Jump to content

Rolls-Royce RB211: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Aeroweanie (talk | contribs)
505 edits
Added Hooker ref
→Industrial RB211: correct section link
Line 78: Line 78:
=== Industrial RB211 ===
=== Industrial RB211 ===


When Rolls-Royce was developing the -22, it realised that it would be straightforward to develop a version of the engine for land-based [[Gas turbine#Gas turbines for electrical power production|power generation]], and in 1974 the industrial RB211 was launched. When the -524 arrived shortly afterwards, its improvements were incorporated in the industrial RB211 which was designated RB211-24. The generator was gradually developed over the following years<ref name="RB211_evolution">{{cite web | last = Rolls-Royce | title = Evolution of the RB211 | url=http://www.rolls-royce.com/energy/overview/history/evo_rb211.htm | accessdate = 2007-01-25 }}</ref> and is still marketed today as a range of generators producing 25.2-32MW.<ref name="Industrial_RB211">{{cite web | last = Rolls-Royce | title = Energy Product Areas | url=http://www.rolls-royce.com/energy/products/default.jsp | accessdate = 2007-01-25 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20070121160205/http://www.rolls-royce.com/energy/products/default.jsp <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archivedate = 2007-01-21}}</ref> Many of its installations have been in the offshore oil and gas production industries.<ref name="Industrial_RB211_applications">{{cite web | last = Rolls-Royce | title = RB211 Experience | url=http://www.rolls-royce.com/energy/products/powergen/rb211/exper.jsp | accessdate = 2007-01-25 }} {{Dead link|date=October 2010|bot=H3llBot}}</ref>
When Rolls-Royce was developing the -22, it realised that it would be straightforward to develop a version of the engine for land-based [[Gas turbine#Industrial gas turbines for power generation|power generation]], and in 1974 the industrial RB211 was launched. When the -524 arrived shortly afterwards, its improvements were incorporated in the industrial RB211 which was designated RB211-24. The generator was gradually developed over the following years<ref name="RB211_evolution">{{cite web | last = Rolls-Royce | title = Evolution of the RB211 | url=http://www.rolls-royce.com/energy/overview/history/evo_rb211.htm | accessdate = 2007-01-25 }}</ref> and is still marketed today as a range of generators producing 25.2-32MW.<ref name="Industrial_RB211">{{cite web | last = Rolls-Royce | title = Energy Product Areas | url=http://www.rolls-royce.com/energy/products/default.jsp | accessdate = 2007-01-25 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20070121160205/http://www.rolls-royce.com/energy/products/default.jsp <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archivedate = 2007-01-21}}</ref> Many of its installations have been in the offshore oil and gas production industries.<ref name="Industrial_RB211_applications">{{cite web | last = Rolls-Royce | title = RB211 Experience | url=http://www.rolls-royce.com/energy/products/powergen/rb211/exper.jsp | accessdate = 2007-01-25 }} {{Dead link|date=October 2010|bot=H3llBot}}</ref>


=== Marine WR-21 ===
=== Marine WR-21 ===

Revision as of 19:02, 12 December 2011

RB211
Rolls-Royce RB211 22C
Type Turbofan
Manufacturer Rolls-Royce
First run 1969
Major applications Lockheed L-1011
Boeing 747
Boeing 757
Boeing 767
Tupolev Tu-204
Developed into Rolls-Royce Trent

The Rolls-Royce RB211 is a family of high-bypass turbofan engines made by Rolls-Royce plc and capable of generating 37,400 to 60,600 pounds-force (166 to 270 kilonewtons) thrust. Originally developed for the Lockheed L-1011 (TriStar), it entered service in 1972 and was the only engine to power this aircraft type. Although the costs of development forced Rolls-Royce Limited into bankruptcy and nationalisation by the British government, the company survived and the RB211 became the first true three-spool engine, which also turned Rolls-Royce from a small player in the airline industry into a global competitor.[1]

The RB211 was officially superseded in the 1990s by the Rolls-Royce Trent family of engines, the conceptual offspring of the RB211.[1]

History

Background

In 1966 American Airlines announced a requirement for a new short-medium range airliner with a focus on low-cost per-seat operations. While they were looking for a twin-engined plane, the aircraft manufacturers needed more than one customer to justify developing a new airliner. Eastern Airlines were also interested, but needed greater range and needed to operate long routes over water; at the time this demanded three engines in order to provide redundancy. Other airlines were also in favour of three engines. Lockheed and Douglas responded with designs, the L-1011 TriStar and DC-10 respectively. Both had three engines, transcontinental range and seated around 300 passengers in a widebody layout with two aisles.

Both planes also required new engines. Engines were undergoing a period of rapid advance due to the introduction of the high bypass concept, which provided for greater thrust, improved fuel economy and less noise than the earlier low-bypass designs. Rolls-Royce had been working on an engine of the required 45,000 lbf (200 kN) thrust class for an abortive attempt to introduce an updated Hawker Siddeley Trident as the RB178. This work was later developed for the 47,500 lbf (211 kN) thrust RB207 to be used on the Airbus A300, before it was cancelled in favor of the RB211 programme.

Meanwhile Rolls-Royce was also working on a series of triple-spool[2] designs, which promised to deliver higher efficiencies. In this configuration, three groups of turbines spin three separate concentric shafts to power three sections of the compressor area running at different speeds. In addition to allowing each stage of the compressor to run at its optimal speed, the triple-spool design is also more compact and rigid, although more complex to build and maintain. Several designs were being worked on at the time, including a 10,000 lbf (44 kN) thrust design known as the RB203 intended to replace the Rolls-Royce Spey.

Finalisation of design

On 23 June 1967, Rolls-Royce offered Lockheed the RB211-06 for the L-1011. The new engine was to be rated at 33,260 lbf (147,900 N) thrust and combined features of several engines then under development: the large high-power, high-bypass design from the RB207 and the triple-spool design of the RB203.[3] To this they added one totally new piece of technology, a fan stage built of a new carbon fibre material called Hyfil developed at RAE Farnborough. The weight savings were considerable over a similar fan made of steel, and would have given the RB211 an advantage over its competitors in terms of power-to-weight ratio. Despite knowing that the timescale would be challenging for an engine incorporating these new features, Rolls-Royce committed to putting the RB211 into service in 1971.[4]

Lockheed felt the new engine would offer a distinct advantage over the otherwise similar DC-10 product. However, Douglas had also requested proposals from Rolls for an engine to power its DC-10, and in October 1967 Rolls responded with a 35,400 lbf (157,000 N) thrust version of the RB211 designated the RB211-10. There followed a period of intense negotiations between airframe manufacturers Lockheed and Douglas, potential engine suppliers Rolls-Royce and General Electric and Pratt & Whitney, as well as the major U.S. airlines. During this time prices were negotiated downwards, while the required thrust ratings were raised ever higher. By early 1968, Rolls was offering a 40,600 lbf (181,000 N) thrust engine designated RB211-18. Finally, on 29 March 1968 Lockheed announced that it had received orders for 94 TriStars, and placed an order with Rolls-Royce for 150 sets of engines designated RB211-22.[4][5]

RB211-22 series

Development and testing

The RB211's complexity required a lengthy development and testing period. By Autumn 1969 Rolls-Royce was struggling to meet the performance guarantees to which it had committed: the engine had insufficient thrust, was over-weight and its fuel consumption was too high. The situation deteriorated further when in May 1970 the new Hyfil (a Carbon (fiber) composite) fan stage, after passing every other test, shattered into pieces when a chicken was fired into it at high speed.[6] Rolls had been developing a titanium blade as an insurance against difficulties with Hyfil, but this meant extra cost and more weight. It also brought its own technical problems when it was discovered that only one side of the titanium billet was of the right metallurgical quality for blade fabrication.[7]

In September 1970, Rolls-Royce reported to the government that development costs for the RB211 had risen to £170.3 million - nearly double the original estimate; furthermore the estimated production costs now exceeded the £230,375 selling price of each engine.[4] The project was in crisis.[8]

Bankruptcy and aftermath

By January 1971 Rolls-Royce had become insolvent, and on 4 February 1971 was placed into receivership,[9] seriously jeopardizing the L-1011 TriStar program. Because of its strategic importance, the company was nationalised by the then-Conservative government of Edward Heath, allowing development of the RB211 to be completed.

Because Lockheed was itself in a vulnerable position, the government required that the US government guarantee the bank loans that Lockheed needed to complete the L-1011 project.[10] Despite some opposition, the US government provided these guarantees.[11] In May 1971, a new company called "Rolls-Royce (1971) Ltd." acquired the assets of Rolls-Royce from the Receiver, and shortly afterwards signed a new contract with Lockheed. This revised agreement cancelled penalties for late delivery, and increased the price of each engine by £110,000.

Kenneth Keith, the new chairman who had been appointed to rescue the company, persuaded Stanley Hooker to come out of retirement and return to Rolls. As technical director he led a team of other retirees to fix the remaining problems on the RB211-22. The engine was finally certified on 14 April 1972,[12] about a year later than originally planned, and the first TriStar entered service with Eastern Air Lines on 26 April 1972. Hooker was knighted for his role in 1974.

The RB211's initial reliability in service was not as good as had been expected due to the focus of the development program on meeting the engine's performance guarantees. Early deliveries were of the RB211-22C model, derated slightly from the later -22B. However, a programme of modifications during the first few years in service improved matters considerably, and the series has since matured into a highly reliable engine.

RB211-524 series

Although originally designed for the L-1011-1, Rolls-Royce knew that the RB211 could be developed to provide greater thrust. By redesigning the fan and the IP compressor, Hooker's team managed to increase the engine's thrust to 50,000 lbf (220 kN). The new version was designated RB211-524, and would be able to power new variants of the L-1011, as well as the Boeing 747.

Rolls-Royce had tried without success to sell the RB211 to Boeing in the 1960s, but the new -524 offered significant performance and efficiency improvements over the Pratt & Whitney JT9D which Boeing had originally selected to power the 747. In October 1973 Boeing agreed to offer the RB211-524 on the 747-200, and British Airways became the first airline to order this combination which entered service in 1977. Rolls continued to develop the -524, increasing its thrust through 51,500 lbf (229,000 N) with the -524C, then 53,000 lbf (240 kN) in the -524D which was certificated in 1981. Notable airline customers included Qantas, Cathay Pacific, Cargolux and South African Airways. When Boeing launched the larger 747-400 still more thrust was required, and Rolls responded with the -524G rated at 58,000 lbf (260 kN) thrust and then the -524H with 60,600; these were the first versions to feature FADEC.[13] The -524H was also offered as a third engine choice on the Boeing 767, and the first of these entered service with British Airways in February 1990.

These would have been the final developments of the -524, but when Rolls developed the successor Trent engine, it found it could fit the Trent 700's improved HP system to the -524G and -524H. These variants were lighter and offered improved fuel efficiency and reduced emissions;[14] they were designated -524G-T and -524H-T respectively. It was also possible to upgrade existing -524G/H engines to the improved -T configuration, and a number of airlines did this.[15]

The -524 became increasingly reliable as it was developed,[16] and the -524H achieved 180-minute ETOPS approval on the 767 in 1993.

RB211-535 series

Rolls-Royce RB211-535E4B on an Icelandair Boeing 757-300
American Airlines Boeing 757

In the mid 1970s, Boeing was considering designs for a new twin-engined aircraft to replace its highly successful 727. As the size of the proposed plane grew from 150 passengers towards 200, Rolls-Royce realised that the RB211 could be adapted by reducing the diameter of the fan and removing the first IP compressor stage to produce an engine with the necessary 37,400 lbf (166,000 N) thrust. The new version was designated RB211-535. On 31 August 1978 Eastern Airlines and British Airways announced orders for the new 757, powered by the -535. Designated RB211-535C, the engine entered service in January 1983; this was the first time that Rolls-Royce had provided a launch engine on a Boeing aircraft.

However, in 1979 Pratt & Whitney launched its PW2000 engine, claiming 8% better fuel efficiency than the -535C for the PW2037 version. Boeing put Rolls-Royce under pressure to supply a more competitive engine for the 757, and using the more advanced -524 core as a basis, the company produced the 40,100 lbf (178,000 N) thrust RB211-535E4 which entered service in October 1984. While still not quite as efficient as the PW2037, it was more reliable and quieter. It was also the first to use the wide chord fan which increases efficiency, reduces noise and gives added protection against foreign object damage. As a result, a relatively small number of -535C's were installed on production aircraft, the majority using the -535E.

Probably the most important single -535E order came in May 1988 when American Airlines ordered 50 757s powered by the -535E4 citing the engine's low noise as an important factor: this was the first time since the TriStar that Rolls-Royce had received a significant order from a US airline, and it led to the -535E4's subsequent market domination on the 757. Humorously (as reported in Air International) at the time of the announcement made by American, selection of the -535E4 was made public prior to the selection of the 757, though this was welcome news to both Rolls-Royce and Boeing.

After being certified for the 757, the E4 was offered on the Russian Tupolev Tu-204-120 airliner, entering service in 1992. This was the first time a Russian airliner had been supplied with western engines.[17] The -535E4 was also proposed by Boeing for re-engining the B-52H Stratofortress, replacing the aircraft's eight TF33s with four of the turbofans. Further upgrading of the -535E4 took place in the late 1990s to improve the engine's emissions performance, borrowing technology developed for the Trent 700.[18]

The -535E4 is an extremely reliable engine,[19] and achieved 180-minute ETOPS approval on the 757 in 1990.

Industrial RB211

When Rolls-Royce was developing the -22, it realised that it would be straightforward to develop a version of the engine for land-based power generation, and in 1974 the industrial RB211 was launched. When the -524 arrived shortly afterwards, its improvements were incorporated in the industrial RB211 which was designated RB211-24. The generator was gradually developed over the following years[20] and is still marketed today as a range of generators producing 25.2-32MW.[21] Many of its installations have been in the offshore oil and gas production industries.[22]

Marine WR-21

An advanced 25 MW class WR-21 Intercooled Recuperated (ICR) gas turbine was derived for marine propulsion.

Specifications

The family is divided into three distinct series:

RB211-22 series

  • Triple-spool high-bypass-ratio 5.0
  • Single-stage wide-chord fan
  • Seven-stage IP compressor
  • Six-stage HP compressor
  • Single annular combustor with 18 fuel burners
  • Single-stage HP turbine
  • Single-stage IP turbine
  • Three-stage LP turbine

RB211-524 series

A British Airways 747-400 powered by the RB211-524G
  • Triple-spool high-bypass-ratio 4.3 - 4.1
  • Single-stage wide-chord fan
  • Seven-stage IP compressor
  • Six-stage HP compressor
  • Single annular combustor with 18 fuel burners (24 on the G/H-T)
  • Single-stage HP turbine
  • Single-stage IP turbine
  • Three-stage LP turbine

RB211-535 series

  • Triple-spool high-bypass-ratio 4.3 - 4.4
  • Single-stage wide-chord fan
  • Six-stage IP compressor
  • Six-stage HP compressor
  • Single annular combustor with 18 fuel burners (24 on later versions of E4)
  • Single-stage HP turbine
  • Single-stage IP turbine
  • Three-stage LP turbine

As well as a featuring a destaged IP compressor, the -535E4 was the first engine to incorporate a hollow wide chord, unsnubbered[23] fan to improve efficiency. It also featured the use of more advanced materials, including titanium in the HP compressor and carbon composites in the nacelle. Later engines incorporate some features (e.g. FADEC) from improved models of the -524.

Leading Particulars

RB211 Engine Family: Leading Particulars[24]
Engine Static Thrust (lbf) Basic Engine Weight (lb) Length (in) Fan Diameter (in/m) Entry Into Service Applications
RB211-22B 42000 9195 119.4 84.8 / 2.15 1972 Lockheed L-1011-1, Lockheed L-1011-100
RB211-524B2 50000 9814 119.4 84.8 / 2.15 1977 Boeing 747-100, Boeing 747-200, Boeing 747SP
RB211-524B4 53000 9814 122.3 85.8 / 2.18 1981 Lockheed L-1011-250, Lockheed L-1011-500
RB211-524C2 51500 9859 119.4 84.8 / 2.15 1980 Boeing 747-200, Boeing 747SP
RB211-524D4 53000 9874 122.3 85.8 / 2.18 1981 Boeing 747-200, Boeing 747-300, Boeing 747SP
RB211-524D4-B 53000 9874 122.3 85.8 / 2.18 1981 Boeing 747-200, Boeing 747-300,
RB211-524G 58000 9670 125 86.3 / 2.19 1989 Boeing 747-400
RB211-524H 60600 9670 125 86.3 / 2.19 1990 Boeing 747-400, Boeing 767-300
RB211-524G-T 58000 9470 125 86.3 / 2.19 1998 Boeing 747-400, Boeing 747-400F
RB211-524H-T 60600 9470 125 86.3 / 2.19 1998 Boeing 747-400, Boeing 747-400F, Boeing 767-300
RB211-535C 37400 7294 118.5 73.2 / 1.86 1983 Boeing 757-200
RB211-535E4 40100 7264 117.9 74.1 / 1.88 1984 Boeing 757-200, Boeing 757-300, Tupolev Tu-204
RB211-535E4B 43100 7264 117.9 74.1 / 1.88 1989 Boeing 757-200, Boeing 757-300, Tupolev Tu-204

See also

Related development

Comparable engines

Related lists

References

Notes
  1. ^ a b How to Build a Jet Engine (Television production). BBC. 2010.
  2. ^ Sometimes called "three-spool".
  3. ^ Rolls-Royce. "Three Shaft Engine Design". Archived from the original on 2006-10-16. Retrieved 2007-01-07.
  4. ^ a b c Pugh, Peter (2001). The Magic of a Name. Icon Books. ISBN 1840462841.
  5. ^ Douglas and its DC-10 launch customers American Airlines and United Airlines selected the General Electric CF6 engine for the DC-10. The Pratt & Whitney JT9D was fitted to later variants.
  6. ^ Bird ingestion testing was, and still is, a FAA requirement for aircraft engines.
  7. ^ Hooker, 1985.
  8. ^ "Red Ink at Rolls-Royce". Time. November 23, 1970. Retrieved 2007-01-06.
  9. ^ Rolls-Royce is commonly said to have become bankrupt in 1971. However, strictly speaking it went into receivership; only individuals and partnerships can go into bankruptcy in the United Kingdom.
  10. ^ It did this because if Lockheed (which was itself weakened by the difficulties) had failed, the market for the RB211 would have evaporated.
  11. ^ "New Life for TriStar". Time. May 17, 1971. Retrieved 2007-01-06.
  12. ^ "Type Certificate Data Sheet A23WE, Revision 18" (PDF). FAA. 25 October 2001. Retrieved 2007-01-14. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  13. ^ This was later adopted by GE and Pratt and Whitney for their engines.
  14. ^ "Rolls-Royce standardises on hybrid RB211 after entry success". Flight International. May 06, 1998. Retrieved 2007-01-20. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  15. ^ "Cathay will re-engine entire 747-400 fleet". Flight International. August 27, 1997. Retrieved 2007-01-20.
  16. ^ Rolls-Royce. "1904-2004 A Century of Innovation in 100 Facts". Retrieved 2007-01-20.
  17. ^ "Tupolev - Tu-204-120". Flight International. Retrieved 2007-01-20.
  18. ^ "R-R prepares combustor for low-emissions test". Flight International. August 8, 1998. Retrieved 2007-01-20.
  19. ^ Rolls-Royce. "RB211-535 Description". Archived from the original on 2006-12-29. Retrieved 2007-01-21.
  20. ^ Rolls-Royce. "Evolution of the RB211". Retrieved 2007-01-25.
  21. ^ Rolls-Royce. "Energy Product Areas". Archived from the original on 2007-01-21. Retrieved 2007-01-25.
  22. ^ Rolls-Royce. "RB211 Experience". Retrieved 2007-01-25. [dead link]
  23. ^ A snubber (or clapper) is a damper used to prevent blade flutter on narrow-chord fan blades, at the cost of reduced effieciency. Hollow, wide-chord blades are more stable and do not need snubbers.
  24. ^ "Rolls-Royce media pack" (PDF). Rolls-Royce. Retrieved 2008-01-26. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
Bibliography
  • Gunston, Bill. Development of Piston Aero Engines. Cambridge, England. Patrick Stephens Limited, 2006. ISBN 0-7509-4478-1
  • Hooker, Sir Stanley. Not Much Of An Engineer, Airlife Publishing, 1985. ISBN 1853102857.
  • Newhouse, John. The Sporty Game: The High-Risk Competitive Business of Making and Selling Commercial Airliners. 1982. ISBN 978-0-394-51447-5
  • Keith, Hayward. Government and British civil aerospace: a case study in post-war technology. 1983. ISBN 9780719008771
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Rolls-Royce RB211.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rolls-Royce_RB211&oldid=465500579"