Talk:Litter (vehicle): Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 82.206.142.82 - "→Wow, this is some heavy POV: new section" |
→Pictures: new section |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
Colonial practice |
Colonial practice |
||
In various colonies, litters of various types were maintained under native traditions, but often adopted by the white colonials as a new ruling and/or socio-economic elite, either for practical reasons (often comfortable modern transport was unavailable, e.g. for lack of decent roads) and/or as a status symbol, legitimizing their theft and occupation by aligning their status as worthy of transportation by palanquin to equal of native elites. During the 17-18th centuries, palanquins (see above) were very popular among European traders in Bengal, so much so that in 1758 an order was issued prohibiting their purchase by certain lower-ranking employees. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/82.206.142.82|82.206.142.82]] ([[User talk:82.206.142.82|talk]]) 19:59, 27 June 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
In various colonies, litters of various types were maintained under native traditions, but often adopted by the white colonials as a new ruling and/or socio-economic elite, either for practical reasons (often comfortable modern transport was unavailable, e.g. for lack of decent roads) and/or as a status symbol, legitimizing their theft and occupation by aligning their status as worthy of transportation by palanquin to equal of native elites. During the 17-18th centuries, palanquins (see above) were very popular among European traders in Bengal, so much so that in 1758 an order was issued prohibiting their purchase by certain lower-ranking employees. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/82.206.142.82|82.206.142.82]] ([[User talk:82.206.142.82|talk]]) 19:59, 27 June 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== Pictures == |
|||
If somebody should need pictures of several Indian litters, they might want to contact me as I do have taken a few and don't have the nerve to upload them right now. Cheers--[[User:Zenit|Zenit]] ([[User talk:Zenit|talk]]) 17:35, 2 August 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:35, 2 August 2009
![]() | China Unassessed | |||||||||
|
![]() | Japan Unassessed | ||||||||||||||||
|
Template:Korean requires
|hangul=
parameter.
![]() | India Start‑class Top‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | Transport Unassessed | |||||||||
|
Spanish link
On the language box at the left side of the page, a link to wikipedia in spanish should be added. The spanish article is "Litera (vehículo)" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.245.8.49 (talk) 17:34, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Sedan chair
I think sedan chair should be broken out into its own article, leaving litter (vehicle) to be about couch-type vehicles. As it is, almost the whole article is about sedan chairs. We need more pics of military/emergency litters as well as luxury litters. --Tysto 22:15, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
- Since there are neither clearly delimited definitions, nor any consistentcy in use of both terms, that can only be confusing. Fastifex 10:13, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
Ambulance service
Can someone identify for me which Royal Infirmary this page is talking about? I've found sources variously identifying the Edinburgh Royal Infirmary [1], Glasgow Royal Infirmary [2] and Chester Royal Infirmary [3]. Thanks. AlistairMcMillan 20:57, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Japan
Added a section on Japan. Not sure if Omikoshi should be here but, I had always translated that term as palanqin.--Timtak 03:54, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Litter?
Why is the palanqin called a litter over here, and in which country is it known as a litter? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:43, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Wow, this is some heavy POV
This sounds like it was written by a "socio-anthropological studies of White Male colonialist oppression major" at UC Berkley.
Colonial practice In various colonies, litters of various types were maintained under native traditions, but often adopted by the white colonials as a new ruling and/or socio-economic elite, either for practical reasons (often comfortable modern transport was unavailable, e.g. for lack of decent roads) and/or as a status symbol, legitimizing their theft and occupation by aligning their status as worthy of transportation by palanquin to equal of native elites. During the 17-18th centuries, palanquins (see above) were very popular among European traders in Bengal, so much so that in 1758 an order was issued prohibiting their purchase by certain lower-ranking employees. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.206.142.82 (talk) 19:59, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
Pictures
If somebody should need pictures of several Indian litters, they might want to contact me as I do have taken a few and don't have the nerve to upload them right now. Cheers--Zenit (talk) 17:35, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- Unassessed China-related articles
- Unknown-importance China-related articles
- Unassessed China-related articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- Unassessed Japan-related articles
- Unknown-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- Start-Class India articles
- Top-importance India articles
- Start-Class India articles of Top-importance
- WikiProject India articles
- Unassessed Transport articles
- Unknown-importance Transport articles
- WikiProject Transport articles