User talk:TJ Spyke: Difference between revisions
Miroa12004 (talk | contribs) |
Miroa12004 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 345: | Line 345: | ||
I think there is no more reliable source than this, you look like an idiot when you argue on a losing case.[[User talk:Miroa12004|Miroa12004]] 24 Jan 2009 <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Miroa12004|Miroa12004]] ([[User talk:Miroa12004|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Miroa12004|contribs]]) 09:26, 24 January 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
I think there is no more reliable source than this, you look like an idiot when you argue on a losing case.[[User talk:Miroa12004|Miroa12004]] 24 Jan 2009 <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Miroa12004|Miroa12004]] ([[User talk:Miroa12004|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Miroa12004|contribs]]) 09:26, 24 January 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
Now that I added the source and edited the page, you can't do anything but shut up and leave it as it is.[[User talk:Miroa12004|Miroa12004]] |
Now that I added the source and edited the page, you can't do anything but shut up and leave it as it is.[[User talk:Miroa12004|Miroa12004]]`24 Jan 2009 comment added by [[User:Miroa12004|Miroa12004]] ([[User talk:Miroa12004|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Miroa12004|contribs]]) 16:22, 24 January 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Revision as of 14:22, 24 January 2009
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Sacrifice
The source for the tagline is Impact. They said it each week in the video packages. Couldn't find a visible source for it.--WillC 06:00, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- I checked In Demand and it was the first line of their report. I sourced it.--WillC 06:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- I just checked TNA's website and no match is placed for Against All Odds. They could have decided to change it.--WillC 03:43, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Lets wait and see. TNA had to change alot of things Monday because of injuries. They might place on Impact to fill time next week. Lets wait til they have it on the website. Also watch out for the dumb rumor that TNA and WWE are joining together which is impossible because of Panda Energy.--WillC 03:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- I as well. When they do announce it officially, don't place it in the table. It is only needed after the event but people want to force it before the event takes place on the WWE events. It is easier to edit with bullet points. I don't know who could be dumb enough to think they would be merging at all because of possible hard times for TNA when they survived their first year which was the hardest.--WillC 03:57, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Re:RR09
I sense some hostility here. You may have been "editing" PPV articles before me but I am more skilled in writing PPV's. Its The Brian Kendrick because his name is not just Brian Kendrick anymore, and that's why we pipelink his name with "The" in it because he has a new name. If it were the opposite, then The Undertaker would just be Undertaker (wrestler).--Truco 23:15, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, but its the correct way. --Truco 23:22, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Why is your opinion greater than mines? So as I see it, you're just lazy to pipe link the wikilink. If The Undertaker was (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.), and it was to be pipelinked to (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.), then you would want it "your way" and leave it as The Undertaker, which is not correct. --Truco 23:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Man you are very hostile, you always want it your way. Yes, it says the same thing, but his proper name should be linked, which includes "The", which is why I refer you back to The Undertaker's name.--Truco 23:40, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Well then read WP:THE and WP:PIPE, for my reasonings.--Truco 23:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- That is completely different, that would be like (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.).--Truco 00:09, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Well, per WP:THE, it states that the article name should have "The" if its the official name and not just added there to like The United States. So, it would be proper to rename the article if he used the name longer, but per WP:COMMONNAME he is mostly known as Brian Kendrick. According to WP:PIPE, redirects should not be piped because they can be made into subpages, but because they are the same person, this doesn't apply, so its necessary to add "The" to the link. In response to yours, the 3 letter word "The" does not make the link longer, so that can't apply to that point you pointed out.--Truco 00:23, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- That is completely different, that would be like (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.).--Truco 00:09, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Well then read WP:THE and WP:PIPE, for my reasonings.--Truco 23:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Man you are very hostile, you always want it your way. Yes, it says the same thing, but his proper name should be linked, which includes "The", which is why I refer you back to The Undertaker's name.--Truco 23:40, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Why is your opinion greater than mines? So as I see it, you're just lazy to pipe link the wikilink. If The Undertaker was (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.), and it was to be pipelinked to (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.), then you would want it "your way" and leave it as The Undertaker, which is not correct. --Truco 23:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- (outdent)I never said it wasn't, it just not as long as an extra term added there like "President" or "WWE Champion". In reality, both are correct, but seeing how it's his official name, it should be linked, but I'm tired of fighting over this, so if you want it your way, whatever dude.--Truco 00:30, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- I really don't care anymore, since there are variations, write it to your liking.--Truco 00:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
WWE championship
I changed that cause vacated reigns aren't supposed to be counted and also the "-" would make the vacant reigns more noticeable on the tables. I'm fine with your way as long as every championship history table is the same. The reigns column is kinda pointless (and confusing) as a sortable column anyway. Secretaria 02:08, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 3 | 17 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 01:09, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:TNA Wrestling.JPG)
Thanks for uploading File:TNA Wrestling.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- Sorry for the Lockdown (2008) revert of your edit. I self reverted it. I apologize. Regards, —Mattisse (Talk) 20:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
common name
You are taking common name too seriously. That rule only effects people who are widely known, like Hogan. Not people like James Storm. What is the problem with the name is parenthesis?--WillC 21:04, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Your idea contradicts the out of universe style, which does not cater to a wrestling fan. A person who reads about science and decides to learn about wrestling would not know who Allen Jones or A.J. Styles is so common name only refers to people that are widely know. i.e. the common name. Hulk Hogan is more a common name than Terry Bollea. And to go by common name you would have to add the Phenomenal A.J. Styles because that is a most common name he uses and people refer to him as such. What is the problem with adding the real names? Everywhere I go you are removing the real names for no reason. You could take Victory Road 04 to FAC and people would wonder why it is not consistent and who is A.J. Styles.--WillC 00:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, I opened a discussion to settle this once and for all. Hopefully a guideline and can be made because James Storm isn't even known by most wrestling fans in the first place. I'm about the leave anyway, I was just getting on to make sure Victory Road is not under review. In the end I believe it should only be used for big names that most know, not just an indy wrestler who has used the name for a few years.--WillC 00:29, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'll be back hopefully to finish all the TNA stuff. I didn't make all these subpages for nothing. I'm home schooled and it has been that way since 2002. I'm a junior and I must go back to school soon. I don't have time to play on the computer anymore. I'll be back whenever I'm in school. Until then I'll be retired or semi-retired. No telling when I'll be back.--WillC 01:36, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Well thought I would drop in and see what the dude said about Destination X 09. He told me he is going to take it to AFD because there is no venue for it announced yet. That is according to this: User talk:DGG#Destination X 09 Watch the page. It might be smart just to place in the WrestleView ref since they are semi-reliable and no harm will be done.--WillC 04:29, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Re:Raw
Yeah, you've been gone too long. That was like "abolished", we add it once it starts airing, its not like it wont air after it begins airing. Plus, dude seriously, 9 minutes before the show begins?? --TRUCO 01:57, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:WrestleMania 23.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:WrestleMania 23.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
if put in some new JBL Shit layfield energy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zapateiro (talk • contribs)
Dance Dance Revolution Mario Mix
That user was me... The PAL box was all I could find at the time because the box art that existed, with a third party corporate watermark, had to go according to policy. Thanks for changing that for me. æron phone home 03:50, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm assuming the rule is that American box art must be used on the English Wikipedia if it exists and there's a decent copy to be found. It was on my list of things to do before life ripped me away from Wikipedia about half a year ago. I'm trying to find an excuse to come back to at least finish what I started (The DDR series of articles). æron phone home 04:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Either way, I agree. Although some of the mutli-regional DDR games did hit Europe first. Just so you know if you get negative feedback for it in the future. In the case of Mario Mix however, it was: Japan, North America, Europe. æron phone home 04:15, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Arena Naming
How does it work then for Stadiums? I'm not being facetious here. I'm just wondering -- would you call it "The Wembley Stadium?" What differentiates using "the" for an arena from other types of venues?--ECWAGuru (talk) 00:58, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Meowth Party.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Meowth Party.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Meowth's Party
I meant serious coverage, not articles that acknowledges that they existed, like development or impressions (ie, a reliable source who believed it to be a game). - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 07:26, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Legend of Zelda
You left me a very polite letter. Thank you.
Sorry if I messed up the Legend of Zelda page but... I was not experimenting. I found this "????? ???????" of the Legend of Zelda page. I checked the source and there it was. It looked like vandalism to me so I removed it.
Now it looks like Japanese Characters. I am using the same browser with the same settings. It is, after all, only six hours later. What I am suggesting is that there was some problem. If you have any thoughts what this is about I would like to hear them.
By the way, I am not new to Wikipedia. I have been editing for three years now.
Nick Beeson (talk) 03:09, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey
Hey TJ Spyke do you have a Yahoo? Save Us.Y2J 3:48 24 January 2009
No, I mean Instant Messenger? Save Us.Y2J 3:52 24 January 2009
Oh, its ok, would you be able to help me with an article? Save Us.Y2J 3:52, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
K, thanks Save Us.Y2J 4:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Re: Zelda: TP
Trust me, the article is not ready for FAC. Either copyedit it, get a copyeditor, or wait for me and I will copyedit it when I have the time. Gary King (talk) 04:59, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
TNA Against All Odds
So I think the TNA official website at this link http://www.tnawrestling.com/component/option,com_wrapper/Itemid,181/ lists the Four Way Match as the main event and on the first line it read MAIN EVENT FOR THE TNA WORLD HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMPIONSHIP Team 3D vs. Kurt Angle vs. champion "The Icon" Sting I think there is no more reliable source than this, you look like an idiot when you argue on a losing case.Miroa12004 24 Jan 2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Miroa12004 (talk • contribs) 09:26, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Now that I added the source and edited the page, you can't do anything but shut up and leave it as it is.Miroa12004`24 Jan 2009 comment added by Miroa12004 (talk • contribs) 16:22, 24 January 2009 (UTC)