User talk:69.86.233.94

hello Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Golan Heights, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Hertz1888 (talk) 03:11, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Jewish history. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RolandR 08:21, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Palestine, you will be blocked from editing. RolandR 08:21, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2010

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lehi (group), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 07:00, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Lehi (group). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. SS✞^(Kay) 07:50, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Mohammad Amin al-Husayni. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 08:04, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:15, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Leni Riefenstahl, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. PleaseStand ^(talk) 02:41, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi, sorry for deleting this, but i have no idea how to communicate with you otherwise. how was my correct edit of leni riefenstahl as a nazi propagandist, not constructive? Is the truth no longer deemed constructive if its not politically correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.86.233.94 (talk • contribs) 03:00, 18 March 2010

Controversial information about living persons on Wikipedia must be cited and must not be libelous. Feel free to add the information back once you have cited a reliable source. If you would like to reply to this message, please reply below, adding four tildes, ~~~~ to sign your name and date at the end. PleaseStand ^(talk) 03:14, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on State of Palestine. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:35, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 17:21, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. TNXMan 17:46, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

April 2010

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:17, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2010

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 18:53, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.86.233.94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Malik Shabazz is clearly blocking me for personal reasons and I would like to contact an administrator about his removal as an admin. I made constructive edits that in no way warrant blockage

Decline reason:

Really? This disgusting piece of non-WP:NPOV editing is something you want to complain about being blocked over? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:39, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.86.233.94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Malik Shabazz is clearly blocking me for personal reasons and I would like to contact an administrator about his removal as an admin. I made constructive edits that in no way warrant blockage. She clearly also has a personal vendetta against me, as you can see she's blocked me numerous times before and blocked me literally 30 seconds after I made the edit today.

Decline reason:

No grounds for unblock provided; the block is appropriate given your behavior (including on this page.) --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:00, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.86.233.94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Malik Shabazz has clearly blocked me for personal reasons. As you can see, she has blocked me 4 times before, though I made constructive edits. On samir kuntar, I simply restated what was later written in the article. And on the state of palestine, Jerusalem is not the capital and the plo illegally declared it as such, considering you cannot declare and already existing capital of another country as your own.

Decline reason:

No reason given for unblock. Block has already been stated by two uninvolved admins to be justified. Repeated posting of the same comment will result in your losing access to your talk page. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 21:14, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How am I not giving a valid reason for unblocking? My posts are clearly not disruptive or vandalizing and I have clearly demonstrated that shabazz has a personal qualm with me, as she removed my edits literally 30 seconds after I posted them. 69.86.233.94 (talk) 21:17, 18 May 2010 (UTC) bob

Oh well, I have an endless supply of computers shabby. Hope you can keep up! 69.86.233.94 (talk) 21:22, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you.Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 00:25, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Please do not violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Samir Kuntar. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:28, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm not violating neutral point of view policy. samir kuntar purposely targeted civilians, making him a terrorist by definition, he then murdered a 4 year old and her family, making him a murderer by definition. How is this not a neutral point of view?

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at State of Palestine, you may be blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 01:10, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at State of Palestine, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:11, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked for a period of 1 month from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 16:42, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Samir Kuntar, you may be blocked from editing. nableezy - 15:57, 5 August 2010 (UTC) 15:57, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at State of Palestine, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:16, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Carlos Latuff has been reverted, as it introduced negative or controversial biographical material without providing a reliable source for this information. Wikipedia requires that all such material be sourced to address the issue of libel. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:54, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Qana airstrike, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. nableezy - 17:59, 8 September 2010 (UTC) 17:59, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 18:27, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2011

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 01:48, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:10, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.86.233.94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This user malik shabazz seems to be shadowing my life as she undos almost every edit I do, instantaneously. Sunlight is good for you malik. Now in regards to my being blocked by this mole person, I do not see how my edits were disruptive. In the state of "palestine" article, I changed 'Israeli control' to 'it being the capital of Israel', in the lede section about Jerusalem.69.86.233.94 (talk) 22:15, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You did a bit more than that, for instance this which came after a final warning. Furthermore, you achieve nothing by complaining about another editor. Please reread WP:NOTTHEM and the other parts of the guide to appealing blocks. Favonian (talk) 22:30, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ok, and how is calling someone who murdered people a "murderer", considered disruptive? 69.86.233.94 (talk) 22:43, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Capital of Israel

Perhaps I am being dense, but is not the capital of Israel Tel Aviv? --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:31, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

The capital of Israel is Jerusalem. Check wikipedias article about Israel.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.86.233.94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This user malik shabazz seems to have a personal vendetta against me as she undos almost every edit I do, instantaneously, for the past 3 months. Now in regards to my being blocked by this mole person, I do not see how my edits were disruptive. In the state of "palestine" article, I changed 'Israeli control' to 'it being the capital of Israel', in the lede section about Jerusalem and in the samir kuntar article, I changed the superfluous "former member of plo" to "murderer". I don't see how calling someone who murdered people and children a murderer can be deemed disruptive or vandalism. 69.86.233.94 (talk) 22:46, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I've reviewed some of your recent edits, and it appears that you are only interested in contributing a political point of view to Wikipedia. Since Wikipedia requires that all edits be neutral, that isn't content we need, so the block will help Wikipedia to meet its goals. If you are truly interested in helping Wikipedia, and not just in trying to further your own ideas, you might consider, when your block expires in March, avoiding the topics of Israel and Palestine entirely, and instead writing about subjects that you don't have such passionate opinions about. Cheese, for instance, or Classical music.

I don't have a plan for editing differently, because I will not be. What are you my parent? Why would I plan on NOT stating facts as I have been? Are you suggesting I make comments that are untrue? Because I don't believe an administrator should be suggesting that contributors state lies rather than truth. Clearly you're not understanding my very simple qualm, could you connect me to a competent administrator please? 69.86.233.94 (talk) 23:54, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:23, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yes thank you for your relevant suggestions about cheese. However it is not up to you or wikipedia to determine whether or not I have an agenda. Obviously I contribute to topics of which I am knowledgeable and that would be Israel. My comments were in no way biased or serving my own interests. My edits were also not "points of view" as you claim, but empirical facts. If you are truly interested in making false assumptions perhaps you should consider liberalism.

It may not have been your intention, but you made this comment and signed it with my name. I did not make this comment, nor would I; I am able to determine, by reading words, whether or not they meet Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Indeed, it would be rather strange if I could not. I would not ever claim that such a simple reading skill was impossible. Please, be careful not to sign my name to your words.-FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:31, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

I'm new to wiki so I don't really know the technicalities of it. It seems you are not able to determine, by reading words, whether or not comments meet wikipedias neutral standard. It seems also you can simply not read, because, as aforementioned, my edits were FACT not OPINION. Jerusalem IS the capital of Israel and samir kuntar DID murder people and IS therefore a MURDERER. It is rather strange indeed that you do not possess these simple reading skills. 69.86.233.94 (talk) 23:37, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Interesting. But not helpful in showing that you have a good plan for editing differently than you have been. I'm sorry that I wasn't able to communicate clearly about the neutral point of view policy; I'll let you read it for yourself, instead. I wish you the best of luck. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:39, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

I don't have a plan for editing differently, because I will not be. What are you my parent? Why would I plan on NOT stating facts as I have been? Are you suggesting I make comments that are untrue? Because I don't believe an administrator should be suggesting that contributors state lies rather than truth. Clearly you're not understanding my very simple qualm, could you connect me to a competent administrator please? 69.86.233.94 (talk) 23:47, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.86.233.94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This user malik shabazz seems to be shadowing my life as she undos almost every edit I do, instantaneously. Now in regards to my being blocked by this mole person, I do not see how my edits were disruptive or vandalism. In the state of "palestine" article, I changed 'Israeli control' to 'it being the capital of Israel', in the lede section about Jerusalem and in the samir kuntar article I changed the superfluous "former member of plo" to "murderer". My edits were not my opinion, they were fact: Jerusalem is the capital of Israel and samir kutar killed a 5 year old girl and her family- effectively murdering them. 69.86.233.94 (talk) 23:33, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The purpose of this community is to build and maintain a neutral encyclopaedia. Your edits are making that more difficult for the rest of us. Also, I am hereby notifying you of WP:ARBPIA#Discretionary sanctions (see below). Also, be aware that further unblock requests that don't address the reason for your block will result in the loss of your ability to edit your talk page. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:53, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As a result of an arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad editing restrictions, described here and below.

• Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
• The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
• Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines.
• Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently WP:AE), or the Committee.

These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.

Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.

This notice is only effective if given by an uninvolved administrator and logged here. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:53, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Note

I've restored the material you removed from this talk page. It was kind of time-consuming, so please don't remove it again. Thanks. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:03, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

January 2006

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jcaraballo enwiki eswiki 00:14, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.