User talk:January

Drug Therapy Problems

To: Cassandra 73

Thank you for cleaning up wikipedia of spam, but I must ask you to reverse your speedy deletion of Drug Therapy Problems. This section actually can not be reworded because it is technical information that is defined by those exact phrases. I listed one copyrighted source as an example that I didn't just pull it out of my hat, but in fact I could list 100's of sources. This is a very important topic because it correlates to many other disciplines related to pharmacy and drug therapy. One author does not hold copyright to these definitions as they are national guidelines that are then talked about in vast medical literature specifically pharmacy related. comment added by speedymarathon (speedymarathon) —Preceding undated comment added 09:20, 26 January 2010 (UTC).

I'm not an administrator so I can't reverse the deletion myself, but it may help if I clarify why I tagged it. There was no indication on the website it appeared to come from that the text was in the public domain. Brief quotes can be used in an article if correctly attributed, but if the entire article matches the source word-for-word this is usually a copyright infringement.

If you disagree and still want the article restored, you can contest this at Deletion Review (WP:DRV). Cassandra 73 (talk) 17:31, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Comment From Me to You

Note To Cassandra73 Thank you, Though it was Deleted, I Will Actually Re-Make The Page, But Instead, I Will "Put it in my own Words". I Aplogize For Any Inconviences That I May Have Caused To You Cassandra73. --The Demon Of The Wiki Sea, Razgriz 15:58, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

no worries, this subject need sto be highlighted and put out to the world as much as possible. thanks for your time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dperks (talk • contribs) 08:56, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

CD/DVD copy protection

Thank you for reverting the SPAM in this page - I did the same yesterday! Since the spammer changes his address, I've asked (and got) page protection (three days granted). Keep up the good work - it can be hell out there!

Since you seem keen to revert vandalism, you might like to consider using Twinkle - where you can easily revert a change and twinkle will make it easy for you to add the standard warnings - I think you need to be autoconfirmed first (4 days and 10 edits).

Another useful tool is Vandal fighter for seeing in real time which pages have been edited. I used this for quite a while until I got enough experience to be able to get roll-back rights to use Huggle  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:48, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Zakerie deletion

can you please tell me why you deleted my page.

Welcome

Hello, Cassandra 73! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing!  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:54, 19 September 2009 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Rollback

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks.  —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 07:31, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, January. You have new messages at The ed17's talk page.
Message added 17:47, 12 October 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Ed (talk • contribs) 17:47, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Here's to you for staying up well into the night to revert vandalism and keep our encyclopedia running smoothly and vandal-free. We appreciate how fast you jumped into this! Keep up the great work! —Mr. E. Sánchez (that's me!)What I Do / What I Say 07:31, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, that's very kind although I have to admit it's already morning on my side of the Atlantic! Cassandra 73 (talk) 08:03, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Tate Forcier

Thanks for reverting the vandalism there, for the full story see my edit to WP:AIV right after you reported the newest IP [1]. Cheers,--Giants27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 22:57, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

The note about there only being one warning was added automatically by Huggle, so glad you spotted that and added the extra info. Cassandra 73 (talk) 23:02, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Noreen Heron and Associates

I did some work on Noreen Heron and Associates. You may want to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noreen Heron and Associates -- Eastmain (talk) 00:44, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

WP:Tennis

You've got a message.BLUE_DOG^TN 22:34, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

re: Farmers Home Administration

Thanks for your early intervention. The long programmatic notice that I got for trying to correct a simple error in spelling, albeit with the article title, was totally off-turning. I have enjoyed making some small contributions to Wikipedia in the past, but I was ready to hang up my editing spurs after that one. Had I been a complete newbie, I probably would have quit right then and there. When I saw the missing link in the Reformers ousted, I spent a fair amount of time researching the rural and agricultural programs arising from the New Deal. There are many things that need to be added to what I think is an important article about that activity. But I was not about to pursue that project after the abrupt digital slap on the hand for my boo boo. I almost didn't even return to see whether the problem was resolved. I was preparing a caustic "Dear Jimmy" message in my head. But I went to the watchlist out of habit and saw that you had made the needed correction. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grapeguy (talk • contribs) 16:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

AngryAryan

Nuts. What's the most disturbing to me is that the editor seems feminine. Some parents should be deemed Unfit. --King Öomie 18:29, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

AngryAryan is now blocked indefinitely .... --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:39, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

I saw that. Good show. --King Öomie 18:45, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

That was one of the crazier vandals I've seen. - Wysprgr2005 (talk) 18:46, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Yes, nasty. And thank you for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. Cassandra 73 (talk) 18:53, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, January. You have new messages at MWOAP's talk page.
Message added 18:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

MWOAP (talk) 18:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC) User talk:January/tb {{talkback [[User:tinitrivedi|tinitrivedi}} Hi, This is regarding the page on Usha Thorat that I am trying to develop. So far I have posted content from a press release issued by the RBI. As you know the press release is public domain and I am surprised to see a copyright notice by you.

Talkback

Hello, January. You have new messages at Tinitrivedi's talk page.
Message added 03:50, 3 January 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi ,

Surprised to see a possible copyright notice by you on Usha Thorat page being developed by me. The content currently is based on a press release - which as you know is public domain shailendra 03:50, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Phospholipid

Great work on catching the phospholipid article vadalism. If weren't for people who do what you do, Wikipedia couldn't function. Good luck to you. Anpetu-We (talk) 03:42, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

COI/N update, re: promotional bouncing balls flying down hills

Greetings!

I wanted to let you know that I accidentally bumped into your COI/N incident report by mistake after apparently being lost in the massive spam overload of the page on the questionably-placed huge incident up top for almost 48 hours. It seems to have fixed itself for now, but I gave out a full opinion here if you'd care to read. Really, sorry it got missed, but with the trainwreck there right now I can (unfortunately) see how it was glanced over since there aren't many true patrols active there (was there at random myself, for that matter). Cheers~ ♪ daTheisen(talk) 10:50, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:42, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome! Cassandra 73 (talk) 16:55, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Anti-Spam Barnstar

		The Anti-Spam Barnstar
		For your exemplary participation in the war on on-Wiki spam, especially on such a large scale, I award you this barnstar. Keep up the great work! Ioeth (talk contribs twinkle friendly) 18:16, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Alankhanphotography

Hiya Cassandra. (Any connection to Cassandra, prophetess of doom?) Thanks for your work identifying usernames that fail our username policy, every report I've seen has been right on the money. Do you have the Twinkle tab that says "csd" loaded up, and are you interested in tagging (most of) these userpages per WP:CSD#G11? It would be more efficient if I could make the deletion call at the same time I'm making the call on blocking, since once I've read everything I need to read to make one call, I'm in a position to be able to make the other call. Just a suggestion ... do whatever work you're comfortable doing. (watching) - Dank (push to talk) 14:02, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

No problem, I can tag the user pages as well when appropriate. (I sort of had Cassandra in mind when I was creating my account, it was an on-the-spot decision really!) Cassandra 73 (talk) 20:07, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I don't know if you prefer having the whole Twinkle package ... I prefer only having the tabs I need. You can search for "speedy" at Wikipedia:Twinkle/doc#Installing individual Twinkle modules if you like. - Dank (push to talk) 20:27, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for the revert.—Sandahl (♀) 21:37, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome! Cassandra 73 (talk) 22:14, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Zip!

		"Speedy" Barnstars
		In grateful acknowledgment of your excellent work with speedy deletions. (Feel free to archive this when it gets annoying!) - Dank (push to talk) 14:23, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you! Cassandra 73 (talk) 14:35, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, January. You have new messages at Ioeth's talk page.
Message added 19:01, 22 January 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ioeth (talk contribs twinkle friendly) 19:01, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Ta

for the move of my comment. Peridon (talk) 20:41, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

It's a little complicated

mainly because different admins tend to look at different things. It's quite likely that a real estate agent who goes by User:IdahoRealEstate and creates a promotional page is not going to contribute productively; the question is how to handle it. My advice is to pick one of two directions and go with it ... either be one of those people who argues the close cases, or aim for recognizing the cases that everyone agrees on, and just do those, and leave the close calls alone. Everyone agrees that we should {{uw-softerblock}} User:ReMax if he works for ReMax and talks about that in his edits (unless he's misbehaving badly, in which case we need something stronger, but that's rare). But theoretically, User:IdahoRealEstate might actually listen to what we're saying, and he might start writing about real estate in Idaho in general and drop his WP:COI. Because that's so unlikely, there are admins who are just waiting for reports like that one at UAA, and they pounce and block. Other admins don't like this because it seems to be (and probably is) against policy, and they blame both the blocking admin and the patroller for making their jobs harder. So ... probably best to forget about the "promotionalism" aspect, and instead think about the copyright problem: information can't flow freely if you lose track of who has the copyright (this is giving Google some major headaches with books.google.com), and we can't know which individual has the copyright on the edits if the edits are associated with a company or website. So, just report the users where there's some evidence that it's the name of their company, organization or website, and it's not a company of just one person. For instance, we softerblock an account named after a band only if there's evidence that it's more than just one guy; if it's one guy, then we treat the band name as an alias or pseudonym, and that's okay. (Watching) - Dank (push to talk) 22:39, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback. I’ll take that on board as it’s not my intention to make controversial reports. The board’s meant for blatant violations, so I think anything that might involve a close call can’t really be blatant. Cassandra 73 (talk) 23:50, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Works for me. - Dank (push to talk) 23:54, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

hey cassandra

hey this is Meghanstein

Hello. Cassandra 73 (talk) 19:11, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Wikiout

WuhWuzDat 17:52, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism to my userpage. Here, have a cookie:

Acather96 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Acather96 (talk) 06:35, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome! Thank you for the cookie. Cassandra 73 (talk) 09:37, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Good job!

Per point number 26 of WP:OWB, you are doing just fine, keep up the good work! (PS: Hope you like the little new look I gave you here!) --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™} 10:44, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you! That's certainly much better than the last time someone tried to give me a new look [2]. Cassandra 73 (talk) 14:06, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Brian D'Apice

You prodded Brian D'Apice; however, the author's talk page comment suggested to me that deletion is not uncontroversial. I have opened an AfD; please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian D'Apice. Thanks! —KuyaBriBri^Talk 18:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Hello Cassandra

Hello Cassandra

You recommended to delete: this post here. since there is another post on prlog.com

If you want I can delete the prlog.com post.

Kindly advice.

Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rm32500 (talk • contribs) 16:27, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

As far as I'm aware, if the text has already been published elsewhere that makes posting it on Wikipedia a copyright violation. Taking it down from the other site doesn't change the fact that it has been published in the past so I don't think it will solve the problem.

If you are the original copyright holder, you can donate the material to Wikipedia - please see WP:IOWN for details. Cassandra 73 (talk) 17:15, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Stay off other pages. There was no point in you touching my page. I have erased it all and will not be using your personal site anymore, by the way you suck!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.123.243.168 (talk) 14:01, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

If you're going to abuse me, could you at least log in first? Cassandra 73 (talk) 16:57, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

User:Fischerg & User:Gerryfischer (same editor?)

Hi Cassandra 73.
I am contacting you as you had some involvement with User:Fischergs' user page, see here

They seem to have another account as User:Gerryfischer, as the user pages contents were almost exactly the same.
I gather having multiple accounts (sockpuppets) is not generally allowed.

• User:Fischerg Userpage diff here.
• User:Gerryfischer Userpage diff here

The 2nd account came up at AN/I here regarding the content. ie BLP violation. I am not sure where to take this, WP:UAA (similar user names) maybe? or WP:SPI (but it's so obvious), or WP:AN/I as before?, so I came to ask you. What do you think?

ps. We seem to have started editing about the same date, see here

Thank you for your time, regards --220.101.28.25 (talk) 21:53, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

This is a strange case, but I don't think it's serious enough for WP:SPI at this point, since the accounts aren't being used to deceptively give the impression of two different editors or to evade a block. Probably not an issue for WP:UAA, as it's quite specific in it's focus on problems with the username itself, rather than problems implied by the username.

Fischerg has blanked the other user page and neither account has edited for a couple of days; I'd be inclined to take this back to ANI if there's any further disruptive editing from either account or a new account crops up (they may regard it as stale if it was raised now). Cassandra 73 (talk) 22:46, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for getting back to me, Cassandra 73.
I get you points. I imagine our Admins are busy enough with more immediate problems. Seems a case of an editor who does not fully understand what Wikipedia is about. If it's of any interest I found the other account by taking a slab of the blanked text and "Googling" it. I was rather surprised to get a fully matching 'hit'.

FisherG actually made a major addition to Richard Doty, which had been a stub since 2005! I'm looking at whether it is a wp:Copyvio (very possibly a cut/paste from another site) or formatting it properly and getting references to make a decent article. : ) --220.101.28.25 (talk) 11:09, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you...

...for this; that article's subject has had an extremely rough go of it on Wikipedia, and it's important to display the kind of vigilance in damage prevention that you showed there. Steve Smith (talk) 21:38, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Removal of PROD from Stephen Reynolds (film producer)

Hello Cassandra 73, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Stephen Reynolds (film producer) has been removed. It was removed by Akira1111 with the following edit summary '(no edit summary)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Akira1111 before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 08:05, 23 March 2010 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 08:05, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD - Dustin Robbins

Hello Cassandra! :) I've added my response to the AfD page for Dustin Robbins. A question for you, if you don't mind - I have several other articles that I want to add that are of importance to the Body Modification industry and I want to make sure that I am providing enough support for their inclusion. I have read most, if not all, of the information on creating articles and notability. The biggest issue I have come across is that it is difficult to provide evidence of notability in a case such as Dustin Robbins, where the subject is in an "alternative" industry that few "main-stream" or common media outlets report on. It seems it would leave Wikipedia incomplete to leave out notable subjects simply because they are unconventional or in a small industry, and therefor do not have many of the most commonly accepted sources. This is especially true in an industry such as Body Modification, where many notable subjects make a point to avoid main stream media outlets. Any recommendations? Thank you for your help! Qquackk (talk) 00:39, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi Qquackk. Wikipedia’s notability requirements are not the same as the everyday definition of notability; it’s generally determined by the strength of the coverage in reliable sources (see WP:GNG) and evidence of this has to be present in the article (WP:NRVE). Unfortunately if suitable coverage is not available there’s really no getting around that – this is upheld particularly rigorously for articles about living people. Cassandra 73 (talk) 16:11, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:U#Stale.3F

Your input is welcome. - Dank (push to talk) 14:47, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Re Jonathan Nash Hearder

Regarding this link that you left at the Jonathan Nash Hearder AfD - you don't happen to have access to it, do you? I'd love to use it to improve the article but obviously I'd need someone with access to a subscription. - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:07, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

• E-mail received. Thanks heaps! - DustFormsWords (talk) 23:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Ellen Willmott

On April 14, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ellen Willmott, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

{{DYKbotdo 11:52, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Elspeth Gibson

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Project MATHEMATICS!

Hi Cassandra 73, thank you for reviewing Project MATHEMATICS! back in November 2009. I am new to all this Wiki stuff, but tried to fix the "advert, notability and peacock" issues you noted. i also added a talk page. Could you review it again and see if the issues were fixed? Thanks very much.

64.40.60.118 (talk) 13:51, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for addressing the issues, the wording of the article is now OK. I have replaced the original tags with the "primary sources" tag as the article still lacks secondary sources, ie published sources from organisations who are not affiliated with the programme (WP:RS will provide more information more information about sourcing). Cassandra 73 (talk) 16:29, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

cavenger image architects

cassandra - I'm new to wikipedia and am trying to write my first article, which is this. Please be patient with me. I'm adding citations, etc, but you've submitted it for deletion. What's wrong?