User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 33

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

Header for TOC

---

You deleted my page on "Macism", can you send me my material so I can expand on it. I need the information that I already submitted. Also, why delete it? It is real, are you someone that it applies to?

---

I'M NOT FINISHED YET, PLEASE STOP DELETING MY PAGE! —Preceding unsigned comment added by EHuman875 (talk • contribs) 04:35, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

You should create the page on your own userpage or keep previewing and adding to it until you feel it is ready to be published to Wikipedia. Editors will quickly mark short and stumpy articles for deletion if there is little material to warrant their existance. --RoyalFool (talk) 04:41, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

--The Pro Wrestling Chicago page was deleted before I could put up all the links to legitimate promotions in the Chicagoland area, along with a huge article on the area's history, dating back to the 1800's! I can't believe that there could have been any form of advertising, like the clip said about the article. It is not possible to advertise when you are not selling anything but rather are contributing to a vast data base some information that some people like to read about. I do not understand why at the very least there could not have been given some time to put up the article as proof that it is an article about history. To make matters even more confusing, the computer which we use has its IP banned and we cannot figure out two things. They are: how can you sell history? Meaning, history based articles that were to be provided for free as a part of the Wikipedia library, and also why not at least prove any wrongdoing or point any being done? This does not make sense. This isn't meant as any type of disrespect, but other articles were pulled as well, and all of the information that was to be posted is based in historical fact.

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.162.86.56 (talk) 07:16, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

---

Why did you delete the Ame page? These are a hugly significant group. They changed my life and many

Conra

what about this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FutureRP there are no Source, no reference, how this can be called 'Notable'? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dark heart 389 (talk • contribs) 21:55, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

and also this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utopia_(online_game) it clearly said " This section does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources (ideally, using inline citations). Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (January 2008)" why do you keep that page?

The deletion is not "because it's a game". It's because you haven't shown that this gaming website meets the notability standards for websites set out at WP:WEB, and you haven't cited reliable sources to show the site's notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC) How to show you that website meets the notability ? Why don't you just open the official website at www.conra.cn?

is this reliable enough to show site's notablility? http://best-rpg.com/reviews/show/260 http://www.conra.cnDark heart 389 (talk)

hi why you delete my page about Conra? is it because conra is about game? what about this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revelation:_Lands_of_Kaldana or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Materia_Magica or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medievia and alot more. Why you keep such pages, but not for Conra?

and if article about game is must be deleted, you should delete all things in here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_text-based_MMORPGs. please reply —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dark heart 389 (talk • contribs) 21:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Franco Iacomella article

Hello, I am still wayting for your reply about this issue. --Maximus99 (talk) 17:54, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

This is the original message:

Hi, thanks for your message. Im new in Wikipedia. I added that article because its about an important free software referent and GNU hacker of latin america and because other important figures of the free software foundation as Fernanda G. Weiden, Federico Heinz or Christiano Anderson have acepted articles. Why this case is different? Thanks for your help.

--Maximus99 (talk) 07:45, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Hostel 8

I dont understand why you have deleted this page. This may seem generic term but it is part of IIT Bombay. It has amazing history and its a non profit organization. The need for publicity is very strange reason to delete it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Biggerbangtheory (talk • contribs) 18:10, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

PlanetTogether

Hey, I have been trying to create a page for PlanetTogether, and have worked very hard to find references, which I now have, and also to create a completely neutral article.

I was wondering specifically what problems you had with my entry, and if you can help me create a successful entry? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kagej (talk • contribs) 15:29, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

• There's nothing in the article to indicate that the product is in any way notable, and therefore nothing to show that the article is anything other than an ad for the product. The sources cited are either themselves ads, PR entries, or blogs. See WP:V for a discussion of reliable independent sourcing. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:37, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

the Soft Pack

Hello, I am the manager of a band called the soft pack and you wont allow me to create a wiki for them. This isn't for advertising purposes but strictly for fans to gain a further insight into their history. Please can you allow for me to do this? Thank you.

• Not unless you can show that they meet the notability standards of WP:BAND by citing reliable independent sources per WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:06, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Ok... they have internationally toured, released a 10 track EP on a big independent 1928 records NA, supported internationally acclaimed bands such as bloc party, notable press:http://s466.photobucket.com/albums/rr26/thesoftpack/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeanatc (talk • contribs) 11:23, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

• • Good. The next step would be to write an article that cites reliable independent sources to reflect that, and to write it in neutral language and not as advertising. The last article was pure PR, with copy like "a refreshingly stripped-down, revved-up, no-frills brand of raucous rock and roll that, for all of its nods to the past, sounds, miraculously enough, sharply modern yet effortlessly cool, cutting a swathe through anything else out there in the process." You're going to have to eliminate all the promotional language. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:32, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Sure.... can I have the old copy back and I'll edit it accordingly. Apologies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeanatc (talk • contribs) 11:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

hope this is all good. many thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeanatc (talk • contribs) 12:03, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

It's april fools...

Please remember for the next 23.8333333 hours that it is April Fools Day. Stuff like this is just all in good fun, and it's actually an inside joke in another part of Wikipedia. Thanks, X! :  Chat  00:52, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Can i Get a copy of the page you deleted

I made a page called The Biography of Sir Ian Andrew de MacLeish and it was deleted by you. Can i please have a copy of it. Thanks. — Empello (talk • contribs) 02:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you so much! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Empello (talk • contribs) 03:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Request for Deleted Page

My article for the restaurant Pizza Antica was speedily deleted. This is my third request to please get a copy of it for further editing. Please? MattyIsWiki (talk) 04:21, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Independent sources

Hello Nawlin, thank you for answering my doubt. I just wanted to know if the page philatino.com or other pages that have links and information to it are an independent source that I could use for posting my article about philatino, . Or publicity of philatino in philatelic journals (if i can scan the journal and where should I upload the pictures). Thank you!

Sylvia. 200.122.15.199 (talk) 17:35, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

• No, philatino.com is not an *independent* source. Please read WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:36, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Independet sources 2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherrystone_Auctions This article does not have independent sources. I'm trying to create an article but I can't because all the sources that i find are wrong and now there is an article of philatelic auctions without independent sources and nobody has never deleted it. Please answer my question, can I use as source other pages that have philatino information?? Or publicity of philatino in philatelic journals. Thank you.

Sylvia. Sylvia.Plath07 (talk) 18:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

• • For the last time -- why don't you read WP:V, which explains sourcing in detail, rather than asking me the same question over and over? I can't answer whether you can use "other pages" if I don't know what they are. PLEASE READ WP:V. And I've deleted Cherrystone Auctions. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:19, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

THANK YOU for your patience and your kindness... Of course I READ the WP:V a hundred times but it's not clear about using the webs as an resourse, and as I told you before english is not my lenguage and its my second day using wikipedia. So, thanks for being such a good manager, if you look, you deleted my article 5 times in 2 days, and I modified the text to look better, I didn't post the same text. But this page Cherrystone was in wikipedia for more than 2 years before someone deleted it for first time, are you kidding me??? Again, THANK YOU. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sylvia.Plath07 (talk • contribs) 18:29, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Edits by User:I Am Not Bob the VI

I'm requesting oversight for all edits made by that editor as we speak. Tonywalton ^Talk 20:08, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

All edits by him now have now been oversighted (including deleted edits), plus those by User:164.58.69.2, his (and his target's) school IP. The IP has trolled for his password before, with posts including his real name (again, oversighted). Any more from that IP and they get a long schoolblock, with the possibility of contacting the school administration. That lot was just nasty. Tonywalton ^Talk 21:06, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Opinion

Hi. :) I wanted to ask your opinion on something. You had reverted some blanking on article I came to today following an OTRS letter. Article, Oxford English Limited. I reblanked, because the material was unsourced, mostly nonsense and troublesome (in my reading) under BLP, with allegations like "The sexual politics of the group was bizarre. One female undergraduate had to organise a complaint from the girls at Wadham College regarding the crepuscular activities of its cult leaders" (which certainly smacks of sexual harassment allegations). That material has now been restored twice. I've opened the question at BLPN, here, but since you had at least some familiarity with the article (maybe in a routine reverting unexplained blanking sense, but, still) wanted to ask your opinion. If the material had been added today, I would wonder if it was some kind of April Fool's joke. Since it wasn't, I'm at a loss. Do you have feedback? --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:32, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

It seems like either I caught you at a bad time or you don't have an opinion. :) Oh, well. I don't like playing the WP:BLP card (except with clear vandalism); I'm much more comfortable in the copyright realm these days. But maybe somebody at BLPN will offer feedback. Again, the material is just so bizarre that if it hadn't been placed on March 29th, I'd be looking around for Ashton Kutcher. :) Cheers. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 22:00, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for the late reply. I support your revert and protection of the page. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:49, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

No problem. :) We, too, are allowed to have lives. Although an IP editor at my page this morning is questioning my lack thereof. :D (P.S. Thanks for the feedback. I'm still inclined to think this is some kind of joke, but BLPN has been quiet on the matter. :/ I used to participate heavily there before moving over to copyright, which had more dire need. Seems like we have dire need all over.) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:03, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Mr.Putnam

It looks like it has been recreated. ZooFari, today's top vandal. (talk) 23:40, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Request access for further editing

My article for Swanson Russell was speedily deleted. It was submitted prior to adding references and additional contents. Could I have access to edit/re-create the article for submission? Thank you! Swansonrussell (talk) 23:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Picassomedia

I made a mistake with Angel Taylor so I'm checking with you instead of going to the UAI board. :P User:Picassomedia seems to be a company as it was posting on its talk page a clear copyvio of http://www.pixeldom.co.uk/about_pixeldom.html . And hopefully my accuracy will improve... -WarthogDemon 03:59, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

• It was also blatant spam -- I agree with your blanking of it. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 04:04, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: How Wikipedia Works

Would you mind sending me a copy of latest version that you deleted? I promise I had nothing to do with the writing of it :) but I'm curious who did, and what they had to say. -- phoebe / (talk to me) 05:50, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

All true, at least! Hardly advertising... Thanks. -- phoebe / (talk to me) 05:57, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Interesting block reason

00:56, March 30, 2009 NawlinWiki (talk | contribs | block) blocked Messedrocker (talk | contribs) (account creation blocked, e-mail blocked, cannot edit own talk page) with an expiry time of indefinite ‎ (Abusing multiple accounts) (unblock | change block)

Not that I really care about you blocking my former username, but I find it to be an interesting position that I abused it. —harej 11:10, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Right, should have figured. In any case, thank you for preventing some hoodlum from misappropriating my former identity. —harej 18:48, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Request of a copy of the Stong sid article

Hi there. May I request a copy of this article that you have deleted, since the author Fangoriously (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) may be a sockpuppet of this user based from his username (as pointed out by User:Rjd0060 and notified to me by User:Jay). Thanks and happy editing! E Wing (talk) 11:42, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Your AfD

Please, don't nominate for AfD articles, about which you know nothing. Read fr:Droit civil, es:Derecho civil, or anything else first. Thank you. —Guy Peters ^{Talk • Contributions • Edit counter} 17:56, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

I need to talk with you....

---

I have a question about one of the articles I made that you deleted I would like to talk soon. Thank you for reading this and taking time to talk to me.

Dockofusa (talk) 18:03, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

---

Brian's Brain

I was just wondering how a book by an author that is currently selling copies of said novel worldwide is not considered 'notable'. After reading the book, I felt that a quick and available source of information regarding it would be beneficial. --MedicantBias (talk) 23:49, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

• It's a selfpublished book, and the article cited no reliable independent sources to show that the book has been recognized as notable. See WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:29, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Grawp / JarlaxleArtemis

The block log entries should now have been blanked and the accounts hideusered. Cheers. --Rrburke^(talk) 05:38, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello, NawlinWiki. You have new messages at Rrburke's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Parakeet day

I prodded Parakeet day less than half an hour ago and now it's deleted as both CSD#G3 and expired prod. How can it be an expired prod if it's been less than half an hour? Did someone place a CSD tag between the time I prodded it and the time it was deleted?

Not that I really care for reinstating the article for the sake of process; I think Wikipedia is a better place without that article, but I am concerned about deleting prodded articles without letting the full 5-day period lapse. KuyaBriBri^Talk 20:41, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Protecting {{Kosovorecognition}}

While you're at it I'm not 100% sure why you decide to pagemove protect it, but you may as well get {{ROCrecognition}} as well. For that matter, it would make some sense to add it to the note in {{Countries of Asia}}. Please post on my talk if you need me. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:06, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Abuse removal request

Please see Revision history of User:Gavin.collins. -- IRP ☎ 01:32, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Just Add Spice

Hi there, I would like to request that this page be reinstated - Spice is a very significant non-profit organisation in the UK, that has a unique model for engaging people in rebuilding communities. The article qualified this with independent reports produced by a very reputable think-tank (the new economics foundation), the university of wales and the welsh national government. Both of spice's 'parent' organisations the Young Foundation and the University of Wales, Newport are both included on wikipedia. If this article is not suitable in its present form could you please recommend alterations? Thanks Tris Dyson (talk) 13:40, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Hamish Ross socks

Nope, you caught the whole lot. I've blocked the underlying IP for the Hamish Ross and Grawp socks. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 21:46, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Ah, actually there was one that PMDrive1061 got before you. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 21:47, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Permanent full protection

Please contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 April 7#West Indies → Caribbean. Uncle G (talk) 23:43, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Essential Eating Sprouted Baking

Would you please take a look at this page. It has been revised and hopefully the "advertising" alert can be removed. Thank you. Jaaq (talk) 00:53, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

• Sorry, but there's nothing in the article to indicate that this book is notable per WP:N. The article about the author, Janie Quinn, has the same problem and is also written like an ad. This is why we have the guideline Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:01, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Award

		The Original Barnstar
		Thanks for keeping Wikipedia vandal-free. You have work blocked those attack accounts before I even saw them. Abce2 (talk) 00:57, 8 April 2009 (UTC)Abce2

• Thanks! NawlinWiki (talk) 00:58, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Accounts

Hello -- we're locking & hiding all of these usernames at Meta, which terminates any open sessions and prevents future logins, so there's no need for you to be blocking the accounts locally. — Dan | talk 01:04, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

• OK, thanks. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:05, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Potato Day

Hi; notice you deleted Potato Day, which was perfectly reasonable in its then-current state -- but that's why I hung an {{inuse}} tag on it. I'm currently in the process of turning this into an actual article, so it may spring up again shortly as a non-redirect. Regards, NapoliRoma (talk) 15:26, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Or not... right now, I'm not finding a keep-worthy article in the material I've found so far. Regards,NapoliRoma (talk) 15:54, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Soul Pancake

Back again. Please ban the creator, create block/account block... creator also keeps removing CSD tags beyond 4th warning. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 17:15, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Back again already R3ap3R.inc (talk) 17:18, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, and RfA

First off, thanks for helping me with all those CSD's. Second, I would love it if I could delete the obvious CSD's myself but I need someone to nominate me. Please, check my history: over a year, twinkle/friendly/rollback. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 17:17, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Did I do something wrong?

I was just welcoming him like any other user. - Eugene Krabs (talk) 20:54, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Daily Kitten is watching..

That's funny!! I love it. By the way, I changed my username recently and shortly afterwards you blocked my old username Greater Syria, this then autoblocked me for 24 hours due to my IP. Howcome you blocked it? Izzedine (talk) 07:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Jen Jeniro page deletion

Hello, Would be possible to have clarification over the deletion of the Jen Jeniro page please? The article was purely factual and did not read like an advertisement in any way. On the 'notability' front, it included quotes from BBC Radio 1 DJs, among other (which, again, isn't promotion, merely an indication of how well a particular record was received - again, purely factual) as well as a full discography. I can see no possible justification against the existence of the page. Thanks, Aled Hughes —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aledramirez (talk • contribs) 14:16, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Essential Eating Sprouted Baking

Would it be better to list this as a stub? This listing was patterned after the pages Moosewood Cookbook and Diet for a Small Planet and I just noticed that they are both stubs. Many thanks. Jaaq (talk) 14:00, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Here's some of those annoying socks

Ginger freckles Boxy roxy CRIMINAL STATISTICS Venn diagramatist Exellent Judgement Estates Maintenance Hope this helps--Abce2 (talk) 21:47, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Assassin's Creed 2

Can you unlock Assassin's Creed 2?. Currently there is enough of information for it to have its own article. Thanks. --SkyWalker (talk) 03:35, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

• You need to talk to User:Rootology, who protected the redirect just yesterday. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:36, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

He has already mentioned any admin can open it. I have reviewed the magazine scans it is latest. --SkyWalker (talk) 03:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Panch. Ramalingam

Can you take a quick look at this again Panch. Ramalingam Seems like you moved it before (no wonder it seemed so fast when I went to welcome the user) but the user has recreated it in the article namespace. Don't want to bombard them with CSD's from a non-admin. Thanks. JCutter (talk) 04:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Giambiville

What the hell asshole? LooseGoose225 (talk) 18:36, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Krazy

1. 2 on the Wikipedia:Notability (music) states this Has had a charted single or album on any national music chart. Being that Breather Life has indeed charted on borh the Top R&B/Hip-Albums and Top Independent Albums, I think that this article should be restored. Live and Die 4 Hip Hop (talk) 18:38, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

History restore

Any chance of restoring the history of Sasha Alyson? I think it's now an acceptable stub. Regards, Guest9999 (talk) 18:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks very much. Guest9999 (talk) 21:21, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

ANI

I don't know you, so this is not entirely accurate; but in light of this - [1] - and seeing your recent activity since then, I'm reminded of Salah's quote to Indy and Marion in Raiders of the Lost Ark: "Oh, my good friends... I'm so pleased you're not dead!" Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 08:58, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Jonathan Van Barneveld delete?

Hello. We created a page on one of our local citizens and within seconds it was deleted. We took the time to make sure that everything was in order, we had legitimate sources and within seconds it was all gone. Jonathan Van Barneveld may not be a global name, but to our local region he is quite well known and we feel that he deserves a wikipedia page for everything he has contributed to the communities in the region. We are formally requesting that you overturn the speedy delete that was placed on the page. Please. It would mean a lot to all the people who had input to his page. User: British Columbian —Preceding unsigned comment added by British Columbian (talk • contribs) 04:53, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Heavens, I've never been indeffed before. Must be careful. I don't actually intend to be disruptive. Warmest regards, Hamlet, Prince of Trollmark (talk) 21:26, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

ANI

For your reference: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Nawlinwiki and Abuse Filter. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:40, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Kacko

Why was my kacko page deleted? I'm new here and I was just wondering why. It's actually a word, believe it or not. Kacko123 (talk) 10:57, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

• It appears to be one of those "words I made up that can mean anything you want it to mean". That's not what Wikipedia is for. See WP:NFT and WP:NAD. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:08, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Okay, but it is a well known word where I come from. But never mind, I understand that rules are rules. Could I at least have the deleted page given back to me? Thank you. Kacko123 (talk) 14:21, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

• • Now in your userspace at User:Kacko123/Kacko. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:36, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Phoenix14news

I did some major trimming to the article and added sources. And have now just found and added multiple awards from various organizations... 2005: Aegis Awards Winners and finalists recognition[2], 2006: two awards at the 27th annual Telly Awards[3], 2007: they won a Radio-Television News Directors Association of the Carolinas (RTNDAC) Award for "Best Student Television Newscast".[4], 2008: Three awards at the 29th annual Telly Awards[5], and the 2009 Broadcast Education Association awards[6][7]. I think it has enough independent notability after being trimmed and properly sourced to exist as a stand-alone. Best regards, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:58, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Vandal

Hi, I noticed you temporarily blocked User talk:216.154.41.11 - he's been at it again though since. Perhaps something slightly more drastic is needed? Cheers Akerbeltz (talk) 21:37, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Request

Since you originally locked the page, can you edit Naruto: Shippūden to reflect the following:

#REDIRECT [[Naruto#Naruto: Shippuden]]

Please reply below, Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 00:49, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Done, thanks. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

I just wanted to say thank you for reverting that vandalism on my user page.

Oldlaptop321 (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Oldlaptop321 (talk) 02:06, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Yeah im a stranger....

But noticed your names on some pages where you cleaned up vandalism... Just wanted to make myself noticed and say hi :) JasonHockeyGuy (talk) 07:31, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Help lol

What could I have done to make the article on world wide dream builders more relevant? —Preceding unsigned comment added by EvolveInc (talk • contribs) 21:29, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Civony

You deleted this page within an hour of it being created before there was even time to post references, supporting articles or such. You posted no revelent info on the talk page. Making a solo call on what you think is revelent isn't the wiki way...it might be your way but it's the wrong way. Terryrayc (talk) 22:25, 23 April 2009 (UTC) | Oh it should also be noted that a quick search found a lot of articles on web based games, I see you are picking and choosing. Terryrayc (talk) 22:27, 23 April 2009 (UTC)