Talk:Disconnection (Scientology): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:20, 25 March 2010

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Disconnection (Scientology) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

Scientology Start‑class High‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.ScientologyWikipedia:WikiProject ScientologyTemplate:WikiProject ScientologyScientology articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Start‑class Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Start‑class Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Media Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Examples of applications

Is there really a need for such a large amount of examples? I would have thought that two or three would have sufficed. The division between 60's & 80's onwards seems arbitrary. 93.107.142.64 (talk) 10:48, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is a good idea, particularly as the organization denies this occurs. -- Cirt (talk) 15:41, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Two or three well referenced examples demonstrates just as well that this occurs as 10 - 15. A lot of the examples mentioned amount to hearsay, and these detract from the overall message. 109.77.22.14 (talk) 00:20, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 Is there really a need for such a large amount of examples? I would have thought that two or three would have sufficed. The division between 60's & 80's onwards seems arbitrary.  [[Special:Contributions/93.107.142.64|93.107.142.64]] ([[User talk:93.107.142.64|talk]]) 10:48, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 :It is a good idea, particularly as the organization denies this occurs. -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 15:41, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
+::Two or three well referenced examples demonstrates just as well that this occurs as 10 - 15. A lot of the examples mentioned amount to hearsay, and these detract from the overall message.  [[Special:Contributions/109.77.22.14|109.77.22.14]] ([[User talk:109.77.22.14|talk]]) 00:20, 25 March 2010 (UTC)