Talk:EgyptAir Flight 181: Difference between revisions
Undid revision 712703400 by Haristunner (talk) |
|||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
::::: Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/87.228.158.48|87.228.158.48]] ([[User talk:87.228.158.48|talk]]) 15:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC) |
::::: Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/87.228.158.48|87.228.158.48]] ([[User talk:87.228.158.48|talk]]) 15:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC) |
||
I agree with protecting articles about a current event such as this while they are happening, because information about it changes fast and is often unreliable. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:EvidenceFairy|EvidenceFairy]] ([[User talk:EvidenceFairy|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/EvidenceFairy|contribs]]) 20:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
I agree with protecting articles about a current event such as this while they are happening, because information about it changes fast and is often unreliable. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:EvidenceFairy|EvidenceFairy]] ([[User talk:EvidenceFairy|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/EvidenceFairy|contribs]]) 20:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
: In retrospect, this article should absolutely be protected. Alongside the garden-variety vandalism, we've got people [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=EgyptAir_Flight_181&diff=712726689&oldid=712717437 lazily deleting sentences sourced to tabloids], though the same can found in more respectable publications, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=EgyptAir_Flight_181&diff=prev&oldid=712759035 deleting entire paragraphs] 'cause they don't align with their political beliefs, and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=EgyptAir_Flight_181&diff=712699036&oldid=712693603 passive-aggressively tagging bits they don't like] ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=EgyptAir_Flight_181&diff=712732412&oldid=712726689 repeatedly]). Please, protect this article from people. They are the worst. [[Special:Contributions/87.228.154.109|87.228.154.109]] ([[User talk:87.228.154.109|talk]]) 10:49, 31 March 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== Codes footnote == |
== Codes footnote == |
Revision as of 10:49, 31 March 2016
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the EgyptAir Flight 181 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about EgyptAir Flight 181. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about EgyptAir Flight 181 at the Reference desk. |
A news item involving EgyptAir Flight 181 was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 29 March 2016. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
BBC News Channel
The BBC News channel just said that BBC Arabic journalists interviewed passengers getting off the plane, and they said that cabin crew took their passports, then the plane unexpectedly climbed in altitude, landed in Cyprus, then they were told that the plane had been hijacked. Not sure if this is useful or not. Seagull123 Φ 09:55, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- These details have been included in the article. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
"wearing an explosive belt, later found to be fake"?
Neither of the sources attached to this state that it has been confirmed that the explosives were fake. Indeed, the BBC News article says "it was unclear whether the hijacker had taken explosives on board or whether he was bluffing". Cwmxii (talk) 10:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- This source, tagged "Tue, 29 Mar 2016-08:26pm , Cyprus , Reuters" now used in the lede section, says "Cypriot authorities have determined that the belt worn by an Egyptian man who hijacked an EgyptAir plane did not contain explosives." Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:49, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Protection
Why is this page protected? Since when do we automatically protect articles on the front page? 87.228.158.48 (talk) 11:25, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- We don't. There was a semi-prot request here. I'm not sure it's justified. @Widr: All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 11:40, 29 March 2016 (UTC).
- I asked because we had some odd behavior on the page before, and there was a risk of speculative wars going on. Now that it is resolved, I would have no objection to taking it down. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 12:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Removed. Widr (talk) 12:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks all. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 15:03, 29 March 2016 (UTC).
- Thanks. 87.228.158.48 (talk) 15:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks all. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 15:03, 29 March 2016 (UTC).
- Removed. Widr (talk) 12:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- I asked because we had some odd behavior on the page before, and there was a risk of speculative wars going on. Now that it is resolved, I would have no objection to taking it down. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 12:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
I agree with protecting articles about a current event such as this while they are happening, because information about it changes fast and is often unreliable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EvidenceFairy (talk • contribs) 20:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- In retrospect, this article should absolutely be protected. Alongside the garden-variety vandalism, we've got people lazily deleting sentences sourced to tabloids, though the same can found in more respectable publications, deleting entire paragraphs 'cause they don't align with their political beliefs, and passive-aggressively tagging bits they don't like (repeatedly). Please, protect this article from people. They are the worst. 87.228.154.109 (talk) 10:49, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Codes footnote
What is fact tag for? EgyptAir's codes or something else? 87.228.174.124 (talk) 21:00, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Presumably for "These codes are often used in flight numbers." All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 22:49, 29 March 2016 (UTC).
- Wikipedia In the news articles
- B-Class aviation articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- C-Class Crime-related articles
- Low-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- C-Class Cypriot articles
- Low-importance Cypriot articles
- All WikiProject Cyprus pages
- C-Class Disaster management articles
- Low-importance Disaster management articles
- C-Class Egypt articles
- Low-importance Egypt articles
- WikiProject Egypt articles