Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/August 2009: Difference between revisions
Scorpion0422 (talk | contribs) ←Created page with '{{featured list log}} {{TOClimit|limit=3}}' |
promoting 4 FLCs |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{featured list log}} |
{{featured list log}} |
||
{{TOClimit|limit=3}} |
{{TOClimit|limit=3}} |
||
{{Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/WCW United States Tag Team Championship/archive1}} |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of tallest buildings in Las Vegas/archive1}} |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of CMLL World Tag Team Champions/archive1}} |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of City University of New York institutions/archive1}} |
Revision as of 20:48, 2 August 2009
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 20:48, 2 August 2009 [1].
WCW United States Tag Team Championship
Well, here she is..My first list since April. Me and Blue expanded this list in about a week, and I think it turned out pretty well. To us it looks and reads fine, but we're used to it and issues can probably be found by others. Since this is my first nom in a while, I wont be surprised if I see a lot of concerns, but they will be addressed by myself or Blue quickly. Thanks in advance to any reviews.--Truco 503 20:56, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: No alt. text can be added to the image because it is an infobox inserted image. Also note that this nomination may have came a bit too soon, but stability should be no issue because this article is not touched upon daily or even monthly.--Truco 503 20:57, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support
Resolved comments from MPJ-DK
|
---|
|
- Comments from Wrestlinglover
- Stay tuned, coming tomorrow, or whenever.--WillC 09:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Lots of cool table-work, lots of detail, but I'm worried about the references. The entirely article seems to be based upon source material from Solie.org (save a couple small notes from the Beekman book). I'm sure the information holds true, but is there really no better/other source material to confirm or build up that referencing? With all the promotional material wrestling puts out, is there no "Wrestling Encyclopedia" or something that has this information in more reliable, printed form? Staxringold talkcontribs 02:28, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I know this one, it's actually mainly sourced by the book "Wrestling Title histories", the solie.org link is to provide an online version of the book, so that people without the book can check it. I think Solie.org also credits the book on the pages linked to. So it's a very reliable and thoroughly researched source (the book) with a "courtesy link" added. MPJ-DK (No Drama) Talk 02:35, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Could the book ref be included as well, just as something for Wiki-browsers to investigate for a printed source? See CMLL World Heavyweight, CMLL World Light Heavyweight, IWGP Heavyweight, etc? Some, like PWG World Tag (though this one has TONS of specific citations), simply list Solie but I really think a redundant print source would be nice to at least keep listed in the article. Staxringold talkcontribs 02:40, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Way to make myself look dumb for not checking - i thought it was the book ref, I gave the author the details to use "cite book" (if I didn't I can). MPJ-DK (No Drama) Talk 02:43, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Nah, the book source is included under the specific refs, it just seems like it's worth listing under general if it is ultimately the source material for Solie anyways. Staxringold talkcontribs 02:46, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry for the late replies. The main reason why there are little specific refs is because this title is a former championships that existed well over 10 years ago, and because the company which owned the title does not exist anymore, we are limited to resources. The book ref listed is just sourcing some specific information about the history of the NWA (such as Crockett, Jr. being NWA President). I added, however, the main book ref from Wrestling Title Histories under the general refs.--Truco 503 03:10, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Nah, the book source is included under the specific refs, it just seems like it's worth listing under general if it is ultimately the source material for Solie anyways. Staxringold talkcontribs 02:46, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Way to make myself look dumb for not checking - i thought it was the book ref, I gave the author the details to use "cite book" (if I didn't I can). MPJ-DK (No Drama) Talk 02:43, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Could the book ref be included as well, just as something for Wiki-browsers to investigate for a printed source? See CMLL World Heavyweight, CMLL World Light Heavyweight, IWGP Heavyweight, etc? Some, like PWG World Tag (though this one has TONS of specific citations), simply list Solie but I really think a redundant print source would be nice to at least keep listed in the article. Staxringold talkcontribs 02:40, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I know this one, it's actually mainly sourced by the book "Wrestling Title histories", the solie.org link is to provide an online version of the book, so that people without the book can check it. I think Solie.org also credits the book on the pages linked to. So it's a very reliable and thoroughly researched source (the book) with a "courtesy link" added. MPJ-DK (No Drama) Talk 02:35, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Thanks for that, guys, makes all the difference IMO. The tables are great, just wanted to ensure they were reliable. Staxringold talkcontribs 03:29, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (17–14) 22:23, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
|
Support – Seems to be up to the level of the other wrestling title lists that have been streaming through FLC lately. Nice to see one of the older titles getting some attention. Giants2008 (17–14) 22:23, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 20:17, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
* Dabs; please check the disambiguation links identified in the toolbox. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:57, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
|
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 19:39, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 20:48, 2 August 2009 [2].
List of tallest buildings in Las Vegas
Self-nomination. Another tallest building list, modeled after recently promoted lists such as List of tallest buildings in San Diego and List of tallest buildings in Oklahoma City. I believe it to meet all the FL criteria in that it is comprehensive, stable, well-referenced, well-organized, useful, and complete. Any concerns brought up here will be addressed. Thanks! Cheers, Rai•me 01:09, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment
- Why do two buildings in the first list not have a rank? It goes "blank, 1, 2, 3" which seems odd to me. MPJ-DK (talk) 22:13, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Never mind, I saw the note - maybe putting the note in the empty cell? people see it and wonder "why?" if the note is there it's an easy way to make it obvious why it's blank. Just a suggestion. MPJ-DK (talk) 22:14, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure how to format that; the current note label, [A], would look strange in a column otherwise filled with numbers, particularly if it were centered. Cheers, Rai•me 23:09, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It would look like one of the columns in this article List of CMLL World Trios Champions, which I personally think looks okay. MPJ-DK (talk) 04:00, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- That list seems to use dashes, not note labels. I like the idea of the en-dash, as it is already used for the image column. I added them for both towers. Cheers, Rai•me 04:06, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oops, never mind, I was only looking at the first column in that list. I moved the note labels to the first column and changed the text to [Note A] (from [A]) to make it more differentiated from the numbers. Cheers, Rai•me 04:11, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
|
Resolved issues from Jpeeling (talk · contribs) |
---|
Comments from Jpeeling (talk · contribs)
There's a few discrepancies that need fixing.
--Jpeeling (talk) 14:03, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply] Additional comments
|
Weak Support for now as I would like to see someone more knowledgeable on the subject than myself review the article. --Jpeeling (talk) 16:33, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 20:15, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
|
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 20:15, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ref 8: publications such as journals are italicized. Also, we don't use allcaps in titles, even if it was like that in the original.- Done
- What makes the following sources reliable?
http://www.vegastodayandtomorrow.com/trade_centers.htm- I removed the reference and replaced it with this ref from Reuters.
http://en.structurae.de/structures/data/index.cfm?ID=s0003279- I removed the reference, as the Stratosphere entry is already covered by three sources. But Structurae is, along with Emporis, considered an authority on civil engineering data.
Dabomb87 (talk) 23:28, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 20:48, 2 August 2009 [3].
List of CMLL World Tag Team Champions
I've been here before and I've incorporated everything from before to make the list as ready for FLc as I possibly can. I've also been reading with great interest some old and current discussions on ALT text and especially on redlinks in a FL. As you can see there are currently 5 red links, I've already created one article for the list (La Sombra, created today) and I will create all five of the missing articles over the two weeks that the FLc process (as a minimum) takes. Watch as the redlinks for Pierroth, Jr., Emilio Charles, Jr., Rayo de Jalisco, Jr., Mr. Niebla and Scorpio, Jr. turn blue so that when this (hopefully) passes the FLReview it'll be a true blue list, because I do not see this as an "easy accomplishment" at all. MPJ-DK (talk) 15:35, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- And I got four out of five turned blue before the reviews have rolled in. MPJ-DK (talk) 10:05, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Alt text looks good. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:00, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:39, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
|
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:27, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from Wrestlinglover
- Stay tuned, coming tomorrow, or whenever.--WillC 09:33, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
|
- Note - the list is now a "true Blue" list with no redlinks at all. :) MPJ-DK (talk) 10:31, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – There are some prose issues, but I'm more concerned about the formatting, which could use tightening in several places.
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (17–14) 22:31, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Do we have a wrestling glossary article that could be linked for Booker? I think that would be helpful to our general readership.
Giants2008 (17–14) 22:29, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
Support – Although the sorting proved difficult to fix, that and the other comments have been taken care of, so I'm happy to switch from oppose. Do be sure to double-check the sorting in future nominations, though. Giants2008 (17–14) 21:17, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Most definitly, it won't be put up for FLC before I've checked and double checked sorting. MPJ-DK (No Drama) Talk 06:47, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 20:48, 2 August 2009 [4].
List of City University of New York institutions
I am nominating this for featured list because I started this article a few months back, worked it through DYK and PR and this it now could pass for FL. MBisanz talk 18:13, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks great. I'd say to do the same thing as the state university list: combine the male/female percentages. Reywas92Talk 03:37, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
|
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:51, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
Comment Images need alternative text per criterion 5b. Also, image captions that are not complete sentences should not have periods at the end. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:29, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:57, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 18:13, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Oppose (apologies for the delay in the review)
|
- Support - good work on my picky comments. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:13, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.