User talk:Solarra: Difference between revisions
added the start of a conversation on a talk removal |
|||
Line 224: | Line 224: | ||
I have no idea if you are part of the religious intolerance of certain people adding to and editing the "Hailsham" page, or if you have just been used by others. Wikipedia has a strick policy against the editing of information about religion on the basis of intolerance against religion or religious groups. I intend to report this matter if any more words to Judaism and Christianity and Islam are removed from the Hailsham page without proper justification. Wikipedia is a site for everyone to add to, and to edit, not just people who hold narrow religious viewpoints and are intolerant of others. References to Jewish persecution should not be edited out of a town's history just because some people do not like it. |
I have no idea if you are part of the religious intolerance of certain people adding to and editing the "Hailsham" page, or if you have just been used by others. Wikipedia has a strick policy against the editing of information about religion on the basis of intolerance against religion or religious groups. I intend to report this matter if any more words to Judaism and Christianity and Islam are removed from the Hailsham page without proper justification. Wikipedia is a site for everyone to add to, and to edit, not just people who hold narrow religious viewpoints and are intolerant of others. References to Jewish persecution should not be edited out of a town's history just because some people do not like it. |
||
:I haven't edited that page. However, based on [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hailsham&action=history your edit history] it seems you are having issues with other editors on the content of the article. I suggest taking the issues to the talk page :-) [[User:Solarra|<font color="#FC89AC" face="Comic Sans MS">'''♥ Solarra ♥'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Solarra|<font color="green">♪ 話 ♪</font>]]</sup> ߷ <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Solarra|<font color="darkgreen">♀ 投稿 ♀</font>]]</sub> 11:08, 29 May 2014 (UTC) |
:I haven't edited that page. However, based on [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hailsham&action=history your edit history] it seems you are having issues with other editors on the content of the article. I suggest taking the issues to the talk page :-) [[User:Solarra|<font color="#FC89AC" face="Comic Sans MS">'''♥ Solarra ♥'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Solarra|<font color="green">♪ 話 ♪</font>]]</sup> ߷ <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Solarra|<font color="darkgreen">♀ 投稿 ♀</font>]]</sub> 11:08, 29 May 2014 (UTC) |
||
==Talk Edit on DC Publications Crossover== |
|||
If what I said is nonconstructive, its nonconstructive. I am not going to argue that, however I would like advice on moving this forward. I tried to provide as much foreknowledge as possible and ask for assistance in finding source material to legitimatize the original edit before I jumped in and deleted it without. The edit in question is uncited, and when trying to cite it, I found Not one shred of reference to it even existing in any comic industry journalism or otherwise, I attempted to crowdsource for the answer which is when it became vandalised. Ideas? thoughts? comments? should I try rewriting and attempting a talk post again or should I just ignore the "potential vandalism" and assume if it isn't legit, it will be removed eventually, or should I jump the gun and remove it myself? never removed possible vandalism so Im treading lightly as to not anger the other users or worse admin gods ;) --[[User:Dwarvenbierschneeman|Dwarvenbierschneeman]] ([[User talk:Dwarvenbierschneeman|talk]]) 11:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:48, 29 May 2014
Template:Archive box collapsible
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:56, 24 July 2014 (UTC) Problems with your non-admin closuresPlease do not perform non-admin AfD closures unless you're able to perform them correctly. I had to fix layout errors for the following discussions; your errors in closing these discussions created errors on the entire AfD log page.
Additionally, I had to remove the AfD templates from the article pages and add the AfD result templates to their talk pages. Again, I suggest you don't perform such closures unless you can do so properly. Also, the closure at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ritu Raj as a "snow" keep is inappropriate, because only two respondents to a nomination is not particularly worthy of a "snow" closure. Thank you for your consideration, NorthAmerica1000 07:15, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
With Carpe Fulgur a history merge is required. If an admin had closed the AfD this would have happened. Please, since you closed the discussion and are not an admin, find an admin to perform the history merge. This is a closure you very much ought not to have done on the simple basis that work is required that you do not have the user rights to perform. So I am asking you to finish the job by following it through to completion by finding a admin to do the extra work. Fiddle Faddle 07:59, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Continental CelticI removed the infobox on the language family relationships of Continental Celtic because Continental Celtic is not a linguistic grouping, it is only a geographic one. The info box was therefore misleading. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.194.124.141 (talk) 09:27, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
DeletionGem,This image here Criteria for Speedy Del https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ArvindIyer.jpg can you help delete it.It really is of no use and is not linked or connected to anything thanks (Suntug11 (talk) 10:12, 24 May 2014 (UTC)) Update-It has been deleted.Thank You.(Suntug11 — Preceding undated comment added 10:31, 24 May 2014 (UTC) Germaine GreerHi Solarra. I don't want to insult you by templating you, but I did want to give you a heads-up that you've already breached 3RR on Germaine Greer. I'm warning you and the other editor both, so please don't take this the wrong way. Ishdarian 13:43, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
ThanksHi, i didn't notice my talk page, you reverted it back to original from the blanking performed by some user. Thanks--Vin09 (talk) 14:30, 25 May 2014 (UTC) Edit to Shael Polakow-SuranskyHi — thanks for your message. The reason the content was removed was that it verges on vandalism, does not use a neutral tone with respect to a living person and it is not properly sourced. If you review the edit history for this page and the talk page of this editor (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:74.66.11.71) you will note that it was blocked several weeks ago because of exactly this problem after several editors made efforts to reason with the editor who repeatedly inserted this inappropriate text. Let me know if you would like to discuss further. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.73.232.21 (talk) 17:45, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
Sorry to bother you.You just left me a message that you cleaned up my article and removed the CSD template, could you pleas assist me in getting it back to the article space. How do I get it back to the article space? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LennyPerez44 (talk • contribs) 00:52, 26 May 2014 (UTC) Never mind I got it back in place thank you... I really appreciate you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LennyPerez44 (talk • contribs) 00:55, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
Image RenamingDear Solarra,Is it possible to rename this image https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ArvindIyer1.jpg to ArvindIyer.jpg ? please help if possible.thank you.(Suntug11 (talk) 11:56, 26 May 2014 (UTC))
1 Million thanks.(42.104.1.20 (talk) 02:30, 27 May 2014 (UTC)) Race GurramHai. One user destroyed the article Race Gurram. I too destroyed the page without my knowledge as I don't know much about references. Please construct the page how it was before. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RajtheEmperor (talk • contribs) 14:23, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
ExilesWhat I had added was the name of the comic book that psylock had entered in, She first appeared in the enemy of the stars saga. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.111.91.195 (talk) 04:18, 27 May 2014 (UTC) Changes made to "Bisexuality" pageHello -- I would like to know why the changes I make to the "Bisexuality" page keep getting undone on the basis of vandalism. The changes I've been trying to make are not vandalism, nor are they experimentation. The definition currently on the Bisexuality page -- "attraction to both males and females" -- is incorrect as according to the bisexual community itself[1][2]. This is a harmful spread of misinformation, as is the idea that only two sexes and genders exist. "Romantic attraction" should not be included under the label "bisexuality," as it has its own distinct label, "biromanticism." You also removed the addition of asexuality as a possible sexuality, which is frankly offensive, as asexuality gets little visibility elsewhere as well. 206.208.133.156 (talk) 05:10, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi Solarra Please can you give some guidance as to the content of the Ausmed Education page so that it does not amount to 'speedy deletion'? Thank you Ausmed education (talk) 06:46, 27 May 2014 (UTC) This was needed!I took it from the page as I've recently made a main article Babe Smith. When a main article on a charcater is made, the infobox from the list must go from there to the article. For example - Mick Carter and Pam Coker - these don't have infoboxes on the list, as they are on the article. This exercise needs to be done on Babe Smith! ♣Ad♣ --TheCoker (talk) 09:58, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Zippr AddressHey Solara, you had cleared up an external link that i had posted on the Golconda page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golkonda. The link directs people to the golconda fort's coordinates on a map and then gives the person turn by turn navigation. Zippr is a new platform being used in some places in India and is picking up. As a hyderabad citizen i wanted Golconda to be easily found and navigated to. Please re-instate the link if the above reason is justified. Also try Zippr first hand to understand what i mean. Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.82.3.71 (talk) 10:26, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Hey, i've seen the External Articles link, but i fail to see what rule my post violates, please help me understand. As this is not a brand or promotion, its an alternate address. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.82.3.71 (talk) 10:39, 27 May 2014 (UTC) @Solara, please comment — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.82.3.71 (talk) 11:10, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
To explain once again, the only reason i added this code is to help people navigate to the location. This is a new way to navigate and i don't understand how this is spam, please try it for your self @ www.zip.pr before calling it spam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.184.254.145 (talk) 11:58, 27 May 2014 (UTC) Revert Article for DiscussionAs for now, Geeta Tandon is merged in Fear Factor: Khatron Ke Khiladi (season 5). So there s no chance for deletion! 42.104.1.244 (talk) 10:53, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Potters house Christian centreHello I was just wondering why you thought my comment was unnecessary? I thought it was important to show people searching wiki for the potters house church what the church is really like, from an actual member rather than from people who have left in the past or just don't know that much about the church. The way the church was being portrayed, in my opinion was inaccurate. I personally believe it a lovely Christian and love filled place to be, and wanted to share that with everyone. I understand people may think I come from a biased viewpoint, but you need both viewpoints on the site rather than just a critical viewpoint, I personally believe from my experiences of 16 years up till present, that my viewpoint is objective. Anyways I would love to hear your side, god bless and kind regards :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilovejesuschristforever777 (talk • contribs) 11:13, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
My user pageGreetings, That was me who edited my user page - I just hadn't bothered to sign in. Even so, why did you believe the changes to be unconstructive? The table clearly needed updating, so did you not even bother to look at what the changes were? Cheers, Ollie231213 (talk) 11:42, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Thank youSolarra, thank you for removing the vandalism from my page! I did not know about this. Thanks for removing the vandalism! I appreciate your actions! Warrenkychu (talk) 13:13, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
James VI and I and the English ParliamentI was reverting a couple of pieces of vandalism: sometimes a faggot really is a bundle of sticks. 95.172.233.183 (talk) 13:19, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Bill McKibbenHello. This edit that I made and you reverted was correct. The quote from Paul Greenberg is taken from this article from the New York Times and as you can see it really says "Eaarth itself will be that ecological Lenin [...]". Eaarth is the name of a book that Bill McKibben wrote. I don't know why it was named in this way as I haven't read it. But it's not a typo. Fturco (talk) 16:55, 27 May 2014 (UTC) How do I clear my sandbox?Thanks Solarra. I was trying to clear my sandbox so that I could start a new article and mistakenly cleared the contents. Can you guide me on how I could start a new article? ThanksRM (talk) 05:35, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
External LinkHi Can you please tell me the exact reason, that why you removed my link? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.71.239.203 (talk) 09:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Okay Solarra.. Then how I will add? I want add my link.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.71.239.203 (talk) 10:08, 28 May 2014 (UTC) Why this needlessly offensive wikipedia notifications policy?Hello Solarra, Can you explain to me why Wikipedia.org has such an needlessly offensive notifications policy? What I try to do is to reach out and create an open source reference to 'People for planet'. Why I think this is important? Because we, people should care more about life on earth. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ardoc.team (talk • contribs) 2014 May 29 04:25 UTC+0
{{Hang on}}
A barnstar for you!
Religious IntoleranceI have no idea if you are part of the religious intolerance of certain people adding to and editing the "Hailsham" page, or if you have just been used by others. Wikipedia has a strick policy against the editing of information about religion on the basis of intolerance against religion or religious groups. I intend to report this matter if any more words to Judaism and Christianity and Islam are removed from the Hailsham page without proper justification. Wikipedia is a site for everyone to add to, and to edit, not just people who hold narrow religious viewpoints and are intolerant of others. References to Jewish persecution should not be edited out of a town's history just because some people do not like it.
Talk Edit on DC Publications CrossoverIf what I said is nonconstructive, its nonconstructive. I am not going to argue that, however I would like advice on moving this forward. I tried to provide as much foreknowledge as possible and ask for assistance in finding source material to legitimatize the original edit before I jumped in and deleted it without. The edit in question is uncited, and when trying to cite it, I found Not one shred of reference to it even existing in any comic industry journalism or otherwise, I attempted to crowdsource for the answer which is when it became vandalised. Ideas? thoughts? comments? should I try rewriting and attempting a talk post again or should I just ignore the "potential vandalism" and assume if it isn't legit, it will be removed eventually, or should I jump the gun and remove it myself? never removed possible vandalism so Im treading lightly as to not anger the other users or worse admin gods ;) --Dwarvenbierschneeman (talk) 11:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC) |
- ^ . American Institute of Bisexuality http://bisexual.org/qna/what-is-the-difference-between-bisexual-and-terms-like-pansexual-polysexual-omnisexual-ambisexual-and-fluid/.
{{cite web}}
: Missing or empty|title=
(help) - ^ . American Institute of Bisexuality http://bisexual.org/qna/doesnt-identifying-as-bisexual-reinforce-a-false-gender-binary/.
{{cite web}}
: Missing or empty|title=
(help)