User talk:Lucasmoura: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:53, 18 November 2012

Release dates

Adding additional release dates not only adds clutter but is really unnecessary. We should only display the original release date and where it was released.—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 21:20, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

But the Japanese release dates should match the North American version release dates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucasmoura (talk • contribs) 23:36, 3 April 2012

Please see WP:FILMRELEASE for information on why it doesn't belong there.—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 23:43, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese films by year

Hi. You may be interested in this discussion about some categories you've recently created. Thanks. Lugnuts (talk) 08:10, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Category:1998 Japanese films with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 14:01, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, please! I created new categories. You cannot remove! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucasmoura (talk • contribs)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Category:1998 Japanese films with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 14:12, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Category:1998 Japanese films with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 14:14, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

But I liked this category. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucasmoura (talk • contribs)

You may like something, but under NO reason should you repeatedly delete content! ~ ⇒TomTom N00 @ 14:20, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) What he said; please don't just remove notices. You can, however, comment on the discussion here, and please do - whether or not it is to be merged has not been finalised, so your input may even prove useful in general. — Isarra (talk) 14:25, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Category:1998 Japanese films, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Just comment at the discussion, don't do this. Sven Manguard Wha? 14:23, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that you have been reported to WP:AIV. Your continued actions may result in being blocked from editing, which will make it difficult for you to participate in the discussions surrounding your categories. Your continual removal of the CFM template does not stop the discussions or the potential merger of your categories. -- ferret (talk) 14:32, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jac16888 ^Talk 14:32, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Z10

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. —cyberpower ^{Happy Easter}_Online 16:54, 8 April 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —cyberpower ^{Happy Easter}_Online 17:44, 8 April 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Violation of WP:3RR

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. I am submitting a report of you violating WP:3RR on Pokemon 4Ever. You are consistently adding categories you "like" and it is innappropriate. There is no consensus for such categories and therefore are not acceptable.—cyberpower ^{Happy Easter}_Online 18:30, 8 April 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:44, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pokémon episode lists

There was absolutely no reason for you to remove the broadcast dates from the articles' headers and I'm afraid you do not quite understand what talk pages are for.—Ryulong (竜龙) 10:30, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am assuming you just edited as 177.65.136.215 (talk · contribs · info · WHOIS) and undid all of Ryulong (talk · contribs) revisions. I rolled them back again. You are clearly edit warring and socking. This will get you blocked quickly. If you want to change this discuss it first and gain consensus.—cyberpower ^Chat_{Limited Access} 13:47, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pokémon season 1 (1997-1999 Japan/1998-1999 USA)
Pokémon season 2 (1999 Japan/1999-2000 USA)
Pokémon season 3 (1999-2000 Japan/2000-2001 USA)
Pokémon season 4 (2000-2001 Japan/2001-2002 USA)
Pokémon season 5 (2001-2002 Japan/2002-2003 USA)
Pokémon season 6 (2002-2003 Japan/2003-2004 USA)
Pokémon season 7 (2003-2004 Japan/2004-2005 USA)
Pokémon season 8 (2004-2005 Japan/2005-2006 USA)
Pokémon season 9 (2005-2006 Japan/2006-2007 USA)
Pokémon season 10 (2006-2007 Japan/2007-2008 USA)
Pokémon season 11 (2007-2008 Japan/2008-2009 USA)
Pokémon season 12 (2008-2009 Japan/2009-2010 USA)
Pokémon season 13 (2010 Japan/2010-2011 USA)
Pokémon season 14 (2010-2011 Japan/2011-2012 USA)
Pokémon season 15 (2011-present Japan/2012-present USA; continues Pocket Monsters Best Wishes series 2; 2012 present/TBA USA)

WP:AN

I have reported you to WP:AN because your edits are more of a disruption than they are of help.—cyberpower ^Chat_{Limited Access} 14:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:12, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing, with no attempt to take note of messages about the problems, and even a statement that "nobody will stop" you from further disruption. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:13, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Let me make some changes in my edit please?

August 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this recent edit to Category:Animated features released by Toho, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:29, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pokémon: Lucario and the Mystery of Mew with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 19:37, 29 August 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of American films of 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3D (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:27, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pokemon films

Please stop adding incorrect categories to the Pokemon films. They are not American films and certainly not Cartoon Network television films. They are Japanese films that premiere (typically) a year before they come the United States. We categorize by year for the first release, not for each. BOVINEBOY2008 18:32, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pokémon is Japanese first and should be treated as such. They are never American films.—Ryulong (琉竜) 11:19, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That was also dubbed in american films.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:02, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.—Ryulong (琉竜) 11:28, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --Toddst1 (talk) 16:12, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing, with no attempt to take note of messages about the problems, and even a statement that "nobody will stop" you from further disruption. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 19:13, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please, Unblock me!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lucasmoura (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

Decline reason:

One unblock request at a time, please. No reason has been offered to unblock this account. Please read your block message above carefully, especially the link Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:26, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lucasmoura (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

Decline reason:

No reason has been given to unblock you. Please note that further empty requests will result in this page being disabled. Kuru (talk) 14:40, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Lucasmoura (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=your reason here |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Unblock Lucasmoura for Toddst1

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Lucasmoura (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=your reason here |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Lucasmoura (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=your reason here |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Lucasmoura (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=your reason here |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Lucasmoura (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=your reason here |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Lucasmoura (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=your reason here |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Lucasmoura (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=your reason here |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

@@ Line 131: / Line 131: @@
 == Unblock Lucasmoura for Toddst1 ==
+{{unblock|your reason here}}
+{{unblock|your reason here}}
+{{unblock|your reason here}}
+{{unblock|your reason here}}
+{{unblock|your reason here}}
 {{unblock|your reason here}}

Revision as of 14:53, 18 November 2012

Release dates

Japanese films by year

April 2012

Violation of WP:3RR

Categories

Your recent edits

Pokémon episode lists

WP:AN

Your recent edits

August 2012

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

Pokemon films

Your recent edits

November 2012

Unblock Lucasmoura for Toddst1