Jump to content

User talk:Erfson: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Erfson (talk | contribs)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 107: Line 107:


Hi Erfosn. A couple of things about this article.{{pb}}The first one is that blogs, personal websites, and other similar [[:WP:UGC|user-generated content]] are typically not considered to be [[:WP:RS|reliable sources]] for Wikipedia's purposes. The information contained on such sites might be [[:WP:VNT|true]], but they cannot be used as citations in support of article content, except under certain conditions like explained in [[:WP:NEWSBLOG]] or [[:WP:SPS]].{{pb}}Next, you shouldn't [[:WP:C-P|copy and paste]] large blocks of content found on external websites or in reliable sources directly into Wikipedia articles because this almost always going to be seen as a [[:WP:COPVIO]] and [[:WP:PLAGIARISM]]; even [[:WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASE]] is not allowed. Even if you cite a source in support, [[:WP:COPY|Wikipedia's licensing requirements]] and the licensing of the source are almost always in conflict which means Wikipedia would in a sense be infringing upon someone else's copyright. Short quotations are often allowed, but only if they meet [[:MOS:QUOTE]].{{pb}}Finally, generally only subject deemed [[:WP:N|Wikipedia notable]] are considered OK to have articles written about them. Whether something/someone is Wikipedia notable is bascially determined by whether it can be established that it/they has received [[:WP:SIGCOV]] in reliable sources. I've asked about Gardner at [[:WT:MILHIST#Elizabeth L. Gardner]] and so far the first response is not very positive; so, if you are aware of any old newspapers, magazines, books, etc. which have some substanial coverage of Gardner (not just a name mention in a caption or in a sentence), then please add those to the article as citations; if you're not sure how to do that, please see [[:WP:REFB]] for some general information. -- [[User:Marchjuly|Marchjuly]] ([[User talk:Marchjuly|talk]]) 06:38, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi Erfosn. A couple of things about this article.{{pb}}The first one is that blogs, personal websites, and other similar [[:WP:UGC|user-generated content]] are typically not considered to be [[:WP:RS|reliable sources]] for Wikipedia's purposes. The information contained on such sites might be [[:WP:VNT|true]], but they cannot be used as citations in support of article content, except under certain conditions like explained in [[:WP:NEWSBLOG]] or [[:WP:SPS]].{{pb}}Next, you shouldn't [[:WP:C-P|copy and paste]] large blocks of content found on external websites or in reliable sources directly into Wikipedia articles because this almost always going to be seen as a [[:WP:COPVIO]] and [[:WP:PLAGIARISM]]; even [[:WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASE]] is not allowed. Even if you cite a source in support, [[:WP:COPY|Wikipedia's licensing requirements]] and the licensing of the source are almost always in conflict which means Wikipedia would in a sense be infringing upon someone else's copyright. Short quotations are often allowed, but only if they meet [[:MOS:QUOTE]].{{pb}}Finally, generally only subject deemed [[:WP:N|Wikipedia notable]] are considered OK to have articles written about them. Whether something/someone is Wikipedia notable is bascially determined by whether it can be established that it/they has received [[:WP:SIGCOV]] in reliable sources. I've asked about Gardner at [[:WT:MILHIST#Elizabeth L. Gardner]] and so far the first response is not very positive; so, if you are aware of any old newspapers, magazines, books, etc. which have some substanial coverage of Gardner (not just a name mention in a caption or in a sentence), then please add those to the article as citations; if you're not sure how to do that, please see [[:WP:REFB]] for some general information. -- [[User:Marchjuly|Marchjuly]] ([[User talk:Marchjuly|talk]]) 06:38, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, the article was on a list of requested aviators for wikiproject:aircraft. Please explain why we should not have the article

Revision as of 15:21, 6 December 2018

Erfson, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Erfson! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Erfson. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 18:24, 28 April 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Erfson. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 22:48, 17 May 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Erfson! You created a thread called How do add a picture? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Delivered by Muninnbot, an automated account. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Erfson. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 12:19, 1 June 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

June 2018

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Teahouse, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:22, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Erfson! You created a thread called How do I add a picture to my user page at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by User:Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Pubgcoverphoto195.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Pubgcoverphoto195.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 21:45, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for signing up for this project. It is a very busy and active project with lots going on and we can always use more help and especially a fresh set of eyes. If you haven't done so already you might want to add Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft to your watch list as this is where much of the background discussion occurs. You may also want to watch Wikipedia:New articles (Aircraft) as this is where newly created articles get listed for peer review. Having a look over these new articles is a great way to get a feel for how things are done on the project and also most new articles need reviewing anyway. If you have any questions you can leave me a note or post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft, either way you will get a quick response. - Ahunt (talk) 01:38, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:TU-104B(Accident1971).jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:TU-104B(Accident1971).jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 06:02, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Machine-translated text

Please do not insert machine-translated text into articles without proofreading and copyediting. You are free to put machine-translated text in your sandbox and drafting spaces as notes, but such text should not be in the article mainspace. If you need help writing articles and want someone to proofread your work, feel free to ask, but do not copy-paste google-translated text into articles. Thank you.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:57, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PlanspotterA320, I insert machine-translated text as a base, so that we have the information, and then we can edit. The machine translated text was not intended as the final form. Erfson (talk) 18:22, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Then please put it in your sandbox, copyedit it, and then put it in the article. Because machine translated text often has lots of technical, grammar, and formatting errors. Other users don't have time to fix every single article you've inserted machine translated text into - by the time we finish fixing one article, three more articles have machine-translated text added, creating a growing mess. Your sandbox is a great place to draft articles. I appreciate your enthusiasm and look forward to reading the articles you write, but we cannot allow pure machine-generated text to say in the article mainspace due to the huge amount of innacuracies and flaws from machine translation.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:26, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Erfosn. A couple of things about this article.

The first one is that blogs, personal websites, and other similar user-generated content are typically not considered to be reliable sources for Wikipedia's purposes. The information contained on such sites might be true, but they cannot be used as citations in support of article content, except under certain conditions like explained in WP:NEWSBLOG or WP:SPS.

Next, you shouldn't copy and paste large blocks of content found on external websites or in reliable sources directly into Wikipedia articles because this almost always going to be seen as a WP:COPVIO and WP:PLAGIARISM; even WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASE is not allowed. Even if you cite a source in support, Wikipedia's licensing requirements and the licensing of the source are almost always in conflict which means Wikipedia would in a sense be infringing upon someone else's copyright. Short quotations are often allowed, but only if they meet MOS:QUOTE.

Finally, generally only subject deemed Wikipedia notable are considered OK to have articles written about them. Whether something/someone is Wikipedia notable is bascially determined by whether it can be established that it/they has received WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources. I've asked about Gardner at WT:MILHIST#Elizabeth L. Gardner and so far the first response is not very positive; so, if you are aware of any old newspapers, magazines, books, etc. which have some substanial coverage of Gardner (not just a name mention in a caption or in a sentence), then please add those to the article as citations; if you're not sure how to do that, please see WP:REFB for some general information. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:38, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the article was on a list of requested aviators for wikiproject:aircraft. Please explain why we should not have the article