Jump to content

Talk:Gold Box: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.2.7.1)
Kelesis (talk | contribs)
submission for peer review
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Peer review|archive=1}}
{{WikiProject Video games|class=Start|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Video games|class=Start|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons|class=start|importance=low
{{WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons|class=start|importance=low

Revision as of 19:39, 18 August 2018

WikiProject iconVideo games Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:
WikiProject iconDungeons & Dragons Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
D&D to-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Spelljammer

Spelljammer wasn't exactly a Goldbox game... -- Nils Jeppe 20:16, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

True, but the turn-based crew member combat engine was essentially the same as the Gold Box combat engine, so I felt the game warranted a mention in this article. --Muchness 20:46, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

New category?

Gold Box Games - What do you think? -G3, 21:54, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Silver Edition

Should mention be made in this article of the Forgotten Realms Archives edition of these games released in mid-late 1990s? Especially the Silver Edition which I believe had the complete gold box series in its collection.

Also while looking around I found this [Gamespy page] which has a very useful list of SSI titles (gold box and otherwise). Would it be worth mentioning that SSI is now owned by UbiSoft?

Pieterkonink 19:58, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Missing games

There are a few (actually quite a few, now that I checked that link below) missing gold box games, Gateway to the Savage Frontier, and Treasures of the Savage frontier, to name two (that I thought were the only two) but also the Krynn gold box games. The snare (talk) 06:39, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Really? I thought everything was mentioned, at least in the template. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 15:30, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Categories

Am wondering if these games should be added to Category:Video games with oblique graphics or not. They use first-person graphics sometimes, too. SharkD  Talk  18:12, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If the shoe fits...? 99.126.204.164 (talk) 18:33, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gold Box. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]