Jump to content

Tachyon: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
rewording
8digits (talk | contribs)
→‎Speed: Lots of work needed here.
Line 78: Line 78:


=== Speed ===
=== Speed ===
One curious effect is that, unlike ordinary particles, the speed of a tachyon ''increases'' as its energy decreases. In particular, <math> E </math> approaches zero when <math> v </math> approaches infinity. (For ordinary bradyonic matter, ''E'' increases with increasing speed, becoming arbitrarily large as ''v'' approaches ''c,'' the [[speed of light]]). Therefore, just as bradyons are forbidden to break the light-speed barrier, so too are tachyons forbidden from slowing down to below ''c'', because infinite energy is required to reach the barrier from either above or below.
One curious effect is that, unlike ordinary particles, the speed of a tachyon ''increases'' as its energy decreases. In particular, <math> E </math> approaches zero when <math> v </math> approaches infinity. (For ordinary bradyonic matter, ''E'' increases with increasing speed, becoming large and larger as ''v'' approaches ''c,'' the [[speed of light]]). Therefore both bradyons and tachyons are forbidden going at light-speed because infinite energy is required to reach the light-speed. The difference however between bradyons and tachyons within the framework of the [[Standard-Model Extension]] (SME theory) is disputed as various theorists have suggested that the neutrino might have a [[tachyon]]ic nature,<ref>
A. Chodos, A. I. Hauser, and V.A. Kostelecky, ''The Neutrino As A Tachyon'', Phys. Lett. B 150, 431 (1985).
</ref><ref>
A. Chodos and V.A. Kostelecky, ''Nuclear null tests for space-like neutrinos'', Phys. Lett. B 336, 295 (1994). [http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9409404 arXiv:hep-ph/9409404]
</ref><ref>
A. Chodos, V.A. Kostelecky, R. Potting, E. Gates, ''Null experiments for neutrino masses'', Mod. Phys. Lett. A7, 467 (1992).
</ref><ref>[http://inspirebeta.net/search?ln=en&p=refersto%3Arecid%3A15887 List of articles on the tachyonic neutrino idea (may be incomplete)]. InSPIRE database.</ref>


As noted by [[Gregory Benford]], among others, [[special relativity]] implies that tachyons, if they existed, could be used to communicate backwards in time<ref>
As noted by [[Gregory Benford]], among others, [[special relativity]] implies that tachyons, if they existed, could be used to communicate backwards in time<ref>

Revision as of 12:08, 4 February 2012

Template:Two other uses

Alt text
Because a tachyon always moves faster than light, we cannot see it approaching. After a tachyon has passed nearby, we would be able to see two images of it, appearing and departing in opposite directions. The black line is the shock wave of Cherenkov radiation, shown only in one moment of time. This double image effect is most prominent for an observer located directly in the path of a superluminal object (in this example a sphere, shown in grey). The right hand bluish shape is the image formed by the blue-doppler shifted light arriving at the observer—who is located at the apex of the black Cherenkov lines—from the sphere as it approaches. The left-hand reddish image is formed from red-shifted light that leaves the sphere after it passes the observer. Because the object arrives before the light, the observer sees nothing until the sphere starts to pass the observer, after which the image-as-seen-by-the-observer splits into two—one of the arriving sphere (to the right) and one of the departing sphere (to the left).

A tachyonic particle or tachyon (/[invalid input: 'icon']ˈtæki.ɒn/) is a hypothetical subatomic particle that always moves faster than light. Most physicists do not believe such particles exist or are consistent with the known laws of physics.[1] In the language of special relativity, a tachyon would be a particle with space-like four-momentum and imaginary proper time. A tachyon would be constrained to the space-like portion of the energy-momentum graph. Therefore, it cannot slow down to subluminal speeds.[citation needed]

The first hypothesis regarding tachyons is sometimes attributed to German physicist Arnold Sommerfeld.[2] More recent discussions of tachyons include George Sudarshan,[3] Olexa-Myron Bilaniuk,[4] Vijay Deshpande,[4] and Gerald Feinberg[5]. Some of these authors incorrectly concluded that excitations of a field with imaginary mass would propagate faster than light. However, the fact that they do not has been clearly understood at least since the late 1960s.[6] (who originally coined the term in the 1960s) who advanced a theoretical framework for their study. The name comes from the Greek: ταχύς (tachys, “swift, quick, fast, rapid”).

If tachyons are particles that can be used to send signals faster than light, this leads to violations of causality in special relativity.[citation needed]

Conventional massive particles that travel slower than the speed of light are sometimes termed "bradyons" or "tardyons" in contrast, although these terms are only used in the context of discussions about tachyons.

Despite the theoretical arguments against the existence of tachyon particles, experimental searches have been conducted to test the assumption against their existence; however, until recently no experimental evidence[7] for the existence of tachyon particles has been found.

Following the results of the September 2011 observation of faster-than-light neutrino velocities, the faster-than-light neutrino anomaly, the value of the neutrino velocity is now a subject of theoretical and experimental studies.[8]

Tachyons in relativistic theory

From a special relativity dynamics perspective a tachyon would be a particle with space-like four-momentum.[citation needed] The existence of such particles would pose intriguing problems in modern physics since they are faster than light.

Mass

There are two equivalent approaches to handling their kinematics[citation needed]:

  • The Theory of Relativity requires that all the same formulas that apply to regular slower-than-light particles ("bradyons") also apply to tachyons since they too exist in spacetime. In particular the energy-momentum relation:
where p is the relativistic momentum of the bradyon and m is its rest mass still holds, along with the formula for the total energy of a particle:
which is interpreted to mean that the total energy of a particle (bradyon or tachyon) contains a contribution from the rest mass (the "rest mass-energy") and a contribution from the body's motion, the kinetic energy.
However the energy equation has, when v is larger than c, an "imaginary" denominator, as the value inside the square root is negative. Because the total energy must be real then the numerator must also be imaginary (i.e., the rest mass m must be imaginary, as a pure imaginary number divided by another pure imaginary number is a real number).
In quantum field theory imaginary mass would induce tachyon condensation; essentially a mathematical treatment of the 'particle' which yields a real result. One good way of illustrating this is by thinking of simple harmonic motion and the use of Euler's Formula to dissociate the 'imaginary' part of the motion which is of no meaning in the physical universe, although this is only a loose analogy.
  • A simple substitution for the mass yields an equivalent way of describing tachyons with real masses. Define m = iz (where i2 = −1) and we get Einstein's energy–momentum relation to read:
With this approach the energy equation becomes:
And we avoid any necessity for imaginary masses, sidestepping the problem of interpreting exactly what a complex-valued mass may physically mean. Except, of course, when converting z back to m for interactions with non-tachyon particles. Both approaches are equivalent mathematically and have the same physical consequences.

Speed

One curious effect is that, unlike ordinary particles, the speed of a tachyon increases as its energy decreases. In particular, approaches zero when approaches infinity. (For ordinary bradyonic matter, E increases with increasing speed, becoming large and larger as v approaches c, the speed of light). Therefore both bradyons and tachyons are forbidden going at light-speed because infinite energy is required to reach the light-speed. The difference however between bradyons and tachyons within the framework of the Standard-Model Extension (SME theory) is disputed as various theorists have suggested that the neutrino might have a tachyonic nature,[9][10][11][12]

As noted by Gregory Benford, among others, special relativity implies that tachyons, if they existed, could be used to communicate backwards in time[13] (see Tachyonic antitelephone article).

In 1985 it was proposed by Chodos et al. that neutrinos can have a tachyonic nature.[14] The possibility of standard model particles moving at superluminal speeds can be modelled using Lorentz invariance violating terms, for example in the Standard-Model Extension[15][16][17]. In this framework, neutrinos experience Lorentz-violating oscillations and can travel faster than light at high energies. On the other hand, the above-mentioned proposal by Chodos et al. was strongly criticized by some researchers, [18] but this criticism was subsequently shown to be incorrect.[19] Since then, the idea has been studied by other researchers.[20]

In 1979 a new approach to study tachyon was proposed by Tsao Chang,in which a generalized Galilean transformation (GGT) is introduced. It has been shown that GGT is a non-standard form of the Lorentz transformation.[21] When describing superluminal particles, the time of GGT always goes to positive direction.

In 1986 Chang suggested that the neutrino would be the most possible candidate of a free tachyon. [22] To explain the experiment of parity non-conservation, the two-component neutrino theory was introduced. The neutrino has a left-hand spin and anti-neutrino has a right-hand spin. That means the velocity of an observer in any frame must be less than the velocity of neutrinos, otherwise the direction of the neutrino’s spin will be changed. In other words, the neutrino must be a particle with the velocity of light or faster than light.

Cherenkov radiation

Taking the formalisms of electromagnetic radiation and supposing a tachyon had an electric charge—as there is no reason to suppose a priori that tachyons must be either neutral or charged—then a charged tachyon must lose energy as Cherenkov radiation[23]—just as ordinary charged particles do when they exceed the local speed of light in a medium. A charged tachyon traveling in a vacuum therefore undergoes a constant proper time acceleration and, by necessity, its worldline forms a hyperbola in space-time. However, as we have seen, reducing a tachyon's energy increases its speed, so that the single hyperbola formed is of two oppositely charged tachyons with opposite momenta (same magnitude, opposite sign) which annihilate each other when they simultaneously reach infinite speed at the same place in space. (At infinite speed the two tachyons have no energy each and finite momentum of opposite direction, so no conservation laws are violated in their mutual annihilation. The time of annihilation is frame dependent.) Even an electrically neutral tachyon would be expected to lose energy via gravitational Cherenkov radiation, because it has a gravitational mass, and therefore increase in speed as it travels, as described above.

Causality

Causality is a fundamental principle of theoretical particle physics. If tachyons can be used to transmit information faster than light, then according to relativity, they can also be used to violate certain simple understandings of the causality principle using a scheme sometimes known as the "tachyon telephone paradox".[24] This can be understood in terms of the relativity of simultaneity in special relativity, which says that different inertial reference frames will disagree on whether two events at different locations happened "at the same time" or not, and they can also disagree on the order of the two events (technically, these disagreements occur when spacetime interval between the events is 'space-like', meaning that neither event lies in the future light cone of the other).[25]

If one of the two events represents the sending of a signal from one location and the second event represents the reception of the same signal at another location, then as long as the signal is moving at the speed of light or slower, the mathematics of simultaneity ensures that all reference frames agree that the transmission-event happened before the reception-event.[25] However, in the case of a hypothetical signal moving faster than light, there would always be some frames in which the signal was received before it was sent, so that the signal could be said to have moved backwards in time. Because one of the two fundamental postulates of special relativity says that the laws of physics should work the same way in every inertial frame, if it is possible for signals to move backwards in time in any one frame, it must be possible in all frames. This means that if observer A sends a signal to observer B which moves faster than light in A's frame but backwards in time in B's frame, and then B sends a reply which moves faster than light in B's frame but backwards in time in A's frame, it could work out that A receives the reply before sending the original signal, a seeming challenge to temporal causality in every frame. Nonetheless, the event cannot be said to lack causal structure as the events are still connected, albeit in this case in a backwards relationship. Mathematical details can be found in the tachyonic antitelephone article, and an illustration of such a scenario using spacetime diagrams can be found here.[26]


Fiction

Tachyons appear in many works of fiction. It has been used as a standby mechanism upon which many science fiction authors rely to establish faster-than-light communication, with or without reference to causality issues. The word tachyon has become widely recognized to such an extent that it can impart a science-fictional "sound" even if the subject in question has no particular relation to superluminal travel (a form of technobabble, akin to positronic brain).

See also

References

  1. ^ Tipler, Ralph A.; Llewellyn (2008). Modern Physics (5th ed.). New York, NY: W.H. Freeman & Co. p. 54. ISBN 978-0-7167-7550-8. ... so existence of particles v > c ... Called tachyons ... would present relativity with serious ... problems of infinite creation energies and causality paradoxes. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  2. ^ A. Sommerfeld, "Simplified deduction of the field and the forces of an electron moving in any given way", Knkl. Acad. Wetensch, 7, 345-367 (1904)
  3. ^ Bilaniuk, O.-M. P.; Sudarshan, E. C. G. (1969). "Particles beyond the Light Barrier". Physics Today. 22 (5): 43–51. doi:10.1063/1.3035574.
  4. ^ a b Bilaniuk, O.-M. P.; Deshpande, V. K.; Sudarshan, E. C. G. (1962). "'Meta' Relativity". American Journal of Physics. 30 (10): 718. Bibcode:1962AmJPh..30..718B. doi:10.1119/1.1941773.
  5. ^ Feinberg, G. (1967). "Possibility of Faster-Than-Light Particles". Physical Review. 159 (5): 1089–1105. Bibcode:1967PhRv..159.1089F. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.159.1089.
  6. ^ Aharonov, Y.; Komar; Susskind (1969). "Superluminal Behavior, Causality, and Instability". Phys. Rev. 182 ({5}, ). American Physical Society: 1400--1403. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.182.1400. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |first 2= ignored (|first2= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |first 3= ignored (|first3= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  7. ^ Feinberg, G. (1997). "Tachyon". Encyclopedia Americana. Vol. 26. Grolier. p. 210.
  8. ^ http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn21064-neutrino-watch-speed-claim-baffles-cern-theoryfest.html
  9. ^ A. Chodos, A. I. Hauser, and V.A. Kostelecky, The Neutrino As A Tachyon, Phys. Lett. B 150, 431 (1985).
  10. ^ A. Chodos and V.A. Kostelecky, Nuclear null tests for space-like neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 336, 295 (1994). arXiv:hep-ph/9409404
  11. ^ A. Chodos, V.A. Kostelecky, R. Potting, E. Gates, Null experiments for neutrino masses, Mod. Phys. Lett. A7, 467 (1992).
  12. ^ List of articles on the tachyonic neutrino idea (may be incomplete). InSPIRE database.
  13. ^ Benford, G.; Book, D.; Newcomb, W. (1970). "The Tachyonic Antitelephone". Physical Review D. 2 (2): 263. Bibcode:1970PhRvD...2..263B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.2.263.
  14. ^ Chodos, A. (1985). "The Neutrino as a Tachyon". Physics Letters B. 150 (6): 431. Bibcode:1985PhLB..150..431C. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)90460-5.
  15. ^ Colladay, D.; Kostelecky, V. A. (1997). "CPT Violation and the Standard Model". Physical Review D. 55 (11): 6760–6774. arXiv:hep-ph/9703464. Bibcode:1997PhRvD..55.6760C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.55.6760.
  16. ^ Colladay, D.; Kostelecky, V. A. (1998). "Lorentz-Violating Extension of the Standard Model". Physical Review D. 58 (11): 116002. arXiv:hep-ph/9809521. Bibcode:1998PhRvD..58k6002C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.58.116002.
  17. ^ Kostelecky, V. A. (2004). "Gravity, Lorentz Violation, and the Standard Model". Physical Review D. 69 (10): 105009. arXiv:hep-th/0312310. Bibcode:2004PhRvD..69j5009K. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.105009.
  18. ^ R. J. Hughes and G. J. Stephenson Jr., Against tachyonic neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 244, 95-100 (1990).
  19. ^ A. Chodos et al., Null experiments for neutrino masses, Mod. Phys. Lett. A7, 467 (1992).
  20. ^ List of publications on the tachyonic neutrino idea (may be incomplete). InSPIRE database.
  21. ^ Chang, T. (1979). "A New Approach to Study the Superluminal Motion". Journal of Physics A . A 12: L203.
  22. ^ Chang, T. (1986). "Does a Free Tachyon Exist?". Proceedings of the Sir Arthur Eddington Centenary Symposium . 3: 431. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |Ed.= ignored (help)
  23. ^ Bock, R. K. (9 April 1998). "Cherenkov Radiation". The Particle Detector BriefBook. CERN. Retrieved 2011-09-23.
  24. ^ Grøn, Ø.; Hervik, S. (2007). Einstein's General Theory of Relativity: With Modern Applications in Cosmology. Springer. p. 39. ISBN 978-0387691992.
  25. ^ a b Mark, J. "The Special Theory of Relativity" (PDF). University of Cincinnati. pp. 7–11. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-09-13. Retrieved 2006-10-27.
  26. ^ Baker, R. (12 September 2003). "Relativity, FTL and causality". Sharp Blue. Retrieved 2011-09-23.