User talk:Cerebellum

Regarding Charlie Zelenoff

Hello sir. Aren't the links/sources i posted on the Charlie Z page enough? Charlie Zelenoff is famous in the boxing community. He's even famous in the mixed martial arts community. I'm not sure if youtube links are acceptable, but his youtube video fight against Mayweather has almost 300k views. Isn't that enough for him to have a wiki page? Cheers.

Eugene Zelenova —Preceding undated comment added 04:53, 21 March 2012 (UTC).

Finding Highly Composite Numbers

Hi Cerebellum. Thanks for your supportive comments about my (first) article. When I wrote it, I did not realise just how strict Wikipedia is. I have looked up the various links to Wikipedia rules which were included in the deletion discussion and it is quite clear that the article infringes on the rules about original research. And while some of this work (possibly all of it) has been done independently elsewhere, I have also done it independently. I have had an interest in highly composite numbers for two decades and first implemented the successive prime factors algorithm for finding them about nine years ago. At that time I was not even aware of the term "highly composite numbers" let alone the research of other people into those numbers. I am a professional computer programmer, not an academic, so I don't see myself being able to comply with all the requirements for references and citations. Therefore my first Wikipedia article will probably also be my last.

Thanks for your suggestion about Wikibooks. Once the discussion about my article has run its course, I'll probably explore this further.

Torkel1001 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:36, 11 February 2011 (UTC).

Gilbert Cory

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gilbert Cory, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.coryfamsoc.com/john1/john1/b619.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:02, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Gilbert Cory

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Gilbert Cory, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 15:05, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero (Marvel Comics)

The article G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero (Marvel Comics) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero (Marvel Comics) for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:23, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

SLQ new pages

Thanks for your contribution to the SLQ collaboration in February. See commons:Commons:State Library of Queensland/Reports/2#New Wikipedia articles (and the intro at the top). --John Vandenberg ^(chat) 08:12, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Arashikage

I found and restored Arashikage, if there is anything you can do to source and fix that article. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 22:52, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

No problem. :) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 14:43, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Looking much better! The Ninja Force characters could use an expansion as well, if you can find the time. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 16:17, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

G.I. Joe: ARAH toy lists

Howdy, would you mind taking a quick look at these pages to make sure I'm on the right track? Also have a few questions that need addressing in their respective talk pages. Also debating whether it would be better to do them in tabular format, similar to the Characters article. Thanks!

• List of G.I. Joe vehicles
• User:Jake fuersturm/List of G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero playsets

-- Jake fuersturm (talk) 13:16, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Cerebellum. You have new messages at TYelliot's talk page.
Message added 15:47, 16 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Cerebellum. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Jake fuersturm (talk) 15:26, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Cerebellum. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Jake Fuersturm (talk) 11:23, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Raintheone

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Raintheone regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. If you have the time, please participate by reviewing the summary that has been prepared, and giving your opinion as to what can be done. Thank you! Fortdj33 (talk) 15:10, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:StormShadow 07.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:StormShadow 07.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:36, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Grant Morrison photo

Hi. Your opinion on what would be the best photo for the Infobox in the Grant Morrison article is requested here. If you could take the time to participate, it would be greatly appreciated, but if you cannot, then disregard; you don't have to leave a note on my talk page either way. Nightscream (talk) 01:28, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Carthage and Australia in Palestine Op-ed: Remembering 9/11

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 17:40, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Cerebellum! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D and Ian Rose look at Australian air power Op-ed: Buggie111 ruminates about WikiLife and WikiDeath

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

cats before stub tags

Hi, re this edit: categories go before stub tags - see WP:FOOTERS for the full list of end matter for an article. Thanks. PamD 22:29, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for telling me! I'll be more careful in the future. Thanks, --Cerebellum (talk) 15:31, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Glad to see your renewed interest in G.I. Joe articles, especially G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero (Marvel Comics). I made some modifications of my own, and hopefully we can work together, to get that article back to GA status! Fortdj33 (talk) 16:01, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Cerebellum, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Cerebellum/Sandbox.

• See a log of files removed today here.
• Shut off the bot here.
• Report errors here.
• If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:07, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about John McLeish

Hello, Cerebellum, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John McLeish whether the article John McLeish should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving John McLeish, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! Template:Z82 Jenks24 (talk) 13:36, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Wittgenstein

thanks very much, have addressed your comments which are very good, and made notes on the review page. please let me know what you think Tom B (talk) 20:06, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

yes probably needs one, may take a while Tom B (talk) 17:48, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Nurkse says hello!

Hi, thank you so much for reviewing the Ragnar Nurkse's balanced growth theory article. I made the changes you asked for. :) I have a small doubt, which I have posted on the GA review page. Please help with that, if possible. Regards - Abhilasha369 (talk) 13:31, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Hey! Thanks for passing Ragnar Nurkse's balanced growth theory as a GA! Really admire the way you're reviewing so many GA nominations! :-) Is there some way I can get involved in the December drive? Regards Abhilasha369 (talk) 17:24, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Scarlett (G.I. Joe)

Hey, I'm sure that you are busy, but I have started to significantly cleanup the article Scarlett (G.I. Joe). I noticed some of your comments on the talk page, so if you have a chance, please check it out and let me know what you think. Thanks! Fortdj33 (talk) 15:07, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Military Historian of the Year

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.

Barnstar

		The Invisible Barnstar
		Seemed the most appropriate given our talk about the absence of social contact at NPP ;). Thanks for the awesome interview! Hit me up if you ever need sourcing or help with an article. Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:46, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Awesome, thanks! :) --Cerebellum (talk) 00:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	It is with grand appreciation that I award you this barnstar for completing Good Article reviews for the December 2011 Good Article Nomination backlog elimination drive Cheers, AstroCog (talk) 22:11, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

AfD and PROD

Howdy Cerebellum. Back in November, you got either an AfD or PROD notification and it was during one of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (1, 2), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at swallingwikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 23:19, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Swordfish Translation Editor

You asked for the deletion of the page. I’ve edited it to improve it. Do you think it is fine now? Should I put a list of supported format like in the page on Web Translate It? Spray&Pray (talk) 00:47, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Google

I get 113 million hits running your exact search. What do you get running mine? -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 22:57, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Editing Harifal

M.A.Harifal. 16:17, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Thanks, Mr. Cerebellum for helping improve my article 'Harifal' in terms of editing, cohesion etc, but I would also like to bring in your kind notice that following your editing a technical error has occurred in reference section at serial number 4,could u help in rectifying.I hope you will continue helping me in future too, so that I could improve it.M.A.Harifal. 16:17, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening COTM

The current WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening Collaborations are: Hobby farm Raised bed gardening Sustainable gardening Urban horticulture Vermicompost The next collaborations will be posted on April 1, 2012. (Contribute here)

New Page Triage engagement strategy released

Hey guys!

I'm dropping you a note because you filled out the New Page Patrol survey, and indicated you'd be interested in being contacted about follow-up work. This is to notify you that we've finally released both the initial documentation about the project and also the engagement strategy, which sets out how we plan to work with the community on this. Please give both a read, and leave any comments or suggestions you have on the talkpage, on my talkpage, or in my inbox - okeyeswikimedia.org.

It's awesome to finally get to start work on this! :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 02:22, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Cerebellum. You have new messages at Wifione's talk page.
Message added 05:36, 7 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wifione ^Message 05:36, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Exodus

I invite you to comment on Talk:The_Exodus#Intro.Quarkgluonsoup (talk) 05:41, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Heya

Thanks for your review of Clement of Alexandria. I'm ultimately looking at getting these articles on Eastern church fathers to FA standard, but it'll be some time (wanna GA them all first!) - your suggestions will help ! --23.20.130.229 (talk) 21:31, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

PS - Clement's thought on theological issues can be hard to define (although on moral/societal issues he normally has a clear viewpoint), especially as his "secret" theology is markedly different from that found in the trilogy. I therefore found it much easier to write about the contents of his works, and thus give the reader a sense of his theology. You're right that a summary could be useful - perhaps before the works section ? --23.20.130.229 (talk) 21:58, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

I enjoyed reviewing the article, I don't know much about Eastern church history and it's always a pleasure to learn more. :) Right now I'm working to improve articles related to the works of John the Evangelist, but when I get through with that I'll see what I can do to help you out. I agree that the "Theological works" section gives a pretty comprehensive view of his theology, but since it's so detailed a summary section would help place the commentary on the works in context. I think a "Theology" section could include info on his moral and societal views, plus separate descriptions of his secret and traditional theology. If I understand things correctly, people sometimes attribute ideas to Clement which are not his own, i.e. the Mar Saba letter, so I guess you have to be careful about what you say. Whatever you end up doing, the article is a great addition to Wikipedia and I wish you all the best as you continue working :). Thanks, --Cerebellum (talk) 22:59, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

the exodus

Discussion on the exodus talk page will only go so far. Why don't you make some edits to the article?Quarkgluonsoup (talk) 18:28, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Baptism in the Holy Spirit

Thanks for reviewing the article and all the suggestions! Ltwin (talk) 23:18, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Lisa Marie Presley Storm & Grace

Hi thanks for the input but the Storm & Grace page is now redirected back to Lisa Marie Presley page. Curious why that would be?JGG59 (talk) 19:03, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

AFC

		The Articles for Creation barnstar
		Great work on our backlog! Please don't stop ;) We still have (at the moment of writing) 332 submissions to review. mabdul 19:28, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll do what I can. :) --Cerebellum (talk) 19:31, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Oh by the way: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harry Tindall - don't decline because of WP:MOS! This is not a valid reason! Either find a better reason, or move it and fix it or tag it (in this case with wikify). mabdul 20:24, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Whoops, I've changed the rationale, the article seems to rely on sources which are affiliated with the subject. Thanks for letting me know. --Cerebellum (talk) 20:45, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

conservation-restoration of Silver

I just read your edit and really don't understand it. You cite the problem as being that it reads like a personal essay, yet it is well sourced and basically empty of personal opinion. Please elaborate about it on the talk page or where appropriate. It seems your review was done with some haste--RichardMcCoy (talk) 21:32, 18 March 2012 (UTC).

Article for creation "Interstate river Water Disputes Act"

Dear Cerebellam,

You stated that comments are given on content of requested article for creation on 18 March, 2012. Sufficient inline references were already given. I could not find any other comment. Please clarify. Your reference in meesage to me is given below.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kwdt2&diff=0&oldid=477587760 for all changes since your last visit. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kwdt2 for the current revision.

Kwdt2 (talk) 04:42, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Re Article for Creation about Bernadette Davis

Hi Cerebellum, thanks for re-reviewing my article for Creation on Bernadette Davis. I wasn't quite sure what the new comments you had added to the article - was it just reiterating Nolelover's comments that I need to prove the notability and significance of Bernadette Davis? The problem I have is that most of her work was in the 'pre-internet reviews' era: I have trawled the net looking for articles, quotes, reviews etc. from sources considered valid, but she was most actively writing in the mid- to late-90s when there wasn't the same amount of information available on the internet - I guess most of the articles and reviews back then would have been paper based. She then retired for a while to have a family but is now back with a new upcoming comedy series on BBC 3 (see my links!) The sitcom 'Game On' was a huge hit at the end of the 90s (described as part of the zeitgeist that came to define a generation" and as a "sitcom that was so of its time, that it took its name from a catchphrase of the decade" (Yorkshire Post, Interview with Matthew Cottle, one of the 3 main stars, along with Sam Janus, now on Eastenders, and Ben Chaplin, now in Hollywood) - and it rightly has its own page on Wikipedia. However, all the acclaim and attention seems to have gone to Andrew Davies, and hardly any to Bernadette Davis (no relation) - the most heinous example of which is on the BBC Comedy website itself (http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/gameon/) which says Andrew Davies co-wrote it - but doesn't say who the other co-writer is!! So I thought it was only right to reset the balance, so to speak, by at least giving her her due on Wikipedia. I have tried to post as many links and references as I can to her output, but because of the times (just before the internet really took off info-wise) there just isn't that much available. And actually the article's references are now longer than the article! My main arguments for her deserving of a page of her own are that, as "Game On" is very famous, and has a place on Wikipedia, she deserves to be on it too, as the co-writer (and the sole writer for the 3rd series!) After all, you couldn't have just a page on Jagger without one about Richards, or Ant without Dec, or Mitchell without Webb, or, er, Rod Hull without Emu! :-) So, she is significant as being responsible for something significant! Please let me know what you think. Yours, PaukiPKK (talk) 10:46, 19 March 2012 (UTC)PaukiPKK Hi Cerebellum, thanks for your response to my last response - I will go to my local library and see if they have anything paper-based that could become the missing link that I am after (the source that will tie it all together) - and after that - win or lose - I'll move it to 'live' and see if it gets marked for deletion, or, as sometimes happens, someone else adds some stuff to it that solidifies the argument! Thanks for your time and consideration. I may come back to you in the future about your offer of the editing (tho I'm feeling a little jaded at the moment, I must admit!), though not quite at the moment. 212.95.227.74 (talk) 13:10, 20 March 2012 (UTC)PaukiPKK

Review of Article

Hi Cerebellum, Thank you for your review of the proposed Adam Joinson article and thank you for your comments. It appears that the notability is an issue. I'm new to wikipedia and i'm unsure as to what this actually means. I've read the notability guidelines wikipedia have produced however, i'm still uncertain as to the types of sources that are needed. If you could suggest any types of sources that would help with this issue, they would be very appriciated. Thanks SarahAStewart (talk) 12:47, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

RN Podar page

Hi!

I'm an alumnus of RN Podar school and I understand that the previous article was not quite up to the mark. I do understand that there's a LOT of scope for improvement. Fixed the inline citations and moved unused newspaper articles to 'external links'. I understand the content can be worked upon but most of what's on now has Media references.

Please do see if you think it's wiki-worthy now. Thank you for your time! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Purplesky91 (talk • contribs) 13:41, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Dogeared

HI Cerebellum. Thanks for the edit. I am a little confused regarding the deletion of the recent submission. Almost every statement made has a reliable source. I compared it to other articles that have been submitted such as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Muse and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rio_Grande_(company) Can you tell me the difference in what was accepted in those articles and the Dogeared one that I submitted?

Any other help would be very useful. Thanks!

Mtheisner (talk) 18:07, 19 March 2012 (UTC)mtheisner

Thanks again Cerebellum for the pointers! I have updated the page. Let me know what you think! Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtheisner (talk • contribs) 17:47, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Big Self

Hello, I did an article on Big self that was referenced with Irish times, Hot Press and BBC references amongst others and I don't understand why it wasn't accepted. I have some magazine clippings from the 70's to back up the information how would I cite them as references and if I did would that help the article be submitted. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Big_Self Lorcanmce (talk) 19:21, 19 March 2012 (UTC)LorcanmceLorcanmce (talk) 19:21, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Exodus sandbox

The sandbox version of the exodus article has been moved to Talk:The_Exodus/Draft.Quarkgluonsoup (talk) 16:01, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Hey quark, good to see you back! Thank you for the heads-up; I won't be very active on this stuff for the rest of the week, but I'll try to take a look this weekend and see if there is anything else I can add. I did a little work on the historicity stuff already, but it remains to be seen if there is consensus for keeping my additions. Cheers, --Cerebellum (talk) 02:03, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

USA Fuel Sources for Electric Energy

Thanks for you suggestions. Having learned how to do charts in Wiki I wanted to make this entry and then add to it. I will take your suggestions and resubmit. Thanks Queenwe (talk) 01:59, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eckstein, Karl

Hi! It's Lerysik. You didn't accept my article and suggested:

"Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you."

But my resources look like that because the other user advised me doing this:

"Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eckstein, Karl

My article hasn't been accepted again((( I've got the answer that only one of the resources (#2) is independent. But I can't understand why the other sources don't meet the requirements..Please, could you explain it? To my mind they are all independent (of course, I can't think the other way)) There is nothing written by the subject, paid for by the subject. Not his website, and not a press release. And another question: If I leave only one resource (#2), will it be enough? Please, help me.. I'm so exhausted... Maybe you could show me the right example concerning Karl Eckstein?)))) Thanks in advance)) Lerysik (talk) 06:11, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

I can see what happened. The reviewing editor had a quick look at the list of sources, saw most of them seemed to be from the Consulate website and declined your article on that basis. However, the links are actually to reproductions of news coverage in various independent publications. I've expanded one of them to explain the source (article title, publication, date, page). Maybe if you could do the same for the other similar sources it may convince a reviewer that the sources are independent (and in-depth?). Sionk (talk) 13:07, 12 March 2012 (UTC)"

So what should I do? I'm very tired of so different opinions((( Please, HELP!Lerysik (talk) 06:51, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Regarding "these directions"

Once upon a time, we didn't have the article wizard to handle submissions, so we just threw down some directions on the main AFC page to help the submitters. And those directions were of course removed when the wizard was created, but apparently not the request to follow them. I guess we were so used to having that sentence there it didn't occur to us how out of place it was, and reviewers rarely if ever visited that page anyway. But still, I mean, wow. It's been years since that sentence made any sense. Thanks for noticing and removing it. Someguy1221 (talk) 07:56, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Ha, I actually think that page is very well done and much less confusing for new users than a lot of our other pages. Glad I could help streamline it though ;) --Cerebellum (talk) 12:30, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Sain Kamal khan Sherani

Mr Cerebellum you helped last time in my previous article "HARIFAL". Now I have put in a new article, named above. There I have some problems could you help me.Let me clarify it that the image of Sain kamal khan in my article is free for all use having no copy right claim,In public use; but technically I am not very sound to attach a tag as required by Wikipedia Administrators,though I have tried my level. Could you plz help me. M.A.Harifal. 13:04, 21 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr.Muhammad Akbar (talk • contribs)

Many-many-many thanks!)))

Wow! You can't imagine how happy I am! Many thanks! It was a long job, and finally it is finished and accepted!)))))) I'm just ready to kiss you! I'm very grateful to you)))) Thanks a lot again)))) Lerysik (talk) 06:18, 22 March 2012 (UTC)