User talk:Onel5969

Onel5969's Talk
Phoenix ... It's a dry heat ...
Born	New York city
Nationality	American

Please click here to leave me a new message. Please leave your username, and a link to the article it refers to, if you have a question.

Edit count

• edit count

Wiki mark-up link

Hi! You might find these handy:

• Simple guide to Wikipedia mark-up
  • Advanced guide to Wiki mark-up

Cheers! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 22:35, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Article review

Hi Onel5969: Please take a look at the resubmission for this article. Past submissions had numerous independent external reviews, but the remaining defect was that there was no report in the mass media about this project. This has now been remedied. Notice that the last section at the very bottom was edited: instead of "Commentary and Controversy" it's now "In the News". Most of the entries were deleted and a new one added: interview with Matt Hansen in The Week, June 2015. Here is the link to the article: http://theweek.com/articles/563549/future-americas-endangeredlanguages

Here's the link to the new submission: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Norbert_Francis#Seminario_de_Estudios_Modernos_y_de_Cultura_Acallan_.28SEMYCA.29 Thanks ˜˜˜˜ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobowikibobo (talk • contribs) 01:42, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Bobowikibobo - I'm no longer involved in the AfC process, but you can ask your question at WP:TEAHOUSE, and someone there will respond relatively quickly. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:41, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

RfC of interest

Hello! This is to let you know that there is a current Request for Comment on a topic which you previously commented on. The RfC is at Talk:List of European cities by population. The question is, "In articles which rank European cities or countries in order by population or area, should the entire city or country be counted, or only the portion which is in Europe?" Your input there would be appreciated. MelanieN (talk) 15:34, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 1 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Timeline of Arizona page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Greensboro, North Carolina

I this was kind of funny [1], when you reverted the material back IN, after you and talked about leaving it out last November on the talk page. Again, it really is contentious, no one has argued to keep it, so it needs to be left out unless a consensus comes in and argues otherwise. I did break off a new article, List of people from Greensboro, North Carolina because that section was looking kind of, sad and braggish like a lot of mid sized town articles. You might want to watchlist the new article. It still lacks sources, of course, but at least the main article looks better. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:29, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

That is funny, Dennis Brown, in a sad pathetic sort of way on my part. I had forgotten about that discussion last November, and I guess I had the same impulse this time regarding reverting cited material. I watch about 250 city articles, and sometimes its difficult to remember what was discussed when. Thanks for pointing it out, and I will put your new list article on my watchlist. It's funny, creating that was on my list of things to do as well. So much to do, so little time. Right now I'm working on Timeline of Arizona, and after that, I'll flesh out the History of Arizona page. Then on to more housekeeping tasks. Take care. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:39, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Ironic that is your interest as well as mine. I lived in Phoenix in the 1980s, and live near Greensboro now. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:44, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

I have problems

Hello Onel5969

I see that you changed my changes on Cara Delevingne's wiki page. But the things I said on there was true. Cara Delevingne was actually born in 1892 and is 122 years old. She was a spawn of Satan. Because Satan is her parent she has demonic powers. Her grandfather was a Jew but really liked the Nazis and started to worship Satan. Satan asked her grandfather for a child to rule the world so her grandfather sacrificed his 22 year old daughter Johanna Hiedler/Pandora Delevingne for Satan to mate with. Once he mated with her he revived her and erased her memories up to her death. With Cara's demonic powers she time travailed to 1888 and had sex with Alois Hitler and gave birth to Adolf Hitler. She married Alois Hitler and went by the name of Klara Hitler for about 47 years. Because she was the daughter of Satan she hated Jews because they were God's chosen people. And because Hitler was Cara's (or Klara's, notice how similar their names are?) son he was demonic and hated Jews too. Hitler had a gift with words given by Cara and Satan. People want you to think she won the "Model of the Year’" award but really it was the "Mom of the Year" award gifted to her in Germany because she was the mother of Hitler. Between December 21, 1907 and 12 August 1992 she roamed the earth, invisible, stirring up people to murder and steal. In 12 August 1992 She reformed herself into Cara. Her last name Delevingne, if you switch up the letters, is Devilnegen. Obviously the first part is "Devil" which is another name for Satan. The "Negen" is is Old Dutch for nine. We do not know what nine might mean, but it's probably important. You might ask, "What about Charles Hamar Delevingne?" he is the reincarnation on Benito Mussolini. Satan saw that Cara didn't have a father for the public to see, so he reincarnated Benito Mussolini into Charles Hamar Delevingne. Charles Hamar Delevingne is laying low but soon should rise with Cara. Thank you for reading this and I hope you will realize the truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Houresbob (talk • contribs) 09:17, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Adeline De Walt Reynolds

Thank you for your help (pass it on) Victuallers (talk) 12:02, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

your deleting my work on the "welfare state"

I confess I am fairly new at this, and that my explain why I cannot find any explanation for why you deleted my work--twice. Your page suggests you try to be kind and nice to people, and I certainly try to as well. But I cannot see any reason for your action. I hope and trust you are not just deleting text that you do not find politically agreeable. What exactly is wrong with my text? I would like to resolve your problem in a friendly way. Please explain. What is the problem?

thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Academie21st (talk • contribs) 19:38, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Academie21st - Thanks for talking about this. I posted on the talk page of the article (and noted that (I think) in the edit summary). That's where you can take discussions of a particular article. If you want to alert another editor that you're talking about something they are involved with you can always use the {{ul|Academie21st}} tag (where you insert the user name of the editor you wish to alert - which I probably should have done when I posted on the article's talk page, but I thought my comment in the edit summary would suffice).

But taking it to the talk page of the editor is also totally acceptable. Here's my issue with your edit: it creates a non-neutral viewpoint to the article. Take a look at WP:NPOV. Since there are opposing views to the academic you included, to maintain the neutrality of the article, if you insert your referenced material, other referenced material showing the other viewpoint should be included. This is especially critical in articles which are potentially politically charged, like this one. I hope this makes sense.

If your edit had been the opposing viewpoint I would have reverted it as well, for the same reason. I hope this makes sense. And don't hesitate to ask questions, that's one of the best ways to get to know stuff. Happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:49, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Moved archive

Hi Onel5969, I just wanted to let you know that I just moved your talk page Archive 9 from the mainspace to your user talk space. If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know. Have a good day, MJ94 (talk) 02:43, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi MJ94 - I saw that, thanks. Am trying to organize my talk page archives, and I screwed up the page types on ALL of them. Am going through them now and correcting. Again, thanks for the heads up. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:45, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Americans for Prosperity

"V" has decided to convert the article to his (non-mainstream) POV, and I may not restore neutrality. Your move. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 10:30, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Arthur Rubin - When I made my edits, I was very careful to follow the consensus on the talk page. I did not remove all negativity towards the organization, as is claimed by some, but did remove the heavy bias regarding funding, legal trivia and the Koch brothers, which was discussed on the talk page and a consensus was reached. Two admins have intervened, one to put the DS tag on the article, which I believe correct, and another to put a 1RR restriction on the article, which I also believe to be the prudent move. Viriditas has, in his edit, made multiple reversions on the article, in violation o the 1RR rule, as well as not respecting the ongoing discussion on the talk page. In that regard, he's following HughD's prior moves. Hopefully an admin will step in, but I wouldn't bet on it. It's not worth my time for me to remain that involved in this article. HughD has engaged in WP:FORUMSHOP and WP:CANVASS (campaigning), which appears to be working, since folks from other forums who share his views are now becoming involved. If that is the type of editor that wiki wants, and condones his behavior, then it is no wonder that Wikipedia has such a poor reputation, particularly regarding political articles. And its probably why I don't spend much time on them. I don't have a whole lot of interest in the article, I simply felt that if the article was edited back to a place of neutrality, the community could take care of it. Obviously I was wrong. It looks like another article will have a strong non-neutral POV. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:27, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Personal attacks

I don't see any from SchroCat on the Grande article. Are you merely saying this in order to provoke a reaction? Cassianto^Talk 18:27, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Cassianto - nope. Deleted the earlier attack here on my talk page, and calling people who disagree with him lacking "common sense" is a personal attack, as is final comment in that same post. As is his now follow-up uncivil comment. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:19, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Referring to him as "Schro-something or other" in an edit summary is just good humour then I suppose? Honestly, you and your friend Chasewc91 really need to look up the meaning of "incivility" in the OED. Cassianto^Talk 19:37, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Again, nope, knew his user name began with Schro, and couldn't remember the entire name when I wrote my edit summary. Plain and simple. Not sure why you bring another editor into this somewhat antagonistic post on my talk page, particularly since I don't really know Chasewc that well, I actually think I've had more interaction with you, than with him. And in regards to incivility, might I suggest you look at WP:UNCIVIL? And any further non-constructive edits on my talk page will simply be deleted. Take it easy. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:43, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)I think a better question is: Why are you spoiling for a fight, Cassianto? Frankly, your presence on this talk page seems to be for the sole purpose of harassment. Do you think that's wise so soon after getting an early-release for a block enforced because of incivility/harassment? -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 20:03, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Who's spoiling for a fight? I merely asked why he thought such lilly-liveried comments were uncivil? If you want to know what uncivil is, check my block-log, apparently. I'm not engaging further, so you can all talk amongst yourselves. In the meantime, the Grande pantomime has been archived and you'd be wise to walk away from the dead carcass. Cassianto^Talk 20:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

"Who's spoiling for a fight?". You are. That much is obvious. And your backpedaling is noted, as is your quick retreat. Wise of you to do so (retreat). -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 20:24, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

19:49:48, 6 July 2015 review of submission by 2601:240:CA02:AB00:1C8D:E607:DADA:FF8F

• 2601:240:CA02:AB00:1C8D:E607:DADA:FF8F (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:InqScribe (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi,

Thanks for taking the time to look over the article. I have a few questions about how to improve it. I’ve tried to comply with the Golden Rule (“significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic”) by citing relevant published sources. How else can I establish notability? Are there any issues with the sources I’m currently citing? By citing published resources, including an academic review of notable transcription tools, I believed I was following Wikipedia's citation guidelines.

Before creating the article, I looked at some similar language software entries like MacSpeech Scribe (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacSpeech_Scribe), VoxSigma (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VoxSigma), and Transana (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transana). I’d like to document InqScribe alongside these similar language tools.

2601:240:CA02:AB00:1C8D:E607:DADA:FF8F (talk) 19:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi. I'm not involved with the AfC process any longer, so you might ask your question at WP:TEAHOUSE. Somewhere there will most likely get back to you in a relatively short timeframe. I did take a quick look at the article. Half the cites come from a primary source (InqScribe), and 2 of the other three are from the same source. Digital Tools for Qualitative is an excellent source, actually both are. You might get it approved. Good luck. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:00, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Champaign Supernova (talk) 04:05, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Article

Please take a look at the article Jenny Skavlan that I have created. I plan a DYK nom for it. Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:30, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

And if you find time for it, Storfors Church. Just a bit short of DYK sadly...--BabbaQ (talk) 23:23, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Sure thing. I'll get to it today or tomorrow. I'm going through a major re-write of the Southwestern US article. And when I take a break from that, I'll look at those articles. Are you saying that you need more DYK noms? If so, I'll pass some along to you that I think might work... One of my articles made it the other day (I didn't nom). Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:16, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Okay BabbaQ -  Done Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:10, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

I see that you have edited the Tampa, Florida article. So if you are interested you could atleast take a look at the article about Oba Chandler. I have invested quite some time editing it over the years. Thanks :)--BabbaQ (talk) 17:11, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Review - Uppi 2

The movie Uppi 2 will be releasing next month and need to go live with wiki page immediately, kindly review the page & approve it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gypsz13 (talk • contribs) 05:33, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Hm. Not signed ... no wikilinking ... and no "please" or "thank you" — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 09:15, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

lol, Gareth Griffith-Jones - but in all fairness, they did use "kindly". Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:34, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Gypsz13 - I'm no longer involved in the AfC process, so you might want to politely make your request at WP:TEAHOUSE. Folks there are real helpful, and will get back to you rather quickly. One thing, you need to disclose that you have a vested interest in the article, since you appear to be connected with the film. Take a look at WP:COI. Good luck. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:34, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

So Sorry

This is in regards to the following sock puppet investigation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Deadbeat_parent/Archive I have removed any reference to myself, such as links from my own Youtube account or my own personal page (www.okabenamedia.com) from the page in question that has been attacked. I have no idea who is doing this, but I am a public school teacher, and it is likely a disgruntled former student. This same individual (under different names) also attacked me on the Stone Arch Bridge (Minneapolis) page. At this point, I'm not sure what more I can do.

Ray.lowry Ray Lowry 19:19, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Ray.lowry - no need to apologize for something that wasn't your fault. The other editor was a trollish boor. They happen from time to time. I guess they were a bit jealous of you. Other than reporting the user, and keep on editing, not much you can do. Other editors, such as myself and others can also help if it gets too overwhelming. And if they start making personal threats or attacks, see WP:THREAT on how to handle it. Take it easy. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:30, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

The Diary of a Teenage Girl: An Account in Words and Pictures

Hi One15969, You edited one of my pages a few months ago. I wonder if you could look at this one? I've revised it a few times, it's still not accepted. Thank you! User:Merise/The Diary of a Teenage Girl: An Account in Words and Pictures (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Merise/The_Diary_of_a_Teenage_Girl:_An_Account_in_Words_and_Pictures) Merise (talk) 02:17, 10 July 2015 (UTC)Merise

Hi Merise - sorry I didn't respond. I didn't see your comment since you didn't set it out in its own section. I also see that this is now a moot point. Congrats on the article! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:52, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Article: Youth for Heritage Foundation

Hi,

This is regarding Youth for Heritage Foundation. You said, it has lack of references. May I know, what qualifies as a reliable reference? I have already provided links from leading newspapers of country and authentic articles by renowned media personnel.

Roycop (talk) 17:19, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Roycop - here's a good link for what constitutes a reliable source: WP:RS. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:54, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Onel5969 - The link says that newspapers are allowed and reputed newspapers are even better. That's what I have quoted. Is there a specific portion in my article that you want to flag-off Roycop (talk) 13:50, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Ee9807

Please keep page with accurate information or we will file a law suit against wiki for misrepresentation and incitement to hatred.

Do not change my edits again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ee9807 (talk • contribs) 13:45, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

You have earned this

		The Purple Barnstar
		Based on the attack on you earlier today I am legally bound to present you with this award. Keep up the good work MarnetteD|Talk 16:08, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Company's logo

Hi there. Why the logo for this company wasn't added? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinidad_and_Tobago_Electricity_Commission — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kesdbes (talk • contribs) 03:23, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Kesdbes. Not sure why you're asking me, but my guess would be because no one's added it. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:44, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Blank US Map svg.SouthwesternUSA.cropped.png

I originally assumed those were mistakes, but now I see it may be otherwise. Either way, you need not include the name of the file you took it from and "cropped" in the file name. That bloats the title and confuses things... So sorry if you dislike the title change. Dustin (talk) 15:17, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Temperance (virtue)

Hi, you have reverted my changes on the Temperate article. The sentence

In “Charmides,” one of Plato’s early dialogues, the one who possessed ‘sophrosune’ is defined in four ways: (1) one who has quietness, (2) one who has modesty, (3) one who does his own business, and (4) one who knows himself.

seems to indicate that Plato defines Temperate as one of these four ways. When we argues against them. For instance, against quietness

Then temperance is not quietness, nor is the temperate life quiet,-certainly not upon this view; for the life which is temperate is supposed to be the good. And of two things, one is true, either never, or very seldom, do the quiet actions in life appear to be better than the quick and energetic ones; or supposing that of the nobler actions, there are as many quiet, as quick and vehement: still, even if we grant this, temperance will not be acting quietly any more than acting quickly and energetically, either in walking or talking or in anything else; nor will the quiet life be more temperate than the unquiet, seeing that temperance is admitted by us to be a good and noble thing, and the quick have been shown to be as good as the quiet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antilas (talk • contribs) 15:39, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Just read the entry on Oba Chandler. These murders were the subject of an episode of Psychic Detectives and they claim the psychic was key to solving the crimes. No mention of this in the Wikipedia entry. Is it not true?