Jump to content

Talk:Timur: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
* [[/Archive 2|Archive 2]]
* [[/Archive 2|Archive 2]]
}}
}}

[[File:Tamrlane.jpg|thumb|400px]]
==Portrait==
The portrait of Timur in the article infobox has a few problems<br>
'''1.''' Colour, the image is black and white and you can see the glare of light. <br>
'''2.''' The claim that the image is from a timurid era manuscript would make the image more preferable except that the file description says it's probably a copy of an original. plus miniatures or manuscripts of the time would probably have been coloured in the way a [[Persian Miniature]] is coloured.<br>
'''3.''' This image is a bit dull and not quite "good looking", though it's satisfactory <br>

So i was thinking we could use the image to the right. It's coloured, good quality, artistic, and visually pleasing (could use some cropping). ANYTHING other than the current article portrait!<br><br>
[[User:Timur073767|Timur073767]] ([[User talk:Timur073767|talk]]) 20:52, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:53, 18 November 2015

Template:Vital article

Template:WP1.0

Portrait

The portrait of Timur in the article infobox has a few problems
1. Colour, the image is black and white and you can see the glare of light.
2. The claim that the image is from a timurid era manuscript would make the image more preferable except that the file description says it's probably a copy of an original. plus miniatures or manuscripts of the time would probably have been coloured in the way a Persian Miniature is coloured.
3. This image is a bit dull and not quite "good looking", though it's satisfactory

So i was thinking we could use the image to the right. It's coloured, good quality, artistic, and visually pleasing (could use some cropping). ANYTHING other than the current article portrait!

Timur073767 (talk) 20:52, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]