Jump to content

Wikipedia:Closure requests/Archive 21: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AlbinoFerret (talk | contribs)
OneClickArchiver adding [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure/Archive 21#Talk:Cannabis dispensaries in the United States#RfC for "Cannabis dispensaries" or "Marijuana dispensaries"|Talk:Cannabis dispensa...
AlbinoFerret (talk | contribs)
OneClickArchiver adding [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure/Archive 21#Talk:Veganism/Archive 14#RfC: Should the definition at the start of the lead of Veganism contain the wording, 'and an associated p...
Line 172: Line 172:
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at [[Talk:Cannabis dispensaries in the United States#RfC for "Cannabis dispensaries" or "Marijuana dispensaries"]] {{Initiated|22 January 2016|done=yes}}? Thanks, [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at [[Talk:Cannabis dispensaries in the United States#RfC for "Cannabis dispensaries" or "Marijuana dispensaries"]] {{Initiated|22 January 2016|done=yes}}? Thanks, [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
* {{Done}} <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 09:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
* {{Done}} <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 09:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

{{Clear}}
====[[Talk:Veganism/Archive 14#RfC: Should the definition at the start of the lead of Veganism contain the wording, 'and an associated philosophy that rejects the commodity status of animals'?]]====
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at [[Talk:Veganism/Archive 14#RfC: Should the definition at the start of the lead of Veganism contain the wording, 'and an associated philosophy that rejects the commodity status of animals'?]] {{Initiated|17 January 2016|done=yes}}? Thanks, [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
::Not done - No such RFC in the current talk page. May be a malformed request for closure of the RFC. It isn't obvious why [[Veganism]] would be discussed in connection with [[Human spaceflight]], and I didn't see such a discussion. [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 07:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
:::I've fixed the link to [[Talk:Veganism/Archive 14#RfC: Should the definition at the start of the lead of Veganism contain the wording, 'and an associated philosophy that rejects the commodity status of animals'?]]. [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 04:40, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
::::{{Done}}. A "part two" RfC has also been opened on [[Talk:Veganism]] regarding this RfC. '''''[[User:Esquivalience|<span style="color: #33BBFF; font-family:Lato, monospace'">Esquivalience</span>]]'' <sup>[[User talk:Esquivalience|<span style="color:#00B88A;">t</span>]]</sup>''' 03:03, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:22, 3 March 2016

Archive 15 Archive 19 Archive 20 Archive 21 Archive 22 Archive 23 Archive 25

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

 Done Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 14:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

 Done Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:11, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

 Done Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:11, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

 Done Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:11, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

This discussion forum has an extensive backlog where the oldest active entry was started on 10 June 2015 ({{Initiated|10 June 2015}}), and at the time if me posting this request, the page has 163 discussions that have yet to be closed, several started over a month ago. Steel1943 (talk) 19:10, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Please update {{Initiated}} below as the backlog is (slowly) taken care of.--Aervanath (talk) 19:35, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
(Initiated 3383 days ago on 13 June 2015)
About 155 discussions still to be closed.

Since this discussion board is now deprecated, and there will be no new discussions opened there, I would appreciate some help clearing the backlog.--Aervanath (talk) 21:56, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

  • I just "did" about 3 of them. For the ones where I believe could really use more discussion, I've been relisting them on WP:FFD (but not in huge droves as that would overwhelm the daily subpages over there.) Steel1943 (talk) 21:59, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
  • We're getting close to having all these discussions closed. NFCR is now down to 100 open discussions. Also, in November, NFCR was shut down to new requests, directing new requests to WP:FFD; when all of the discussions are closed from NFCR, the noticeboard will be closed and marked as historical. Steel1943 (talk) 18:52, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Finally  Done. Thanks to everyone who helped clear the backlog. Steel1943 (talk) 15:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Would an administrator please assess the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Martin Hogbin? Thanks, --Sammy1339 (talk) 19:35, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

The discussion is now located at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive278#Martin Hogbin. This is an ongoing issue. Can it be de-archived and evaluated? --Sammy1339 (talk) 03:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Take it to ArbCom. It's not going to happen here. Guy (Help!) 23:52, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 Done JzG, we are not going to bother the poor Arbs with this. Not yet anyway. Drmies (talk) 17:57, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

I'm looking for an admin to close this move request, because of the sensitive nature of it. It's worth noting that a few new or little-used accounts/IPs have commented on both sides. Many thanks, SarahSV (talk) 21:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

 Done by User:Drmies. --GRuban (talk) 17:07, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Emily Dickinson#Emily Dickinson's main picture (Initiated 3163 days ago on 19 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

 Done Robert McClenon (talk) 08:08, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds#Request for comments (Initiated 3166 days ago on 16 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

 Done - No consensus. Robert McClenon (talk) 08:02, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

 Done Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:55, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

 Done Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:55, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of ministers of the Universal Life Church#RFC: Reliable sources (Initiated 3181 days ago on 1 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Would an admin please assess the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Boomerang: Proposed Topic Ban for Krzyhorse22 and close the discussion as they see fit. Thanks, WCMemail 12:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

 Done Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:03, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

 Done Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:09, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

A consensus has been reached. GoodDay (talk) 22:52, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

A consensus at an RFC is the result of 30 days of discussion. The bot continues to invite editors. There is no need for an early close. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Ok. GoodDay (talk) 06:37, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Open for 25 days. The discussion has petered out, and there is a clear consensus that it can be closed now. But this is a highly controversial issue, and has been the subject of numerous previous requests. Looking for an experienced, careful, and brave admin to close the discussion. StAnselm (talk) 18:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

  • User:StAnselm, I think you need to butter any prospective admin up a bit more. Drmies (talk) 17:14, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
  • StAnselm, help me out here. I have it 15-11, if I skip the intermediary polls, one of which I closed and the others I have yet to assess. Oppose: In ictu oculi, StAnselm, Polentarion, Tiggerjay, StevenJ81, JudeccaXIII, Simon Burchell, Graeme Bartlett, InsertCleverPhraseHere, BobKilcoyne, agr (ArnoldReinhold), Srnec, HokieRNB, H. Humbert, Amakuru. Support: Theroadislong, First Light, Doug Weller, Moxy, Hy Brasil, RGloucester, Rwenonah, Scjessey, Jonathan Tweet, Jess, jps. Note: I have friends and lovers on either side, so I think I can be unfair to both sides. I'm not saying, by the way, that I'll actually finish this: it's a beast. Drmies (talk) 17:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Actually, you missed Basileias as an oppose in the main discussion. But I found the opinion poll quite confusing, and I some editors voted only in it, so Darkfrog24, 172.58.225.118, StevenJ81, Deryck C, Roches, Dmcq, Dweller, and Maher-shalal-hashbaz should be added to the "opposes", with Leonhard Fortier, Röbin Liönheart, Khajidha, James, Dimadick, Keahapana and AIRcorn added to the supports. Also, First Light is clearly an oppose rather than a support. StAnselm (talk) 18:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
That's why I asked you, to copyedit. Thanks. Yeah, I did not look/count in those sections yet. I have some doubts about that IP, and will ping User:Bishonen. Wait, I just did. Drmies (talk) 18:45, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
I see that I left out Martin Hogbin as well: I failed to copy him and Basileias from my list in Notepad. Drmies (talk) 18:47, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

 Done by Mike Cline--Aervanath (talk) 12:20, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

After days of recycling the same arguments over and over, it looks like there is a sort of compromise everyone would agree with, while the talk page has not been edited for a week.--The Traditionalist (talk) 03:33, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

 Done--Aervanath (talk) 13:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Campus sexual assault#"The majority of rape and other sexual assault victims do not report their attacks to law enforcement." (Initiated 3167 days ago on 15 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Why is an early close being requested? Robert McClenon (talk) 06:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Robert McClenon, maybe because, in the Proposals section, editors have reached an agreement. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:36, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
I agree with Flyer22 Reborn. Today is the 30th day after the RfC was opened, so an RfC close will no longer be early. Cunard (talk) 19:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 Done --GRuban (talk) 16:46, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Vehbi_Koç#RfC_on_the_Kasapyan_estate (Initiated 3172 days ago on 10 January 2016)? Étienne Dolet (talk) 07:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

 Done --GRuban (talk) 16:16, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Would an uninvolved editor assess the consensus at Talk:Statewide opinion polling for the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016#RfC on inclusion of Overtime Politics polls (Initiated 3172 days ago on 10 January 2016)? 108.2.58.56 (talk) 17:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

 Done --GRuban (talk) 15:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus of the RfC at Talk:Shrauta (Initiated 3131 days ago on 20 February 2016)? I doubt there will be more input.VictoriaGraysonTalk 20:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

 Not done - No need to close after running for 7 rather than 30 days. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:CobraNet#RfC on manufacturer list (Initiated 3202 days ago on 11 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

 Done - No consensus. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:36, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive278#Standard offer unblock request from Md iet (Initiated 3147 days ago on 4 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

 Done--Aervanath (talk) 21:36, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Cannabis dispensaries in the United States#RfC for "Cannabis dispensaries" or "Marijuana dispensaries" (Initiated 3160 days ago on 22 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Veganism/Archive 14#RfC: Should the definition at the start of the lead of Veganism contain the wording, 'and an associated philosophy that rejects the commodity status of animals'? (Initiated 3165 days ago on 17 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Not done - No such RFC in the current talk page. May be a malformed request for closure of the RFC. It isn't obvious why Veganism would be discussed in connection with Human spaceflight, and I didn't see such a discussion. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
I've fixed the link to Talk:Veganism/Archive 14#RfC: Should the definition at the start of the lead of Veganism contain the wording, 'and an associated philosophy that rejects the commodity status of animals'?. Cunard (talk) 04:40, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 Done. A "part two" RfC has also been opened on Talk:Veganism regarding this RfC. Esquivalience t 03:03, 2 March 2016 (UTC)