User talk:Anbu121: Difference between revisions
m Talkback (User talk:Yunshui) (TW) |
Cake102992 (talk | contribs) →Julie Otero: new section |
||
Line 234: | Line 234: | ||
{{talkback|Yunshui|ts=10:45, 12 October 2012 (UTC)}} |
{{talkback|Yunshui|ts=10:45, 12 October 2012 (UTC)}} |
||
[[User:Yunshui|Yunshui]] '''[[User talk:Yunshui|雲]]‍[[Special:Contributions/Yunshui|水]]''' 10:45, 12 October 2012 (UTC) |
[[User:Yunshui|Yunshui]] '''[[User talk:Yunshui|雲]]‍[[Special:Contributions/Yunshui|水]]''' 10:45, 12 October 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Julie Otero == |
|||
I can try and find more information so the article does not have to be deleted. How's that sound? --[[User:Cake102992|Cake102992]] ([[User talk:Cake102992|talk]]) 12:45, 12 October 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:45, 12 October 2012
Archive 1 (9 Dec 2011 - 11 Feb 2012) |
How am I doing?
Hi Anbu, I saw that I was the first person to edit Chennai today as part of the COTM. I've done a few bits of rewording here and there with adding two refs. How am I doing? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:38, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
- Fantastic. Keep Rocking! I am bit surprised to see you asking me how you are doing. You are a much more senior editor than me. I just created the Chennai COTM page, after seeing the level of collaboration that happened in Chennai MRTS article. COTM is just a platform to bring the efforts of around 10 people together on a single article at a time. Doing so would give us a much more effective result than what could be achieved if all of us edit different articles. I would like COTM to be as informal as possible. This is going to a combined responsibility of all of us. --Anbu121 (talk me) 16:16, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Rajiv Gandhi Salai
Hi Anbu, I've put up a Movenotice on Rajiv Gandhi Salai suggesting that it be renamed to Old Mahabalipuram Road. What do you say? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:06, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
- I searched on news articles in Hindu and Times of India for common name. Both OMR and RG Salai are being equally used by the media. We need to do some more deep analysis. --Anbu121 (talk me) 17:53, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- True, but that article is written like an essay and the name seems to promote it a lot. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:37, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
'But why?'
You asked but why in your edit summary. I assume you are asking why did I choose Bangalore over Chennai? Okay let me first assure you that I don't have a problem with any of those. I was choosing top cities from East (Kolkata), West (Mumbai), North (Delhi) & South (Chennai/Bangalore) India. Then I took a look at the table 2 of Indian census which ranks Bangalore way above Chennai in south India. Hence my change from Chennai to Bangalore. I hope you understand. Now with this explaination I am restoring the image of Bangalore. okay?
P.S. Please don't take offence to this change. You may give me {{tb}} on my talk. Mrt3366(Talk?) (New thread?) 06:32, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- The template shows chennai in the 4th place. So, I think pics of top 4 in the list must be shown. --Anbu121 (talk me) 07:41, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- Check this discussion that is simultaneously taking place. Besides, nobody said that we can only show images of the first four cities according to the template's list according to urban agglomerations. Check this table. Mrt3366(Talk?) (New thread?) 08:02, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- Don't engage in an edit war. There is not need for that. I hope you're familiar with WP:3RR? Discuss, and do not be egoistic. It's not about winning dear. These four images are specifically chosen to show the countries top four urbanizations from four different regions. Please don't revert blindly. Mrt3366(Talk?) (New thread?) 08:11, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- You have mentioned "Feel free to revert" in your edit summary, and now you are telling me not to revert. Please show some integrity. I have not reverted blindly. Didn't you saw the edit summary? I will reply at the discussion. --Anbu121 (talk me) 08:41, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- Errr... if it isn't necessary to have images of only the top four cities, can I replace all four with pictures of Pune, Coimbatore, Kochi, and Hyderabad ??? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:39, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- Chosen by whom? And it's a little strange for the pictures not to match the table, if that really is the choice. As for an edit war, I see two participants. Kerfuffler (talk) 20:57, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- Hey, the pictures I suggested are very much in the list. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:14, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
- You have mentioned "Feel free to revert" in your edit summary, and now you are telling me not to revert. Please show some integrity. I have not reverted blindly. Didn't you saw the edit summary? I will reply at the discussion. --Anbu121 (talk me) 08:41, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- Don't engage in an edit war. There is not need for that. I hope you're familiar with WP:3RR? Discuss, and do not be egoistic. It's not about winning dear. These four images are specifically chosen to show the countries top four urbanizations from four different regions. Please don't revert blindly. Mrt3366(Talk?) (New thread?) 08:11, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- Check this discussion that is simultaneously taking place. Besides, nobody said that we can only show images of the first four cities according to the template's list according to urban agglomerations. Check this table. Mrt3366(Talk?) (New thread?) 08:02, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
September 2012
Hello, I'm Balablitz. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. The removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hi Anbu121, I accept your suggestion to create a separate article. I am working on it. Meanwhile, a year back i added those two names on their respective alma mater. they're indeed notable alumni. I could even welcomed the suggestion of deleting it on my own when i knew how to add them. Am a still a newbie in exploring wikipedia. I'd be pleased to know if you are the greatest specialist in their field or an alumnus of those respective institutions or admin of those pages or whatever?
Thank you once again for giving me a good suggestion.
I'd like to seek help from you in future, in creating a article in Wikipedia. Balablitz (talk) 12:33, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
- Mind what you say. I have not removed any content without explaining them. I challenge you to provide the diff, if you think I did so. There are no admins responsible for any pages. Anybody can edit any page, subject to Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Regarding your query, please read Wikipedia:Notability (people). --Anbu121 (talk me) 14:12, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
INCOTM
Hi, this is just an informal invitation to nominate and vote at this months India Collaboration of the Month. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:11, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi Anbu121,
I had been chasing some Signet IPs around when I came to their unexplained mass content deletions at the Meena (actress) page on 3 September 2012 . I had a look at some of the other edits there and noticed the 'edit warring' over her year of birth. I reverted another IP year change, but then I found that the source (here) did not directly support the date of birth, only the year. This obliquely too when it says ".. thirty three years old ..." in 2009. So her birth year could be 1976, or 1975 if the "September 16" is correct.
If it can't be confirmed then the date should probably be removed, or "circa 1975-1976" put in its place. Thoughts? - 220 of Borg 06:42, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
- I have added a ref for DOB. --Anbu121 (talk me) 10:38, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chennai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Triplicane article
Dear Anbu. Triplicane article has now been, to some extent, revamped. But still I feel it doesn't qualify for a C class. Although there are about 63 references in the article, the information is still meager in an encyclopedic parlance. Let's try editing it keeping South Side, Chicago (or similar featured ones) as a model. Still, a long way to go. Let's try to find more statistical information about the area (preferably from government sources, which I feel would bolster the References section). Seeking your opinion. :) Rasnaboy (talk) 08:39, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Chennai Collaboration of the Month
Dear Anbu. Thanks for the notification. Just wondering what to nominate, as we all are still with the Chennai main article. There's a lot to do in it, and am currently concentrating on individual sections one by one. Hope the other editors too are doing the same. Can we nominate another article for this month, or should we continue with the current one? Rasnaboy (talk) 17:53, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Indian Institute of Management Lucknow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Page Curation newsletter
Hey Anbu121. I'm dropping you a note because you used to patrol new pages. This is just to let you know that we've deployed and developed Page Curation, which augments and supersedes Special:NewPages - there are a lot of interesting new features if you want to get back into the swing of patrolling :). There's some help documentation here if you want to familiarise yourself with the system and start using it. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:11, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Comment ...
... requested here. Thx. --regentspark (comment) 18:03, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) I took care of this. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 18:14, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
a note on talk:india
Could you please take a look at the note I left for you on Talk:India? Thanks. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 18:13, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for writing Chepauk (Chennai MRTS) - it's rare to see a transport article so wonderfully referenced :). Ironholds (talk) 11:16, 27 September 2012 (UTC) |
Ping!
Talk:Indian Institute of Management Lucknow/GA1 TheSpecialUser TSU 10:19, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Deletion of unwanted details from Arcot article
Hi!Anbu ,kindly have a relook at the article Arcot,is it necessary to give details like cell phone numbers in Wikipedia?I don't guess this is "yellow pages".And kindly help in not making Wikipedia an advertisement forum. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aks bhatt (talk • contribs) 18:14, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
- The content you deleted had a ref. Thats why I reverted it. Sorry that I didn't notice the cell phone numbers. I have removed them now. Feel free to clean it up further and be careful not to remove sourced content. --Anbu121 (talk me) 18:21, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Chennai COTM
Hi Anbu, please have a look at the nominations. I don't think re nominating Chennai is a good idea, atleast not this month. We can still get it to GA. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:41, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
- Fine. But Arignar Anna Zoological Park was the result of the voting process for october. --Anbu121 (talk me) 19:45, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
- Don't you think you should post it on the talk pages of others? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:15, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry,Forgot. Done that now. --Anbu121 (talk me) 15:29, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- Hehe, OK, thanks. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:09, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry,Forgot. Done that now. --Anbu121 (talk me) 15:29, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- Don't you think you should post it on the talk pages of others? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:15, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion contested: Vitthal Kamat
Hello Anbu121. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Vitthal Kamat, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article, so A1, doesn't apply, however, the article does not assert enough credible significance, so I have re-tagged it as an A7. Thank you. --v/r Electric Catfish (talk) 11:52, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- Sufficient Context? Which Business? which hotel? --Anbu121 (talk me) 11:56, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- This was an article about as person that you tagged as an A1, but had enough context to identify the subject, but still didn't credibly assert significance, so I tagged it as an A7 and removed your A1 tags. --v/r Electric Catfish (talk) 12:10, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I am also talking about the same page. It just said the person is a businessman, nothing else. That's not sufficient context to identify the subject. --Anbu121 (talk me) 12:14, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- It said his name and what he does. An example of an A1 is if it just said his name. Either way, it did not assert enough significance and I tagged it as an A7, and it was deleted as an A7. --v/r Electric Catfish (talk) 12:16, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- Well, I could not "identify" the subject with just the single word 'businessman'. --Anbu121 (talk me) 12:24, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- It said his name and what he does. An example of an A1 is if it just said his name. Either way, it did not assert enough significance and I tagged it as an A7, and it was deleted as an A7. --v/r Electric Catfish (talk) 12:16, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I am also talking about the same page. It just said the person is a businessman, nothing else. That's not sufficient context to identify the subject. --Anbu121 (talk me) 12:14, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- This was an article about as person that you tagged as an A1, but had enough context to identify the subject, but still didn't credibly assert significance, so I tagged it as an A7 and removed your A1 tags. --v/r Electric Catfish (talk) 12:10, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For all of your great work reverting vandalism today using Huggle! --v/r Electric Catfish (talk) 14:44, 3 October 2012 (UTC) |
What is different from husband and wives? LOL
Isn't husband and wives exactly the same? In my opinion husband sounds much better. That's why I edited. And what is wrong with that? From a Catolic btw. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.166.134.36 (talk) 14:38, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not the place to play around and get entertained. This is serious stuff- an encyclopedia. --Anbu121 (talk me) 14:43, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for fixing my screw-up on this, which may have been the first SPI I've filed in 4+ years of editing. I was in the process of re-filing it in the right space and asking for db-7 on the error, but you caught it first. Your help is most appreciated. Best, --Arxiloxos (talk) 15:24, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
How about you pay attention and read the Talk page.
I removed the 21st century paragraph because it was ill informed and not noteworthy. Just because there were a few sickos on youtube who made comments referencing the 2011 Tōhoku tsunami disaster to anything related to 70 year old World War II issues doesn't mean it's worthy of a wikipedia entry, furthermore just because someone with a blog or publishing ability on a website sees these comments and decides to write an article about it purely shows bad journalistic and investigative qualities on their behalf. I'm going to remove it again and would kindly ask that it not be repurposed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.94.7.228 (talk) 18:21, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't blindly reverted it. I have heard of this news. Its not just the one source cited there. Here are some more: [1], [2], [3] --Anbu121 (talk me) 18:39, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- Refer to what I just said, "just because someone with a blog or publishing ability on a website sees these comments and decides to write an article about it purely shows bad journalistic and investigative qualities on their behalf."
Continue to interfere and you will be reported for intentional disruptive behavior. --71.94.7.228 (talk) 19:25, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- Mind what you say. I didn't reverted it this time. --Anbu121 (talk me) 19:29, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- Right to that, I was just about to send you another message regarding that. It was another user, so I apologize for jumping the gun on that situation. That being said, I've already created a section in the talk page for that particular article referencing what I removed. I'm not blindly vandalizing or simply just "blanking" sections. --71.94.7.228 (talk) 19:35, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- Please leave an edit summary for every edit to avoid these kind of confusions. Rollbackers wont revert if they see an edit summary --Anbu121 (talk me) 19:37, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- Right to that, I was just about to send you another message regarding that. It was another user, so I apologize for jumping the gun on that situation. That being said, I've already created a section in the talk page for that particular article referencing what I removed. I'm not blindly vandalizing or simply just "blanking" sections. --71.94.7.228 (talk) 19:35, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- Mind what you say. I didn't reverted it this time. --Anbu121 (talk me) 19:29, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Not a clue where I am now. But thanks for that advice. Will write next time I change something, Recato (talk) 17:55, 6 October 2012 (UTC) |
Regarding Tamil Nadu new Legislature & Secretariat Complex - Deletion
- Hi Respected user: Anbu121, thank you for your kind information
- Reason 1: The article Tamil Nadu legislative assembly-secretariat complex proposed for merging so only i have created this article.
- Reason 2: In real (Normal) the term Tamil Nadu legislative assembly - Secretariat refers Fort St. George (article Fort St. George (India)), to differentiate it i have created this article. Because it is easy to people for better understanding
- Request: Please kindly remove the deletion tag because i will improve this article to meet the Wikipedia Standards & Requirements
- I am expecting good positive reply, Thanking you, Muniyankaruppan (talk) 20:24, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- You just copy pasted the content from Tamil Nadu legislative assembly-secretariat complex, which is copyright violation as per Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. If you want to make any changes, do it in the same article, no need to create a new one. --Anbu121 (talk me) 20:33, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Breaking up is hard to do
List in question is List of biblical names.Can it be 3 columns instead of 1? Can you do it using "Template:Multicol". Thanks...--Doug Coldwell talk 22:53, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- Please check it now. I have split it with alignment. Is that what you wanted? --Anbu121 (talk me) 07:36, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, that column splitting is it exactly. You guys are so good with this technical stuff. I'll learn from your example you did. Thanks!--Doug Coldwell talk 11:19, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
- That "alignment" is something new for me to have learned also. Thanks for showing me that.--Doug Coldwell talk 11:51, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, that column splitting is it exactly. You guys are so good with this technical stuff. I'll learn from your example you did. Thanks!--Doug Coldwell talk 11:19, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Chennai COTM
Just a reminder, that you haven't left the barnstars on the Talk pages of all those who did the awesome work. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:40, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, I was in a dilemma whether to award it now or after the GA. --Anbu121 (talk me) 22:29, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
- You should award it after the COTM period is over, whether article reaches GA or not. :) --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:01, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 23:28, 8 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Anonymouse321 (talk • contribs) 23:28, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
You deserve this one. You started the Chennai COTM, and now you're helping us get articles to good quality. -- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:52, 9 October 2012 (UTC) |
Bot problem on New contributors' help page
I noticed you had to insert some dates. I was going back and looking at some questions I missed since I got behind on both help desks while I was at the beach, and there seems to be some problem with the archiving as well. I fixed a couple of the archives but fear the problem may go back further.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 19:25, 10 October 2012 (UTC) Yes, I noticed it. --Anbu121 (talk me) 21:10, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
hi can you upload this photo on tamanna's article
http://tollywoodmonster.com/tamanna-looks-hot-at-rebel-teaser-launch/?pid=11853 Nivethamahesan (talk) 10:40, 11 October 2012 (UTC) |
October 2012
Hello Anbu121, Yes this was a mistake, I was just talking to my professor about it and we were going to try and restore it after my class. I am new to wikipedia and thank you for your assistance. You made the process much easier. AdnaloyMTA (talk) 14:39, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
TheSpecialUser TSU 21:26, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 10:45, 12 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Yunshui 雲水 10:45, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Julie Otero
I can try and find more information so the article does not have to be deleted. How's that sound? --Cake102992 (talk) 12:45, 12 October 2012 (UTC)