Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Undid revision 895019058 by Heatherlcrespo (talk) This is not the place to paste a copy of Draft:Kokumi. If you have a question about the draft, click the "Click here to ask a new question." link at the top of this page, state your question, and link to the draft using double square brackets.
No edit summary
Line 392: Line 392:


<!-- End of message -->[[User:Esolischi|Esolischi]] ([[User talk:Esolischi|talk]]) 01:07, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
<!-- End of message -->[[User:Esolischi|Esolischi]] ([[User talk:Esolischi|talk]]) 01:07, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

== Request on 14:52:48, 1 May 2019 for assistance on [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|AfC]] submission by Michron777 ==
{{anchor|14:52:48, 1 May 2019 review of submission by Michron777}}
{{Lafc|username=Michron777|ts=14:52:48, 1 May 2019|declinedtalk=Draft:Your_Story_Hour}}

<!-- Start of message -->
Hello, I was confused at the reason why my article got rejected (Your Story Hour). Before submitting it, I got advice from other editors/contributors, and looked at several similar published articles as a guide to what is acceptable (which made it more weird because some of the other radio drama articles I've looked at didn't seem to have much notability based on the reasons given me).

Because notability is broad, is there something specific that I could have added to make more noteworthy (while at the same time not make it sound so biased)?

<!-- End of message -->[[User:Michron777|Michron777]] ([[User talk:Michron777|talk]]) 14:52, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:52, 1 May 2019

Main pageTalk pageSubmissions
Category — List (sorting)		ShowcaseParticipants
Apply — By subject		Reviewing instructions
Help deskBacklog
drives
Shortcuts
Welcome to the Articles for Creation help desk

  • This page is only for questions about article submissions—are you in the right place?
  • Do not provide your email address or other contact details. Answers will be provided on this page.
  • Watch out for scammers! If someone contacts you saying that they can get your draft published for payment, they are trying to scam you. Report such attempts here.
Ask a new question
Please check back often for answers.
Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions


April 25

03:44:13, 25 April 2019 review of draft by Vijayrva

{{SAFESUBST:Void|

Shall I create and publish a page without references? Once published, I shall later work on to add more references & supporting documents & links.

Vijayrva (talk) 03:44, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vijayrva: No, references are required. --BoothSift 04:03, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10:11:48, 25 April 2019 review of draft by Mohitkumardeaf


Mohitkumardeaf 10:11, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

There isn't actually any content here - I'd imagine it was accidentally submitted, I'm not sure what the editor was actually hoping/asking for here. Nosebagbear (talk) 23:21, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:02:10, 25 April 2019 review of draft by RHall1970


I have created a draft page for 'David Rees' - but this needs to be changed to 'David Rees (chemist)' as there is already a David Rees page. I'm not sure if or how to do that - can you help? RHall1970 (talk) 15:02, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rhall1970 Best that you do it yourself. It is easy. Go to your draft: David Rees talk page, at top choose More (it is a drop down) choose move page. It will default to draft David Rees add (chemist) and next blank space explain why you are moving the page.Oldperson (talk) 15:38, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@RHall1970:Pinging you to above response. I mistyped your user name. Oldperson (talk) 15:43, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Oldperson! I think I need to wait for my account to be autoconfirmed before I can move it - hopefully that will happen in a couple more days — Preceding unsigned comment added by RHall1970 (talk • contribs) 16:16, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
All set RHall1970. User:Whispering(t) 22:45, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks Whispering! RHall1970 (talk) 08:11, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 17:17:23, 25 April 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Akonyetobin1


I am trying to create an article for a school which i could not find on wiki, but it keeps getting rejected..

Akonyetobin1 (talk) 17:17, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Akonyetobin1: For one, you need better references. Google Search is not one --BoothSift 23:34, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 26

07:41:02, 26 April 2019 review of draft by Akarnikos


Can we please get help on publishing this page asap thank you.

Akarnikos (talk) 07:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Who is "we" user accounts are strictly for single person use. Theroadislong (talk) 08:36, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:50:12, 26 April 2019 review of submission by Jjwap00


Hello Wikipedia,

I am wondering why my page about the CEO of Wikipedia is being declined. Please kindly let me know what I can do to get this page live, and why this page has been stated as being contradictory to the purpose of Wikipedia?

Thanks very much Jjwap00 (talk) 08:50, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jjwap00. The sources the draft cites are ones that don't mention McIvor, are press releases from organizations he worked for (and thus not independent), or merely quote him briefly. Sources of those types do nothing to demonstrate notability (suitability for inclusion in Wikipedia). Wikipedia may not be used for advertising. Most likely, the reviewer saw the topic as purely promotional, but if you have a question about what was in the mind of a particular editor you should really talk to that person. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:30, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:18:23, 26 April 2019 review of draft by George Klaudiny


Review submission delays. Hello, I'm new at Wikipedia and I submitted a page of a film Angel of the North for a review, about a month ago. I would like to ask if this is an ordinary delay or if I did something incorrectly (as I was given a prompter response and a kind assistance from other Wiki-users and admin, previously). Thank you for your answer. George Klaudiny (talk) 16:18, 26 April 2019 (UTC)George Klaudiny George Klaudiny (talk) 16:18, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi George Klaudiny. The draft is in the group of submissions that have been waiting 3-4 weeks. The current backlog is 8+ weeks. You may continue improving the draft while you wait, or check out Wikipedia:Community portal for millions of other ways to help improve the encyclopedia. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:31, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 27

Request on 09:38:20, 27 April 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by SHISHIR DUA


To use my knowledge to the best and give a decent information an to update and create pages for your fabulous organization


SHISHIR DUA (talk) 09:38, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think the editor accidentally added their message to the hidden text (I've uncovered it), but it doesn't actually explain what they want from us with respect to the draft. Nosebagbear (talk) 23:24, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Nosebagbear: The draft was blank so maybe that's what they meant, you have to add content.--BoothSift 03:47, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:12:12, 27 April 2019 review of draft by BCNJamez


What to do if the references are limited on the internet? Is there a minimum requirement for number of references?? The article i am creating is for a popular international supermodel. There are multiple articles on her.. But most as references wikipedia is not accepting.. I really cannot and am not able to find more "acceptable" references.. Please help me out

BCNJamez (talk) 15:12, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BCNJamez. Novice editors are commonly advised to cite at least three independent, reliable, secondary sources containing significant coverage of their topic. The sources do not need to be on the internet. Sources for topics suitable for the encyclopedia can often be found in libraries. If you can't find sources which demonstrate that she is notable, then write about something else. The world will not come to an end if Wikipedia doesn't have an article about a particular popular international supermodel. --Worldbruce (talk) 22:51, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:57:17, 27 April 2019 review of draft by Telmo E Silva


I would like my article reviewed by someone else other than KylieTastic, taking into consideration similar articles that have been approved and published in the past.

ClicData is a company and I am its founder. I believe that ClicData has a place in Wikipedia, that it is a notable company and is no different than thousands of others companies and products currently published on Wikipedia.


Telmo Silva (talk) 18:57, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Telmo E Silva. The {{UserboxCOI}} declaration of your conflict of interest is misplaced. It belongs on your user page, not the draft page. There is a different template that goes on the talk page of the draft, but that has been taken care of for you.
I see that another reviewer has already obliged with a second evaluation of the draft. It is entirely possible that thousands of companies and products currently published on Wikipedia should not be. The existence of an article does not mean it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or that it has been in any way "approved". It is not a good excuse to create similar articles. The essay WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS may help you understand why. 123 articles have been deleted in the past 24 hours, and others have been redirected. I think that's a fairly typical day's work. You can help by not adding material that volunteers would have to delete. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:34, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

22:29:27, 27 April 2019 review of submission by Ajg2345


The Band MewithoutYou has released 2 albums called untitled - one is an ep called untitled that is lowercase and the other is a full length album that is Untitled with a capital letter. Both of this article and the one for the main LP are correct to the best of everyone's abilities please re-review this for clarity and content so that they can be added to the main MewithoutYou wikipedia page so people can find the proper information about the bands albums.

It is unclear to all involved why we keep getting the error messages that we get. Ajg2345 (talk) 22:29, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ajg2345: - hi there. The error messages you are getting are because the reviewers think the EP doesn't have enough notability to warrant its own wikipedia article.
NALBUM (album notability) sets out how you can demonstrate its notability through one of several ways. By far the most common is 2 or more reviews of the EP/album, but the reviews must be independent, reliable and in-depth. SputnikMusic doesn't meet this set of requirements. There's a good list here of review websites accepted (or generally accepted) as meeting these requirements. Some are only legitimate if done by a staff writer, not a "contributor". Nosebagbear (talk) 23:33, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've added 3 more reviews for this e.p from reputable sites listed on the list you provided. Is this now enough information to approve the page for this album? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajg2345 (talk • contribs) 15:05, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 28

03:47:12, 28 April 2019 review of draft by Cyberfan195


Cyberfan195 (talk) 03:47, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyberfan195: What is your request?--BoothSift 05:11, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

05:15:07, 28 April 2019 review of submission by Karan raghavan


Karan raghavan (talk) 05:15, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


05:20:45, 28 April 2019 review of submission by Karan raghavan


i have checked all the information and everything is correct.if you do not belive me i have added references below to prove my claims.Most of them are videos by the epic artist(Sri Raam).He gives a lot of information about himself in his channel Karan raghavan (talk) 05:20, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Karan raghavan: Why did you make two requests? Also, while primary sources are great, we require secondary sources as well. Hope this helps--BoothSift 05:47, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

06:27:03, 28 April 2019 review of submission by Karan raghavan


Karan raghavan (talk) 06:27, 28 April 2019 (UTC)i have checked all the info and gave appropriate sources. there is one problem. Sri Raam is not that active in social media.He only posts his drawings on instagram.The only place he shows his face and gives information about himself is his youtube channel.i have given a link to even his youtube channel.all the things i have have wrote about him comes from the information given in his videos.i have given a link to all the videos that i have gotten information from.Thank you[reply]

Hi Karan raghavan. Unverified Instagram and YouTube accounts may not be used as a source of information about a living person. Even verified personal accounts of those types are very poor sources (see Wikipedia:External links/Perennial websites). At best they would be self-published primary sources, which do nothing to establish notability (suitability for inclusion in Wikipedia). Because there is no independent coverage of the subject in reliable sources (think books, newspapers, magazines, and their web analogues), no amount of editing will make the draft acceptable for publication. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:08, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:10:41, 28 April 2019 review of draft by Bibliognom


Hello! I've made a mistake when I named my draft "Globus A Slavic Bookstore" ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Globus_A_Slavic_Bookstore ) The owner's already renamed it into "Globus Books" and the page name should be the same. I don't know how to change the page name. Bibliognom (talk) 08:10, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The answer to your question can be found at Wikipedia:Moving a page. Geolodus (talk) 10:10, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:12:34, 28 April 2019 review of submission by Ajg2345


I was told the release was not notable enough I have added 3 more reviews from the list. I am asking that this page be re-reviewed and possibly approved. Ajg2345 (talk) 15:12, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ajg2345: - I submitted it and reviewed it. I felt the additional sourcing was sufficient and so I've accepted it - it's now just pending a look by a new page patroller. Nosebagbear (talk) 22:12, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:24:04, 28 April 2019 review of submission by Bhojak Sandeep


Bhojak Sandeep (talk) 16:24, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bhojak Sandeep: What is your request?--BoothSift 01:28, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 16:36:05, 28 April 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Teresa Wennberg


OK, all I want is to have a decent presentation, no scam. I therefore copied an artist friend Cm von Hausswolf on Wikipedia. With sources, do you mean links? With COI.. some of the people are no longer alive. I am not a robot. Best, TeresaW

Teresa Wennberg (talk) 16:36, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Teresa Wennberg: The various boxes added to the top of the draft include links to more information about the problems with the draft. In addition to those links, you may find Wikipedia:Tutorial/Citing sources helpful. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:24, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 29

08:59:19, 29 April 2019 review of submission by Chagogervasio


I don't know who created this profile but I have found some details which I updated with sources for Mr. Lee which would be help them to make this profile successful. Now I hope it's fine. Chagogervasio (talk) 08:59, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold pending paid editing disclosure, see User talk:Chagogervasio#Declare any connection. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:21, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:19:36, 29 April 2019 review of draft by JoeMCooper2794


JoeMCooper2794 (talk) 09:19, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Thanks for reviewing my draft article. Can I ask which references are deemed inadequate? Is it because some are wikipedia pages?

Thanks, Joe

Hi JoeMCooper2794. It was declined because it contains statements that do not cite a source. In some cases they originally cited Wikipedia, which, being user-generated, is not a reliable source, so the reviewer removed the citations.
The subject appears to be living, so I've gone further and removed part of a sentence about his medical history and why he did something. Writing such things without citing a reliable published source is a violation of Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons. If you know the subject personally, be careful not to accidentally include things you know only from personal knowledge. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:50, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12:45:36, 29 April 2019 review of submission by Hcs2019


we are an arts charity that would like to get listed on Wikipedia. We are similar to Artsangel charity, so please can you advise why they can have a page but we cannot?


Hcs2019 (talk) 12:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Hcs2019: - well as a first critical point, the draft was a copyright breach - just duplicating site content without a suitable license on it. As a secondary aspect, there are articles in Wikipedia that should not be here and just haven't been identified yet, and so the existence (or absence) of one article doesn't justify the existence of another. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS explains why we have this viewpoint quite well.
As a bigger concern, please pay attention to your talk page - your account seems to be breaking at least 1 serious rule, and possibly a second.
If you are writing about an organisation due to a connection (especially any paid connection) you have to declare it - please look at the post and respond to its requirements to avoid the risk of your account being blocked. Nosebagbear (talk) 22:20, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:00:52, 29 April 2019 review of submission by Zenus103


Zenus103 (talk) 13:00, 29 April 2019 (UTC) I added the references just after the first review. How can I ask again for a review?[reply]

Hi Zenus103. The newspaper is not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). Revisit the topic in a few years, by which time its circumstances may have changed. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:23, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:20:11, 29 April 2019 review of submission by Rjdavies1994


Rjdavies1994 (talk) 13:20, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Hi,

I'm struggling to create this page as I'm following the likes of other companies that are similar and the content they cover on those pages. This company is as relevant as the other live pages and mentions similar topics and forwards to the same articles. (GoCompare, Simply Business, Hiscox)

I've also linked multiple sources, which are professional British publications used as sources across wikipedia also. Can I get some assistance on what is wrong with this page?

 On hold pending paid editing disclosure, see User talk:Rjdavies1994#Declare any connection. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:14:57, 29 April 2019 review of submission by 213.205.242.2

 Hi, could I please know when my draft will be reviewed? It’s been more than 2 months so I’m just wondering? Thanks!213.205.242.2 (talk) 14:14, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

213.205.242.2 (talk) 14:14, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nearly 400 drafts have been awaiting review longer than Draft:Pandey Ganpat Rai, with the longest wait currently being 14 weeks. You can monitor these numbers by checking every week or so to see how many drafts are ahead of yours on the list. Volunteers are not required to work on the oldest drafts first, but some do, so the draft should gradually move up the list. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:44, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It has since been accepted by another editor. You should have received a notice, but if not, Congratulations on your first article! Please stay around and make further ones. I urge you to make an account--you don't hav to use your real name. DGG ( talk ) 17:39, 30 April 2019 (UTC) . DGG ( talk ) 17:38, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:37:36, 29 April 2019 review of submission by Liff182


Hello,

Can you please review this page. I believe that Edapt is a notable organisation as it is a national organisation for teachers in England and Wales. It has had substantial press coverage and offers an alternative to the teaching unions. Reputable press coverage includes:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/2018/11/10/private-schools-now-taking-legal-insurance-teachers-amid-rise/

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/10289775/Teachers-are-tiring-of-their-old-unions.html

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-24347235

Can you please provide further advice on how to publish this article?

Liff182 (talk) 14:37, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:08:35, 29 April 2019 review of submission by Emmanuelgzleh


am doing to know why David keep rejecting my post what is the matter with him on it..

  1. @4GE.KING LIMITED 17:08, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi Emmanuelgzleh. User:Emmanuelgzleh/sandbox is not an encyclopedia article, so it cannot be accepted for publication at Articles for Creation. I've left a welcome basket of links on your user page that may help you get oriented and understand how you can contribute to the encyclopedia. --Worldbruce (talk) 22:29, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 30

09:02:26, 30 April 2019 review of submission by Morgangr


I don't believe that someone can diminish our work and reject our article in such a manner and comment. This is unacceptable and degrading. The fact that our charity is not well known does not mean that we cannot list it on Wikipedia or ANY other online list of organisations, events etc. Our charity is 100% voluntary and 100% grass roots. We help people that governments and large charities don't.

Thanks Andreas Papazidis Co-Founder and Trustee GRACEaid.org.uk

Morgangr (talk) 09:02, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Morgangr. The rejection of the draft is not a reflection on the quality of the organization or the worth of what they do. Many good organizations are not suitable for inclusion. Wikipedia is not a list of organizations, it is an encyclopedia. It aims to cover only those topics that are notable, ones that have gained significant attention from the world at large and over a period of time, as evidenced by significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable, secondary sources. Being "not well known" means there should not be an article on the topic here. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:53, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 09:08:35, 30 April 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Anand raj singh Sisodia


My draft have own reference and contain specialist please check and success my work

Anand raj singh Sisodia (talk) 09:08, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anand raj singh Sisodia It would help very much if you could add some more informationand sources. This is a town, and we do include all tows if they are adequately documented. Peraps some regional magazines or newspapers have articles about it? They don't necessarily have to be in English . DGG ( talk ) 17:35, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:48:58, 30 April 2019 review of draft by Fatemiounwiki1


Fatemiounwiki1 (talk) 09:48, 30 April 2019 (UTC) may i ask to helm me how can i publish my article[reply]

Hi Fatemiounwiki1. Four sections of the draft: birth, life, education, and scientific trips, cite no sources. Also, the nature of the second reference is unclear. Is it a book, an academic journal, a magazine, or what? Who is the author, what organization published it, and when was it published? It is not clear from the two sources cited, one of which is not independent of Shams al-Din Mohammad Mojtahedi Najafi, whether he is notable (suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia). You may wish to consider alternative outlets for your work. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:06, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10:55:10, 30 April 2019 review of submission by Jacqueline456


Someone has created this profile may he/she doesn't have the much more details so I have updated an account of a young entrepreneur and If I'm not wrong, this will be goes for live. Jacqueline456 (talk) 10:55, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 14:38, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:59:24, 30 April 2019 review of submission by Karan raghavan


i want to know why my article got rejected.i used good references too. Karan raghavan (talk) 11:59, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia and YouTube and Instagram are not reliable sources. Theroadislong (talk) 15:33, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:52:57, 30 April 2019 review of draft by Warriorwolfraven


Warriorwolfraven (talk) 15:52, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How do I add photos/images to my article?

Hi Warriorwolfraven. Unless you took the photos yourself, start with Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. To further understand what the copyright holder has to give up, you may find it useful to read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you can't get permission, you can't use the image. Once you have the correct permission, adding an image is a two-step process: upload it, then use it in on a page.
Go to Commons:First steps and carefully step through the tutorial. When you get to "First steps/Uploading files", don't dive in too hastily. First follow the link on that page to learn about the different licensing options. Other useful advance reading includes Wikipedia:File names and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images, which will prepare you to answer important questions the upload wizard will ask you. If after that you have any questions or doubts, Commons has its own help desk.
Once you've uploaded an image, the picture tutorial explains how to use it on a page. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:07, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:03:23, 30 April 2019 review of draft by Juleskramer


Hello, I would like to update the title of my article to Miami-Dade County Commission for Women. So, just adding the hyphen. I also would like upload a logo but I am getting an error about owning the image. Is there any way to avoid this?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Miami_Dade_County_Commission_for_Women

Juleskramer (talk) 19:03, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Juleskramer The fair use provision of copyright does not apply to drafts, so don't try to add a logo now. The presence or absence of images will have no effect on whether the draft is accepted. If it is accepted, then you can add a logo. --Worldbruce (talk) 21:35, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:31:15, 30 April 2019 review of draft by Dora's ice lolly


Direct link to Draft

Hello, I have written to you before but I wonder if my message got lost. Please see links below, I do not understand why you are allowing Wiki articles about other rabbit organisations but not Cottontails. If you compare my article to the others in the link, I don't see why theirs is acceptable and mine is not. Please compare and review your decision. Thank you for your assistance.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_Rabbit_Society https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Rabbit_Council Dora's ice lolly (talk) 19:31, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dora's ice lolly. Your previous question was answered on 30 December, here.
Wikipedia is forever a work in progress. It contains high quality articles and poor quality articles. The existence of an article does not mean it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. British Rabbit Council, for example, is tagged for notability, which is often the first step on the road to deletion. So generally it isn't productive to compare a draft to other pages. The essay WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS may help you understand why. If you wish to learn from example articles, be sure to use only Wikipedia's best.
If you believe that you have improved Draft:Cottontails to the point that it meets the oganization notability criteria, then you may submit it for review by clicking the blue button in the big gray box on the draft. --Worldbruce (talk) 21:32, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

22:14:15, 30 April 2019 review of submission by ICrimea


ICrimea (talk) 22:14, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


22:14:15, 30 April 2019 review of submission by ICrimea


On English language few sources. --ICrimea (talk) 22:14, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

23:25:14, 30 April 2019 review of submission by Marcela McLeod

I would like to ask for help fellow editors to see why is my article being declined. TMarcela McLeod (talk) 23:25, 30 April 2019 (UTC)he reason stated on the review is the inline citation aren't used. As I am aware I've included all the supporting citations for the article and not sure which information is the editor refering to.[reply]

Please let me know which line exactly I need to fix as this process of creating article is being very exhausting and long.

Thank you.

Marcela McLeod (talk) 23:25, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


May 1

Request on 01:07:40, 1 May 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Esolischi


I was developing this article as a stub and followed dozens of other medical stubs in doing so. Could you please help in identifying what I'm doing wrong to get this stub published? I didn't see other stubs require as much notoriety?

Esolischi (talk) 01:07, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 14:52:48, 1 May 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Michron777


Hello, I was confused at the reason why my article got rejected (Your Story Hour). Before submitting it, I got advice from other editors/contributors, and looked at several similar published articles as a guide to what is acceptable (which made it more weird because some of the other radio drama articles I've looked at didn't seem to have much notability based on the reasons given me).

Because notability is broad, is there something specific that I could have added to make more noteworthy (while at the same time not make it sound so biased)?

Michron777 (talk) 14:52, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&oldid=895026904"