User talk:MSENDER007: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 07:12, 20 June 2017

This is MSENDER007's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has no references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:MSENDER007/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:03, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! MSENDER007, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:03, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring and copyright violations

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for Edit warring and copyright violations. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at WP:AN3. You were warned about the copyright issue by User:Diannaa but you deleted her message while making no reply. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:21, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MSENDER007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize for deleting Dianna's suggestions and did it when I was frustrated with a different user who was targeting me through wikipedia. I take copyright violations serious and I have made changes to include citations as well as rewrite other inform in my own words.I have never used talk pages before and didn't really understand how to use it until now.MSENDER007 (talk) 01:40, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Block length increased to 72 hours for block evasion. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 05:25, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Is there any particular reason why you never use article talk pages? EdJohnston (talk) 03:05, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: MSENDER007 seems to be evading this block as 2600:100A:B020:340:DB01:DD73:38A9:AE2B (talk · contribs · WHOIS). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:44, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The IP is now blocked by NinjaRobotPirate for 48 hours. EdJohnston (talk) 04:49, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair, that one kind of looks like he forgot his password or something, why would someone use an IP just to make an unblock request?★Trekker (talk) 05:59, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The IP range was blocked by a checkuser. He posted an unblock request to get it overturned. He's also evading his block under 75.87.132.231 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). I've semi-protected a few of the articles to prevent further sock puppetry. MSENDER007, I suggest you stop digging deeper. I don't know about anyone else, but I see extensive block evasion, copyright infringement, edit warring, and persistent addition of unreliable sources, my analysis is, "This user isn't worth the trouble." What you need to do is convince admins that you are not going to continue doing these things. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:13, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.★Trekker (talk) 20:58, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ★Trekker (talk) 21:05, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

I've noticed you moved The Howling III and Timecop to a "Title (film)" format. I've reverted these moves because these pages are the primary topics for those titles. If a title is shared by multiple topics, but one of these is much more likely to be the one the average reader looks for, then we generally don't make the reader start at the disambiguation page. In future, try requesting page moves at WP:RM, and especially read the page on disambiguation policy, as the pages you moved have been titled that way for a reason, and it is likely that a discussion will be necessary to establish a new consensus about how to title them. Daß Wölf 22:01, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Universal Soldier Theatrical Poster.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Universal Soldier Theatrical Poster.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:29, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your attention needed at WP:CHU

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 11:34, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:07, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked your account, because in spite of warnings and a previous block for copyright violations, you continued to add copyright material to this wiki in violation of our copyright policy and copyright law. You cannot resume editing until you provide a clear statement that demonstrates that you have read and understand our copyright policy and intend to follow it in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:09, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MSENDER007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had hard time creating that table and simply forgot to had the citations.If you would allow me to, I would add citations from IMDB and the other site.MSENDER007 (talk) 20:13, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for copyright violations. Adding links to IMDB is not a method of solving copyright violations. If you can't respond to the problem that was explained to you, there doesn't seem much hope that you will follow our policy in the future. EdJohnston (talk) 20:31, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your response demonstrates that you don't actually understand copyright law or how it applies to Wikipedia editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:18, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MSENDER007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize for violating your copyright and copyright although it was untentional.MSENDER007 (talk) 20:30, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're now creating sock puppets. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:38, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I just blocked an obvious sock, Filmnut260 (talk · contribs). This will need to be addressed in any future unblock requests. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:38, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Filmnut260 added the same copyvio to Timecop (TV series) as was added by MSENDER007. I have revision deleted this material. They also created the account user:Averagejoe260, per Previous revision of Wikipedia:Changing username/Simple (the account was created before the block and has no edits so far). I am blocking Averagejoe260 as a preventative measure. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:53, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

He has seem to have used several IP socks before, should they have the "suspected sock puppets of MSENDER007" added to them?★Trekker (talk) 13:50, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Administrators I originally came on to Wikipedia to write about articles that interest me and to work with other editors to help improve my writing skills; however, I made mistakes along the way – did not properly download images onto the website, deleted Dianna’s comment on talk page, and made the mistake of breaking copyright laws when I let my frustration take over. I allowed other editors to affect my judgment as they harassed me and failed to give me constructive feedback. For a moment, I want to take a minute and thank Daß Wölf for his input on the Howling and Timecop franchise, which are articles that I created. He is a true editor who gives a person constructive feedback instead of leaving rude comments on your talk page. I create a different username not to cause mischief on Wikipedia, but, to get away from editors like Trekker and Dianna who are so quick to penalize and erase a person’s hours of work without courtesy comment. Furthermore, I have created a different username because I have learned from my mistakes and want to put them to good use without further harassment. So, I ask of you to show some compassion, give me one last chance if you will or at the least ban me for a month.