a light porous wood, gives an easy passage to these particles, which are also very fine and subtle; the effluvia then driven forwards by those that follow them, and pressed at the same time by the atmosphere incumbent on them, are forced to enter the little interstices between the fibres of the wood, and by that effort they oblige it to incline, or dip down perpendicularly, to become parallel with the little columns which those vapours form in their rise.

A study towards the end of the 19th century concluded that the phenomenon was attributed to cryptesthesia, where the practitioner makes unconscious observations of the terrain and involuntarily influences the movement of the rod.[44] Early investigations by members of the Society for Psychical Research endorsed this view.[45]

Committed parapsychologist G. N. M. Tyrrell also believed that the action of the rod was caused by involuntary muscular movements and debunked the theory of external influences.[46]

Dowsing over maps, prior to visiting the site, was also believed to work, hence some kind of clairvoyance was proposed. This was believed to act on the nervous system, rather than on the muscles directly. These various mechanisms remain in contention among dowsers.[45]

Fraudulent security devices[edit]

Skeptic James Randi at a lecture at Rockefeller University, on October 10, 2008, holding a US$800 device advertised as a dowsing instrument

In the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries a number of dowsing-like devices were marketed for modern police and military use, primarily as explosive detectors, such as the ADE 651, Sniffex, and the GT200.[47][48] In consequence of these frauds, in 1999 the United States National Institute of Justice issued advice against buying equipment based on dowsing.[49]


The device used by a dowser is typically referred to as a dowsing or divining rod, even though it may not be rod-shaped.[4]

Dowsing twig[edit]

George Casely uses a hazel twig to search for water on the land around his Devon farm, 1942.

Traditionally, the most common method used is the dowsing twig, a forked (Y-shaped) branch from a tree or bush. Some dowsers prefer branches from particular trees, and some prefer the branches to be freshly cut. Hazel twigs in Europe and witch-hazel in the United States are traditionally commonly chosen, as are branches from willow or peach trees. The two ends on the forked side are held one in each hand with the third (the stem of the Y) pointing straight ahead. The dowser then walks slowly over the places where he suspects the target (for example, minerals or water) may be, and the dowsing rod is expected to dip, incline or twitch when a discovery is made.[30] This method is sometimes known as "willow witching." Some dowsers would hang a golden ring on the edge of the dowsing rod, or split the tip to slide in a silver coin.[50]

Pair of rods[edit]

Two L-shaped metal wire rods

Many modern dowsers use a pair of L-shaped metal rods. One rod is held in each hand, with the short arm of the L held upright, and the long arm pointing forward. The upright arm is often free to rotate inside a tube. When something is "found," the rods move in synchrony. Depending on the dowser, they may cross over or swing apart.[4] If the object is long and straight, such as a water pipe, the rods may point in opposite directions, showing its orientation. The rods may be fashioned from wire coat hangers or wire flags used for locating utilities. Glass or plastic rods have also been accepted. Straight rods are also sometimes used for the same purposes, and were common in early 19th century New England.


A pendulum weight on a short cord or thread is the tool of choice for many modern dowsers.[4][obsolete source] The dowser holds the cord in one hand and allows the pendulum to swing freely. The dowser then observes how the pendulum is swinging and interprets the motion to offer insights.[51]


  • Dowsing studies from the early twentieth century were examined by geologist John Walter Gregory in a report for the Smithsonian Institution. Gregory concluded that the results were a matter of chance or explained by observations from ground surface clues.[52][53]
  • Geologist W. A. MacFadyen tested three dowsers during 1943–1944 in Algeria. The results were entirely negative.[54]
  • A 1948 study in New Zealand by P. A. Ongley tested 75 dowsers' ability to detect water. None of them was more reliable than chance. According to Ongley "not one showed the slightest accuracy."[55]
  • Archaeometrist Martin Aitken tested British dowser P. A. Raine in 1959. Raine failed to dowse the location of a buried kiln that had been identified by a magnetometer.[56][57]
  • In 1971, dowsing experiments were organized by British engineer R. A. Foulkes on behalf of the Ministry of Defence. The results were "no more reliable than a series of guesses".[58]
  • Physicists John Taylor and Eduardo Balanovski reported in 1978 a series of experiments they conducted that searched for unusual electromagnetic fields emitted by dowsing subjects; they did not detect any.[59]
  • A 1979 review by Evon Z. Vogt and Ray Hyman examined many controlled studies of dowsing for water, and found that none of them showed better than chance results.[10]
  • British academics Richard N. Bailey, Eric Cambridge, and H. Denis Briggs, carried out dowsing experiments at the grounds of various churches. They reported successful results in their book Dowsing and Church Archaeology (1988).[60] Their experiments were critically examined by archaeologist Martijn Van Leusen who suggested they were badly designed and the authors had redefined the test parameters on what was classified as a "hit" or "miss" to obtain positive results.[60]
  • A 2006 study of grave dowsing in Iowa reviewed 14 published studies and determined that none of them correctly predicted the location of human burials, and simple scientific experiments demonstrated that the fundamental principles commonly used to explain grave dowsing were incorrect.[61]
  • A randomized double-blind trial in 2012 was carried out to determine whether homeopaths were able to distinguish between Bryonia and placebo by use of a dowsing method. The results were negative.[62]

Kassel 1991 study[edit]

A 1990 double-blind study[63][64][65] was undertaken in Kassel, Germany, under the direction of the Gesellschaft zur Wissenschaftlichen Untersuchung von Parawissenschaften (Society for the Scientific Investigation of the Parasciences). James Randi offered a US$10,000 prize to any successful dowser. The three-day test of some thirty dowsers involved plastic pipes through which water flow could be controlled and directed. The pipes were buried 50 centimeters (19.7 in) under a level field, the position of each marked on the surface with a colored strip. The dowsers had to tell whether water was running through each pipe. All the dowsers signed a statement agreeing this was a fair test of their abilities and that they expected a 100% success rate. However, the results were no better than chance, and no one was awarded the prize.

Betz 1990 study[edit]

In a 1987–88 study in Munich by Hans-Dieter Betz and other scientists, 500 dowsers were initially tested for their skill, and the experimenters selected the best 43 among them for further tests. Water was pumped through a pipe on the ground floor of a two-story barn. Before each test, the pipe was moved in a direction perpendicular to the water flow. On the upper floor, each dowser was asked to determine the position of the pipe. Over two years, the dowsers performed 843 such tests and, of the 43 pre-selected and extensively tested candidates, at least 37 showed no dowsing ability. The results from the remaining 6 were said to be better than chance, resulting in the experimenters' conclusion that some dowsers "in particular tasks, showed an extraordinarily high rate of success, which can scarcely if at all be explained as due to chance … a real core of dowser-phenomena can be regarded as empirically proven."[66]

Five years after the Munich study was published, Jim T. Enright, a professor of physiology who emphasized correct data analysis procedure, contended that the study's results are merely consistent with statistical fluctuations and not significant. He believed the experiments provided "the most convincing disproof imaginable that dowsers can do what they claim",[67] stating that the data analysis was "special, unconventional and customized". Replacing it with "more ordinary analyses",[68] he noted that the best dowser was on average 4 millimeters (0.16 in) out of 10 meters (32.81 ft) closer to a mid-line guess, an advantage of 0.04%, and that the five other "good" dowsers were on average farther than a mid-line guess. Enright emphasized that the experimenters should have decided beforehand how to statistically analyze the results; if they only afterward chose the statistical analysis that showed the greatest success, then their conclusions would not be valid until replicated by another test analyzed by the same method. He further pointed out that the six "good" dowsers did not perform any better than chance in separate tests.[69] Another study published in Pathophysiology hypothesized that such experiments as this one that were carried out in the twentieth century could have been interfered with by man-made radio frequency radiation, as test subjects' bodies absorbed the radio waves and unconscious hand movement reactions took place following the standing waves or intensity variations.[70]

Scientific reception[edit]

Ideomotor phenomenon[edit]

Science writers such as William Benjamin Carpenter (1877), Millais Culpin (1920), and Martin Gardner (1957) accept the view of some dowsers[71] that the movement of dowsing rods is the result of unconscious muscular action.[72][73][74] This view is widely accepted amongst the scientific community.[7][8][75][76] The dowsing apparatus is known to amplify slight movements of the hands caused by a phenomenon known as the ideomotor response: people's subconscious minds may influence their bodies without consciously deciding to take action. This would make the dowsing rod susceptible to the dowsers' subconscious knowledge or perception; and also to confirmation bias.[7][77][78][79][80]


Dowsing is in all other respects considered to be a pseudoscience.[81][82][83]

Psychologist David Marks in a 1986 article in Nature included dowsing in a list of "effects which until recently were claimed to be paranormal but which can now be explained from within orthodox science."[84] Specifically, dowsing could be explained in terms of sensory cues, expectancy effects, and probability.[84]

Science writer Peter Daempfle has noted that when dowsing is subjected to scientific testing, it fails. Daempfle has written that although some dowsers claim success, this can be attributed to the underground water table being distributed relatively uniformly in certain areas.[85]

According to archaeologist Kenneth Feder, "the vast majority of archaeologists don't use dowsing, because they don't believe it works."[57]

Psychologist Chris French has noted that "dowsing does not work when it is tested under properly controlled conditions that rule out the use of other cues to indicate target location."[76]

Water dowsers often achieve good results because random chance has a high probability of finding water in favorable terrain.[86]

Notable dowsers[edit]

Otto Edler von Graeve in 1913

Notable dowsers include:

See also[edit]


  1. ^ As translated from one preface of the Kassel experiments, "roughly 10,000 active dowsers in Germany alone can generate a conservatively-estimated annual revenue of more than 100 million DM (US$50 million)". GWUP-Psi-Tests 2004: Keine Million Dollar für PSI-Fähigkeiten Archived April 10, 2005, at the Wayback Machine (in German) and English version Archived August 14, 2007, at the Wayback Machine.
  2. ^ Pellwel, Calvin E (May 19, 2022). "What Is Dowsing? - The Ancient Practice For Treasure Hunting". Archived from the original on March 26, 2023. Retrieved June 19, 2022.
  3. ^ "Bad vibrations: what's the evidence for geopathic stress?". the Guardian. 2015-08-20. Archived from the original on 2023-03-26. Retrieved 2022-11-18.
  4. ^ a b c d Inglis (1986), pp. 245–246
  5. ^ "Dowsing, Doodlebugging, and Water Witching". Association of Independent Readers and Rootworkers Wiki. Archived from the original on 12 October 2011. Retrieved 11 October 2011.
  6. ^ Lyman, Thomas G. (1967). "Water Dowsing as a Surviving Folk Tradition". Keystone Folklore Quarterly. 12: 137. Archived from the original on 2023-03-11. Retrieved 2022-06-25 – via HathiTrust.
  7. ^ a b c Zusne, Leonard; Jones, Warren H. (1989). Anomalistic Psychology: A Study of Magical Thinking. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. pp. 105–110. ISBN 978-0-805-80507-9
  8. ^ a b Novella, Steve; Deangelis, Perry. (2002). Dowsing. In Michael Shermer. The Skeptic Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience. ABC-CLIO. pp. 93–94. ISBN 1-57607-654-7 "Despite widespread belief, careful investigation has demonstrated that the technique of dowsing simply does not work. No researcher has been able to prove under controlled conditions that dowsing has any genuine divining power... A more likely explanation for the movement of a dowser's focus is the ideomotor effect, which entails involuntary and unconscious motor behavior."
  9. ^ Lawson, T. J; Crane, L. L. (2014). Dowsing Rods Designed to Sharpen Critical Thinking and Understanding of Ideomotor Action. Teaching of Psychology 41 (1): 52–56.
  10. ^ a b Vogt, Evon Z.; Ray Hyman (1979). Water Witching U.S.A. (2nd ed.). Chicago: Chicago University Press. ISBN 978-0-226-86297-2. via Hines, Terence (2003). Pseudoscience and the Paranormal (Second ed.). Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books. p. 420. ISBN 978-1-57392-979-0.
  11. ^ Regal, Brian. (2009). Pseudoscience: A Critical Encyclopedia. Greenwood Press. pp. 55–57. ISBN 978-0-313-35507-3
  12. ^ a b Inglis (1986) pp. 246–247.
  13. ^ Decem praecepta Wittenbergensi populo praedicta, Martin Luther
  14. ^ Hill, Sharon A. (19 March 2017). "Witching for water". Spooky Geology. Archived from the original on 2017-03-20. Retrieved 2017-04-07.
  15. ^ Sharon A. Hill (2017-03-26). "15 Credibility Street #13". Doubtful News (Podcast). Retrieved 2017-04-07.
  16. ^ Barrett, William (1911). Psychical Research. New York and London: Henry Holt & Co. (N.Y.), Williams and Norgate (London). p. 171. Retrieved 2 January 2018.
  17. ^ of Avila, Saint, Teresa of (1573). The book of the foundations of S. Teresa of Jesus of the Order of our Lady of Carmel, with the visitation of nunneries, the rule and constitutions. University of Toronto – Robarts Library: London, Baker. p. 116. Retrieved 14 February 2018.
  18. ^ Michel Eugène Chevreul, De La Baguette Divinatoire du pendule dit explorateur at des table tournants au point de vue de l'histoire, de la critique, and de la méthode expérimentale, Paris, 1854. "Le père Gaspard Schott (jés.) considère l'usage de la baguette comme superstitieux ou plutôt diabolique, mais des renseignements qui lui furent donnés plus tard par des hommes qu'il considérait comme religieux et probe, lui firent dire dans une notation à ce passage, qu'il ne voudrait pas assurer que le demon fait toujours tourner la baguette." (Physica Curiosa, 1662, lib. XII, cap. IV, pag. 1527). See facsimile Archived 2023-09-05 at the Wayback Machine on Google Books
  19. ^  One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainChisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Divining-rod". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 8 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 333–334.
  20. ^ Baring-Gould, S. (Sabine) (May 26, 1876). "Curious myths of the Middle Ages". London, Rivingtons – via Internet Archive.
  21. ^ William Barrett and Theodore Besterman. The Divining Rod: An Experimental and Psychological Investigation. (1926) Kessinger Publishing, 2004: p. 7
  22. ^ Agricola, Georgius (1556). De Re Metallica (tr. Herbert Hoover, 1950, Dover Publications, New York ed.). Basel. pp. 38ff. Retrieved 11 May 2018.
  23. ^ "Cornwall and West Devon Mining Landscape". Archived from the original on 2020-08-02. Retrieved 2019-12-26.
  24. ^ Gough, John Weidhofft (1930). The Mines of Mendip. Oxford University Press. p. 6. OCLC 163035417.
  25. ^ "Wiktionary entry for schlag". Archived from the original on 28 January 2018. Retrieved 13 January 2018.
  26. ^ "Wiktionary entry for ruthe". Archived from the original on 29 January 2018. Retrieved 13 January 2018.
  27. ^ a b Barrett, William (1911). Psychical Research. New York and London: Henry Holt & Co. (N.Y.), Williams and Norgate (London). p. 170. Retrieved 2 January 2018. Now, the colloquial German word for the rod was then schlag-ruthe or striking-rod; this, translated into the Middle English became the duschan or striking rod, and finally "deusing or dowsing rod".
  28. ^ Stratmann, Francis (1891). A Middle-English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. p. 182. Retrieved 15 January 2018. duschen, v., ? = M.L.G. duschen; =dweschen; strike, beat; dusched {pret.) Ar. & Mer. 5624; A. P. ii. 1538; dusched a doun ... hure fon Fer. 3068; see daschen, dusching, sb., tumbling; ... dinning and dusching of sinfulle PR. C. 7350.
  29. ^ Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Dowser and Dowsing" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 8 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 461.
  30. ^ a b Inglis (1986)
  31. ^ Boyle, Robert (1661). "On Unsucceeding Experiments". Works. Vol. One (1743 ed.). Thomas Birch. pp. 342–343.
  32. ^ Locke, John (1824). Some considerations of the consequences of lowering the interest, and raising the value of money. In a letter sent to a Member of Parliament, in the year 1691. Archived from the original on 5 September 2023. Retrieved 15 January 2018. That four per cent. is not of the nature of the deusing-rod, or virgula divina, able to discover mines of gold and silver, I believe will easily be granted me.
  33. ^ Skeat, Walter W. (2005). An Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, Inc. p. 181. ISBN 978-0486317656. Archived from the original on 5 September 2023. Retrieved 19 January 2018. DOWSE (3), to extinguish. (E.) A cant term; dowse the glim, i.e. to extinguish the light. Probably only a particular use of dowse (1), to strike. Possibly suggested by dout, to extinguish.
  34. ^ Barrett, William (1911). Psychical Research. New York and London: Henry Holt & Co. (N.Y.), Williams and Norgate (London). p. 170. Retrieved 19 January 2018. To dowse or " strike " the sail is still a common expression in Cornwall
  35. ^ Grace Fairchild and Walker D. Wyman, Frontier Woman: The Life of a Woman Homesteader on the Dakota Frontier (River Falls: University of Wisconsin-River Falls Press, 1972), 50; Robert Amerson, From the Hidewood: Memories of a Dakota Neighborhood (St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society Press, 1996), 290–298.
  36. ^ Inglis (1986), p.248
  37. ^ FIX ME (could not access entire article) Claudia Sandlin (1989-11-30). "Divining Ways; Dowsers Use Ancient Art in Many Kinds of Searches". Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2012-10-22. [Louis Matacia] worked as a Marine Corps analyst at Quantico during The Vietnam War teaching Marines how to dowse...
  38. ^ Rolf Manne (2005). "Ønskekvist i snøskred – psevdovitenskap i praksis?". Pseudovitenskap og Etikk, published at Norwegian University of Science and Technology. p. 45. Archived from the original on 2018-01-26. Retrieved 2018-01-25.
  39. ^ California Farmers Hire Dowsers to Find Water Archived 2014-03-02 at the Wayback Machine, ABC news
  40. ^ Marks, Ben. "Our Dad, the Water Witch of Wyoming". Collectors Weekly. Archived from the original on 2021-04-22. Retrieved 2021-05-26.
  41. ^ Scientist finds UK water companies use 'magic' to find leaks Archived 2018-06-14 at the Wayback Machine, BBC Oxford, 21 November 2017. (retrieved 21 November 2017)
  42. ^ Matthew Weaver, UK water firms admit using divining rods to find leaks and pipes Archived 2017-11-21 at the Wayback Machine, The Guardian, 21 November 2017.
  43. ^ Camila Domonoske, U.K. Water Companies Sometimes Use Dowsing Rods To Find Pipes Archived 2017-11-22 at the Wayback Machine, The Two-Way, NPR, 21 November 2017.
  44. ^ Pass, A.C.; Tawney, Edward. B. (1876). "The divining rod". Proceedings. I. Bristol Naturalists' Society: 60 et seq.
  45. ^ a b Inglis (1986), pp.254-5.
  46. ^ Tyrrell, G. N. M. (1938). Science and Psychical Phenomena, Methuen, London.
  47. ^ Double-Blind Field Evaluation of the MOLE Programmable Detection System, Sandia National Laboratories Archived November 4, 2009, at the Wayback Machine
  48. ^ Nordland, Rod (November 4, 2009). "Iraq Swears by Bomb Detector U.S. Sees as Useless". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 15, 2011. Retrieved February 15, 2017.
  49. ^ "Guide for the Selection of Commercial Explosives Detection Systems for Law Enforcement Applications (NIJ Guide 100-99), Chapter 7. Warning: Do Not Buy Bogus Explosives Detection Equipment" (PDF). September 1999. pp. 71–72. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-02-27. Retrieved 2022-02-25.
  50. ^ Randolph, Vance (2012). Ozark Magic and Folklore. Dover Publications. ISBN 978-1-306-33958-2. OCLC 868269974.
  51. ^ William Bown; "Science: The physics of a dowsing pendulum Archived 2022-02-23 at the Wayback Machine", New Scientist, 6 October 1990.
  52. ^ Gregory, J. W. (1928). Water Divining. Annual Report of the Smithsonian Institution. United States Government Printing Office. pp. 325–348.
  53. ^ Mill, Hugh Robert. (1927) Belief and Evidence in Water Divining. Nature 120: 882–884.
  54. ^ MacFadyen, W. A. (1946). Some Water Divining in Algeria. Nature 157: 304–305.
  55. ^ Ongley, P. (1948). "New Zealand Diviners". New Zealand Journal of Science and Technology. 30: 38–54. via Hines, Terence (2003). Pseudoscience and the Paranormal (Second ed.). Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. p. 420. ISBN 978-1-57392-979-0.
  56. ^ Aitken, M. J. (1959). Test for Correlation Between Dowsing Response and Magnetic Disturbance. Archaeometry 2: 58–59.
  57. ^ a b Feder, Kenneth L. (2010). Encyclopedia of Dubious Archaeology: From Atlantis to Walam Olum. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 93. ISBN 978-0-313-37918-5
  58. ^ Foulkes, R. A. (1971). Dowsing Experiments. Nature 229: 163–168.
  59. ^ Taylor, J. G.; Balanovski, E. (1978). "Can electromagnetism account for extra-sensory phenomena?". Nature. 276 (5683): 64–67. Bibcode:1978Natur.276...64B. doi:10.1038/276064a0. PMID 740020. S2CID 4316473.
  60. ^ a b Leusen, Martijn Van. (1998). Dowsing and Archaeology. Archaeological Prospection 5: 123–138.
  61. ^ Whittaker, William E. "Grave Dowsing Reconsidered". Office of the State Archaeologist, University of Iowa. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 17 June 2013.
  62. ^ McCarney R, Fisher P, Spink F, Flint G, van Haselen R. (2002). Can homeopaths detect homeopathic medicines by dowsing? A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Archived 2018-05-03 at the Wayback Machine. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 95: 189–191.
  63. ^ GWUP-Psi-Tests 2004: Keine Million Dollar für PSI-Fähigkeiten Archived April 10, 2005, at the Wayback Machine (in German) and English version Archived August 14, 2007, at the Wayback Machine.
  64. ^ Konig, Robert; Moll, Jurgen; Sarma, Armadeo (January 1991). "Kassel Dowsing Test - Part 1". Skeptiker. Archived from the original on 2022-04-28. Retrieved 2021-05-26 – via Geotech - Technology for Treasure Hunting.
  65. ^ Konig, Robert; Moll, Jurgen; Sarma, Armadeo (January 1991). "Kassel Dowsing Test - Part 2". Skeptiker. Archived from the original on 2021-05-26. Retrieved 2021-05-26 – via Geotech - Technology for Treasure Hunting.
  66. ^ Wagner, H., H.-D. Betz, and H. L. König, 1990. Schlußbericht 01 KB8602, Bundesministerium für Forschung und Technologie. As quoted by Jim T. Enright Archived 2014-03-29 at the Wayback Machine in the Skeptical Inquirer.
  67. ^ Enright, Jim T. (January–February 1999). "The Failure of the Munich Experiments". Skeptical Inquirer. CSICOP. Archived from the original on 2009-11-17. Retrieved 2006-11-14. The researchers themselves concluded that the outcome unquestionably demonstrated successful dowsing abilities, but a thoughtful re-examination of the data indicates that such an interpretation can only be regarded as the result of wishful thinking.
  68. ^ Enright, J. T. (1995). "Water dowsing: The Scheunen experiments". Naturwissenschaften. 82 (8): 360–369. doi:10.1007/s001140050198.
  69. ^ Enright, J. T. (June 1996). "Dowsers lost in a Barn" (PDF). Naturwissenschaften. 83 (6). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg: 275–277. Bibcode:1996NW.....83..275E. doi:10.1007/BF01149601. ISSN 1432-1904. S2CID 8201640. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-03-28. Retrieved 2009-09-26.
  70. ^ Huttunen P, Niinimaa A, Myllylä R (2012). "Dowsing can be interfered with by radio frequency radiation". Pathophysiology. 19 (2): 89–94. doi:10.1016/j.pathophys.2012.01.004. PMID 22365422.
  71. ^ Bailey, Arthur (1999). Anyone Can Dowse For Better Health. The Publishing House, Bennetts Close, Cippenham, Berkshire, England: Quantum, an imprint of W Foulsham & Co Ltd. p. 46. ISBN 0-572-02461-4. The angle-rods are driven in exactly the same way as the forked rod: by a muscular reaction causing a slight unconscious rotation of the forearms. If the tops of the forearms rotate towards each other, then the rods will move towards each other; the opposite rotation will cause the rods to move outwards. It is the change in balance between opposing sets of muscles in the arms (flexors and extensors) that makes the rods move.
  72. ^ Carpenter, William Benjamin. (1877). Mesmerism, Spiritualism, &c. Historically & Scientifically Considered. New York: D. Appleton and Company. pp. 47–53
  73. ^ Culpin, Millais. (1920). Spiritualism and the New Psychology: An Explanation of Spiritualist Phenomena and Beliefs in Terms of Modern Knowledge. London: Edward Arnold. pp. 34–43
  74. ^ Gardner, Martin. (1957). Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science. Dover Publications. pp. 101–115. ISBN 0-486-20394-8
  75. ^ Hyman, Ray. (2003). "How People Are Fooled by Ideomotor Action" Archived 2017-05-11 at the Wayback Machine. Quackwatch.
  76. ^ a b French, Chris. (2013). "The unseen force that drives Ouija Boards and fake bomb detectors" Archived 2017-06-20 at the Wayback Machine. The Guardian.
  77. ^ Hyman, R; Vogt, E. Z. (1968). Psychologists examine the secrets of water witching. Science Digest 63 (1): 39–45.
  78. ^ Hines, Terence. (2003). Pseudoscience and the Paranormal. Prometheus Books. pp. 418–421. ISBN 1-57392-979-4
  79. ^ Hyman, Ray. (2007). Ouija, Dowsing, and Other Selections of Ideomotor Action. In. S. Della Sala. Tall Tales About the Mind & Brain: Separating Fact From Fiction. Oxford University Press. pp. 411–424
  80. ^ "Dowsing (a.k.a. water witching)" Archived 2012-06-19 at the Wayback Machine. The Skeptic's Dictionary.
  81. ^ Regal, Brian. (2009). Pseudoscience: A Critical Encyclopedia. Greenwood. pp. 56–57. ISBN 978-1591020868
  82. ^ Pigliucci, Massimo; Boudry, Maarten. (2013). Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University Of Chicago Press p. 38. ISBN 978-0-226-05196-3
  83. ^ Radford, Benjamin. (2013). "Dowsing: The Pseudoscience of Water Witching". Live Science.
  84. ^ a b Marks, David F. (March 13, 1986). "Investigating the paranormal". Nature. 320 (6058). Nature Publishing Group: 119–124. Bibcode:1986Natur.320..119M. doi:10.1038/320119a0. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 3951553. S2CID 4329580.
  85. ^ Daempfle, Peter. (2013). Good Science, Bad Science, Pseudoscience, and Just Plain Bunk: How to Tell the Difference. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. p. 115. ISBN 978-1-4422-1728-7
  86. ^ "Teach the Controversy: Dowsing". Ars Technica Videos. Archived from the original on 2019-04-10. Retrieved 2019-04-10.
  87. ^ "His Rod to Find Radium" (PDF). The New York Times. January 28, 1914. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-07-17. Retrieved 2010-07-13. Otto Edler von Graeve, who locates water and minerals with a 'divining rod,' arrived yesterday from Germany on the George Washington, ...


Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]