Jump to content

Talk:Slavery: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
rm "on a mission" spamming by blocked user
No edit summary
Line 65: Line 65:


:OK. [[User:Editor2020|Editor2020]] ([[User talk:Editor2020|talk]]) 19:40, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
:OK. [[User:Editor2020|Editor2020]] ([[User talk:Editor2020|talk]]) 19:40, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

==Slavery is 'Slavs'==

This is an extremely questionable and controversial theory to be removed. The fact is that it was invented by "scientists"-racists 17-18 from Germany and France. Unfortunately this misconception is so common still in the West, even in Oxford refer to it. In reality, the Slavs have absolutely nothing to do with slavery. Unfortunately, I cannot change this text now.

Revision as of 18:49, 25 August 2018

Template:Vital article

10s of Millions press-ganged and conscripted into slavery and death

Is being press-ganged or conscripted into the military against your will, often to die thousands of miles from your family, considered slavery? Should there be a link to the 'Impressment' and 'Conscription' Wikipedia pages? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.30.55.165 (talk) 16:01, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There's already a link to Involuntary servitude in the "See also" section. It's not the same as slavery though, since slaves didn't get paid. Bataaf van Oranje (Prinsgezinde) (talk) 08:51, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Slave auctions in Libya

See [1] Doug Weller talk 14:09, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Slavery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:59, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

Slavery is depicted as bad throughout the article. As an author you have to be above the zeitgeist, even if the topic is considered morally questionable. Morality is always subjective. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.47.74.232 (talk) 14:19, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Slavery in classical antiquity

the page is locked, otherwise I'd do it myself.

Can someone add the Slavery in antiquity article as a "main article" heading under the Slavery#Classical antiquity section. Thanks --Tomatoswoop (talk) 01:03, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Editor2020 (talk) 19:40, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Slavery is 'Slavs'

This is an extremely questionable and controversial theory to be removed. The fact is that it was invented by "scientists"-racists 17-18 from Germany and France. Unfortunately this misconception is so common still in the West, even in Oxford refer to it. In reality, the Slavs have absolutely nothing to do with slavery. Unfortunately, I cannot change this text now.