Jump to content

Talk:Phyllis Zagano: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 45: Line 45:
[[User:Eblem|Eblem]] ([[User talk:Eblem|talk]]) [[User:Eblem|Eblem]] ([[User talk:Eblem|talk]]) 22:27, 9 August 2015 (UTC)22:21, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
[[User:Eblem|Eblem]] ([[User talk:Eblem|talk]]) [[User:Eblem|Eblem]] ([[User talk:Eblem|talk]]) 22:27, 9 August 2015 (UTC)22:21, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
::You're kind of suffering from [[WP:IDHT]] but if you are willing to open a DRN case and abide by the decision reached, I'm all for it. [[User:Elizium23|Elizium23]] ([[User talk:Elizium23|talk]]) 22:28, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
::You're kind of suffering from [[WP:IDHT]] but if you are willing to open a DRN case and abide by the decision reached, I'm all for it. [[User:Elizium23|Elizium23]] ([[User talk:Elizium23|talk]]) 22:28, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Calling "p-ssing contest" profanity could be Exhibit A in an article on [[WP:IDHT]]. Do you want to submit it and end everyone's "suffering"? [[User:Eblem|Eblem]] ([[User talk:Eblem|talk]]) [[Special:Contributions/50.190.158.171|50.190.158.171]] ([[User talk:50.190.158.171|talk]]) 22:32, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:32, 9 August 2015

WikiProject iconArticles for creation Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article was accepted on 16 August 2012 by reviewer John F. Lewis (talk · contribs).

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://people.hofstra.edu/phyllis_zagano/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:49, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Date of Birth

Without much trouble I found a half dozen uses of the LDS Family Search genealogy database in longstanding Wikipedia entries. You're misinterpreting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Avoid_misuse_of_primary_sources It would be applicable if I went to New York and accessed primary birth records. The LDS website uses a third party aggregator as described at the reference. In addition when you deleted the date of birth this time, you deleted the place of birth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eblem (talkcontribs) 11:17, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"no way of knowing whether that record relates to this person)" - Justlettersandnumbers

There is only one Phyllis Zagano in the United States:

http://www.whitepages.com/name/Phyllis-Zagano

http://find.intelius.com/results.php?ReportType=1&formname=name&qf=phyllis&qmi=&qn=zagano&qcs=&focusfirst=1

etc, etc

I am not sure why this Zagano article has turned into a p-ssing contest, but I am going to restore this if you don't present something more profound in the next 24 hours or so.

Eblem (talk) 14:13, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See e.g. the short discussions here and here for why the source you are citing is not a reliable source. --JBL (talk) 14:35, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Those "short discussions" are just that - discussions citing opposing positions. If you can't cite a Wikipedia "decision" you're simply taking a contra position. Again, this Zagano article is becoming a p-ssing contest for reasons that simply elude me. Wikipedia is rife with completely unsourced DOBs and numerous others using the same source I cited.

Eblem (talk) 15:28, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLPPRIMARY is the "decision" you're asking for. I used it in my edit summaries if you would only look. You may also want to consult WP:OTHERSTUFF while you're at it. Elizium23 (talk) 20:54, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It would be if the reference were a primary source. It is not. I am all for submitting this to dispute resolution. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution Eblem (talk I can live with whatever comes out of that.

Btw, what "profanity"? "P-ssing contest" isn't profane (obscene, lewd or abusive) even spelled out. If it is, you better see about this Wikipedia entry:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pissing_contest

Eblem (talk) Eblem (talk) 22:27, 9 August 2015 (UTC)22:21, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're kind of suffering from WP:IDHT but if you are willing to open a DRN case and abide by the decision reached, I'm all for it. Elizium23 (talk) 22:28, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Calling "p-ssing contest" profanity could be Exhibit A in an article on WP:IDHT. Do you want to submit it and end everyone's "suffering"? Eblem (talk) 50.190.158.171 (talk) 22:32, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]