User talk:Hewhoamareismyself

Poor man's ARCHIVE: 1, 2

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
345		Poverty threshold (talk)						Add sources
884		Sheffield Wednesday F.C. (talk)						Add sources
75		Olympiastadion (Berlin) (talk)						Add sources
30		Tom Sharkey (talk)						Add sources
1,347		Daughtry (band) (talk)						Add sources
30		Hindko dialect (talk)						Add sources
253		Stan Collymore (talk)						Cleanup
4,412		Sam & Cat (talk)						Cleanup
27		2009–10 Portsmouth F.C. season (talk)						Cleanup
14		Ukrainian Wikipedia (talk)						Expand
6		Laz grammar (talk)						Expand
91		1994–95 in English football (talk)						Expand
1,026		John Lydon (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
72		2010–11 Tottenham Hotspur F.C. season (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
162		Toph Beifong (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
241		Environmental movement (talk)						Merge
12		Artemis Fowl I (talk)						Merge
43		Community gardening (talk)						Merge
18		Pt/Co scale (talk)						Wikify
58		2008–09 in English football (talk)						Wikify
100		Ray Clemence (talk)						Wikify
2		S. Rehman (talk)						Orphan
13		Accoya wood (talk)						Orphan
1		Agonum gratiosum (talk)						Orphan
4		Triformin (talk)						Stub
7		The Patience of the Spider (talk)						Stub
12		Route 13 (Laos) (talk)						Stub
1		Daniellia klainei (talk)						Stub
7		The Scent of the Night (talk)						Stub
5		The Wings of the Sphinx (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:28, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on changes to the AfC mailing list

Hello Hewhoamareismyself! There is a discussion that your input is requested on! I look forward to your comments, thoughts, opinions, criticisms, and questions!

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

This message was composed and sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Articles for creation March 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Hewhoamareismyself:

WikiProject AFC is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1, 2014 to March 31, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1500 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script has been released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks.
Posted by Northamerica1000 (talk) on 02:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation

Notification of a June AfC BackLog Drive

Hello Hewhoamareismyself:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1500 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

The AfC helper script can assist you in tallying your edits automatically. To view a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Sent on behalf of (t) Josve05a (c) by {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} using the MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
14		2007–08 Birmingham City F.C. season (talk)						Add sources
9		The International Wizard of Oz Club (talk)						Add sources
34		Villains in Power Rangers in Space (talk)						Add sources
30		J. D.'s Revenge (talk)						Add sources
33		2008–09 Aston Villa F.C. season (talk)						Add sources
33		Lao Royal Family (talk)						Add sources
149		David Dunn (talk)						Cleanup
206		Abul A'la Maududi (talk)						Cleanup
31		Artemis Fowl: The Graphic Novel (talk)						Cleanup
3,039		Mammal (talk)						Expand
79		2006–07 in English football (talk)						Expand
145		SpongeBob SquarePants: Battle for Bikini Bottom (talk)						Expand
111		Delwar Hossain Sayeedi (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
159		2010–11 Manchester United F.C. season (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
38		Wise use (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
121		Microbeads (talk)						Merge
380		Sierra Club (talk)						Merge
227		Quotation mark glyphs (talk)						Merge
118		Horns (novel) (talk)						Wikify
12		Lao art (talk)						Wikify
16		2006–07 Reading F.C. season (talk)						Wikify
4		Chromochord (talk)						Orphan
3		Sumit Nag (talk)						Orphan
3		Dittionario giorgiano e italiano (talk)						Orphan
472		Second World (talk)						Stub
6		August Heat (talk)						Stub
6		Scottish Financial Enterprise (talk)						Stub
2		Carlyle Gifford (talk)						Stub
43		National Assembly (Laos) (talk)						Stub
31		Tam-Lin (film) (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:41, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm responding to the rejection of the Yun Mu Kwan article. I am not sure what the criticism of it was. Perhaps I am not sufficiently familiar with how one navigates around wikipedia but, basically, I am not able to find the critical comments that need to be addressed. Can you give me some guidance as to where to look or what the issues are specifically? Thanks. S. W. Mirsky 23:10, 3 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swmirsky (talk • contribs)

I cant find any comments that detail the issue with the submission. Can you please clarify? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pena.christian (talk • contribs) 21:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

I cant find any comments that detail the issue with the submission. Can you please clarify? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pena.christian (talk • contribs) 21:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Poor Man's ACD

Thanks for the clarification.

Removed the Wikipedia source and added two other sources referencing the term. Pena.christian (talk) 21:56, 4 June 2014 (UTC) pena.christian

Okauchee Lions Club

The Okauchee Lions Club is more important than most of the other Lions Clubs in the world because they are one of the few Clubs to own and run their own park. This article also is better written and more important than the Oconomowoc (film), Phantom vibration syndrome, Aglet, Mad Tea Party ride in Disneyland, Shoo Fly Don’t Bother Me, and many more Articles. This article is also more informational and has good resources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tschick1 (talk • contribs) 13:19, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar

I just wanted to thank you for looking over a bunch of articles that my students have submitted for a social studies project from Oconomowoc High School. The students are really responding to your critiques and trying to fix and get published. Even though, I'm not sure if any will get published, the students have learned and practiced a lot of skills that we have been working on all year. Thank you again for all of your work! Nkschueller66 (talk) 14:36, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Abel Laureano

Saw your decline of this one - I think you meant "unreferenced" rather than "blank"? Thanks.--ukexpat (talk) 15:20, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Dear Hewhoamareismyself,

Thanks for your feedback. I am new to Wikipedia and learning as I go.

I am in the process of doing some further research to edit my project article on Fishing Charters. It has been difficult to find quality none-commercially linked & verifiable content for reference sources. Published books tend to just lead to sales page. I hope that using government publications on the industry will have sufficient authenticity.

It is this lack of accessible general knowledge that led me to believe an article on Fishing Charters would be a worthwhile addition to Wikipedia alongside Fishing and Fishing Vessels.

I hope to re-submit during the next week.

Any advice would be welcome.

Regards, Deep End Fishing (talk) 23:05, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Reference Intakes

Thanks for your comments on the draft article "Reference Intakes". I've made a couple of changes, and hope this is now acceptable. Norman21 (talk) 13:45, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Inline URLs

"Please see the denial notice that was posted by Timtrent just 10 hours ago. Please remove all inline URLs"

Dear Hewhoamareismyself, I thought I had removed all inline URLs. Can you please tell me which I have missed? (I now removed two links that were directing towards an insittucional repository, for fear of that being considered "inline URL).

Bramblebough 01:36, 8 June 2014 (UTC)BrambleboughBramblebough 01:36, 8 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bramblebough (talk • contribs)

Review of ...And Jesus Moonwalks the Mississippi

Hey there, I noted your review of the article linked above at [1]. I'm curious about what went into your decision to decline based on our neutrality policy since I didn't have any issues with the language. I don't think there were any neutrality issues with the article as it was written. I've also gone ahead and published that article, if you'd like to contest my decision. Let me know and all the best, Blurpeace 05:58, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

I also just got another user who joined #wikipedia-en-help ^connect about your review of Draft:Kevin Williams. I'd say it's probably best to publish and tag the article for inline style issues, rather than declining it and having it potentially indefinitely languish in the draft namespace.

I noticed that you just recently picked up editing again and that you've made 1,000 edits just this month. Given it's only been 8 days and the bulk of your work has been reviewing article drafts, maybe it'd be a good idea to take things a little slower and really contemplate each individual article?

I don't say that to be condescending or anything. Just that we only get one chance to do reviews right and every mistake counts pretty heavily. That also isn't to say nobody can make a mistake, but it might be a good idea to take it slow while you're just getting a handle of things again. Of course, if I have any other issues, I'll make sure to engage you directly and note specifically what's wrong. Wishing all the best and welcome back to the project man. Blurpeace 08:06, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Review of Draft:Camargo Society

Hi there, I wound up at Draft:Camargo Society while reviewing another draft by the same editor. You flagged this for notability -- in cases like this, which look notable but need better sources, I prefer to try to add a few sources. This was super-easy in this case: There's in fact a Britannica article (and anything covered by another encyclopedia is notable). Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 18:49, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

References

Hello. I don't know what else to do to make text's references appear on the references number bottom.

I received a red note saying "There are <ref> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a

</nowiki>template (see the help page)".

Sincerely I'm lost. I don't no what to do. Can you help me, please? Thanks a lot.hewhoamareismyself 03:20, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

JohnHeggelund, Journal of Applied Research on Children article deletion

I am an intern with Children at Risk, the company publishing the Journal of Applied Research on Children. They asked me to create a wikipedia page using the information from their website. Do they need to write an entirely new summary of the journals just to have a wiki page and a website?

Sorry, this all makes perfect sense. I was frustrated because my job was made less simple. Thank you for doing yours.

--JohnHeggelund (talk) 12:21, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

I was wondering, would it be appropriate to cite one of the journal issues' call for papers in order to write an "About the Journal" section?

I am also considering citing some of the articles from the journal itself in order to write about the journal's focus, and some of the websites that have collected the articles to advocate for policy to support my claim that journal provides research for new policy. For example: This website has collected articles on teen pregnancy and This article has collected more general articles for state policy Do these sound like appropriate sources for my intention? -- Thank you for your time, JohnHeggelund (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 13:21, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Video killed the radio star

I suspect that editor will require watching. It looked to me very much like a fit of pique because I replaced the reviews that they deleted. Fiddle Faddle 22:11, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Kenn Davis Draft

Thank you for your comments on the draft. Sorry for my inexperience. Unfortunately, I have had a hard time finding better sources online. There are a few commercial third-party art-related websites that discuss Kenn Davis work but mostly they just recycle material from the sources I quote. I would formally satisfy your requirement by quoting these third-party websites instead of his website but I feel this would be intellectually dishonest as it defies the purpose of your comment. I understand that Wikipedia generally discourages citing the person's website since people themselves may have an incentive to oversell their importance. But this primary source is also most accurate and informative because the person (or in this case his surviving family) knows best about himself. Moreover, I do not quote his website as proof of notability. Rather, I mostly use it as a source of biographic facts. His notability (as defined by Wikipedia guidelines) is established by his substantial work as author of quite a number of mystery novels and repeated nominations for the most important prize in this genre, the Edgar Award. Currently I work on getting hard-copies of newspaper articles discussing his exhibitions. But this will be matter of weeks or months with uncertain success because it involves searching through dusty newspaper archives that are off-line. Moreover, I speculate that once the article would be up, other people may contribute more material and better sources currently unknown to me. Perhaps one brute-force solution is to delete everything in the article that cites primary sources. But this would make the article less informative and thus less useful to the reader.

To sum up, I am not quite sure how I can satisfy your request soon in a meaningful way. At the same time, I am quite sure that this person meets Wikipedia's notability standards. There are numerous articles on what I would consider less notable people in Wikipedia. What to do? Bcschipper (talk) 08:17, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

My submission on June the 11th - Sonar Flow Meter

Hello all...

My article was not approved and I have NO idea why... I don't see direct comments as to the reason of the decline, all I see are pages and pages of links which are EXTREMELY confusing! Please tell me what I need to do and I will be happy to do it to get my article approved.

Looking foreword to hearing from you Sylviahaidar (talk) 15:53, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

National Centre For Excellence

HI Hewhoamareismyself, The AFC 'National Centre For Excellence' has been declined due to one reason for a long time that is, referencing. Pls help me in getting me some refrences for my page. Thank You, Rahulmdinesh