User talk:Ttonyb1: Difference between revisions

Not clear how to go about editing the post to improve its documentation and delete stuff that isn't documented. I guess the article will disappear and I can start over? K Weaver Kathleenweaver (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:09, 30 September 2010 (UTC).[reply]

The issue stems from the lack of unsupported statements and lack of notability. See reliable sources for what constitutes a valid reference and notability for what is needed for an article. ttonyb (talk) 00:12, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Shotokan Karate Coalition

Hi there. I note you have included a request to speedy delete this article. Can you please see DMacks rquest also together with my explanation. I am trying to update this now but I have the note you have placed on there and cannot remove it. Can you please confirm? Thanks Kiwi Karateka (talk) 01:17, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I saw DMacks' statement and I waited 2 days before placing a CSD tag on it. BTW - you should not have removed the tag. ttonyb (talk) 04:12, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tonyb1. Please accept my apologies. This is/was my first article and I was trying to put the hang on tag as I wanted clarification but clearly I must have removed the tag. Please be assured that this was wholly unintentional. If this has caused inconvenience or otherwise then I apologise. I had exchanged correspondence with DMacks and believed that whilst this was work in progress, the further details I had added would be sufficient as I was aware of the time pressures I was under from DMacks. I now note that the page has been deleted again. I am at a loss now and am looking for guidance as I believed in my earlier exchange that the information was of a sufficient standard to warrant inclusion. I have also seen other similar karate organisations pages and see little difference in them. Any pointers or help would be really appreciated as I am not sure what to do now. Sorry. Kind regards Kiwi Karateka (talk) 07:41, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

contest Ol Irish Design and Build Company deletion

References got deleted of worry of copyright infringement however "Administrators should take care not to speedy delete pages or media except in the most obvious cases. If a page has survived a prior deletion discussion, it should not be speedy deleted except for newly discovered copyright violations. Contributors sometimes create pages over several edits, so administrators should avoid deleting a page that appears incomplete too soon after its creation." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CSD#A7 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wexgal (talk • contribs) 11:49, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ttonyb, I declined the speedy on this article in reaction to Opposes 12, 20, and 22 at my failed AfD. I'd like to get your reaction. (There's also a discussion going on about this at User_talk:SoWhy#Query, but I don't want to be accused of canvassing, and I've already probably invited too many people to that party, so I'd appreciate it if you'd answer here, not there. You're a very active non-sysop CSD'er and I'd like to get your view. I'm watching this page. Best regards, TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 15:30, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TransporterMan, I need to logout for a while, but I'll review when I return. Thanks... ttonyb (talk) 15:47, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cyberwit press

Myself, I think a statement that a press has published multiple famous authors is very unmistakably a statement at least asserting importance , and your speedy was therefore not really correct. But I do know if the press is actually notable , and I advised the author to show that more clearly before trying to restore an article. DGG ( talk )

Thanks for the heads-up~~; however, I don't think I marked it.~~ I now see it as of September 5th. ttonyb (talk) 16:53, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Natasha Bedingfield

You suggested that Natasha Bedingfield was a copyright violation of [1]. But isn't it more likely that it's the other way around? See Talk:Natasha Bedingfield#Copyright claim for details. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:23, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and sorry for the trouble. ttonyb (talk) 14:15, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Crowd size controversies

Could you hold off for a day or two? There is a huge edit war going on at the Restoring Honor Rally crowd size section resulting in it's second block. nd if sensible heads prevail, the crowd size section at the Restoring Honor Rally will be much more brief, stating the range of estimates, the methods of arrriving at them and a little about the controversy, which one source noted ended up in gaining as much notoriety as the event itself. I currently has a kitchen sink approach, with too much given to the CBS scientific numbers, and too much weight given to dubious misreported estimate. This article is intended to be much different. The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous (talk) 06:49, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of K.L. Misra

(munnanmisra (talk) 07:25, 7 October 2010 (UTC))I had started writing this page which has been removed as it has been assumed that it was a case of copyright violation from http://klmisra.blogspot.com/. Since that article has been written by me about Pt. K.L. Misra and I operate that blog (http://klmisra.blogspot.com/), I fail to understand how can it be a possible case of copyright violation. Further Pt. K.L. Misra has expired in 1975. If it is acceptable I would appreciate if the speedy deletion could be undone. Thanks.[reply]

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. Until such time, the article is considered a copyright violation. As for the fact the individual has died, that has no bearing on the validity of the article and does not absolve the copyright issue. ttonyb (talk) 15:10, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

fraser cameron article

violation of my own copyrighted image now removed and replaced with my own image taken from camera. malcolm fraser cameron Malcolm Fraser Cameron (talk) 19:45, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article is still a copy of the original text noted in the CSD tag. ttonyb (talk) 19:51, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you

why do you wanna delete my page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kazzdude1 (talk • contribs) 03:41, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article fails to meet the criteria for inclusion into Wikipedia. If you continue to vandalize my pages you will be banned from editing and creating article, I suggest you stop your disruptive edits. ttonyb (talk) 03:46, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI Airplaneman ✈ 03:43, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I saw the disruptive edits. Thanks for reversing them for me. ttonyb (talk) 03:46, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jenny Gomez

Hello, I've declined your CSD A7 tag of Jenny Gomez because importance has been asserted. Feel free to AfD, PROD, etc. if you wish. Regards, Airplaneman ✈ 04:02, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. ttonyb (talk) 04:03, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I realize there may be opinions regarding her notability. I came across the article about her in the Wall Street Journal two days ago and I thought it was really cool that a shoe shine lady made the WSJ! I was even thinking about buying a good pair of shoes (I only own 2 pairs of sneakers and 1 pair of workboots, but I have an old pair of good shoes somewhere perhaps) just so I could go into the city and meet her and have them shined. But I don't know if she is notable enough for everybody here, so I can kind of see how it might go either way, keeping or deleting? I hope the community decides to keep Jenny Gomez but I'm not going to fuss much about it other than to say that I hope Wikipedians keep her in, and I won't have one of my usual wiki-tantrums if the article gets deleted.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 11:09, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Hostert

Racing career of Christian Hostert Sources: http://3511.hot2.zap.lu/press http://www.wort.lu/wort/web/sport/artikel/01757/hostert-trotz-widrigkeiten-zu-siebtem-sieg.php http://www.wort.lu/wort/web/sport/artikel/02505/hostert-knuepft-an-gute-saisonresultate-an.php http://www.kartetpantera.com/res_Essay_avril2007.html http://www.kartetpantera.com/res_CoupedefranceN100_2006.html http://www.kartetpantera.com/res_Biesheim_15_avril06.html http://www.kartetpantera.com/res_kartmag05.html http://www.kartetpantera.com/res_coupedefrance_lavelan.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by HosCh030 (talk • contribs) 07:20, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zed bazi

Other than the text that I've removed (and that you restored!) to the article, nothing on the cached version of the Facebook page has been in the article. Please stop trying to have this text deleted; you're already at 4RR. Nyttend (talk) 19:55, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If it is a copyright violation, why should I stop trying to have it deleted? Perhaps you should give me the benefit of the doubt and ask how it is I am able to get the copy of the text and you are not. ttonyb (talk) 20:14, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

christian hostert

what's your problem dude? please at least check the links and search the web instead of deleting the article after 5 seconds of publication! and indicate what's the problem of the page? I edited the page and added a text+links so what? There are lots of racers who are minor important on wikipedia! I edited a text about his career so am I just wasting my time for nothing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by HosCh030 (talk • contribs) 17:24, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hi

why did you just delete all of my work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rachelhelizabeth (talk • contribs) 03:29, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

why did you delete all of my work. you have no right to. i was in the middle of creating a page for a friend and you just delete it. she is real. just look at her imdb page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rachelhelizabeth (talk • contribs) 03:41, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kenneth Cody article

I understand why the article was deleted. I just wanted people to know the candidate's platform, especially since there was a redlink on Rush Holt's wiki page for Kenneth Cody. DM 794 (talk) 19:11, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Atomic Tom

Hey Tony go check the page, its been sourced with reputable sources.CPacker ^{talk to me} 00:59, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brendan McElroy Deletion

Hi Tony,

I'm not sure why this entry is nominated for deletion. The Dr Brendan website seems to get quite a quite a few hits and he has been the focus of several non trivial news publications and broadcasts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bpamac (talk • contribs) 05:04, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The number of hits a website gets does not support Wikipedia based notability. The article appears to fail WP:BIO – it seems to lack "non-trivial" secondary coverage. ttonyb (talk) 05:17, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In what way are the new york times and cnn trivial? Many people with bios in wikipedia do not have a full page in the NY Times, or a 5 minute segment on cnn... am I wrong? comment added by Bpamac (talk

Revision as of 05:17, 18 October 2010 edit Ttonyb1 (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 81,280 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:27, 18 October 2010 edit undo Bpamac (talk \| contribs) 34 edits →‎Brendan McElroy Deletion Next edit →
Line 177:		Line 177:

	:The number of hits a website gets does not support Wikipedia based [[WP:BP\|notability]]. The article appears to fail [[WP:BIO]] – it seems to lack "non-trivial" secondary coverage. [[User:Ttonyb1\|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:blue; text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.5em; letter-spacing: 2px; padding: 1px 3px;"> <i>ttonyb</i></span>]] ([[User talk:Ttonyb1#top\|talk]]) 05:17, 18 October 2010 (UTC)		:The number of hits a website gets does not support Wikipedia based [[WP:BP\|notability]]. The article appears to fail [[WP:BIO]] – it seems to lack "non-trivial" secondary coverage. [[User:Ttonyb1\|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:blue; text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.5em; letter-spacing: 2px; padding: 1px 3px;"> <i>ttonyb</i></span>]] ([[User talk:Ttonyb1#top\|talk]]) 05:17, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

			In what way are the new york times and cnn trivial? Many people with bios in wikipedia do not have a full page in the NY Times, or a 5 minute segment on cnn... am I wrong? comment added by [[User:Bpamac\|Bpamac]] ([[User talk:Bpamac\|talk]]