Jump to content

Talk:EgyptAir Flight 181: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 712703400 by Haristunner (talk)
Line 29: Line 29:
::::: Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/87.228.158.48|87.228.158.48]] ([[User talk:87.228.158.48|talk]]) 15:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
::::: Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/87.228.158.48|87.228.158.48]] ([[User talk:87.228.158.48|talk]]) 15:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
I agree with protecting articles about a current event such as this while they are happening, because information about it changes fast and is often unreliable. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:EvidenceFairy|EvidenceFairy]] ([[User talk:EvidenceFairy|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/EvidenceFairy|contribs]]) 20:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I agree with protecting articles about a current event such as this while they are happening, because information about it changes fast and is often unreliable. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:EvidenceFairy|EvidenceFairy]] ([[User talk:EvidenceFairy|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/EvidenceFairy|contribs]]) 20:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

: In retrospect, this article should absolutely be protected. Alongside the garden-variety vandalism, we've got people [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=EgyptAir_Flight_181&diff=712726689&oldid=712717437 lazily deleting sentences sourced to tabloids], though the same can found in more respectable publications, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=EgyptAir_Flight_181&diff=prev&oldid=712759035 deleting entire paragraphs] 'cause they don't align with their political beliefs, and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=EgyptAir_Flight_181&diff=712699036&oldid=712693603 passive-aggressively tagging bits they don't like] ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=EgyptAir_Flight_181&diff=712732412&oldid=712726689 repeatedly]). Please, protect this article from people. They are the worst. [[Special:Contributions/87.228.154.109|87.228.154.109]] ([[User talk:87.228.154.109|talk]]) 10:49, 31 March 2016 (UTC)


== Codes footnote ==
== Codes footnote ==

Revision as of 10:49, 31 March 2016

BBC News Channel

The BBC News channel just said that BBC Arabic journalists interviewed passengers getting off the plane, and they said that cabin crew took their passports, then the plane unexpectedly climbed in altitude, landed in Cyprus, then they were told that the plane had been hijacked. Not sure if this is useful or not.  Seagull123  Φ  09:55, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These details have been included in the article. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"wearing an explosive belt, later found to be fake"?

Neither of the sources attached to this state that it has been confirmed that the explosives were fake. Indeed, the BBC News article says "it was unclear whether the hijacker had taken explosives on board or whether he was bluffing". Cwmxii (talk) 10:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This source, tagged "Tue, 29 Mar 2016-08:26pm , Cyprus , Reuters" now used in the lede section, says "Cypriot authorities have determined that the belt worn by an Egyptian man who hijacked an EgyptAir plane did not contain explosives." Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:49, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Protection

Why is this page protected? Since when do we automatically protect articles on the front page? 87.228.158.48 (talk) 11:25, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We don't. There was a semi-prot request here. I'm not sure it's justified. @Widr: All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 11:40, 29 March 2016 (UTC).[reply]
I asked because we had some odd behavior on the page before, and there was a risk of speculative wars going on. Now that it is resolved, I would have no objection to taking it down. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 12:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Removed. Widr (talk) 12:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks all. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 15:03, 29 March 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Thanks. 87.228.158.48 (talk) 15:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with protecting articles about a current event such as this while they are happening, because information about it changes fast and is often unreliable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EvidenceFairy (talkcontribs) 20:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In retrospect, this article should absolutely be protected. Alongside the garden-variety vandalism, we've got people lazily deleting sentences sourced to tabloids, though the same can found in more respectable publications, deleting entire paragraphs 'cause they don't align with their political beliefs, and passive-aggressively tagging bits they don't like (repeatedly). Please, protect this article from people. They are the worst. 87.228.154.109 (talk) 10:49, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Codes footnote

What is fact tag for? EgyptAir's codes or something else? 87.228.174.124 (talk) 21:00, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably for "These codes are often used in flight numbers." All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 22:49, 29 March 2016 (UTC).[reply]