Jump to content

User talk:Longhair: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Crisspy (talk | contribs)
Alert!
Crisspy (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 304: Line 304:
Thanks, was going to go back and get them, we've got quite an influx of bad accounts right now. — [[User:Xaosflux|<b><font color="#FF9933" face="monotype"><big>xaosflux</big></font></b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Xaosflux|<font color="#00FF00">Talk</font>]]</sup> 03:18, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, was going to go back and get them, we've got quite an influx of bad accounts right now. — [[User:Xaosflux|<b><font color="#FF9933" face="monotype"><big>xaosflux</big></font></b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Xaosflux|<font color="#00FF00">Talk</font>]]</sup> 03:18, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
:lol, yea i jsut caught that after i put 3 on, replaced with non-subst'ed versions. Fun night! Happy Editing, — [[User:Xaosflux|<b><font color="#FF9933" face="monotype"><big>xaosflux</big></font></b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Xaosflux|<font color="#00FF00">Talk</font>]]</sup> 03:24, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
:lol, yea i jsut caught that after i put 3 on, replaced with non-subst'ed versions. Fun night! Happy Editing, — [[User:Xaosflux|<b><font color="#FF9933" face="monotype"><big>xaosflux</big></font></b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Xaosflux|<font color="#00FF00">Talk</font>]]</sup> 03:24, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

== Alert! ==

[[user:Mark ritzchkin|Mark ritzchkin]] has been blocked indefinitely, but can still edit. Please block him. He has been vandalising. He has already been warned twice. [[User:Crisspy|El gRiNgO]] 21:59, 2 August 2006 (UTC)Crisspy

Revision as of 22:11, 2 August 2006

User Talk Images Watchlist Contributions Stats Email

W. E. B. Du Bois
Photograph credit: James E. Purdy; restored by Adam Cuerden

How to use my talk page

  • To leave a message for me, click here..
  • Replies: I'll usually reply on your talk page. When I'll reply depends on what I'm doing at the time. Replies may take anywhere from a few minutes to a few days.
  • Signing: Please add your comments to the bottom of this page, and sign your comments using 4 tilde characters ~~~~. Signing your post increases the chance you'll get a reply and lowers the chance I'll delete your comment.


Talk page archives

  • Archive1 (August 31 2004 - June 5 2005)
  • Archive2 (June 5 2005 - June 22 2005)
  • Archive3 (June 22 2005 - August 2 2005)
  • Archive4 (August 2 2005 - August 15 2005)
  • Archive5 (August 15 2005 - December 27 2005)
  • Archive6 (December 27 2005 - February 1 2006)
  • Archive7 (February 1 2005 - March 2 2006)
  • Archive8 (March 2 2006 - May 1 2006)
  • Archive9 (May 1 2006 - July 11 2006)

Electorate articles

Are you really going to go through all 200-odd articles about federal electorates (plus I don't know many state ones) and tag them all as stubs? They are not stubs, they are short articles - what else can they be? What else can be said about the Division of Chisholm? I suppose it would be possible to write a detailed demographic and political history of each Division, but to what end? Who is going to research and write 200 such articles? Not me. Adam 09:34, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mayors.

Thank you very much for taking the time to make the trip. At the moment, I think it would be sufficient if the GHC can verify the accuacy of the information on all subjects on the list. If anything else comes up, I guess that can always be handled later... Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 10:19, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pocketfives.com

Hello, i was wondering if the Pocketfives.com entry is good now, and what else i could add if its not. ty


Thanks

Sorry about the my upgrade "Longhair", I am now up to speed with the process (I hope).

I now have the page up in the GA Class nominee page. Thanks for the headsup with this.

Regards Vufors 07:15, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnic groups

Thanks. Well, I'd like to think that I was being fair, because I reverted some whitewashing on Vietnamese Australian recently. Also, now that I find myself patrolling a Sikh-Muslim-Hindu-Christian personal attack war on a variety of Indian religion articles, I put a survey on my user talk to see if people detect a relgious bias (if it exists) in my judgement. Cheers, and thanks for the support.Blnguyen | rant-line 07:37, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Editing issues.

203.54.9.XX is still up to the same thing that user AYArktos was talking about. I was thinking how about blocking anonymous users from editing Murrumbidgee River and Gundagai for a few days. -- RobertM 07:42, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pages they are editing Murrumbidgee River, Talk:Murrumbidgee River and Gundagai, New South Wales. IP's 203.54.9.235 and 203.54.9.95. --RobertM 07:50, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's time to block the page now. There just going to get worse! Talk:Murrumbidgee River history. -- RobertM 10:29, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the welcome. I'm sure that I will enjoy being a wikipedian!!!

Head-fi

Why was this article deleted?

If someone could give us a clear reason for the deletion, we could perhaps fix it. As it was, we didn't have any time between the flagged for deletion and deletion to really fix anything.

  • I also would like to know why there is an entire section in wikipedia dedicated to online forums just like ours, and ours is not allowed to be here? I mean really if forums like something aweful and general mayhem (which serve no purpose) are allowed to exist here, why cant we? Flecom 12:04, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Australian people vs Lists of Australian people

There is a lot of overlap between these two categories, what should be done? There are some subtle differences I notice, but shouldn't any category or article which is clearly and exclusively a list or a list of list be in only Category:Lists of Australians and not Category:Australian people? Or should I just have a bex and a good lie down? Thanks for your consideration of these pressing matters -- Grumpyyoungman01 06:40, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Casey Gardiner

Whats the difference between other Professional Players and Casey Gardiner?

Hi

Just started the article and was working on it. Please, let me finish it. --Maksud3 08:35, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AYs anon

The anon probably has an ISP with semi random IP assignmnet - Optus and some others use it. Semi protection of the effected articles would be far more effective.--Peta 10:58, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Block on site won't work since they can just get a new IP, a range block has the potential to disrupt some good users. Semi-protection is ideal for this situation.--Peta 11:07, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • This morning he is having a field day 203.54.9.169 (talk · contribs):-) --A Y Arktos\talk 22:42, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • I hope so - WP:AN/I seem more interested in discussing Tony Sidaway! Anyway I am leaving him to it. I wil be on a wikibreak for a couple of days and will take it to Arbcom then if it stil seems appropriate - I can't see any other useful dispute resolution and a ruling would be helpful. Shades of Internodeuser! I particularly like the conspiracy theories and the fact that the world won't ever know the truth because of my actions! [1] Regards--A Y Arktos\talk 22:58, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talking about quick. I'm still working on this thing! Thanks for reminding me, though. There's a good chance I could've missed the categories. Any suggestions? Anyway, I guess this is a good thing. At least someone noticed the article's existence. - Mgm|(talk) 11:39, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Safari park

I changed africa-stub back to stub, undoing your June 24 change while doing a re-write. "Safari Parks" don't have much to do with Africa, other than often featuring african animals ... we do have national parks and lots of wildlife. Robert Ullmann 14:32, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not subst the WoW template

The WoW template includes the following line: "Please do not subst this template." Therefore, in the future, please use {{WoW}} instead of {{subst:WoW}} when tagging WoW accounts. 23:25, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Give me a moment to finish

Why dont you give me a moment to finish.. The significance has yet to come. Geesh

A banned user comes back

LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL is back. I think it's him.--Scott3 03:03, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nioxin

Please see discussion at Nioxin and consider removing tag. -Sjledet 19:30, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Imasmartguy

My user name is blocked from editing. when I try to edit it says the is user LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL or something has been blocked. that's not me, so please fix this!

Wikibreak Status.

Are you back from your wikibreak yet?

Did you get to check out the GHC on Tuesday?

Do you have time to do a page move for an article I created?

Could you please reply on my talk page?

Am I asking too many questions? ;P

--Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 12:46, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GHC

How did the trip go? --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 10:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move request

Could you please move User:Folajimi/sandbox/JD to Jon DeRosa? --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 03:21, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

your message to john baker

Sorry, I don't know if this is the correct way to reply to you. Yes, I'm the novelist. I'm feeling my way around.

no, I mean Johnbakeronline 21:27, 20 July 2006 (UTC) slowly, one step at a time. . .[reply]

Welcoming users

Sorry, I was going too fast. I'll be more careful now :) --Deenoe 01:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Appreciate your bit for the Cape Sorell issue, It seems only after saying "go away" to the delete people did I realise that I wanted it as one of three articles as examples of extreme weather on the west coast of tassie, but havent got around to making the art yet! SatuSuro 05:09, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

you're telling me - I am one of them in a different part of the planet over a dud art title! :( SatuSuro
Actually I am finding so little in wikipedia about waverider bouys, and wave monitoring at all, I am thinking of beefing up the details and re-submitting the article at a later date, so please expect a "help please" message from me for support to re-instate! (but only if you think its worth it) SatuSuro 07:24, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your response: http://www.epa.qld.gov.au/environmental_management/coast_and_oceans/waves_and_storm_tides/wave_monitoring/waverider_buoys/ is a better link than the current BOM page on it. Basically the BOM and CSIRO have had over 10 years of trying to get a handle on swells off west tassie. I used to live there in the mid 70's, I can understand why! It's wild!

I also have placed my reaction on Chuq's talk page. The problem with inland editors :) from other places, they seem to have limited understanding of the importance of the things. And in my honest opinion I am increasingly in awe of you admin guys who stay in there keeping things going despite everything! . Thanks again for your interest. Oh and if I'm going to get to an article, It will be fun doing a DAB on the word for a start its actually a TM according to the BOM website http://www.bom.gov.au/inside/oeb/networks/marine_obs.shtmlSatuSuro 07:40, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know you're trying to sound smart in the way you describe why my article was deleted, but I need to know, in basic English, as to why it was deleted and protected. Did I need to further explain the article? Because I can't, seeing as you protected it.--Coh G 07:32, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok

I get you, I guess it needs to be worded differently as no one quite understands the article. Now, I can only do that if you could please un-protect the space.Coh G 07:45, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dennis Allen

Hi Longhair. Dennis Allen (which you started) was prodded and deleted. I found it yesterday and added references, but thought I'd sleep on it before removing the prod notice. But it actually got deleted before I got back to it today. Could you take a look and tell me if you think it should be undeleted? Cheers, --Commander Keane 08:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I fear you misunderstood me, I added references[2]. Anyway, I'll leave it with you, good luck with the move! --Commander Keane 08:27, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About Prod notices: Looks like this was a case where citations were added but the prod notice wasn't removed, and the 5-day deadline was just about to expire. Once a prod notice is placed on an article the deletion happens automatically, regardless of citations added, or changes to the article. There is no review. Anyone may remove a prod notice at any time for any reason (or none at all), so normally you want to do that at the same time you add citations (or even if you're planning to). Fan-1967 13:12, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. Really meant this message for the Commander. Fan-1967 13:14, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anon from Gundagai

Hi - I saw the Gundagai talk page! Thanks for your intervention. He is quite conscious though of avoiding blocks.

The really weird thing about his comments is nobody other than the anon has been publishing anything about indigenous matters that has not been sourced from elsewhere published material!?! ie - there is no orignial research from me or anybody else.

I had lodged an RfA but it got rejected saying "try mediation first". I thought I would start at the beginning of the dispute resolution process with a request for comment that I am drafting now. I'll let you know when it is ready to post. I would rather be doing something else and I doubt that it will help much, but at least it means there would be eventually community endorsement for managing his edits and talk. For the moment though I will try to resist the temptation to respond.--A Y Arktos\talk 22:24, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

      • My blocks are now for a week at a time, not least because he is breaching the blocks themselves as well as his abusive comments and edit summaries.. I have asked for a review at Wikipedia:Requests for investigation - unfortunately dead silence :-( there is a backlog there. However, at least one other person probably looked at it because they joined in the happy revert game. The small satisfaction I get is that sometimes these IPs are reallocated to him so he would have to log in even more times. The issue is of course a brand new editor might want to contribute :-(--A Y Arktos\talk 06:16, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused

That wasn't a test I made, that was meant to vandalize the article. Why did you say it was a test?

There we go. Thanks.

Thanks for letting me know my edit worked. I was trying to edit my user talk page, and not the actual wikipedia entry for jimjones. How is it that this can be done to it?~!~~!23:55, 25 July 2006 (UTC)~Љ

Thanks for turning the Oakville Trafalgar High School article into a School Stub.

I don't have time to add details to it (at the moment), so hopefully someone will notice.

Timestamp glitch

I don't know why, but your edit to the stub on Franz Carl Weiskopf got a timestamp prior to my even creating it. I'll try incorporating your edit and seeing if that solves the problem. Robert Happelberg 23:01, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My concern is not attribution. My concern was that your edit was not incorporated into the "current version" of the article because it technically took place earlier. But hopefully this was just a one-time glitch. Robert Happelberg 20:26, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your block

The username block on "EvilBot" was wholly inappropriate as it was created to be an AWB-assisted bot run by me.
You could have at least waited for me to create a userpage for it describing its use. Try to assume good faith.
Blocking the user also blocked my IP. I'm a legitimate user with many constructive edits and I'm blocked from editing.
I've asked Sceptre to remove both blocks. In the future, a little AGF will go a long way. Thank you. — Nathan (talk) / 23:30, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: Narooma pics

Did you add those? they are quite nice photographs :) WookMuff 12:18, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for a "speedy keep"

Hi Longhair - You are the first admin I stumbled upon who seems to be logged in right now. Could you please close this AfD with a speedy keep (per rule 1)? Thanks, KissL 16:34, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! KissL 16:41, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

okie i am sorry i didn not know we kould not do that mean stuff but i jsut wanted jrery jackson wiik back up i am sorrie

Template:WP Australia

Hi. I noticed you added {{WP Australia|V8=yes}} to Talk:Oran Park Raceway. Have you noticed that I posted a comment to template talk:WP Australia while you were away that V8=yes seems to do nothing? Thanks. --Scott Davis Talk 01:59, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image source

Do you have source information for Image:Skafbilal.jpg available? If you don't this can probably be deleted, there's some better photos out there. --bainer (talk) 14:32, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Languages

Hi There! Can you translate my name in what language you know please, and then post it Here. I would be very grateful if you do (if you know another language apart from English and the ones on my userpage please feel free to post it on) P.S. all th translations are in alpahbetical order so when you add one please put it in alpahbetical order according to the language. Thanks!!! Abdullah Geelah 16:11, 29 July 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Beatrice Kay

Hello,

This is an interesting process and I am disappointed to see pictures I posted being deleted. I saw your message about Beatrice Kay, and I supposed this is why the Kid Chissel picture was deleted also.

Do you recommend my re-submitting the pictures with my name and saying they are public domain? I have no idea of copyright. I just have these in an envelope as these were family friends and I scanned them from originals (or probably photographic reproducitons). I cannot find copies of these likenesses anywhere on internet, so do not know anything about sources besides that they are from me. There is no copyright information on them.

Or, do you recommend I not submit them at all when I do not know this information?

Thank you,

Scott Rubel

Thanks for uploading Image:Halvagis_mersina.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:50, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{{WoW}}

Thanks, was going to go back and get them, we've got quite an influx of bad accounts right now. — xaosflux Talk 03:18, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

lol, yea i jsut caught that after i put 3 on, replaced with non-subst'ed versions. Fun night! Happy Editing, — xaosflux Talk 03:24, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]