Talk:Edd Byrnes

Should incorrect date et data be updated?

The last line in the article is dated... I'd look into whether or not he made an appearance as scheduled, but the article's locked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.219.113.49 (talk) 19:27, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Vandalism

This article has been receiving prolonged vandalism from the IP 219.44.212.11, I recommend further action to keep this article safe from this user and other anonymous users. Is there an option to make this article only editable from authenticated users? --Sc0ttkclark (talk) 04:50, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

== Unsupported Controversial and Highly Dubious Claims==

Controversial claims must be supported by appropriate citations and references. The dubious claims made in the questionable sections of "Edd Byrnes" are not supported by appropriate citations or references. There is nothing to substantiate the unlikely claim that Edd Brynes needed to rehearse which letters were vowels and which were consonants, and in any event, this is not relevant in a biographical entry focusing on the American actor's career. Who are these "game show fans" and "some sites" alluded to? The cited newspaper article does not say that Edd threatened to sue Edward Burns, and in any case the fact that a newspaper columnist alleged that he did does make it true. Additionally, there is no link to the alleged newspaper reports about Edd's alleged behavior at some alleged autograph signing get together. The "references" provided DO NOT substantiate any of the dubious claims made. Moreover, Wikipedia is not the place to express one's personal grudges or act out psychological problems.

I suggest that a competent administrator take a look at this problem. Mandudeguy (talk) 08:13, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia requires online sources for questionable material. Content must be verifiable. All of the below material is questionable. The sources alluded to below are not online and do not provide sufficient details to verify the questionable claims made.

" Byrnes has spent his recent years travelling, selling autographed pictures at car shows. Recent reports cite that because of rude and unprofessional behavior toward fans, car enthusiasts, and his charging above-average rates for his autographed pictures, many car shows have banned Mr. Byrnes. In fact, the president of Kustom Kemps Of America vowed never to use Edd Byrnes again at any of his car shows because of Mr. Byrnes’s unacceptable behavior and high rates. Several sources state that on October 25, 2007 at the Blast With The Past car show in Denison, Texas, that Edd Byrnes started yelling obscenities at a little girl and her father for videotaping in his direction. Mr. Byrnes claimed that he “did not want people coming around recording him and his pictures for free, (without paying him) and then making movies about him”. It was reported that Edd Byrnes made the child cry. She had recently seen the movie Grease and had only wanted to meet him. This was reported on local news (CBS and NBC affiliates) KXII and KTEN, as well as the Herald Democrat Newspaper. " Mandudeguy (talk) 05:33, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

== WARNING! The questionable material above has been removed again, as per Wikipedia BLP guidelines (see below). Further violations may result in permanent removal of the article.

Wikipedia BLP Guielines re Reliable Sources:

" Material about living persons must be sourced very carefully. Without reliable third-party sources, it may include original research and unverifiable statements, and could lead to libel claims.

Material about living persons available solely in questionable sources or sources of dubious value should not be used, either as a source or as an external link (see above).

Never use self-published books, zines, websites, webforums, and blogs as a source for material about a living person, unless written or published by the subject of the article (see below). "Self-published blogs" in this context refers to personal and group blogs. Some newspapers host interactive columns that they call blogs, and these may be acceptable as sources so long as the writers are professionals and the blog is subject to the newspaper's full editorial control. Where a news organization publishes the opinions of a professional but claims no responsibility for the opinions, the writer of the cited piece should be attributed (e.g., "Jane Smith has suggested..."). Posts left by readers may never be used as sources.[4]

Avoid repeating gossip. Ask yourself whether the source is reliable; whether the material is being presented as true; and whether, even if true, it is relevant to an encyclopedia article about the subject. When less-than-reliable publications print material they suspect is untrue, they often include weasel phrases and attributions to anonymous sources. Look out for these. If the original publication doesn't believe its own story, why should we?

Be careful of "feedback loops" in which an unsourced and speculative contention in a Wikipedia article gets picked up, with or without attribution, in an otherwise-reliable newspaper or other media story, and that story is then cited in the Wikipedia article to support the original speculative contention.

Remove unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material Policy shortcut: WP:GRAPEVINE

Remove any contentious material about living persons that is unsourced; that is a conjectural interpretation of a source (see Wikipedia:No original research); or that relies upon self-published sources (unless written by the subject of the BLP; see below) or sources that otherwise fail to meet standards specified in Wikipedia:Verifiability.

The three-revert rule does not apply to such removals. Editors who find themselves in edit wars over potentially defamatory information about living persons should bring the matter to the Biographies of Living Persons noticeboard for resolution by an administrator.

Administrators may enforce the removal of such material with page protection and blocks, even if they have been editing the article themselves. Editors who re-insert the material may be warned and blocked. See the blocking policy and Wikipedia:Libel.

Administrators encountering biographies that are unsourced and negative in tone, where there is no neutral version to revert to, should delete the article without discussion (see Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion criterion G10 for more details)." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mandudeguy (talk • contribs) 07:56, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

April 2010

Other IP editors are now making the same edits as above. I have reverted and left {{uw-biog1}} and {{uw-biog2}} messages. See User talk:68.91.148.188, User talk:68.92.232.84, User talk:68.90.157.30. — MrDolomite • Talk 20:31, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

• A Wikipedia:Requests for page protection has been submitted here. — MrDolomite • Talk 01:34, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
• Regarding the edits made by the IP editors: It does _not_ matter if information has been in the article "for years". Per the policy at WP:BLP:

  We must get the article right. Be very firm about the use of high quality sources. All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion.

  Please locate an actual WP:SOURCE for the information being added. Merely stating that a newspaper or TV channel has reported it in the past is not sufficient. Find the exact website link to the newspaper article history or TV broadcast. If you are unable to determine how to incorporate such information into the article, please paste the link the source here on the talk page and another editor will help include it. — MrDolomite • Talk 01:34, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from THETRUTHPROTECTOR, 14 April 2010

{{editsemiprotected}} There was some factual info that has been removed in recent days. First by an unregester user, then all a sudden from a registered user. Bottom line is, that it has been verified, and now the vandals win because the info has been removed. I ask that the section in later life be restored below.

Byrnes has spent his recent years travelling, selling autographed pictures at car shows. Recent reports cite that because of rude and unprofessional behavior toward fans, car enthusiasts, and his charging above-average rates for his autographed pictures, many car shows have banned Mr. Byrnes. In fact, the president of Kustom Kemps Of America vowed never to use Edd Byrnes again at any of his car shows because of Mr. Byrnes’s unacceptable behavior and high rates. Several sources state that on October 25, 2007 at the Blast With The Past car show in Denison, Texas, that Edd Byrnes started yelling obscenities at a little girl and her father for videotaping in his direction. Mr. Byrnes claimed that he “did not want people coming around recording him and his pictures for free, (without paying him) and then making movies about him”. It was reported that Edd Byrnes made the child cry. She had recently seen the movie Grease and had only wanted to meet him. This was reported on local news (CBS and NBC affiliates) KXII and KTEN, as well as the Herald Democrat Newspaper. THETRUTHPROTECTOR (talk) 07:06, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Until we have a source for this, there is not a need to change the article. Please let us know when you have a good source, and we will make the change.

 Not done ^Avicenna_sis @ 07:56, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Folks, you can ignore THETRUTHPROTECTOR, it's a sock of multiple BLP violators from way back. --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 15:44, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Yes I was wondering why true and comfirmed information keeps getting removed also.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.67.15.29 (talk • contribs)

• See WP:BLP, WP:V and WP:RS. Vandals, people with grudges and unbalanced individuals sometimes persist in adding unsubstantiated information to biographical articles, and that violates several of Wikipedia's policies. Edison (talk) 14:29, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

  The vandalism and BLP violations are still going on. An initial level 1 warning followed by a final warning is as far as I would follow "assume good faith" when new accounts re-add the same inappropriate text. Some might not be as charitable. Edison (talk) 20:12, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

"Kookie, Kookie (Lend Me Your Comb)"

"Kookie, Kookie (Lend Me Your Comb)" from 1959 (not 1960), 13 weeks (not 8 weeks), peaked at #4 (not #27) on the Hot 100. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.151.174.67 (talk) 16:16, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

--Wheel of Fortune++++++

Why does information on Wheel of Fortune appear here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.98.178.120 (talk) 00:04, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

A taste of pure beauty

but not particularly easy to parse:

Kookie's recurring character—a different, exciting look to which teens of the day related —- the valet parking attendance who constantly combed his piled-high, greasy-styled teen hair, often in a windbreaker jacket, who worked part-time at the so-called Dean Martin's Dino's Lodge restaurant, next door to private investigator agency at 77 Sunset Strip—frequently acted as an unlicensed, protégé detective who helped the private eyes (Zimbalist and Roger Smith) on their cases based upon "the word" heard from Kookie's street informants.

Behold that marvellous sentence! I want to hug whoever constructed it. (I've never seen this show so I don't feel qualified to sort things out, but it should probably be slightly unmuddled for ease of comprehension.) Idontcareanymore (talk) 13:30, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

I liked the sentence too. The only thing I changed was 'attendance' to 'attendant'. Cunningpal (talk) 15:36, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 7 August 2014

Insert a space between "[[Cliff Robertson]]" and "for", so it doesn't have a link that says "Cliff Robertsonfor". OfficeLineman (talk) 23:53, 7 August 2014 (UTC)