Talk:Brett Kavanaugh: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
→Julie Swetnick: new section |
||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
The info box just below Kavanuagh's photo says "Incumbent". Is that an artefact that should be removed? [[User:BobEnyart|Bob Enyart, Denver KGOV radio host ]] ([[User talk:BobEnyart|talk]]) 20:40, 5 February 2019 (UTC) |
The info box just below Kavanuagh's photo says "Incumbent". Is that an artefact that should be removed? [[User:BobEnyart|Bob Enyart, Denver KGOV radio host ]] ([[User talk:BobEnyart|talk]]) 20:40, 5 February 2019 (UTC) |
||
:These seems to be an artifact of the infobox judge template. If you look on the infobox examples page, most of the judges display that way. I have placed a note on the talk page of that template. [[User:ResultingConstant|ResultingConstant]] ([[User talk:ResultingConstant|talk]]) 21:09, 5 February 2019 (UTC) |
:These seems to be an artifact of the infobox judge template. If you look on the infobox examples page, most of the judges display that way. I have placed a note on the talk page of that template. [[User:ResultingConstant|ResultingConstant]] ([[User talk:ResultingConstant|talk]]) 21:09, 5 February 2019 (UTC) |
||
== Julie Swetnick == |
|||
Without getting into a loud argument with dozens of people, and rehashing the entire incident, I would like to suggest the paragraph on Julie Swetnick be removed. Not only because it is the least plausible, but because the lawyer involved, Mr. Avenatti, has been indicted for multiple counts of fraud. This indictment appears to confirm the questionable motives of the attorney and hints that the entire claim of Ms. Swetnick was a mere publicity stunt on behalf of Avenatti. It is unfair to Justice Kavanaugh under WP:BLP to have this allegation kept on his biography, and removing it would not harm the article. The fraud indictment of Mr. Avenatti so soon after the convenient Swetnick story suggests that the claim itself is fraudulent.[[User:AlexanderSoul|AlexanderSoul]] ([[User talk:AlexanderSoul|talk]]) 20:44, 17 April 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:44, 17 April 2019
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brett Kavanaugh article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism. |
This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Template:WikiProject Donald Trump Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
A news item involving Brett Kavanaugh was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 6 October 2018. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brett Kavanaugh article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 14 days |
|
||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Confusing sentence needs grammar fix
This sentence:
In his dissent, Linda Greenhouse says Kavanaugh criticized the majority...
Probably should read something like this:
In his dissent, according to Linda Greenhouse (a NY Times opinion writer), Kavanaugh criticized the majority...
Or better yet, maybe this Greenhouse quote is not particularly relevant. She is a journalist who made the assertion in her NT Times article. A better entry would use the Kavanaugh quote and cite the actual Kavanaugh document as support, rather than a newspaper article.
Documents: Law Library of Congress and National Archives
- https://www.loc.gov/law/find/kavanaugh.php
- https://search.archives.gov/search?affiliate=national-archives&query="Brett+Kavanaugh"
- david ferriero. "National Archives Works to Release Records Related to Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh". archives.gov.
Removal of party from scotus justice pages?
Please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject United States courts and judges#Removal of party from scotus justice pages. jhawkinson (talk) 21:35, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Incumbent?
The info box just below Kavanuagh's photo says "Incumbent". Is that an artefact that should be removed? Bob Enyart, Denver KGOV radio host (talk) 20:40, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- These seems to be an artifact of the infobox judge template. If you look on the infobox examples page, most of the judges display that way. I have placed a note on the talk page of that template. ResultingConstant (talk) 21:09, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Julie Swetnick
Without getting into a loud argument with dozens of people, and rehashing the entire incident, I would like to suggest the paragraph on Julie Swetnick be removed. Not only because it is the least plausible, but because the lawyer involved, Mr. Avenatti, has been indicted for multiple counts of fraud. This indictment appears to confirm the questionable motives of the attorney and hints that the entire claim of Ms. Swetnick was a mere publicity stunt on behalf of Avenatti. It is unfair to Justice Kavanaugh under WP:BLP to have this allegation kept on his biography, and removing it would not harm the article. The fraud indictment of Mr. Avenatti so soon after the convenient Swetnick story suggests that the claim itself is fraudulent.AlexanderSoul (talk) 20:44, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Active politicians
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- High-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Conservatism articles
- High-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
- C-Class law articles
- High-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- C-Class Maryland articles
- High-importance Maryland articles
- WikiProject Maryland articles
- C-Class politics articles
- High-importance politics articles
- C-Class American politics articles
- Mid-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class United States courts and judges articles
- High-importance United States courts and judges articles
- C-Class United States articles
- High-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of High-importance
- C-Class District of Columbia articles
- High-importance District of Columbia articles
- WikiProject District of Columbia articles
- C-Class United States Government articles
- High-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Wikipedia In the news articles