User talk:Ukexpat: Difference between revisions
SuggestBot (talk | contribs) SuggestBot recommends these articles... |
→deleted page "B-Open": new section |
||
Line 500: | Line 500: | ||
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on [[User_talk:SuggestBot|SuggestBot's talk page]]. Regards from [[User:Nettrom|Nettrom]] ([[User talk:Nettrom|talk]]), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- [[User:SuggestBot|SuggestBot]] ([[User talk:SuggestBot|talk]]) 00:41, 5 September 2013 (UTC) |
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on [[User_talk:SuggestBot|SuggestBot's talk page]]. Regards from [[User:Nettrom|Nettrom]] ([[User talk:Nettrom|talk]]), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- [[User:SuggestBot|SuggestBot]] ([[User talk:SuggestBot|talk]]) 00:41, 5 September 2013 (UTC) |
||
== deleted page "B-Open" == |
|||
Hi UKexpat, |
|||
i hope you are ok, |
|||
yesterday i posted my first wikipedia page related to the company i work. |
|||
my purpose is not to promote my company, rather to promote the greek software market (as you know, we are in middle of a crisis in the country and we really try hard to become more extrovert and competitive and to meet global standards). |
|||
could you please assist me on selecting a better approach on the article, so it will not violate wikipedia's guidelines? |
|||
would it be a solution if i add a sentence for competitors in the greek market? |
|||
many thanks in advance for your time on this, |
|||
kind regards, |
|||
Dimitrios |
Revision as of 06:37, 5 September 2013
Welcome to ukexpat's talkpage |
· userpage · |
Friday 15
November |
|
This is Ukexpat's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84Auto-archiving period: 7 days |
TUSC token 4ca061685a490899d158b1bcf22d9087
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Help Project newsletter : Issue 6
The Help Project Newsletter |
Issue VI - April 2013 |
Open Help Conference The Open Help Conference will be taking place June 15-19 in Cincinnati Ohio, USA. The conference includes two days of presentations and open discussions, followed by team "sprints" - collaborative efforts to write and improve documentation. It has been suggested to send a team from Wikipedia/Wikimedia: to share our own knowledge about help, learn from others in the open source community working on similar problems, and to carry out a sprint to improve some aspect of Wikipedia's help. There may be support available for volunteers to attend from the Participation Support program (and your editor is certainly hoping to be there!) Please join the discussion in Meta's IdeaLab if you're interested, and/or have suggestions about what we could work on. |
Other news
|
If you don't wish to receive this newsletter on your talk page in future then just edit the participants page and add "no newsletter" next to your name. Suggestions for future issues are welcome at Wikipedia:Help Project/Newsletter. |
2013 Philadelphia Wiki-Picnic: Saturday, June 22
Philadelphia's Great American Wiknic at Penn Park | ||
You are invited to the Philadelphia edition of the Great American Wiknic taking place in Penn Park, on Saturday, June 22, 2013! We would love to see you there!--User:Ocaasi (talk)|}} |
Welcome thanks
hey, thanks :)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Highspiritswow (talk • contribs)
About your answer on the help desk related to the subtitle/taxon creation
Hi Ukexpat, thanks for your comment on the helpdesk about the subtitle/taxon creation, but the original french version of this template is fr:Modèle:Sous-titre/Taxon, if that could contribute to help me. Bastaco (talk) 08:34, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Help needed
Following your edits, I think I need some help inserting cites to the article. Thanks! --Michael Haephrati (talk) 16:09, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
- Please take a look at WP:Referencing for beginners. Rather than referring to the scans you should use the appropriate citation template ({{Cite web}}, {{Cite news}} or {{Cite journal}} for example) referring to the original printed articles etc.--ukexpat (talk) 16:14, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks! --Michael Haephrati (talk) 16:15, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
- I am happy to say I now know how to use the Cite templates. I have worked on the version before your change and at the same time on the current version, going over the articles and sources listed in the old version and adding cites to them inside a textual description. I have added now 2 sites and wanted to ask if you could take a look before I proceed. --Michael Haephrati (talk) 16:46, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
- Another thing you have commented was "links to scans of sources are not permitted". There are direct links to most of the Amiga magazines, but these links lead to .zip archive per each issue of each Magazine. I have downloaded each issue mentioned and isolated the page of the article (so in some of the cases, these are not scans in fact) and uploaded to Flickr. I can't think of a better way to also display the image of the article cited. The sources for these archives are: Amazing Computing and Amiga World. Michael Haephrati (talk) 17:01, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
- As far as I can tell you are still using Flickr. That's not the way to do it. For ref #1 for example, you should be citing the journal itself using {{Cite journal}}, leaving out the Flickr link. If someone wants to verify the reference, they use the details in the template to find the journal in, say, a library rather than by looking at Flickr.--ukexpat (talk) 17:44, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
- So there is no justification to provide a photo the article page as well (if extracted from the archive)? Michael Haephrati (talk) 17:47, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
- In my view no, because a scan is not verifiable (because of the risk, albeit small, of manipulation), whereas as hard copy in a library is verifiable.--ukexpat (talk) 17:51, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
- Now it points to the official archive of the specific issue (year + month) of the cited magazine — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael.haephrati (talk • contribs) 18:07, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
- I found a new edit which has citing problems and other problems, but just to be on the safe side, you may wish to take a look. Thanks Michael Haephrati (talk) 15:28, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
- Now it points to the official archive of the specific issue (year + month) of the cited magazine — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael.haephrati (talk • contribs) 18:07, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
- In my view no, because a scan is not verifiable (because of the risk, albeit small, of manipulation), whereas as hard copy in a library is verifiable.--ukexpat (talk) 17:51, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
- So there is no justification to provide a photo the article page as well (if extracted from the archive)? Michael Haephrati (talk) 17:47, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
- As far as I can tell you are still using Flickr. That's not the way to do it. For ref #1 for example, you should be citing the journal itself using {{Cite journal}}, leaving out the Flickr link. If someone wants to verify the reference, they use the details in the template to find the journal in, say, a library rather than by looking at Flickr.--ukexpat (talk) 17:44, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks! --Michael Haephrati (talk) 16:15, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 August 2013
- Recent research: WikiSym 2013 retrospective
- WikiProject report: Loop-the-loop: Amusement Parks
- Traffic report: Reddit creep
- Featured content: WikiCup update, and the gardens of Finland
- News and notes: Looking ahead to Wiki Loves Monuments
- Technology report: Gallery improvements launch on Wikipedia
Question about Johnson Controls article
Hello Ukexpat
Thank you for the message you left on my user talk page when I joined Wikipedia. I thought I would reach out to you for help with a question I have on the Johnson Controls Wikipedia article.
I drafted an update to the Business Unit section of the Johnson Controls article and proposed that draft on the articles talk page at Talk:Johnson_Controls#Requested_update_to_.27Business_Units.27_section.
I haven't had a response to the proposed draft. Would you be able to respond to the draft please?
Thank you for your help
--Anna C Timms (talk) 14:40, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
ORTS permissions problem
Hi Ukexpat !
You marked 4 pictures I sent on wikimedia as "missing evidence permission".
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stèle_Golgotha.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lives_in_parallel.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Human_grape.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Life_Score.jpg
I can understand that you need to protect wikimedia and to ensure that these files have the requested permissions, however, I already sent twice an email to the OTRS (french section) with no answers, this even before you marked these pictures as "missing permission".
What else can I do ?
I hope you'll be able to help me!
Clement.nuss (talk) 11:44, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
- You just have to be patient as the OTRS queue is backlogged. If the images are deleted they will be undeleted when the permissions are processed.--ukexpat (talk) 12:48, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Reviewing my subission
UKexpat: Several weeks ago I submitted my biographical material to Wikipedia...I did not keep a copy... Is there any way I can retrieve a copy of my submission or do I have to wait until it is published in the Wikipedia Encyclopedia? It was submitted as Al ( Allen ) Schwartz or Allen (Al) Schwartz. I realize it can take months before it actually appears on line.
Thank You,
Al Schwartz [e-mail removed] Al Schwartz3 (talk) 18:34, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
- See the reply at Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions#Submitted material.--ukexpat (talk) 18:40, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Views/Day | Quality | Title | Content | Headings | Images | Links | Sources | Tagged with… |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
46 | Solid HarmoniE (talk) | Add sources | ||||||
529 | Bounce music (talk) | Add sources | ||||||
8 | The Two Faces of Mitchell and Webb (talk) | Add sources | ||||||
32 | Green (surname) (talk) | Add sources | ||||||
172 | Martin (name) (talk) | Add sources | ||||||
6 | Matsutaro Shoriki Award (talk) | Add sources | ||||||
54 | Michael Underwood (talk) | Cleanup | ||||||
2,352 | Medicine (talk) | Cleanup | ||||||
31 | Sinclair Radionics (talk) | Cleanup | ||||||
0 | Schwabach (Rednitz) (talk) | Expand | ||||||
1 | Web mortem (talk) | Expand | ||||||
25 | Amy Lamé (talk) | Expand | ||||||
53 | Digital textile printing (talk) | Unencyclopaedic | ||||||
6,030 | Sigmund Freud (talk) | Unencyclopaedic | ||||||
39 | Titan (game) (talk) | Unencyclopaedic | ||||||
194 | Simulation hypothesis (talk) | Merge | ||||||
15 | Hart (surname) (talk) | Merge | ||||||
87 | Khufu ship (talk) | Merge | ||||||
4 | American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry (talk) | Wikify | ||||||
7 | Forêt de Mormal (talk) | Wikify | ||||||
5 | Michael Bywater (talk) | Wikify | ||||||
2 | Antonio Peña y Goñi (talk) | Orphan | ||||||
2 | Danielle Knafo (talk) | Orphan | ||||||
1 | Rhodri Evans (talk) | Orphan | ||||||
1 | Aubach (Elsava) (talk) | Stub | ||||||
62 | Bruiser (TV series) (talk) | Stub | ||||||
7 | This Mitchell and Webb Book (talk) | Stub | ||||||
1 | Aubach (Lohr) (talk) | Stub | ||||||
0 | Schwabach (Regnitz) (talk) | Stub | ||||||
3 | The Straight Mind and Other Essays (talk) | Stub |
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:41, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
deleted page "B-Open"
Hi UKexpat,
i hope you are ok,
yesterday i posted my first wikipedia page related to the company i work.
my purpose is not to promote my company, rather to promote the greek software market (as you know, we are in middle of a crisis in the country and we really try hard to become more extrovert and competitive and to meet global standards).
could you please assist me on selecting a better approach on the article, so it will not violate wikipedia's guidelines?
would it be a solution if i add a sentence for competitors in the greek market?
many thanks in advance for your time on this,
kind regards, Dimitrios