User talk:Tiamut

"I am a Palestinian. Hath not a Palestinian eyes? Hath not a Palestinian hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions? Fed with the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject to the same diseases, healed by the same means, warmed and cooled by the same winter and summer, as a Jew is? If you prick us, do we not bleed? If you tickle us, do we not laugh? If you poison us do we not die? And if you wrong us, shall we not revenge? If we are like you in the rest, we will resemble you in that -- the villainy you teach me, I will execute; and it shall go hard but I will better the instruction." Tariq Ali's take on Shakespeare in the Khaleej Times "It is not enough for the settler to delimit physically, that is to say with the help of the army and the police force, the place of the native. As if to show the totalitarian character of colonial exploitation the settler paints the native as a sort of quintessence of evil ... The native knows all this ... he knows that he is not an animal, and it is precisely at the moment he realizes his humanity that he begins to sharpen the weapons with which he will secure his victory. From Frantz Fanon's The Wretched of the Earth "A Jewish youth in the Arab countries expects from Zionism nothing other than colonialism and domination." Ya'qūb Balbūl in the 1930s, as quoted in The Arab Jews "- You can't compare them; a European Jew is something else. - How come? - Because 'Jew' just doesn't go with 'Arab', it just doesn't go. It doesn't even sound right. - Depends on your ear. - Look, I've got nothing against Arabs. I even have friends who are Arabs, but how can you say 'Arab Jew' when all the Arabs want is to destroy the Jews? - And how can you say 'European Jew' when the Europeans have already destroyed the Jews?" Sami Shalom Chetrit's "Who is a Jew and What Kind of Jew", as quoted in The Arab Jews

Archive #1 by Werdnabot /Archive 2 /Archive 3 /Archive 4 /Archive 5 /Archive 6 /Archive 7 /Archive 8 /Archive 9 /Archive 10 /Archive 11 /Archive 12 /Archive 13

DYK for Sharafat, East Jerusalem

On March 7, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sharafat, East Jerusalem, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:02, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Zionist Political Violence - palestinefacts.org

Hi Tiamut,

I created a new section on the talk page for the aforementioned article in the hopes that you'll engage in discussion. I just don't understand what facets of WP:RS the site fails to satisfy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Zionist_political_violence#palestinefacts.org

Thanks, --65.127.188.10 (talk) 01:01, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Yep

My first impression about a person is usually proves to be the right one.--Mbz1 (talk) 01:06, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

As do mine. Tiamut^talk 01:14, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Tell Balata

On March 10, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tell Balata, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Sheikh Jarrah

Hi, There was a tomb of Sheikh Jarrah just to the north of Jerusalem by 1860 at the latest. I have a map. But I can't find anything about this tomb or who Sheikh Jarrah was. There was some general of Omar, conqueror of Jerusalem, with that name, but no source connecting him to the tomb. Can you find anything? Zero^talk 14:26, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi Zero0000. It seems the Sheikh Jarrah quarter on Mount Scopus was named for the nearby tomb of Muslim saint, commonly known as Sheikh Jarrah. [1] The tomb itself is located inside the Mosque of Sheikh Jarrah. Named for a 12th century Muslim saint, it is located on Nablus Road near the American Colony hotel, about a 5-minute walk from the Sheikh Jarrah quarter. [2] According to Mariam Shahin, on pages 328-329 of her book Palestine: A Guide (of which I have a copy at home), the mosque was built in 1895, around the tomb (which is itself dated to 1201). Both are named for the physician of Saladin, known as Hussam al-Din al-Jarrahi (Jarrahi in Arabic means "the surgeon"). The nearby Sheikh Jarrah quarter was named for him, though Shahin notes it is not certin that the tomb contains his actual remains.

I will look for more informtion on Hussam al-Din l-Jarrahi too. But I though I'd let you know wht an initial look around has turned up. Cheers. Tiamut^talk 14:57, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Great. That article needs some history (but see RS/N). Zero^talk 15:06, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

GA

Any luck with the GA afterwards? I made a map Template:Location map Egypt Sinai. I though it might come in handy as a locator for some ancient site that you or Nableezy or somebody might be working on... ‡ Himalayan ‡ ^ΨMonastery 15:40, 10 March 2010 (UTC) No worries, looks good on the Dahab article anyway.. ‡ Himalayan ‡ ^ΨMonastery 20:35, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Userbox

Marhaba Tiamut, I've been "stalking" your wonderful contributions to Wikipedia on Palestine and the Palestinian people, not to mention your relentless articulations on the talk pages, since I first stepped foot here. It's been truly wonderful, and educational. Anyways, I wanted to ask your permission to use your hard coded user box supporting the unmentionable military resistance movements. Would that be okay? Yazan (talk) 18:48, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, Tiamut. I will take you up on that offer, we do badly need an extra set of keyboards at WP:SYR ;). Salamat and Happy editing. Yazan (talk) 19:00, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm happy to know that. Whatever you can dig up will be helpful really. Nevertheless, and this is a bit eccentric, but I've been obsessing about this particular finger-length clay tablet from Ugarit. Arguably the oldest such articulation of an alphabet (and Damascus Museum's most celebrated display) but I can find very little scholarly sources about it. Alas. Yazan (talk) 19:34, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Hey again

I understand that you are busy, but I have now asked several people for help but no one wants to. Are you sure you cant spare a bit of your time to take a look and see if changes are needed? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 01:18, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Mujir al-Din al-'Ulaymi

On March 12, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mujir al-Din al-'Ulaymi, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Calmer Waters 06:03, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

For you

		The Excellent User Page Award
		Rarely are Userpages so full of sadness and poetry. You have a way of latching onto little details—"sounds of my city", the Mona Lisa-esque quality of the "woman from Ramallah"—to reveal the larger picture in the space between the words. As you wrote, "That's what moves me to write. My love for all people which begins with love for myself, then my neighbours, my people, and expands outward from there, everywhere." Beautiful. --AFriedman (talk) 06:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations about the DYK, too. --AFriedman (talk) 06:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks again

Thanks again for all the help at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Israeli art student scam, it was invaluable. Given the massive and strident opposition the fact it survived AFD in any form whatsoever is a gift. The current manifestation has some neutrality problems, but I'm going to wait until the controversy dies down before editing it again. Factsontheground (talk) 01:12, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Rachel's Tomb and Bilal ibn Ribah

Hi, Do you know what this business with Rachel's Tomb being called Bilal ibn Ribah mosque? I know there has been a mosque there since at least the middle of the 19th century, but until recently I didn't hear of it having a name not associated with Rachel. There's a claim it is a fresh new name, but this information is from a Jewish activist source. Also, is the name applied to the whole structure or just the part that is a mosque (see Pringle's diagram])? Here is a Bethlehem site quite happy to call it both "Qubbet Rahil" and "Bilal ibn Ribah mosque", suggesting that calling it a mosque is not intended to deny the Rachel connection. Cheers. Zero^talk 12:27, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

[3] Rachel's Tomb was worshipped by Jews, Christians, and Muslims, according to a 12th century travel account which cites its Arabic name as Carbata or Carbrata' (?).

[4] By the 19th century, its appearance is described by Edward Robinson as like Mulsim wali. This building is described as not ancient, though sheltering n older pile of stones within.

Mariam Shahin, on page 358 of Palestine: A Guide, notes the following, which may help in more directly answering your question:

Past the military checkpoint [at Bethlehem] on the righthand side the Israeli-built separation wall is in full ivew, as is the fortress-like Tomb of Rachel. An important symbol to grieving mothers, Muslims venerate the biblical matriarch, whose male children were killed at Herod's orders. Women have come to her tomb to pray for health and fertility since time immemorial. Initially built by the Byzantines, the existing tomb was built by the Ottomans. In 1841, a British Jewish philanthropist had the dome's roof restored and reportedly made "special" arrangements for Jews at the site. Although the Tomb and Mosque of Bilal Ibn Rabah and a tribal cemetery of the Ta'amre Bedouin tribe share the property with the matriarchal tomb, they are off-limits to Muslims by order of the Isreli military. (Until 1977 the site had been under the protection of the Islamic Waqf and accessible to all.

The bold formatting is in Shahin's text. Its seems clear that thhe two names refer to two different entities located at the same site. Given that Rachel is a respected matriarch in Islamic tradition as well, her tomb was also venerated by Muslims. I guess with all the conflict over it, that veneration had subsided in recent years and the uncontestably Muslim connection of the mosque/tomb is being played up more. But the fact remains, the two names refer to different things located at the same site. Tiamut^talk 13:07, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I found mentions of "Bilal bin Rabah mosque" in Palestinian sources from early in 1997. Some of them clearly refer to two structures. I'd still like to know for how long the name of Bilal bin Rabah has been associated with it. So far I found nothing before 1997 but I can't search in Arabic. Zero^talk 13:40, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

I'll see what I can find in Arabic. However, I suspect that the place was known in Arbic as qubbat rahil for centuries before the name bilal ibn rbbah was attached. In Moshe Sharon's Corpus, he notes it is mentioned in the writings of Mujir al-Din as qubbat rahil ("Rachel's dome") [5]. Lots of other info on the Muslim veneration of it as Rachel's dome in that book as well. Tiamut^talk 14:33, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Tiamut, you have either made a typo in copying Shahin text or Shahin herself has made an glaring error: "An important symbol to grieving mothers, Muslims venerate the biblical matriarch, whose male children were killed at Herod's orders." Rachel died many years before Herod. Chesdovi (talk) 12:03, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi Chesdovi. The text reads exactly as I typed it. It is based (I think) on the tradition outlined in the Book of Matthew (2:16-18) where it says:

He [Herod gave orders to kill all the boys of Bethelehem ...In his way what the prophet Jeremiah had said came true: A sound is heard in Ramah, the sound of bitter weeping, Rachel is crying for her children; she refuses to be comforted, for they are dead.

Tiamut^talk 12:51, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

al-Bassa

Time to stop feeding the troll? Zero^talk 14:22, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Yes. I suspect its AH. Is a sock report necessary? Tiamut^talk 14:34, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Last edits make it 100% clear. It's gone now :). If it comes back, I'll see if we can get someone to semi-protect the talk page. That would be an unusual step, I think. Zero^talk 06:31, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Damascus Citadel?

Marhaba Tiamut. Citadel of Damascus has grown quite a bit since last week, and we're planning to take it to GA, would you be interested in joining the push? Yazan (talk) 18:47, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Greek Orthodox Church of the Annunciation

On March 14, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Greek Orthodox Church of the Annunciation, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Agil Aga

Tiamut dear, that was very generous of you, giving me DYK-credit for Mujir al-Din al-'Ulaymi...you did all the work...

Anyway; more work: I have for some time though we need a article on Agil Aga, the Beduin leader in the mid 19th century--he is buried at I'billin. And now I just found a picture of him, over at commons! [6] -You know I´m crazy about pictures ;) Anyway, Schölch write quite a bit about him in "Palestine in Transformation". And I see this article: http://www.jstor.org/pss/1570684 -I cannot see the full article, but perhaps Nableezy can? Cheers, Huldra (talk) 21:02, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

That sounds good, great that you got the article. I´ll just continue to add the sources on User:Huldra/Sources#Agil_Aga. He had a lot of interactions with the "expats" of the time, especially the different consulars, etc, --and they all wrote about him. In other words: lots of "old" sources. There is no hurry: I´ll leave it to you to start it when you feel like it...cheers, Huldra (talk) 21:48, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

I have this article in full, will I email it? In general, feel free to ask me about journal articles you can't get. I can get almost anything. Zero^talk 22:40, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Yeah; there are a zillion sources on him; so far I haven´t used the search-function at all, I´m just finding the sources mentioned in Schöltz..I´ll continue work in User:Tiamut/Aga, Cheers! Huldra (talk) 17:33, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

I´m not sure we can/should use the maps I put into User:Tiamut/Sinnabra --but it does show, at least, where people thought the place was. I´m no good a photo-fixing though, and we really should (if we use them) only have a part of the map? Cheers, Huldra (talk) 20:32, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

I have no concern about copyright -after all, I found the maps on commons. The size of the map is an issue, especially with the first one, if you could resize it to highlight the location of Sinnabra, it would be great. My biggest concert is, however, I don´t know how accurate these maps are? Basically they only show were they *thought* the location was. If we use them, we must be careful to note the date they were published..., and possibly by whom they were published. Cheers, Huldra (talk) 20:41, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Well, my impression is that few have looked very hard for non-Christian or non-Jewish remains.... Anyway, from what I understand from the discussion under Khirbat-ware here--the place is truly ancient, with habitation going back 4-5 thousand years? Huldra (talk) 21:38, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

User:Tiamut/Sinnabra

Some more sources:

• http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/judaica/ejud_0002_0003_0_02894.html ....this is a facinating article...for all it manage *not* to mention!!
• P. Delougaz and R. C. Haines, 1960: A Byzantine Church at Khirbet al-Karak, University of Chicago
• http://oi.uchicago.edu/pdf/03-04_Ind_Whitcomb.pdf
• http://oi.uchicago.edu/pdf/ois5.pdf ..if you download this .pdf-file, go to p.241, there is an article by Donald Whitcomb (2009): "From Pastoral Peasantry to tribal Urbanites: Arab Tribes and the foundation of the Islamic State." A *must* read! Includes a plan over the site, (p.253) Cheers, Huldra (talk) 00:51, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Only the first page found, I´m afraid:

http://middleeastmedievalists.org/uw141April2002.html

And look at this:

• http://www.tau.ac.il/humanities/archaeology/projects/betyerah/qasr.html

..and their bibliography:

• http://www.tau.ac.il/humanities/archaeology/projects/betyerah/publications.html

Cheers, Huldra (talk) 21:59, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

And:

• Israeli archaeologists identified Caliph Mu’awiya’s Lakeside Palace, 15 March 2010 (nice picture of the mosaic)

• http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hxlDHZsMH3ZXaZbHECPbV41CtOkQD9EGIPR00

and, from books, the connections to other cstles:

• http://books.google.no/books?id=kE_JgKlVltIC&pg=PA159&dq=sinnabra+whitcomb&cd=1#v=onepage&q=sinnabra%20whitcomb&f=false

Cheers, Huldra (talk) 21:59, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

I believe this site:

• //www.biblewalks.com/Sites/BeitYerach.html

is blacklisted on wp...but it has some wonderful photos;)....and some complete wrong information:( Cheers, Huldra (talk) 01:07, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

fame

Something interesting in email. Zero^talk 14:21, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Coordinator elections have opened!

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:25, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Balata al-Balad

On March 19, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Balata al-Balad, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:02, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Bayt Nuba

It seems we don't have an article, is that right?. It has a rich history. Jerome, Crusaders (as Betenuble/Betenoble), etcetc. Now settlement Mevo Horon. p102 in Pringle A-K (Bait Nuba). Hint, hint :). Zero^talk 13:55, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Will start something in user space soon. User:Tiamut/Sinnabra is pretty much done for now, but User:Tiamut/Aga is next up for development. Still, Bayt Nuba sounds mighty interesting. Soon ... I promise. Real life beckons at the moment though. Tiamut^talk 18:42, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi Tiamut, I'd like to thank you for not voting to delete that article that you did not like so much. I'd like to assure you that I did not want to push any POV with it, and, if I unwillingly did, it was only because of my inexperience in writing and/or editing such articles. Thanks for helping me to make it better. --Mbz1 (talk) 19:43, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

The spider house

Tiamut, you ended your comment on FoG talk page[7] with a sentence which is last words are written in Arabic: Don't worry though my friend, because it is all really awha(m) min beit il ankaboot. The translation of it is "Don't worry though my friend, because it is all really stronger than the house of the spider". Please notice that you should always add translation when you write in language different than English. Also, the term "house of the spider" is famous tem that was coined by and regulary use Hezbolla leader when he speak out publicaly against Israel-according to him, Israel is "the house of the spider". So, in this context, I just want to ask you if that's what you refered to? Does anyone who oppose some of FoG edits, to the matter of fact, is included in what you refered to as "the house of the spider"?--Gilisa (talk) 10:54, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Gilisa, it means "weaker than the spider's web", not stronger. Its a metaphor and I'm using it with multiple meanings here intended for Factsontheground, not anyone else and not about anyone editing here, but about the general situation she faced. Its meant to be of some comfort to her. Can you leave it at that? Tiamut^talk 16:21, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Tiamut you wrote: "Breein1007, your comment above crosses all kinds of lines". May I please ask if you also believe that statements by facts "Wikipedia is openly racist against Palestinians" that is proudly displayed at the user talk page also "crosses all kinds of lines", or you agree with it?--Mbz1 (talk) 16:52, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

I don't care to comment on the content of that edit. I will say that considering your own sensitivity to people repeatedly posting at your talk page taking issue with your comments and advocating for you to be blocked, I would think you would be more sensitive to a user who is blocked from even editing their talk page and can't respond to posts made by you and others tht she doesn't want to her from right now. Both you and Breein1007 should leave her alone. Tiamut^talk 17:09, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

I knew, you would not care to comment! BTW I know your "friend". I saw many like her, who would scream on demonstrations: "Palestine will be free from the river to the sea" while displaying Israeli flags with swastikas, and then accuse everybody around in being "racist".--Mbz1 (talk) 17:17, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

If you knew I wouldn't answer then your question was designed for some other end. Please stop soapboxing on my talk page and talking about a blocked editor that I've already asked you to leave alone. Dont bother replying. Tiamut^talk 17:25, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

You choosed to put it in Arabic, it is a very well known phrase sounded by Hasan Nasralla who describe Israel that way ("weaker than spider web" there is also the Hezbolla museum named "the Spider house". In the context of your grievances on racism against palestinians on FoG talk page it sound realy bad. Would appreciate if you avoid it next time, if it's not too much to ask.--Gilisa (talk) 17:29, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

It is too much to ask. Your assumption of bad faith regarding its meaning is not my problem. I will write in whatever language I want to. Just because Hassan Nasrallah uses a metaphor doesn't mean that I can't and I will use it whenever I see fit. And now if you're quite done, I'd appreciate you also staying off my talk page for now. Thanks. Tiamut^talk 17:33, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

new sources, now on the net

Tiamut dear, I am delighted to see that some of Elihu Grant books are now freely available on the net, including his (1907): The Peasantry of Palestine, and his (1921): The People of Palestine I have seen them often referred to, including in Khalidi and Weir. The 1921 book is especially rich on information on villages in the West Bank/Ramallah -area (Grant worked at the Ramallah Friends Schools.) Just look at the content, p.9 ....lots of info, cheers, Huldra (talk) 20:07, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Markook#Merge.3F

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Markook#Merge.3F. nsaum75^{¡שיחת!‎} 07:10, 24 March 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})

Thanks

Thanks for sticking up for me during my latest block. If there is anything I can do for you in the future just let me know. Factsontheground (talk) 12:34, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Ebla tablets

Marhaba Tiamut. I hope I am not imposing, but could you possibly run through this draft for Ebla tablets. You have a long experience with the controversies of Biblical archaeology and this seems like one that would invite a lot of it. Do you think it's better to completely cut that part about their "disputed" biblical significance and focus on their more potent cultural depictions of the era? Input would be welcome. Yazan (talk) 05:55, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the barnstar, I do really appreciate that. And thank you again for the copyedits and the input on Ebla. Happy Editing.Yazan (talk) 09:56, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

"BLP violation" nonsense

Dude, I really don't know what you're talking about, unless for some reason you're somehow expressing some degree of unwarranted solicitude for (WP:BLP violation redacted,Huldra (talk) 22:10, 30 March 2010 (UTC)) Qaradawi. Since I didn't add it to the "Yusuf Qaradawi" article, didn't propose adding it to the "Yusuf Qaradawi" article, never had the slightest intention of adding to the "Yusuf Qaradawi" article, didn't add it to the talk page of the "Yusuf Qaradawi" article, never had any intention of adding to the talk page of the "Yusuf Qaradawi" article, and wasn't even talking about Qaradawi as such (but merely happened to mention him in passing as one example among a large number ideologues who publicly uphold sleazy propaganda tactics which would be found to be unacceptable by most decent people who have any concern whatsoever with morality and ethics), it's hard for me to see your cries of "BLP violation" as any real legitimate concern... AnonMoos (talk) 15:41, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

By the way, I visited the Qaradawi article just now (thanks to you), and you can see what I said in the context of an actual discussion about Qaradawi at Talk:Yusuf al-Qaradawi... AnonMoos (talk) 16:44, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

See this. I think the lesson here (at least for me!) is to take this to WP:AN/I earlier-- not a prospect I really like; I would prefer to "argue it out". And I learned that it is a very thin line indeed between trying to demonstrate the Ethic of reciprocity,...and risk being blocked for violating WP:POINT! Take care, my dear...and don´t forget User:Tiamut/Aga! Cheers, Huldra (talk) 22:03, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Al-Sinnabra

On March 27, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Al-Sinnabra, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 21:35, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Leila Khaled cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Leila Khaled cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 16:55, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 March newsletter

We're half way through round two, and everything is running smoothly. Hunter Kahn (submissions) leads overall with 650 points this round, and heads pool B. TonyTheTiger (submissions) currently leads pool C, dubbed the "Group of Death", which has a only a single contestant yet to score this round (the fewest of any group), as well five contestants over 100 points (the most). With a month still to go, as well as 16 wildcard places, everything is still to play for. Anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Although unrelated to the WikiCup, April sees a Good Article Nominations backlog elimination drive, formulated as a friendly competition with small awards, as the Cup is. Several WikiCup contestants and judges have already signed up, but regular reviewers and those who hope to do more reviewing are more than welcome to join at the drive page. If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) 22:23, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Hello

Thank you Tiamut. Only as I can edit I've also post this on your page. Ashley kennedy3 (talk) 16:16, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

So nice to receive a message from you here. I'm so happy your freedom of movement has been restored. It means much less work for the rest of us. :) Tiamut^talk 16:19, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Few different things

Hi Tiamut, may I please ask you to review my sanctions and Special Enforcement Details here? I'd like to ask you please to keep an eye on me, and report any violation of the sanctions on my side, if you have a time of course.

May I please ask you to review those sanctions that were imposed for a single comment here concerning the article that is not even included

in Israeli–Palestinian conflict category. I asked you to review the sanctions in order to try to make you feel more fair towards administrators actions. I know it is hard,

but maybe you're willing to give it a try.

The last thing is about absolutely different matter. Few days ago I watched a documentary at FOX about George Bernard Shaw, marx, hitler and so on. They said Shaw was advocating putting all unproductive people to gas chambers and gas them to death. I could not believe it! I Google it, and I found few sites that confirmed it [8]

I am not sure, if I will be able to enjoy My Fair Lady the way I used to ever again.--Mbz1 (talk) 00:55, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

They said Shaw was advocating putting all unproductive people to gas chambers

Wow! So GBS would have gassed all the wheelers and dealers in Wall Street?Nishidani (talk) 06:02, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments by others

[9], seems relevant to the topic discussion and should not have been removed per Wikipedia:TALK#How_to_use_article_talk_pages. Dreadstar ☥ 20:37, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

<copy> Here. Does the article linked mention Muhammad al-Durrah? No. The connection is in the mind of the editor who placed it there and based on his OR conclusion that this recent incident somehow means the conspiracy theories surrounding Durrah's death are justified. Talk pages are not a forum for general discussion of the topic. Please revert your reinstatement of this edit. Thanks. Tiamuttalk 15:06, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Please re-read Wikipedia:TALK#Others.27_comments, specifically:

Refactoring for relevance: Archiving material not relevant to improving the article (per the above subsection #How to use article talk pages). Formerly it was not uncommon to simply delete off-topic posts, but this has led to disputes from time to time, and it is generally better to move such threads to an archive page. It is still common, and uncontroversial, to simply delete gibberish, rants about the article subject (as opposed to its treatment in the article) and test edits, as well as harmful or prohibited material as described above. Another form of refactoring is to move a thread of entirely personal commentary between two editors to the talk page of the editor who started the off-topic discussion.

Please respond here for convenience, I've got your talk page watchlisted. Dreadstar ☥ 15:56, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

The comment is likely to provoke a rather unproductive discussion, unrelated to the article's improvement. Per WP:ARBPIA, editors are asked to confine their discussions to material related directly to the articles' improvement, without straying into off-topic discussions on whether or not a particular thesis discussed in reliable sources is true or not. The comment I deleted is best left deleted. I see another editor has removed it now too as well. I'd ask you respect that removal. You reversion on my removal of the comment was more problematic than letting it remain removed. If you want to archive it instead, go ahead. I simply do not want to have to respond to it, when it has nothing to do article improvement. Tiamut^talk 16:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

I see it's been removed again, I'll not reinstate it. Hopefully the issue stops there. Dreadstar ☥ 17:04, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

this user is obviously doing about nothing but slip SOAP in every edit.

I think enough is enough. she is obviously not here to write an encyclopedia . 79.182.50.19 (talk)