Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Anime and manga: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎Proposed deletions: archive completed
Line 59: Line 59:
==Proposed deletions==
==Proposed deletions==
<!-- ''no articles [[WP:PROD|proposed for deletion]] at this time'' -->
<!-- ''no articles [[WP:PROD|proposed for deletion]] at this time'' -->
*{{prodded|Wonder Festival}}
*{{prodded|List of Gundam cast members|2008-07-25}}
*{{prodded|List of Gundam cast members|2008-07-25}}
*{{prodded|List of Yu-Gi-Oh! GX cast members|2008-07-24}}
*{{prodded|List of Yu-Gi-Oh! GX cast members|2008-07-24}}

Revision as of 04:20, 27 July 2008

WikiProject
Anime and manga
v · t · e · rc
Main project page  talk
talk
Guidance
Manual of Style talk
Online sources talk
Reference libraries
 → Books talk
 → Documentaries talk
 → Magazines talk
 → Manga magazines talk
Templates talk
Articles
Departments
  Assessment talk
 → Changelog
 Cleanup talk
 → Category
 → Cleanup listing
  Deletions archive · talk
  Requests archive · talk
Topic workshop talk
   Yellow pages talk
Task forces
Biography talk
Bleach talk
Conventions talk
Digimon talk
Dragon Ball talk
Evangelion talk
Gundam talk
Haruhi Suzumiya talk
Hentai talk
Light novels Joint TF! talk
Sailor Moon talk
Studio Ghibli Joint TF! talk
Visual novels Joint TF! talk
Yu-Gi-Oh! talk
Related projects
Parent
 → WikiProject Japan
Related
 → WikiProject Animation
 → WikiProject Comics
 → WikiProject Film
 → WikiProject Television
 → WikiProject Video games
  → WikiProject Pokémon
  → WikiProject Square Enix
Other
Wikipe-tan talk
Newsletter archive
Character articles
Shortcuts
Deletion Sorting
Project

This is a list of transcluded discussions on the deletion of articles related to Anime and manga. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting.

You can help maintain the list on this page as follows (open the edit box first):

  • add a new AFD discussion (once it has already been opened on WP:AFD). Place on this page:
{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}}
Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. New entries go to the top of the list. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
{{afdl|article title|deletion debate link|debate start date (ISO format)|debate end date (ISO format)}}
  • remove an AFD from this page, which is not on a relevant subject, by deleting it.

Please note that adding an AFD to, or removing it from, this page does not add it to, or remove it from, the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page, before adding it to this page.

It is also helpful to:

  • tag an AFD, once it is on this page, by adding to it:
{{subst:delsort|Anime and manga}} <small>—~~~~</small>
  • If you wish, you can automate this task by adding {{subst:deltab|Anime and manga}} to your monobook.js file. See Template:Deltab for instructions.
  • This tag will display a note that the AFD has been listed here (in addition to the main AFD page).


 {{{linktext}}}

 {{{linktext}}}

 {{{linktext}}}

 {{{linktext}}}

 {{{linktext}}}

Related deletion sorting


Deletion Archive   Deletion Archive


Anime and manga

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 22:27, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Neon Genesis Evangelion voice actors

List of Neon Genesis Evangelion voice actors (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD)

Disputed prod. Information about voice actors and the characters they portray are already incorporated in the character summaries, either on the main article, a list of characters article, or the individual character articles, as directed by WP:MOS-AM#Sections. Because of this, there is no point in keeping a separate "cast list" article and the list does not serve a useful purpose. --Farix (Talk) 16:08, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: we typically do not include information on any language dubs or translations aside from Japanese and English; the most mention this information typically gets is within the infobox and maybe a few sentences in the prose. If anything, this information should be transwikied to the appropriate foreign-language Wikipedias. —Dinoguy1000 22:23, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Scientizzle 16:19, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Neon Genesis Evangelion topics

AfDs for this article:
List of Neon Genesis Evangelion topics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD)

Disputed prod. List is redundant to the navigational template {{Neon Genesis Evangelion}}. --Farix (Talk) 15:15, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:01, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Zatch Bell! cast members

List of Zatch Bell! cast members (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD)

Information about voice actors and the characters they portray are already incorporated in the character summaries, either on the main article or in a list of characters article, as directed by WP:MOS-AM#Sections. Because of this, there is no point in keeping a separate "cast list" article and the list does not serve a useful purpose. --Farix (Talk) 15:03, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The information in the article is already included in the List of Zatch Bell! characters page as well as the pages for specific characters. That's why it's being put up for deletion, not because of notability concerns. Gelmax (talk) 19:57, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete regretfully, because I worked hard on it (and was the one who removed the prod), but TheFarix made a valid point, unlike Dinoguy whose "redundant to other article" did not constitute an argument. In any case, prod's should not be placed on article deletions which may prove controversial and it should have been brought here from the start. JuJube (talk) 12:26, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment the prod was in no way controversial - just to be sure of that, I put another, single voice actor list through prod a few days ago with basically the same rationale, and it was deleted at the end of the five-day period, which also invalidates your other comment. There are about seven or eight voice actor lists prodded ATM, and of the two or three of the original group that were disputed, this is the only one that was disputed for my rationale being a nonargument. —Dinoguy1000 16:40, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 03:40, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Naru 2 U

Naru 2 U (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD)

Non-notable convention that has not held it's first event. No reliable third-party source to support the article, as required by WP:V. Prod was disputed by original author. --Farix (Talk) 14:47, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I'm not sure why this keeps getting marked for deletion. The con's official site is referenced. I've also submitted an entry to AnimeCons.com, which should be up within a week. --AceStarleaf (talk) 15:46, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Did you not read the reasoning I gave? The convention is not notable and has not held its first event. There are no reliable third-party sources that supports anything in the article or to assert the conventions notability. A single webPAGE with only a date and location can't be used as a source because anyone could have bought the domain and threw that page up. All other anime conventions have well developed sites that provide more then just a date and location. And AnimeCons.com does require more then just a single webpage, but a fully developed site before they add a convention to their list. But even a listing on AnimeCons.com isn't enough to establish notability as that site is an online directory. And let me also add that a Google search for "Naru 2 U" did not bring up a single hit. Not even from a web forum or blog. --Farix (Talk) 16:15, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Google won't show the site yet as it's not cross linked on any other sites, and the domain itself is only about 2 days old. I have submitted the site to Google already, and a better laid out page is in the works. I figured a Splash Page with the date and location would be better than the "Under Construction" pages most domain hosts put up for a new domain. --AceStarleaf (talk) 13:06, 25 July 2008 (EST)
  • Comment And you just provided more evidence as to why this convention isn't notable yet. In probably now falls under the speedy deletion criteria. --Farix (Talk) 17:16, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment If you only just thought this con up yourself, it's too early to make an article about it. Right now, it's nothing more than just advertising, and considering that you kicked the internet advertising into full gear before you'd even finished your own site, one has to doubt whether the con will even happen at all, let alone perform well. Gelmax (talk) 17:50, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I agree that the article isn't up to any kind of standards now, but like the nominator acknowledged, it's about an event that hasn't happened yet. In other words, while there may not be any reliable sources now, there will be in a couple of months, and it will almost definitely be notable after it's happened. The question, then, is whether we need to go out of our way to delete an article that'll just be remade again before the end of the year. Since it's already here, per WP:WIP and WP:DEADLINE, I think it's worth taking the long-term view and letting it sit till the news articles show up; it's not like it's a stinking blemish on the perfection of Wikipedia or even just the anime/manga articles, after all. Of course, if this article was clearly going to remain this poor forever or even just for a long period of time, prodding it four hours after its creation would be justified. But anime conventions are considered notable, so it's really just a question of what to do with the article in the four months until it attains official and undeniable notability. Gelmax (talk) 16:43, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Sure, according to a strict reading of policy that's the case, but it doesn't account for WP:IAR. It's guaranteed that any real convention will be reported on by news sites enough to be considered notable, since it a con is in fact a significant event. This isn't about whether the article meets the regulations NOW, but what we should do with it in the time until it does meet regulations. Deletion policies generally don't allow for future improvement and shouldn't be blindly followed in a case like this where future improvement is guaranteed. Besides, the page has been here for less than a day. Quick-draw deletions like this one should be reserved for undebatable, unimprovable trash, which this page isn't. Gelmax (talk) 17:50, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Yesh, if you guys want to be this Draconian about it then delete it. I will be re-posting it on Nov 16th after it meets the missing Notability Criteria your complaining about.--AceStarleaf (talk) 18:02, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: It's not about being draconian, as you put it. We have Notability guidelines and deletion policies that reference them for a reason. If this becomes notable on Nov 16th (by meeting the guidelines for notability-- not just for having happened), then certainly repost it. Cheers! --Storkk (talk) 18:11, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 11:40, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Yu-Gi-Oh! cast members

AfDs for this article:
List of Yu-Gi-Oh! cast members (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD)

An unorganized list of cast members. Voice actors are incorporated into the character descriptions so there is no point in keeping a separate list. --Farix (Talk) 16:24, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 23:10, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doozy Bots

Doozy Bots (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD)

Disputed prod. Prod reason: No evidence of notability. One promo video does not grant notability. There is no evidence of coverage in any reliable source. I'll also add that the article engages in a high degree of original research and does not maintain a neutral point of view. The only thing that can be verified is what is in the trailer. --Farix (Talk) 12:29, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. BJTalk 02:28, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of programs broadcast by Anime Network

List of programs broadcast by Anime Network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD)

Nothing but a list of anime titles, with one line of OR. Purely a copy of the original [1]. Wikipedia is not a mirror site for other websites, nor is it an electronic programming guide. This is not a "historically significant programme list." -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 19:11, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: that discussion - closed 16:12, 17 July 2006 — was a massive (and I do mean massive) bulk nomination. :P -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 20:10, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Anime and manga categories, templates, and misc

no categories, templates, or misc listed for deletion at this time

Proposed deletions

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Anime_and_manga&oldid=228128710"