Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/June 17: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:57, 17 June 2012

This is the talk page for making suggestions or discussing improvements to Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/June 17.

To report an error when this list is currently on the Main Page, see Main Page errors. Please remember that this list defers to the supporting articles, so it is best to achieve consensus and make any necessary changes there first.
Before making a suggestion, please read the selected anniversaries guidelines. Please remember that this list usually defers to supporting pages when there is disagreement, so it is best to achieve consensus and make any necessary changes there first.
To discuss improvements to the corresponding June 17 article, see Talk:June 17 instead.

Frequently asked questions

Q1: Why is [Insert event here], an event that is "more important and significant" than all the others that are currently listed, not posted?: A1: Relative article quality along with the mix of topics already listed are often deciding factors in what gets posted. Any given day of the year can have a great many important or significant historical events. The problem is that there is generally only room on the Main Page to list about 5 events at a time, so not everything can be posted.

As stated on Wikipedia:FAQ/Main Page, the items and events posted on the Main Page are chosen based more on how well they are written, not based on how much important or significant their subjects are. It is easier for admins to select a well-written, cited, verifiable article over a poor one versus trying to determine objectively how much a subject is important or significant.

Keep in mind that the quality requirements only apply to the selected bolded article, not the other links. Thus, an event may qualify for multiple dates in a year if there is an article written in a summary style and an article providing detailed content; if one of those pages have cleanup issues, the other page can be bolded as an alternate.

Another criterion is to maintain some variety of topics, and not exhibit, just for example, tech-centrism, or the belief that the world stops at the edge of the English-speaking world. Many days have a large pool of potential articles, so they will rotate in and out every year to give each one some Main Page exposure. In addition, an event is not posted if it is also the subject of this year's scheduled featured article or featured picture.

Q2: There are way too many 20th-century events listed. Why aren't there more events from the 19th century and before?

A2: The short, basic reason is the systemic bias of Wikipedia. There are not enough good, well-written articles on 19th-century and earlier events for all 365 days in the year. Currently, a majority of users seem to be generally more interested in writing articles about recent events. If you would like to further help mitigate the systemic bias in Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias.

Q3: This page seems to be biased toward events based in [Insert country or region here]. What can be done about it?

A3: This again is attributed to the systemic bias of Wikipedia. Many users are generally more interested in working on good, well-written articles pertaining to their home country. Since this is the English Wikipedia, there will be more English-speaking users, and thus more articles pertaining to English-speaking countries. And if there are more users who are from the United States, there will probably be more well-written articles about events based in the United States. Again, if you would like to further help mitigate the systemic bias in Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias.

Q4: Why is the birthday/death anniversary of [Insert name here] not listed?

A4: There are only four slots available for birth and death anniversaries. As with the events, article quality and diversity in time period, geography, and reason for notability are all contributing factors in whether an article gets selected for inclusion.

Q5: Are the holidays/observances listed in any particular order?

A5: Yes, there is a specified order: International observances first, then alphabetically by where observed.

Q6: Some of the holidays/observances that are listed have dates in parentheses beside them. What do they mean?

A6: There are two reasons that some holidays/observances have dates next to them:

Non-Gregorian-based holidays/observances are marked with the current year as a reminder to others that their dates do in fact vary from year to year.
National Days, Independence Days, and other holidays celebrating the nationhood of a country are generally marked by the year of the significant historic date being observed.

Today's featured article for June 17, 2025
Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 17, 2025 create – talk – watch
Picture of the day for June 17, 2025
The featured picture for this day has not yet been chosen. In general, pictures of the day are scheduled in order of promotion to featured status. See Wikipedia:Picture of the day/Guidelines for full guidelines. create

← Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/June 16 * Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/June 18 →

1579 - Sir Francis Drake claims California for England
1775 - American Revolutionary War: The Battle of Bunker Hill is fought
1776 - American invasion of Quebec ends
1885 - The Statue of Liberty arrives in New York Harbor
1972 - Watergate scandal: Five White House operatives are arrested for burglarizing the offices of the Democratic National Committee
1976 - China tests its first hydrogen bomb

The NIght Attack

Please change the name of Vlad III the Impaler to Vlad III Dracula, as it is mentioned in the Night Attack, the article which is featured On this Day. It is a matter of consistency and nothing else. It is not good to have Vlad III Impaler on the main page and Vlad III Dracula in the article. --Thus Spake Anittas 22:01, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I don't think it should say that he attacked an Ottoman Empire camp, but an Ottoman camp. Otherwise, everything else is fine. --Thus Spake Anittas 22:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2012 notes

Omitted: New Albion; Battle of Bunker Hill; Population Registration Act
Included: The Night Attack (4th appearance, last in 2009; rescued from Ineligible); Battle of Vienna, Virginia (first appearance); Hyatt Regency walkway collapse (first appearance)
Repeats: Origins and architecture of the Taj Mahal (2nd consecutive appearance, 2 total); Joint Communique (3rd consecutive appearance, 3 total)

—howcheng {chat} 05:26, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hyatt Regency Walkway Collpase

I would like to know the name of the mornoic editor who put the Hyatt Regency Walkway Collapse in Kansas City, Mo. on the JUNE 17 page. It is lised as JULY 17, 1981 on the main article for the incident, the 1981 timeline page AND the July 17 timeline page. Yet smoehow some genius with an IQ hovering around mentally retarded thought it was on June 17, too. When will this be REMOVED? It has now been up here for nearly a full HOUR. I will continue to post about this until it is removed. So get the job done or else. MORONS. IDIOTS. FOOLS. DUMBFUCKS. DavidSteinle (talk) 00:57, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 *Repeats: [[Origins and architecture of the Taj Mahal]] (2nd consecutive appearance, 2 total); [[Joint Communique]] (3rd consecutive appearance, 3 total)
 <span style="font-family:Verdana; ">—'''[[User:Howcheng|<span style="color:#33C;">howcheng</span>]]'''  <small>{[[User talk:Howcheng|chat]]}</small></span> 05:26, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
+== Hyatt Regency Walkway Collpase ==
+I would like to know the name of the mornoic editor who put the Hyatt Regency Walkway Collapse in Kansas City, Mo. on the JUNE 17 page. It is lised as JULY 17, 1981 on the main article for the incident, the 1981 timeline page AND the July 17 timeline page. Yet smoehow some genius with an IQ hovering around mentally retarded thought it was on June 17, too. When will this be REMOVED? It has now been up here for nearly a full HOUR. I will continue to post about this until it is removed. So get the job done or else. MORONS. IDIOTS. FOOLS. DUMBFUCKS. [[User:DavidSteinle|DavidSteinle]] ([[User talk:DavidSteinle|talk]]) 00:57, 17 June 2012 (UTC)