User talk:Kleuske: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:33, 8 March 2017

Imgur and Road & Track share partnership :)

Sometimes Imgur is a reliable source. But R&T is always reliable. BeautyIslam (talk) 13:01, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please take it to WP:RS/N and argue your case there. All I saw was a GIF. Kleuske (talk) 13:02, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cher

I like Cher okay but JEEZE, who writes that garbage ? It needs to be cut down by about 80%. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.231.74.1 (talk) 02:18, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hello! Can you please improve the career section of Ryu Jun-yeol. I think it needs citation tags. Thank you! 180.191.151.238 (talk) 12:06, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a little confused why you ask me. I have no affinity with Korean pop-music and/or movies at all and to be frank, I've necver heard of this guy, so there's little to nothing I can sensibly improve. If you feel extra citations are required, you can add the {{cn}}-tags yourself. Kleuske (talk) 12:12, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi what issue are you having with my edits? I am trying to provide more sources for the information and make sure the profile is up to date.

Kindly revisit the the page by the name "YOUTH CONSORTIUM OF TANZANIA"

Dear Kleuske!!

I acknoledge your comments on proposing the deletion of the page that is entitled as "Youth Consortium of Tanzania" due to reasons of the lacking the notability by the page. I therefore inform you that, I have edited the page and you may revisit the page and advise me on what should be more added i order to evidence the notability of the page where necessary.

Regards

Abdulrahma1985 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdulrahman1985 (talk • contribs) 09:15, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A lack of notability arises from the absence of reliable sources that mention the subject at hand. This is not something that can be solved by improving the article. Sorry. Kleuske (talk) 11:18, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Revert the page Lineageos and accuse me of vandalism

You accuse me of vandalism about the page LineageOS.And why you revert something before you consult the writer.How many power have you peoples idling here and what do you think of another opinions? In this case there are no signs that the developer of LineageOS support this unofficial builds.Do you know some developers??

Sie können mir auch ihre Email hinterlassen.Dann forwarde ich ihnen die Email, die ich an wikipedia schicke.Mir reicht es mit den etablierten Usern die denken , das sie hier die Herrschaft haben.

And if you cannot read : The link about unofficial builds was not mine.Mine was the remark, thats dangerous to use unknown sources. FreeBeastie (talk)

If you think that adding "Remark :"If you donate for theandroidsoul.com, you dont know where your money goes and unknown malicious code is a danger for your device!" is somehow appropriate for an encyclopedia, I think we might have a serious Kompetenzmangel. As to my email: sie können mir mal den buckel runterrutschen. Good luck with that e-mail. Kleuske (talk) 22:13, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Kompetenzmangel is a great word! I love German! Bishonen | talk 15:13, 19 January 2017 (UTC).[reply]

John de Ruiter Article

Hi Kleuske. thank you for looking into the article. I had interest in creating and editing this article after I went to a retreat years ago which was really good and I wondered why I could only find negative things on the web about this teacher. I thought I could present a more balanced view of him and let people make their own minds. At any rate, I have noticed certain individuals that have vehemently attacked the article over the years. Look at the history. As of writing this Richard Gooi has just undone all of the edits made the the Wikipedia Arbitration Committee editors such as yourself within a day of their edits, I believe in an effort to craft a negative picture. Richard Gooi is also the one who posted the 'laughable' edits you mentioned earlier. See for yourself. Thank you. Planktonium (talk) 18:29, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you object to the edits of Mr. Gooi, you can express your sentiments on the appropriate talk page. Going behind someones back, instead of addressing people directly, leaves a bad taste and a declined inclination to be helpful. I don't know what you mean by "Arbitration Committee editors", but I can assure you I am in no way, shape or form connected to that institution or editing on its behalf. My only status here is that of Perambulatory Looshpah Laureate of the Encyclopedia and I edit independently. Kleuske (talk) 12:31, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ryback

I did it as a joke can't u take a joke u big bullt Abi25gail05 (talk) 12:34, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There are plenty of websites dedicated to jokes. Wikipedia is not one of them. Though we have a Category:Wikipedia humor making jokes in articles is frowned upon, especially if it goes agains the policies set out in WP:BLP. If you cannot grasp that or are unwilling to comply, I suggest you find another website, which does cater to your whims. Kleuske (talk) 12:39, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BLP PROD on Adam lach photographer

I just removed the BLP prod you had placed on Adam lach photographer, as the article was not eligible for that tagging. Per WP:BLPROD, "To be eligible for a BLPPROD tag, the entry must be a biography of a living person and contain no sources in any form (as references, external links, etc., reliable or otherwise) supporting any statements made about the person in the biography." The article had external links on the names of books going to a website that said that Lach was author of those books. It was not a reliable source, but links to avoid placement of a BLP prod need not be reliable source (which is a different situation than links added to after a BLP prod has been placed.) Let me know if you have any questions. --Nat Gertler (talk) 14:46, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. My bad. Kleuske (talk) 15:54, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Trams

Sorry, but tram stops and lines are not deletable under A7. A7 applies only to people, named animals, companies/organisations/groups (but not educational establishments), web content, and organised events. A tram manufacturer, or a tram operating company, could fall under A7, but are likely to be notable anyway. Peridon (talk) 12:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Peridon: I noticed. To the best of my knowledge none of the tram stops are notable per WP:GNG, so I'll take the high road and AfD them (one by one). I have no objections to manufacturers, operating companies or even tram lines (if notability is shown) but that's not the case here. Kleuske (talk) 12:48, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can AfD them en bloc if you want. There are articles about UK tram stops - like Pomona tram stop which I've referred the author of these Dutch ones to as an illustration of (minimal) referencing. Railway stations are almost always considered notable, but for trams perhaps an article about the line containing stop info might be better. The modern tram stop is more like a railway station than the old ones were - they were mostly just like bus stops. Anyway, please don't use A7 on the wrong things. Borderline cases maybe - is a driving school an educational establishment or not? Wrong tagging (and wrong deletion as a result) plays into the hands of the 'keep it at all costs' brigade, who would like to see nothing deleted unless it was copyvio, attack, or pure spam. When they see misuse, they want to remove the criterion rather than educate the taggers and deleters. Peridon (talk) 18:00, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I followed the advice on WP:AfD and tested the water with one (unsourced and apparently not notable) example. I do not "use A7 on the wrong things' on purpose, as you may already have guessed, but "errare humanum est". If train stations and educational establishments are deemed notable regardless of any sourcing, I think WP:GNG should reflect that, one way or another, but that's another argument. Kleuske (talk) 12:48, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quill Corporation

Hi I am trying to update this company profile with more references to back up the information and update it with the latest history of the company. Why do you keep reverting the changes citing self promotion - this is a corporation page and I am simply trying to update it with proper links and references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by QuillDigital (talk • contribs) 15:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I left a comment on your talk page concerning confict of interest. Additionally I feel obliged to point out that a) That's not a "company page" but a "Wikipedia page" and b) undisclosed paid editing is verboten. Kleuske (talk) 23:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May I suggest you use Twinkle and/or you apply for the newpage patroller right?

Hello and good job on New Page Patrolling. I notice that you are not using Twinkle or other automated tools (such as Huggle), or using Page Curation in newpage patrolling. While manual tagging is acceptable, using these tools makes the job easier. In addition, I suggest that you apply for the newpage patroller right, which allows you to mark newly-created pages as "patrolled", meaning that they will not appear as yellow on Special:Newpages. This makes it easier for other users to know what articles have been checked, and what have not. Thank you and happy editing. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:41, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may....

Twinkle and huggle are good ideas, too. Kleuske (talk) 10:44, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ken Sibanda Page

Thank you a million! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Casablancathe (talk • contribs) 22:20, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Any idea what the computer is asking for, please see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#Please_remove_protection_of_Ken_Sibanda_page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Casablancathe (talk • contribs) 22:40, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Elaborate your concern please & how to solve it.

Sir, if you don't mind to please be more elaborate on what concern that you think is inappropriate in the entry of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MalwareMustDie.

There is no concern of me to make any form of advertisement of a group of people who doesn't need finance support or work, they did many works yet less people acknowledge it although a lot of news mentioned their work.

Please give direction or execute as much edit as you want instead, I do not rant because of hours time I spent collecting facts that you deleted in a snap, but let's be fair here.

Thank you and look forward. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kljtech (talk • contribs) 14:38, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You created the article and are the biggest contributor. Moreover, you have inserted this NPO (or its work) in many articles. Hence I suspect a Conflict Of Interest and marked the page accordingly.
The style of the article (summing up its Greatest Hits for one) is responsible for the second concern.

I would urge you to read the Conflict of Interest page for some more detail. Thanks. Kleuske (talk) 14:47, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

> Thank you for the response. I read the article.

> So what is the solution? What has to be done?

> Please kindly advise in simple explanation, should I delete the whole thing?

> Thank you for your time in advance, and look forward for direction.

14:52, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kljtech (talk • contribs) 14:52, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Philipp Plein

In case you are interested, in addition to reverting to your version of this article, I have started an SPI at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/A3789. Deli nk (talk) 16:08, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Kleuske (talk) 10:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brimstone (film)

Hi! A fan from Denmark of the film still continues to do rambling, incoherent edits from different user names. He/She needs to be stopped. Have a nice day! Sebastian James (talk) 14:59, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the article and cleaned it up a bit, but I see no clear evidence of sockpuppetry. You should be carefull since casting aspersions is generally frowned upon. If you have evidence for sockpuppetry, WP:SPI is the proper venue. That being said; this looks like a content dispute to me. I suggest you take it to the talkpage. I am not an arbiter in this and do not wish to be. If you feel unable to resolve the conflict, Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard and Wikipedia:Dispute resolution may be useful. HTH, HAND. Kleuske (talk) 16:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re IP edits of Armenian Genocide recognition

I'm going to write the IP a warning for adding unsourced material in about half an hour. If you think I should make it uw2 vandalism let me know. Thanks for working on that. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 01:34, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's at your discretion. I trust your judgment. Kleuske (talk) 12:03, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello Kleuske. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that there is consensus that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course still be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks.Template:Z149 KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 13:05, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AFD Mike Bivins

I noticed your comment about 2 local newspapers. Washington Post is not a local newspaper, and puts millions of copies a week into print. Were you being serious or joking? Washington Post is one of USA's largest newspapers Pittsburghangelsforever (talk) 22:33, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 123: / Line 123: @@
 [[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello Kleuske. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting  you know, however, that [[Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#cite_ref-Hasty_7-1|there is consensus]] that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context ([[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#A1. No context|CSD A1]]) and/or content ([[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#A3|CSD A3]]) moments after they are created. It's usually best to wait ''at least'' 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should ''not'' be marked as [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/patrolled pages|patrolled]].  Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may [[Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers|drive away well-meaning contributors]], which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages ([[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G10|G10]]), blatant nonsense ([[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G1|G1]]), copyright violations ([[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G12|G12]]) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes ([[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G3|G3]]) should of course still be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks.{{Z149}}<!-- Template:uw-hasty --> [[User:KGirlTrucker81|<span style="background-color: pink; color: white">'''KGirlTrucker81'''</span>]]<sup> [[User talk:KGirlTrucker81|<span style= "color:pink">huh?</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/KGirlTrucker81|what I've been doing]]</sup> 13:05, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
+== AFD Mike Bivins ==
+I noticed your comment about 2 local newspapers. Washington Post is not a local newspaper, and puts millions of copies a week into print. Were you being serious or joking? Washington Post is one of USA's largest newspapers [[User:Pittsburghangelsforever|Pittsburghangelsforever]] ([[User talk:Pittsburghangelsforever|talk]]) 22:33, 8 March 2017 (UTC)