Jump to content

Criticism of Judaism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Shii (talk | contribs)
→‎Circumcision: per talk page consensus
→‎Heretical views within Judaism: Re-title section to a more accurate title, per Talk page
Line 3: Line 3:
'''Criticism of Judaism''' has existed since [[Judaism]]'s formative stages, as with many other [[religions]], on [[theological]] grounds.
'''Criticism of Judaism''' has existed since [[Judaism]]'s formative stages, as with many other [[religions]], on [[theological]] grounds.


==Rejection of concept of a personal god==
==Heretical views within Judaism==
Philosopher [[Baruch Spinoza]] rejected the orthodox understanding of the [[Torah]], its view of [[God]], and he rejected the idea of the Jews as a [[chosen people]].
In many religions ex-members and excommunicates became known for doctrinal disputes with their former faith. In Judaism a process similar to excommunication is called ''[[cherem]]''. The process is a form of ecclesiastical censure that states the person is not to be listened to by the community. Among people declared ''cherem'' there were a few critics of Judaism.
The most famous might be [[Baruch Spinoza]] who was censured primarily for rejecting the [[Orthodoxy|orthodox]] understanding of the [[Torah]] and its view of [[God]]. His ''[[Theologico-Political Treatise]]'' in particular rejected the idea of the Jews as a [[chosen people]] and saw the Torah as merely a kind of Jewish constitution. He further felt that Judaism allowed for little in the way of speculation or internal reflection. Spinoza's critique of the Judaism of his day formed the foundation for his broader radical critique of theology that would follow in his later writings, which have been seen as precursors to later trends in [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]] thought. An earlier heretic, [[Uriel da Costa]], a convert of Jewish ancestry, had also been met with a writ of ''cherem'' for his denial of the immortality of the soul.


[[Baruch Spinoza]] was censured primarily for rejecting the [[Orthodoxy|orthodox]] understanding of the [[Torah]] and its view of [[God]]. His ''[[Theologico-Political Treatise]]'' in particular rejected the idea of the Jews as a [[chosen people]] and saw the Torah as merely a kind of Jewish constitution. He further felt that Judaism allowed for little in the way of speculation or internal reflection. Spinoza's critique of the Judaism of his day formed the foundation for his broader radical critique of theology that would follow in his later writings, which have been seen as precursors to later trends in [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]] thought. An earlier heretic, [[Uriel da Costa]], a convert of Jewish ancestry, had also been met with a writ of ''cherem'' for his denial of the immortality of the soul.
However, ''cherem'' has rarely been practised since the Enlightenment.

In many religions ex-members and excommunicates became known for doctrinal disputes with their former faith. In Judaism a process similar to excommunication is called ''[[cherem]]''. The process is a form of ecclesiastical censure that states the person is not to be listened to by the community. Among people declared ''cherem'' there were a few critics of Judaism. However, ''cherem'' has rarely been practised since the Enlightenment.


==Criticism from Christianity==
==Criticism from Christianity==

Revision as of 23:00, 13 February 2010

Criticism of Judaism has existed since Judaism's formative stages, as with many other religions, on theological grounds.

Rejection of concept of a personal god

Philosopher Baruch Spinoza rejected the orthodox understanding of the Torah, its view of God, and he rejected the idea of the Jews as a chosen people.

Baruch Spinoza was censured primarily for rejecting the orthodox understanding of the Torah and its view of God. His Theologico-Political Treatise in particular rejected the idea of the Jews as a chosen people and saw the Torah as merely a kind of Jewish constitution. He further felt that Judaism allowed for little in the way of speculation or internal reflection. Spinoza's critique of the Judaism of his day formed the foundation for his broader radical critique of theology that would follow in his later writings, which have been seen as precursors to later trends in Enlightenment thought. An earlier heretic, Uriel da Costa, a convert of Jewish ancestry, had also been met with a writ of cherem for his denial of the immortality of the soul.

In many religions ex-members and excommunicates became known for doctrinal disputes with their former faith. In Judaism a process similar to excommunication is called cherem. The process is a form of ecclesiastical censure that states the person is not to be listened to by the community. Among people declared cherem there were a few critics of Judaism. However, cherem has rarely been practised since the Enlightenment.

Criticism from Christianity

Paul criticizes Jews for their failure to believe in Jesus (Romans 9:30-10:13) and for their view about their favored status and lack of equality with gentiles (Roman 3:27).[1]

Criticism from Islam

A prominent place in the Qur'anic polemic against the Jews is given to the conception of the religion of Abraham. The Qur'an presents Muslims as neither Jews nor Christians but followers of Abraham who was in a physical sense the father of the Jews and the Arabs and lived before the revelation of Torah. In order to show that the religion practiced by the Jews is not the pure religion of Abraham, the Qur'an mentions the incident of worshiping of the calf, argues that Jews do not believe in part of the revelation given to them, and that their taking of usury shows their worldliness and disobedience of God. Furthermore, the Quran claim they attribute to God what he has not revealed. According to the Qur'an, the Jews exalted Ezra as the "son of God." (See the Quranic statements about perceived Jewish exaltation). This however, has no historical basis, is not mentioned in any Jewish text or oral tradition, and is not practiced by modern Jews (nor is there evidence to show that it ever was practiced).[citation needed] The character of Ezra became important in the works of the later Andalusian Muslim scholar Ibn Hazm who explicitly accused Ezra of being a liar and a heretic who falsified and added interpolations into the Biblical text. In his polemic against Judaism, Ibn Hazm provided a polemical list of what he considered "chronological and geographical inaccuracies and contradictions; theological impossibilities (anthropomorphic expressions, stories of fornication and whoredom, and the attributing of sins to prophets), as well as lack of reliable transmission (tawatur) of the text".[2][3]

Kosher slaughter

Kosher slaughter as a practice has attracted widespread criticism from animal welfare groups who claim that the absence of any form of anesthesia or stunning prior to the severance of the animal’s jugular vein entails prolonged and unnecessary pain. The British Farm Animal Welfare Council (FAWC), an independent body which advises the British Government in matters of animal welfare, has demanded that kosher slaughter no longer be exempted under relevant legislation, demanding that animals be subjected to stunning before slaughter. FAWC Chairwoman, Dr Judy MacArthur (herself a farmer and qualified veterinarian) has defended the organisation’s stance, criticising her detractors by claiming that "(kosher slaughter involves) a major incision into the animal and to say that it doesn't suffer is quite ridiculous." [4] This claim is contrary to those made by supporters of kosher slaughter, who claim that the extreme blood loss caused in the process results in a rapid loss of consciousness and therefore an absence of pain.[5]

See also

References

  1. ^ E. P. Sanders, Paul the Law and Jewish People, Fortress Press, p.154
  2. ^ Encyclopedia of Islam, Uzayr
  3. ^ Hava Lazarus-Yafeh, Tahrif, Encyclopedia of Islam
  4. ^ [1]
  5. ^ [2]