Talk:Brianna Wu: Difference between revisions
→"Software Engineer": new section |
→"Software Engineer": reply |
||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
I removed this particular job title/occupation as there was no source for this. It seems that via Twitter, in this [https://twitter.com/Spacekatgal/status/802587848704688129 tweet], Wu herself directed people to undo this edit, alleging that I am some sort of GamerGater, hellbent on undoing her entire career as a software engineer. I do not believe that Twitter can be considered a reliable source. Also, merely from the definition of software engineer, I see no evidence of the educational qualifications required to claim that distinction, regardless of how much programming she did on Revolution 60. --[[User:SVTCobra|SVTCobra]] ([[User talk:SVTCobra|talk]]) 19:39, 26 November 2016 (UTC) |
I removed this particular job title/occupation as there was no source for this. It seems that via Twitter, in this [https://twitter.com/Spacekatgal/status/802587848704688129 tweet], Wu herself directed people to undo this edit, alleging that I am some sort of GamerGater, hellbent on undoing her entire career as a software engineer. I do not believe that Twitter can be considered a reliable source. Also, merely from the definition of software engineer, I see no evidence of the educational qualifications required to claim that distinction, regardless of how much programming she did on Revolution 60. --[[User:SVTCobra|SVTCobra]] ([[User talk:SVTCobra|talk]]) 19:39, 26 November 2016 (UTC) |
||
* The profile of her at [https://www.theguardian.com/profile/brianna-wu The Guardian] describes her as "...head of development at Giant Spacekat, a software engineer ..." [http://www.firstpersonscholar.com/interview-with-brianna-wu/ This interview] at First Person Scholar identifies her as a software engineer. So there are secondary sources. You admit that she was a programmer for her game studio, but that she isn't worthy of the term "software engineer" because of her educational background isn't relevant; the definition of [[software engineer]] on WP doesn't say anything about any educational requirements and even says that the definition overlaps that of programmers. [[User:Eaolson|eaolson]] ([[User talk:Eaolson|talk]]) 20:10, 26 November 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:11, 26 November 2016
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brianna Wu article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Brianna Wu" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
WARNING: ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES This page is subject to discretionary sanctions; any editor who repeatedly or egregiously fails to adhere to applicable policies may be blocked, topic-banned, or otherwise restricted. Note also that editors on this article are subject to a limit of one revert per 24 hours (with exceptions for vandalism or BLP violations). Violation may result in blocks without further warning. Enforcement should be requested at WP:AE. Also, the article and this Talk page may not be edited by accounts with fewer than 500 edits, or by accounts that are less than 30 days old. Edits made by accounts that do not meet these qualifications may be removed. (Such removals are not subject to any "revert-rule" counting.) |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Inc. Magazine
[1] David Whitford, "WOMEN ENTREPRENEURS Brianna Wu vs. the Troll Army", Inc. April 2015.
Boston Globe 9-15-2015
One of the editors to this article appears to have discussed it with the subject
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Is this a problem?--Runescrape (talk) 03:51, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
(The rest of this inappropriate and unproductive discussion has been redacted.) MarkBernstein (talk) 17:31, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Brianna Wu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141108090812/http://gamepolitics.com/2014/10/31/harassed-game-dev-setting-legal-defense-fund-harassed-women to http://gamepolitics.com/2014/10/31/harassed-game-dev-setting-legal-defense-fund-harassed-women#.VF17Z8mJnct
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:24, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
I removed this particular job title/occupation as there was no source for this. It seems that via Twitter, in this tweet, Wu herself directed people to undo this edit, alleging that I am some sort of GamerGater, hellbent on undoing her entire career as a software engineer. I do not believe that Twitter can be considered a reliable source. Also, merely from the definition of software engineer, I see no evidence of the educational qualifications required to claim that distinction, regardless of how much programming she did on Revolution 60. --SVTCobra (talk) 19:39, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- The profile of her at The Guardian describes her as "...head of development at Giant Spacekat, a software engineer ..." This interview at First Person Scholar identifies her as a software engineer. So there are secondary sources. You admit that she was a programmer for her game studio, but that she isn't worthy of the term "software engineer" because of her educational background isn't relevant; the definition of software engineer on WP doesn't say anything about any educational requirements and even says that the definition overlaps that of programmers. eaolson (talk) 20:10, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Biography articles of living people
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class video game articles
- Low-importance video game articles
- Start-Class indie game articles
- Indie video game task force articles
- WikiProject Video games articles