User talk:Uyarafath: Difference between revisions
→Jade Mya: C |
No edit summary |
||
Line 155: | Line 155: | ||
:::::Hi, {{ping|CNMall41}} - You are 100% correct. I was asked from a person to create an encyclopedic content with neutral view about Jade Mya. But, I haven't been paid by anyone and even from the person who requested me. So if I get paid, immediately I will disclose it. Whenever I am requested to make encyclopedic content on any subject and if I get paid I disclose it. You may visit these talk page [[Talk:Comparison of authentication solutions]] [[Talk:Elliott Michael Smith]] where I disclosed. I am always ensuring neutrality and notability and I never make any content for promotional for anyone. If any such, people like you always help me to correct. Thank you[[User:Uyarafath|Uyarafath]] ([[User talk:Uyarafath#top|talk]]) 06:51, 11 August 2017 (UTC) |
:::::Hi, {{ping|CNMall41}} - You are 100% correct. I was asked from a person to create an encyclopedic content with neutral view about Jade Mya. But, I haven't been paid by anyone and even from the person who requested me. So if I get paid, immediately I will disclose it. Whenever I am requested to make encyclopedic content on any subject and if I get paid I disclose it. You may visit these talk page [[Talk:Comparison of authentication solutions]] [[Talk:Elliott Michael Smith]] where I disclosed. I am always ensuring neutrality and notability and I never make any content for promotional for anyone. If any such, people like you always help me to correct. Thank you[[User:Uyarafath|Uyarafath]] ([[User talk:Uyarafath#top|talk]]) 06:51, 11 August 2017 (UTC) |
||
::::::Okay. Sorry to sound accusatory. It just seems strange that "a person" asked you to create an article and you are not being paid, despite the fact that the image uploader is the founder of a marketing firm that sells Wikipedia editing services - not to mention you have disclosed being a paid editor for a few other pages. There is nothing wrong with having a COI as long as you edit from a neutral point of view; however, having a financial interest that you do NOT disclose is against Wikimedia's TOU. My main concern is the possibility of paid edits that have not been disclosed. Also, I am not sure if what you said about being asked to create a page still constitutes a conflict of interest or not. I will likely just bring it up at [[WP:COIN]] to get an opinion as I don't know for sure. Thanks for the clarification. --[[User:CNMall41|CNMall41]] ([[User talk:CNMall41|talk]]) 19:23, 11 August 2017 (UTC) |
::::::Okay. Sorry to sound accusatory. It just seems strange that "a person" asked you to create an article and you are not being paid, despite the fact that the image uploader is the founder of a marketing firm that sells Wikipedia editing services - not to mention you have disclosed being a paid editor for a few other pages. There is nothing wrong with having a COI as long as you edit from a neutral point of view; however, having a financial interest that you do NOT disclose is against Wikimedia's TOU. My main concern is the possibility of paid edits that have not been disclosed. Also, I am not sure if what you said about being asked to create a page still constitutes a conflict of interest or not. I will likely just bring it up at [[WP:COIN]] to get an opinion as I don't know for sure. Thanks for the clarification. --[[User:CNMall41|CNMall41]] ([[User talk:CNMall41|talk]]) 19:23, 11 August 2017 (UTC) |
||
::::::Hi, {{ping|CNMall41}} - Okay. Got it. The person who asked me to create this article is running a marketing company. I clarify, I am an individual, not employed in any such marketing company. I am informed I will get paid if page sustains from the person. Thank you so much for all your information and guidance my dear friend.[[User:Uyarafath|Uyarafath]] ([[User talk:Uyarafath#top|talk]]) 05:37, 12 August 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:37, 12 August 2017
Welcome!
|
Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Uyarafath. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
- avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
- instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
- when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. James (talk/contribs) 15:27, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Limnesh Augustine
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Limnesh Augustine, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
- It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.coxandkings.com/promotion/3d-painting-tours/limnesh-augustine-profile-details.shtml. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 15:44, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Limnesh Augustine
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Limnesh Augustine, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 14:44, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
May 2017
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Limnesh Augustine. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 14:50, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Limnesh Augustine, you may be blocked from editing. reddogsix (talk) 14:53, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Limnesh Augustine
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Limnesh Augustine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 14:58, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
- I read the talk page. I also read the content that speaks so glowingly of its subject: just like the message at the talk page, the article praises him with "renowned" and talk of his technical expertise. Please consider if you'd used such language in your dissertation and imagine what your committee's reaction would have been. Minus that content, nothing particularly significant about him appears; it's a matter of "no indication of significance", as plenty of people get in Guinness. Nyttend (talk) 16:56, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
May 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Limnesh Augustine. reddogsix (talk) 14:58, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of List of Indian painters
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on List of Indian painters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 17:14, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of National Wind Tunnel facility IIT Kanpur
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on National Wind Tunnel facility IIT Kanpur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Muhandes (talk) 09:14, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
To Muhandes
Hi, Hope you are not knowing what is difference between company and national facility. If you are not sure, please don't tag for 'speedy deletion'. Thank you.
Speedy deletion nomination of Anuj Gupta
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Anuj Gupta, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. FITINDIA 09:30, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
The article Indian Association of Clinical Cardiologists has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
References used only mention this organization. I cannot find anything better in my search for references. Holding off on AfD in hopes that someone can add more sources to demonstrate WP:CORPDEPTH.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CNMall41 (talk) 22:11, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Jade Mya
Please refer to WP:PAID and make the required disclosure if appropriate. Thanks. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:33, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, @CNMall41: -Sure. If I get paid I must disclose it. That is my responsibility. Thank you.Uyarafath (talk) 03:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Based on what I found, I believe disclosure would be necessary. If I am wrong, please let me know. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:25, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, @CNMall41:. Whenever I get paid for contributing to Wikipedia, I disclose the details in the respective talk page. As of now, I am not paid anything to this particular article. If I get paid I will sure disclose it in the article talk page. I respect always Wikipedia guidelines. Thank you for your valuable replies. Looking forward to get more input from such experienced person to improve myself.Uyarafath (talk) 04:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- Just seems strange that you uploaded a commercial image to a Wikipedia page and were not paid to do so. Especially since the original image appears to have been uploaded on Flickr only one day prior, by a person who is the founder of a marketing company that advertises Wikipedia editing as a service. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:15, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, @CNMall41: - You are 100% correct. I was asked from a person to create an encyclopedic content with neutral view about Jade Mya. But, I haven't been paid by anyone and even from the person who requested me. So if I get paid, immediately I will disclose it. Whenever I am requested to make encyclopedic content on any subject and if I get paid I disclose it. You may visit these talk page Talk:Comparison of authentication solutions Talk:Elliott Michael Smith where I disclosed. I am always ensuring neutrality and notability and I never make any content for promotional for anyone. If any such, people like you always help me to correct. Thank youUyarafath (talk) 06:51, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- Okay. Sorry to sound accusatory. It just seems strange that "a person" asked you to create an article and you are not being paid, despite the fact that the image uploader is the founder of a marketing firm that sells Wikipedia editing services - not to mention you have disclosed being a paid editor for a few other pages. There is nothing wrong with having a COI as long as you edit from a neutral point of view; however, having a financial interest that you do NOT disclose is against Wikimedia's TOU. My main concern is the possibility of paid edits that have not been disclosed. Also, I am not sure if what you said about being asked to create a page still constitutes a conflict of interest or not. I will likely just bring it up at WP:COIN to get an opinion as I don't know for sure. Thanks for the clarification. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:23, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, @CNMall41: - Okay. Got it. The person who asked me to create this article is running a marketing company. I clarify, I am an individual, not employed in any such marketing company. I am informed I will get paid if page sustains from the person. Thank you so much for all your information and guidance my dear friend.Uyarafath (talk) 05:37, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, @CNMall41: - You are 100% correct. I was asked from a person to create an encyclopedic content with neutral view about Jade Mya. But, I haven't been paid by anyone and even from the person who requested me. So if I get paid, immediately I will disclose it. Whenever I am requested to make encyclopedic content on any subject and if I get paid I disclose it. You may visit these talk page Talk:Comparison of authentication solutions Talk:Elliott Michael Smith where I disclosed. I am always ensuring neutrality and notability and I never make any content for promotional for anyone. If any such, people like you always help me to correct. Thank youUyarafath (talk) 06:51, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- Just seems strange that you uploaded a commercial image to a Wikipedia page and were not paid to do so. Especially since the original image appears to have been uploaded on Flickr only one day prior, by a person who is the founder of a marketing company that advertises Wikipedia editing as a service. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:15, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, @CNMall41:. Whenever I get paid for contributing to Wikipedia, I disclose the details in the respective talk page. As of now, I am not paid anything to this particular article. If I get paid I will sure disclose it in the article talk page. I respect always Wikipedia guidelines. Thank you for your valuable replies. Looking forward to get more input from such experienced person to improve myself.Uyarafath (talk) 04:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- Based on what I found, I believe disclosure would be necessary. If I am wrong, please let me know. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:25, 9 August 2017 (UTC)