User talk:Theroadislong

Welcome to my talk page. Click here to leave me a message .

07:53:55, 14 November 2017 review of submission by FriendlyB

• FriendlyB (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Dr. Petry Textile Auxiliaries (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear Thereodislong,

thank you for reviewing the draft "Dr. Petry Textile Auxiliaries".

For the sources, I cited independent sources, such as - http://www.genios.de/fachzeitschriften/artikel/MTB/20080617/umweltschutz-und-nachhaltigkeit-in-/060817061.html - https://www.biooekonomie-bw.de/de/fachbeitrag/aktuell/insektenchitin-macht-textilherstellung-nachhaltiger/

In order to have more evidence, I added information from further independent sources and references: - https://www.bloomberg.com/profiles/companies/6311207Z:GR-textilchemie-dr-petry-gmbh - https://www.bluesign.com/industry/chemical-suppliers/references/textilchemie-dr-petry

Thank you in advance for re-reviewing.

Thanks for your help!

Thanks for your assistance with Draft:InnoCare. I have included {{connected contributor}} and noted it on your user page that I work for that company. They're not paying me to create this page, I just think it would cool to have a Wikipedia page. Let me know if there's anything else you can suggest to improve my draft. I appreciate your help!

05:44:48, 23 November 2017 review of submission by Lizzybunker

• Lizzybunker (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Anita Bernstein (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I've added the appropriate citations!

Invacio

Hi Theroadislong I've edited the text - please let me know if it's better this way I appreciate your feedback!

00:53:26, 27 November 2017 review of submission by Cmolaro

• Cmolaro (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Paul Mango (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I added more 3rd party sources that are verifiable and are independent, professional sources (not personal blogs or sites). I now have 15 citations.

Please let me know what else you think is required to have it accepted?

12:54:53, 27 November 2017 review of submission by Llewol

• Llewol (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:London Art Week (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

08:40:08, 28 November 2017 review of submission by Salt&pepper12345

• Salt&pepper12345 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Hidden Charms (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there, thank very much for your care and consideration to to help build this page. I can understand why the review was rejected, as i hadn't cited enough sources on the first draft. I was wondering if you'd mind having a read over the latest draft and checking if it is better now thank you. SP

13:22:45, 4 December 2017 review of submission by 79.106.95.85

• 79.106.95.85 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Albanian photographer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

21:10:13, 6 December 2017 review of submission by Innocent Cuty

• Innocent Cuty (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Rodbari (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear Theroadislong

Hope you are fine and doing good.

I am requesting for a review again as the major comment for rejection/decline of this article was its Reference section or having less references. Now, the draft has been updated, and more than 20 solid references have been employed, with more historical details, and best possible bibliographic support in the light of the available literature. This single page article is now having over 25 appropriate references, and are strengthened with new data.

Your anticipation in this regard will be highly appreciated.

Sincere Regards

The objected references (facebook) has been udpated with the departmental URLS (links to the webpages). Thank you for the Prompt response and providing support to make this draft better.

Dear Theroadislong

Thank you very much for your prompt response.

The objected references (facebook) has been udpated with the departmental URLS (links to the webpages). I think, these were the most up to dated and regularly updating references. Moreover, the last paragraph was deleted, because the book describing the paragraph and the mentioned material is in press (which is written by Dr. Ikram), and once the book got published, the three to four lines paragraph will be inserted again.

I do hope, that the draft will get approved now and will get online, as after coming across other such articles, this one seems to be far better than those.

Your prompt and positive anticipation in this regard will be highly appreciated.

Thanking you in anticipation

Sincere Regards

07:43:09, 15 December 2017 review of submission by Kgkg90

• Kgkg90 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Just Dakhila (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

23:49:06, 23 December 2017 review of submission by Pearl ally

• Pearl ally (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Peter Russell (author) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The submission's referencing was improved as advised, and I added a few more. More information on his teachings and publications were added. The page exists in 3 other Wikipedia: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Russell https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Russell https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Russell

In-depth coverage

I added RPG Site. Is that a reliable source?

02:14:50, 26 December 2017 review of submission by Pearl ally

• Pearl ally (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Peter Russell (author) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please see references 15,18,19,21,22

07:39:46, 28 December 2017 review of submission by Nat.johnson

• Nat.johnson (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Admitad (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi Theroadislong! I have recently uploaded a draft of the article "Admitad" here and you have declined it. Could you kindly explain what can I do to make it right? Is it possible to work with you as my mentor on the draft? Or, maybe, you can help with writing, could you kindly tell me what is the best option? admitad is a global company, it already helps over 630,000 people worldwide. I believe, that it needs to be on Wikipedia.

23:24:44, 4 January 2018 review of submission by Yesterdaysfire

• Yesterdaysfire (talk · contribs)
  • User:Yesterdaysfire/sandbox/yesterdaysfire (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there!

I was just wondering what the issue was with my article submission? I tried to follow all the guidelines. I hope that I can make any revisions that you may require!

edited

Hi there Thanks for your comment. Made the edits per your notes on the page for David A. Hurwitz. GigiH0118

13:36:39, 8 January 2018 review of submission by Tearstosweat

• Tearstosweat (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Biju Sopanam (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

More reliable references like newspaper sources(Times of India, Decaan Chronicle) are added

00:42:00, 26 February 2018 review of re-submission by Vliander

• Vliander (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Carl-W. Röhrig (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear Theroadislong,

Thank you for your valuable time and timely reply.

The bellow listed recognition letters and independent press publications may provide a more in-depth coverage regarding different subjects about Carl-W. Röhrig's life and work mentioned in the WIKI article.

I now additionally added the following references to the Citations and References section in the article:

8. Röhrig, Carl-W. (1992). "Newspaper Article". DIE WELT - Independent Daily Newspaper for Germany.

9. Röhrig, Carl-W. (1993). "Newspaper Article". East Grinstead Courier, United Kingdom.

10. Röhrig, Carl-W. (1989). "Recognition Letter". by the National Geographic Society, Washington D.C.

11. Röhrig, Carl-W. (1993). "Newspaper Article". THE PRESS, Christchurch, New Zealand.

12. Röhrig, Carl-W. (1992). "Recognition Letter". by Heinz Sielemann, Munich, Germany.

14. Röhrig, Carl-W. (1993). "Newspaper Article". BILD Newspaper, Germany.

17. Röhrig, Carl-W. (2003). "Newspaper Article". Fränkischer Tag, Newspaper, Germany.

I am looking forward hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Vliander

Vliander (talk) 00:42:00, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

12:27:00, 26 February 2018 review of re-submission by Vliander

Dear Theroadislong,

The article was written from a neutral point of view and reliable sources where provided.

The questioned links in regards to Röhrig letters could be removed if required.

Sincerely,

Vliander

Request on 08:52:05, 6 June 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by WildBullMiller

• WildBullMiller (talk · contribs)
  • User:WildBullMiller/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks for the info

For the bio, is Nicholas Kaufmann's official website a good enough source? That's where the info comes from, anyway.

Typo in Title

Hi and thanks for approving my post for "Helgesias of Sinope." Unfortunately there's a typo in the title, which should be "Hegesias of Sinope" (no L). My apologies for that (it was my first post). I don't know how to fix a mistake in a title. Are you able to help me? Thank you, Budapest Joe

Re-submitted

Hi Theroadislong.

I have resubmitted the article for a re-review, please let me know if it reads better now? If not, can you give me an example of how to improve it. Thank you, Christian.

Images/Imágenes

Hi! As Images/Imágenes stated I am being paid to edit this page, but I am also working on this program as it is a work in progress. It was on the aire for over 30 years and pulled off in 2011. We are currently working on starting the project again but as this program began in the 70's there is not a large online presence. Is there anyway this page could be published for now, so we can show people that Images/Imágenes is coming back? Thanks, Alice

I have a lot of information from the Executive Producer but since none of it is available online, I cannot reference it. For example: (None of this is available online) Mission Images/Imágenes is a multi- Emmy award-winning television program series that creates, chronicles, and promotes the varied rich diverse history, culture, and life experiences of Hispanic/Latino communities in the state of New Jersey and the nation. Brief Organizational History For 46 years, the Images/Imágenes television series provided a voice and platform for New Jersey's diverse Latino population. The program series is known as the longest-running Latino community program in the history of PBS. Over the decades, the Emmy award winning series featured thought provoking round table discussions, interviews, profiles, documentaries and special topic episodes on the most prevalent issues pertaining to and for the Hispanic/Latino populations – the fastest growing demographic in New Jersey. Program topics ranged from lifestyles, business, education, legal matters, community affairs, pop culture/entertainment, the arts, sports and the health and sciences. Images/Imagenes was launched on January 6, 1972 than titled “Mi Casa Su Casa” on NJPTV hosted by producer, Diego Castellanos. The program made history as the first Latino television series on Public Television in New Jersey to air across the Garden State and surged as the nation’s number one market in New York and the number 4 market in Philadelphia. Since then the series is recognized as a resource for top Latino stories, both at local, as well as the national level. Award Winning Producer William Sánchez is the Producer/Director of Images/Imágenes since 1972, and is currently revitalizing a new series as its producer/director at Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. He produced the series with the PBS NJ Television Network until the station was dissolved by the state on June 30, 2011. Within the first ten years Images/Imágenes became the leading contributor of programs for the PBS Series Presente hosted by Rita Moreno. Images/Imágenes competed with mainstream networks and was selected over ABC World News Tonight at the National Unity Awards in St. Louis. Then it rose to the top of the Latino Broadcasting Media when it was highlighted at the San Antonio Film Festival in the 1980s as a must see series on Latin Music alongside the films “LA BAMBA” and “STAND AND DELIVER.” National Recognition

For over 40 years, Images/Imágenes under the leadership of producer William Sanchez the television industry has recognized the series with four Emmys and nominated for twenty by National PBS. The series is distinguished having received numerous national acclaims from the White House, Congress, National PBS, the National Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), and three New Jersey Governors. The series represented PBS in Europe, Asia, and Latin America. It was distributed by the Department of Defense and with audiences including American military bases around the world. It was also national under the Latino Consortium’s series “PRESENTE” with host Rita Moreno. Now under the banner of Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Images/Imagenes’ legacy continues for public viewing at the United States Library of Congress. Signature Shows There are a number of evergreen programs that were signature shows for the series and are timeless works of history and culture. A. Sembrando El Futuro/Seeding the Future (5-part Parent Education Series) Nationally acclaimed/ New York Emmy Award Winner 1985 B. The Hispanic Youth Showcase 1999 (Talent competition/motivational program hosted by kids (Ages 5 to 17) was recognized as one of the top six children’s programs in the nation by The Arts Council Co-op/ Mid-Atlantic Emmy Award Winner C. Su Salud Primero/Your Health First with host John Quiñones Mid-Atlantic 2008 Emmy Award Winner, drew national acclaim D. The Spanish Guitar (History/Legends: Jose Feliciano) Mid-Atlantic Emmy Winner 2010

Notable Programs & Specials Include: E. Festival Afro-Caribeño (Afro-Caribbean Festival at Newark’s Symphony Hall 1980) 2,500 people attended concert/first of several Images’ shows to obtain national acclaim F. Word-Up Stop the Violence with Edward Hames Olmos (Actor) 2004 Emmy Nominated Town meeting with 400 teens G. Lainzation of New Jersey, 1982 winner of the national Unity Award held in St. Louis, Ma. Won against ABC’s World News Tonight Other Notable Programs & Specials Include: H. Caribbean Music And Dance Emmy Nominated, Represented PBS At An International Level I. Latin Music Special Emmy Nominated J. The Art of Baseball Emmy Nominated K. Latinos in Boxing (History and Legends) L. History of Flamenco (History and Performance)

The Golden Age of Dance: The Palladium Obtained worldwide download success on the internet in 2009 1983 Special: Alcoholism & Mental health Inspired New Jersey Government offices to establish policies and focus groups aimed at understanding and serving Latinos in need of mental health

Productech Corporation draft reviewing

Dear Thereodislong,

thank you for reviewing the draft of Productech Corporation article. I was trying to do it objective aтв not an advertising, taking an article about JBL as an inspiration. Looks like I failed (( Would you please advise, what parts of the article require editing? thank you in advance!

References added

Hi, I filled up the draft with some useful references and also added some literature. I hope it could be enought. Thanks

Thanks

I want to know that why my article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dolmen_Malls not approving any suggestion

Grateful!Gmli82164 (talk) 11:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)Gmli82164

Hi! Thank you for the review. I will do what I can to improve that article.

Lorraine McGowen Draft Page

Thank you for the notification. I have removed all external links from the Lorraine McGowen page.

DRAFT:Summation Formula List Decline

Ok, I took your advice and added my material back onto the wiki page on summation. You watch how long it takes D Lazarus to delete it and post his own rambling notes. His notes don't transition well for sentence-to-sentence; paragraph-to-paragraph, nor make any sense; Some of what he posts really is not related to closed form summation. Roger

Dixon Algebra submission.

I have followed your instructions and I think I have successfully updated the references to conform to wiki practices.

Historical notes: • I begsn working on this topic some 40 years ago; • Periodically the algebra has cropped up in the works of others; • Most of this activity has occurred in the last 8 years; • John Baez was the first to call the algebra the Dixon algebra; • This became somewhat solidified when the Quanta Mag and Wired articles appeared; • I recently saw a blog in which the blog's author said there is no wikipedia page for the Dixon algebra yet; • So I decided to start one.

Cheers, Geoffrey Dixon

Great American Doll Company Draft

Hello. Can you please help me edit this wiki page. I have done it the best I can. Can you please tell me what i need to fix up

Thank you for your help....

I really appreciate your help with my draft:Marek Holeček. I will try my best to add those missing citations you pointed out so hopefully it can get better. Thanks again...I really hope the article will be accepted at last ...

autobio

Dear Theroadislong,

Thank you for your reply - I wasn't aware of restriction on autobiographies, but can well appreciate the reasoning behind it!

all best,

Ketty Nez

Aron Ain Draft

Thank you for reviewing the draft. I'll edit the page to include more sources or remove sections that don't have sources. Thank you!

Ashleylouisewilliams3408

FYI: Ashley has been adding photos to Commons and then inserting those photos into various articles in preparation for her intention to create an article about her grandfather, Virgil Williams. I left a note on her Talk to declare paid or COI if she proceeds with the attempt. (Evidence for intention is creation and then deletion of a draft in her Sandbox.) The quail hunting photo you deleted was there because Virgil owns the land that was name-mentioned in the image caption. David notMD (talk)

Mona Lisa Brookshire

New edits

https://ameyawdebrah.com/mona-lisa-brookshire-blay-miezah-featured-in-upcoming-inspirational-film-becoming-the-keys

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ml4lyfe2 (talk • contribs) 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Celalettin-Field Quantum Observation Tunnel

Hello there,

I have removed unsourced material and thinned it out as per your direction. Can you please cast an eye?

Draft:900 wine prosecco

Hi Theroadislong, thanks for reviewing my page!

I saw your comment on my draft page 900 wine, I'm inserting the Italian wine brand on the market. I'm not connected to the company, I just try to make the list of brands on wikipedia as complete as possible. I am passionate about wine and I think this brand is important in the Italian sparkling wine scene.

can you possibly and kindly advise me of the changes that can better comply with the policies of wikipedia? Thanks a lot!

Page deletion tagged

I am definitely not using it as a free hosting service and i am sorry i ll need to disagree with your analysis. its just i am taking time to be up to the required standard of trained wiki editors and i think i ll make it. thank you for taking the time to reviewing my page.

Regards

Shahara Ahmad-Llewellyn

Why can't you just add some things and save as you modify instead of it making you resubmit and publish. Because I have a long way to go and I can't keep getting rejected.

Re-review My Article

Hello Theroadislong,

I have already added new sources like you adviced for my draft article Draft:Finalist of the Intel ISEF and hope if you could review it again and see if its notable enough for Wikipedia.

Thank you very much Mathew Anderson

Review of submission by Casper da Costa-Luis

• Casper da Costa-Luis (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Tqdm (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks for your review.

As requested, I've removed external links as requested (except for the "See Also" section) and used more neutral language.

Do let me know if anything else needs improving!

Short information about Ukrainian scientist

Hello. Could you please help to create short info page about Ukrainian scientist? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Yevgeniy_Zadorin

Milly Bennett review

Hey! Thanks for reviewing the article. I'm very new to this, so I'll try to learn more and go back in to cite third-party sources. Thanks for your help

re-edit is submitted

Hi Theroadislong.

I have re-edited my article submitted on the 19th of April. Will be very thankful if you can have a loot at it in the nearest possible date. Thank you!

M28 Trombonico

hey how can I make my article better or get some exceptions by changing a few things cause I don't really understand what the bot thing wants

Wikipedia page

Dear Theroadislong,

Thank you for getting back to me so quickly, I take on board what you say and will think again.

Many thanks,

Ian

Australian Biome Project

Thank you for your advice, do I need to add credit or remove the biome reference entirely.````

I have re edited for your comment. could you please take a look and give me some feed back thanks````

Update

Hi, Theroadislong -- thanks for your comment. I have updated the situation with the external links. Sorry for the mistake! Please let me know if anything else needs changing. Thanks!

Thank you

Thank you for the swift review of my article. Best, K

PyCM

Hi

I think Draft:PyCM is good enough to be accepted. This article provides some reliable references like Journal of open source software and Github (the most popular community of software developers) and etc. In comparison with other accepted open-source software articles like Aika_(software), Renjin , UIMA , BigDL, Cantera_(software) that most of them are self-cited. And also this library with more than 640 stars, 200 dependant codes and 1000 installs per week, is more popular than currently available articles on English Wikipedia like ELKI, Cantera_(software), OpenNN. Any suggestion is gratefully welcomed to improve this draft.

Thank you for your consideration.

Request for Dispute Resolution

Apologies for not notifying you on your talk page. I thought notification on the related talk page was appropriate initially, but see that I need to notify everyone individually.

Jorgen Odegard decline

Hey Theroadislong!

Hope all is well. I happen to notice a decline for Jorgen Odegard’s wiki page which is totally okay because I’m very new to creating wiki pages. My goal is to improve and help songwriters and producers’ lifes with publishing & management company by creating sources of all their music credit and praises as this is one of the most useful tools publishing companies use to determine their qualifications for sessions, pub deals, and so much more! Also as you mentioned, the information on the producer is lacking and scattered all over the internet, which is why this wiki page is super important for a lot of these producers and songwriters.

That being said, would love your thoughts and suggestions that’ll help this process. To give you an idea, I used Sarah Aarons as a reference who’s another songwriter with a similar amount of credibility as jorgen in this industry. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Aarons Again, would love your input! Thanks so much

Jorgen odegard decline

Hey Theroadislong!

Hope all is well. I happen to notice a decline for Jorgen Odegard’s wiki page which is totally okay because I’m very new to creating wiki pages. My goal is to improve and help songwriters and producers’ lifes with publishing & management company by creating sources of all their music credit and praises as this is one of the most useful tools publishing companies use to determine their qualifications for sessions, pub deals, and so much more! Also as you mentioned, the information on the producer is lacking and scattered all over the internet, which is why this wiki page is super important for a lot of these producers and songwriters.

That being said, would love your thoughts and suggestions that’ll help this process. To give you an idea, I used Sarah Aarons as a reference who’s another songwriter with a similar amount of credibility as jorgen in this industry. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Aarons Again, would love your input! Thanks so much

Jam.py Application Builder (web framework)

Hi Theroadislong,

thanks for reviewing.

I'm confused again. A number of different people rejected my article on different basis (StraussInTheHouse‬, Mjs1991‬, SamHolt6).

This is the first time it's rejected on the "This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia." basis. StraussInTheHouse Reviewer noted: "Potentially notable, but we need more WP:SECONDARY sources."

I really went and checked ALL Python Web Frameworks Published on Wikipedia and have no idea how is my article different than any other? This is a nerve breaking procedure, I do not think anyone deserves this with helping to Open Source community and absolutely free software. Can you please help with advice?

Thank you

Independent Source

Hi! Thanks so much for your feedback on my submission - you've mentioned that an independent source would help, but I just wanted to clarify what you meant and what is lacking from the sources I used.

Thanks so much!

Best wishes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wacholderweg (talk • contribs) 16:43, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Wacholderweg All your sources are connected to the subject. An independent source is a source that has no vested interest in a given Wikipedia topic and therefore is commonly expected to cover the topic from a disinterested perspective. More details here Wikipedia:Identifying and using independent sources. Theroadislong (talk) 17:16, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks again for such a prompt response! I've looked over the page you directed me to and I am unsure how the three news articles included do not meet the criteria for an independent source. Apologies if this seems obtuse - this is my first time attempting to write a Wikipedia article, and so I mirrored the content of a page about another evolutionary psychologist (Benedict_Jones). Would it be helpful if I moved these to earlier in the article than the 'External Links' section? Thanks for your patience! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wacholderweg (talk • contribs) 00:14, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Yes if those external links could be used to support any of the content that would be much preferable, though those articles written by him are not independent of course. Theroadislong (talk) 06:57, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

That makes perfect sense, I understand. Thank you for the guidance. I have added three additional independent sources in addition to the single one that was on there. Please let me know if this is sufficient! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wacholderweg (talk • contribs) 15:06, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Help!

noone is taking care of the entry https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Booky_Oren

This is a paid for article, I have no interest in helping, sorry. Theroadislong (talk) 14:30, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

The Granite Page

Hi, Theroadislong

I got your response regarding the Granite Telecommunications page and am not sure I understand the flag. Nearly the entire entry is sourced from highly reputable sources (newspapers, major business press, tech industry publications). The only items sourced from the subject directly are its products list, which seems like it should be the most accurate source for that, their offices listings or expansion announcements (also the most reliable source for that), and the detailed listing of their charitable activities, which were prominent I looked the company up for the profile.

Can you please clarify the portion that you think is improper? I am happy to make changes but when I look at this, nothing seems obviously out of line. Especially if I look at similar pages that are in good standing.

Thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Technutt (talk • contribs) 19:59, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Technutt It was declined because it reads like an advertisement and is not written in a neutral tone. The draft is stuffed with unsuitable promotional marketing trumpery…“LLC is a $1.4 billion telecom carrier and data provider” “customers include more than 80% of the Fortune 100 companies” “By the end of 2014, Granite had more than 1,200 employees, served 13,500 businesses and government organizations at over 240,000 locations in the U.S. and Canada, and had eclipsed $1 billion in annual revenue” “By year’s end, after seven consecutive years of $100 million in annualized revenue growth, Granite surpassed $1.35 billion in revenue”, “Granite announced a strategic focus on indirect sales with the addition of seven regional channel managers to strengthen local support of indirect sales operations” we need the dry facts not sensational prose. Theroadislong (talk) 20:23, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Theroadislong Alright. I see that approach in many pages and assumed it was necessary to establish that the company is notable. There are Wiki of the largest providers in America that have internal links to Wiki pages to every company but Granite (this was actually what started this project for me, in fact-- it was an obvious omission), and there are pages of the largest telecom companies in the world that include smaller firms than this one. So in my thinking the revenue and industry position detail were relevant. But I can trim all of that down and resubmit the page. Thanks for the feedback.

Theroadislong I stripped all of that information and resubmitted the page. Please let me know if I did it correctly. Thanks.

Request on 11:04:06, 30 August 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Nishibe0121

• Nishibe0121 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Susumu Nishibe (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello.

I added one more source to the draft. Please let me know what can I do further to improve the draft.

Thanks.

Nishibe0121 (talk) 11:04, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Ananya pandey

Why no Wikipedia page She is an actress In Soty2 and Two other movie Atheera raj illalai (talk) 19:14, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

I'm sorry why are you asking me this? Theroadislong (talk) 19:38, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Ananya pandey

She is actress Create Wikipedia 3 bollywood movies lead — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atheera raj illalai (talk • contribs) 19:15, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Theroadislong My opinion is [[ping|Atheera raj illalai}} has a chip on their shoulder,and rather than create their own articles expects you or WP to create articles for persons they nominate.It appears from their comments here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Khans_of_Bollywood, that they have a problem with Muslim Indians, and ready to accuse of Hindu phobia. I don't think that they understand that WP articles are created by persons who might have an interest in the subject. Apparently he thinks that people nominate persons or subjects and WP elves get busy and jump to it.Oldperson (talk) 23:04, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

my article PLEASE help x

My article is about a very well known athlete and public figure called Alana Pang. I watched her on a ice skating documentary by BBC and i wanted to learn more information about her. She is on quite a lot of magazines, features and is an internationally recognised figure skating and has titles all over the world . I dont understand why her profile got denied even though it is 100% accurate and is well publicised and known so i dont know why im getting denied Alana

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Alana_Pang — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harmonyhiccup (talk • contribs) 16:40, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

As I commented on your draft the sources need to follow the content that they support not be in a long list at the end. Theroadislong (talk) 16:48, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Request on 13:35:35, 2 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by KlaraBenedict

• KlaraBenedict (talk · contribs)
  • User:KlaraBenedict/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, What is the mistake in this article ? Thank you and have a lovely day.

KlaraBenedict (talk) 13:35, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Alan Fitzpatrick

Hello, What is the mistake in this article? Thank you and have a lovely day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KlaraBenedict (talk • contribs) 13:36, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

The decline notice tells you this...namely that the submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Discogs is not a reliable source and that is the only one you have. Theroadislong (talk) 13:39, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Alan Fitzpatrick

And which ones are the reliable sources, give me some examples please. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by KlaraBenedict (talk • contribs) 13:53, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Reliable sources tells you all you need to know. Theroadislong (talk) 14:03, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Canal+ (Poland)

Why the draft is declined ?

NC+ will rebrand it's platform and sources are present. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.188.48.144 (talk) 17:46, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

It's not clear why Wikipedia should be interested in this company rebrand? Theroadislong (talk) 17:53, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NC%2B

Do I change NC+ to CANAL+ in this page ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 102.100.201.236 (talk) 18:20, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Looks like someone already has. Theroadislong (talk) 18:29, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

OK, now delete the draft. I changed the name of the platform name but not the title of the page (I can't). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.218.229.202 (talk) 18:31, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

I've added 2 sources in Polish language for rebranding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.218.229.202 (talk) 18:54, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Stone Broken Wikipedia page submission

Thanks very much for your feedback on my draft Stone Broken Wikipedia entry. I have taken your comments on board and amended my references so that they now demonstrate coverage from published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject, as requested. Stone Broken is now a major UK rock band deserving its own Wikipedia entry. Pages already exist for bands who have supported Stone Broken in the recent past, such as Jared James Nichols and Those Damn Crows. Please let me know if any further changes are required in order to gain acceptance. Thank you. Riaft (talk) 08:11, 3 September 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riaft (talk • contribs) 08:00, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Submission declined on 3 September 2019 by Theroadislong

Hi.

You declined my submission because I don't have good enough sources. Could you be so kind and explain to me what kind of source would help me submit a page for a small production company such as Differ Media? I have seen other companies of the same scale have pages on Wikipedia, so it shouldn't be impossible. Could an example of a published, reliable and secondary source be a news article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aurorabean (talk • contribs) 10:43, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Yes at least three independent news articles which discuss the company in detail would suffice. Theroadislong (talk) 11:01, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Message

Please you shouldn't have deleted an article about a history of an educational institution — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quophiasare (talk • contribs) 15:12, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Quophiasare I didn't delete the article I removed promotional and copyrighted content which you added. Theroadislong (talk) 15:16, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Respond

None of the article was copyrighted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quophiasare (talk • contribs) 15:18, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Alexa Curtis draft

Kropfmichele2 deleted the four declines of the AfC for Draft:Alexa Curtis. David notMD (talk) 18:24, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Included more references to interviews with Lemore information about recent news coverage

Hello Thereodislong,

Thank you for reviewing my entry for Eric Lefcowitz. As per your suggestion I have included more references to interviews with Lefcowitz discussing his work and recent coverage of his business ventures which are, indeed, newsworthy. I also fixed typos you pointed out.

I think the citations and references now displayed are more than ample now. They include the New York Times, the Washington Post, the New Yorker, Newsday, NPR, MTV, VH1, PR and two ISBNs for notable books.

Regards,

Readngwearingrocking

Revised my entry

Just wanted to update you that I took your suggestions and moved most references to external links. I believe this is a cleaner entry now and ready. Thanks for reviewing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Readingwearingrocking (talk • contribs) 15:14, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Resubmit : Kwai Chai Hong

hi can you please review my submission? i've changed to include more reference. thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kschay (talk • contribs) 09:42, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Good day to you ,

pls could you let me know what other source may be required. As the ones i have inserted in the reference are Web articles sources.

Draft:Vasilis Michael

Submission declined on 5 September 2019 by Theroadislong (talk).

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article

Pls be so kind to assist me

thank you .

Timon Stathakis (talk) 13:09, 5 September 2019 (UTC)timon

Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject, there don't appear to be any so we cannot have an article. Theroadislong (talk) 15:07, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Washington Post

That is a Facebook link to a Washington Post article. Maybe I should swap it out with the original link - was an accident. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FinJournalist (talk • contribs) 18:38, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Advice on references

Hello Theroadislong!

I recently submitted a wiki page for review and it was declined due to its lack of references. I'm reaching out to you to ask a couple of questions if that's okay. I was wondering what citation style Wikipedia uses for references. My other question is, can I edit in images after the page is published to the main space (I'm still waiting for image rights to come through).

Thank you for your help!

Regards, InkDawkrajai — Preceding unsigned comment added by InkDawkrajai (talk • contribs) 14:33, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

You can read all about referencing here WP:REFB images can be uploaded to commons and then added later, assuming that you are the copyright holder. Theroadislong (talk) 17:32, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Hamideh Jahangiri

Dear (@Theroadislong:) Thank you for your comments. Could you please review my article Draft:Hamideh Jahangiri. I added more 3rd party sources that are verifiable and are independent, professional sources (not personal blogs or sites). Please let me know what else you think is required to have it accepted and move it to article. (Mohamadhadikoochak (talk) 07:34, 7 September 2019 (UTC)).

Your draft suffers from ref bombing, I suggest you choose 3 to 4 of the best sources and remove all the rest, we are not interested in any sources which are her own works. Theroadislong (talk) 18:08, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Update Info

Hello. As a representative of Lawrence Academy, was wondering what the best method to update factual information might be. There are updates to our enrollment, acreage, physical plant, history that I'd like to add into the record, but I do not wish to do so without consulting the person who has kept this page up.Communications Lawrence Academy (talk) 17:39, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

You can suggest proposed edits on the article talk page, once you have changed your user name. Theroadislong (talk) 18:03, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Are the citations the only issues with the page? If so, I can remove passing mentions and only provide more substantial links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mj4841 (talk • contribs) 18:59, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

The sources are poor but you also need to declare any conflict of interest. Theroadislong (talk) 19:06, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

I'm a writer involved in the health insurance industry, but am not being paid for my Wiki article and I am not affiliated with healthinsurance.org or their partners. Is there somewhere I can note this formally? Mj4841 (talk) 13:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

hey,

you rejected my article haha! please do allow it! have sent you a reply on the decline message explaining why it should be allowed!

thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neelpurohit19 (talk • contribs) 17:26, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019

Hello Theroadislong,

Backlog

Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Coordinator

A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.

This month's refresher course

Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.

Paid editing

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion

• Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
• Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.

Not English

• A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.

Tools

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.

Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

rejection of article

Hi,

I greatly appreciate that you reviewed my article so quickly. I had been warned it may take months to receive feedback. I am perplexed by the reasons for your rejection.

Every single one of the 26 references I cited was an independent secondary source with no links to the company as employees or shareholders. Nine (9) of the sources were newspaper articles with the company or its products as the main subject of the article. Nine (9) references were to peer-reviewed scientific journals. One (1) source was a textbook published by a professional association of impeccable standing, AOTA. Four (4) were to Websites of non-profit organizations. One (1) was a government website that described a program whose requirements our product met for use in driver training in a remote indigenous community without a real road network. This might actually be a world first, but I have no third-party validation. The remaining two (2) citations were to industry website magazines.

I am not sure how to respond to your perception that the article reads like an advertisement. I only reported factual information in the most neutral tone I could and all that information is verifiable in secondary sources. Unfortunately, some newspaper and journal sources are behind paywalls, but one Wiki editor told me that is not a serious issue.

So, please reconsider your rejection or at least clarify why the secondary sources I list do not meet Wiki standards.

Thanks very much for your consideration.DriverSafety (talk) 01:19, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

You probably can't see it because you work for them but the whole tone of thedraft is just an advert from the very second sentence "The main market for the company’s simulator-based solutions for driver training". Theroadislong (talk) 07:44, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi again,

I am puzzled. If I find a way to change the tone, I still cannot delete direct mention of the verifiable material that supports the claim to notability.

I am primarily an academic writer. Words and variables need consistent coherent definitions and claims need evidence. Those rules determine what I write.

I respected those rules in writing the Wiki entry. Based on suggestions from David notMD, I have removed the model numbers and photo. Please give me an example of another change I could make that would transform the presentation of these verifiable statements into a less commercial sounding text.

Also, is it possible that you do not think the company has a claim to notability? It seems that this view, if you hold it, might influence how you read the text.

I appreciate all efforts to create a commercial-free space for information and I am being as diligent as I can be in this endeavour. Your feedback is appreciated. DriverSafety (talk) 17:23, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

On Wikipedia, solutions are mixtures and nothing else.Theroadislong (talk) 18:03, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Your content on Draft:Virage Simulation is verified by sources, but Wikipedia requires in-depth coverage in order to pass WP:CORP and yes you are correct I do not think that the company is notable, but once it is, then someone unconnected with the company would be best placed to write the article. Theroadislong (talk) 18:09, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Raihan Merchant

Dear Theroadislong,

Thank you for the prompt review of my article, and the valuable feedback.

It has been a learning experience for me, and rather enjoyable.

Since the rejection, over a month ago, I have made the article much stronger with clear proof of notability and solid references.

Would you be so kind as to take another look, and if possible accept the entry?

Many thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harishassan (talk • contribs) 07:42, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

questions about notability

Hi,

Thanks for the feedback. I deleted the sentence containing the word "solutions". I fully agree with that objection. I also deleted the photo and the model numbers. (Earlier I remarked that other corporate pages like CAE list their products, but I was told this is not a valid argument, so I have no problem conceding this point.)

Concerning notability, we are a small commercial organization working to improve driver training with more scientific and effective tools (as in commercial pilot training on simulators, where the company founders were trained).

Reliable sources independent of this organization report the following achievements for the company, each one, I suggest, is having "a significant or demonstrable effect" on driver training, a subset of driver education, itself a neglected educational subject considering the prevalence of road traffic injury and the prominent role of driver error in these events. 1. First driving manufacturer in Canada 2. Fifteen hours of mandatory on-road driver training program delivered on a driving simulator with Quebec government approval to serve remote communities without road networks (Nunavik, QC) 3. Documented use of a concurrent engineering approach for training program development through collaborations with independent university researchers from several universities. This work led to three (3) peer-reviewed scientific articles (two published in journals and one in a conference proceeding). One of these articles demonstrated the effective transfer of training from the truck simulator to the real truck and was given an award at the Transportation Research Board in Washington DC. I did not mention this because I understood that awards were not appropriate topics on a corporation page.

Naturally, my involvement in this company creates a positive bias, but this bias does not alter or diminish the documented facts from independent sources that I have presented.

First, thank you for reading this message. I am sorry I am so wordy.

Second, if we were a musical group, winning a grammy might qualify us as notable. What would a driving simulator company need to do, in your opinion, to be considered notable? I am slightly worried that you may have created an impossible bar for us to reach. DriverSafety (talk) 19:48, 12 September 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DriverSafety (talk • contribs)

Please see WP:CORP for what is required. Theroadislong (talk) 19:56, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

pseudoscience

wp article says "Pseudoscience consists of statements, beliefs, or practices that are claimed to be both scientific and factual but are incompatible with the scientific method." please try to prove how Daniken can be here? Krochmal (talk) 13:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Krochmal I don't have to "prove" it the reliable sources say it and that is all that matters, Wikipedia is not interested in my opinion or yours. Theroadislong (talk) 15:55, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

it is not matter of opinion here but logic because pseudoscience is linked to wp article. thats for your cosideration. everybody has right to publish a book and express ones mind. and he never claimed to be science. so why you fight so much against him? consider pseudoscience means fraud. it is heavy offence! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krochmal (talk • contribs) 09:54, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Page that I'm trying to edit and improve was marked for speedy deletion

Hi @Theroadislong:,

I saw that you marked the Bug-a-Salt for speedy deletion. The content on the article tab of the page is old and I'm trying to work to update the information. I've been trying to go about this the correct way by following all Wikipedia editing guidelines and policies and create a neutral article. I've stated my Conflict of Interest on the talk page and requested an edit to the article. I would love your assistance with improving this article and updating the page correctly without raising any red flags.

I am not the creator of this page. It was already here when I went to edit. Your help and cooperation is much appreciated!

--Tayloreyelash (talk) 20:22, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Looks like a blatant advert and can't see how it passes WP:GNG. Theroadislong (talk) 20:25, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

I removed the tag mainly because the presence of the WSJ article sets this apart from most articles tagged for deletion. I do agree that it is not neutral in tone and that it is a borderline case. You could try listing it at AfD if you like but I believe it will probably survive. Your call. UninvitedCompany 21:27, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Templates on draft:Plastiq

Hello dude, I see you undid my edit removing the templates, I've been working for a while now on this draft and I've disclosed payment. So I thought that the COI template is just out of place, and I was told that even the former editor disclosed payment but I can't check this because he's blocked. About the may not be notable template, I don't know I added many new references and cleaned up the article tone to sound more neutral and that template gives me the impression that is for articles that are on the main wiki not in draft form. What is the right way to have them removed? I would discuss it on the talk page but nobody would answer because its a draft. JamesRodir (talk) 20:25, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Request on 21:29:38, 13 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Captsungam

• Captsungam (talk · contribs)
  • User:Captsungam/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi I am David Magnus. I have been a photographer since the early 1960. My work is well know. My work has been published all over the world. At this time I have work in Morrison Hotel Gallery LA USA> My agent is Shutterstock. My work appears on their web site. You a Google me try David Magnus Beatles. Can you help me please, what other information do you need. I am mentioned in the Tony Barrow book about The Be3atles. He was their PR The article you have seen is just a test run, I will put in morer personial information about myself.

Kind Regards

David

Captsungam (talk) 21:29, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

If you are really notable in Wikipedia terms, rest assured that someone will write an article about you, please don't try to do it yourself, I have rarely seen it succeed. Wikipedia requires sources to have multiple, in-depth coverage of the subject, not merely passing mentions. Theroadislong (talk) 21:35, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Kawartha Credit Union article declined

Hi, I am confused and disappointed that you have declined to have this article. There are many referenced and verified sources in it. I do not believe it reads like an advertisement. It is factual, concise and sourced. This is a very large credit union that had an article on wikipedia for well over a decade before it was deleted. Without any specific feedback I can't change it.

Dr Ellington Darden

Morning,

Sorry about the confusion here. I am just trying to add Dr Darden to your notable Alumni for FSU and you have taken him down twice. My editing skills are limited and I tried on this recent edit to add the link to Darden's Amazon page https://www.amazon.com/Ellington-Darden/e/B000APAG9K%3Fref=dbs_a_mng_rwt_scns_share

There is a huge amount of material on Dr Darden on the web, images of him in his bodybuilding days, and links to his books and articles. I chose the Amazon page because that shows a selection of his numerous books that are still in print.

Darden is most likely FSU's most successful and widely read author with 75 books published and 7 million copies printed. A very modest man he never promotes himself. Last year he was entered(by his students and friends) into the FSU Distinguished Alumni Awards for the University College of Education which was submitted to Ashley Milton, the Alumni Development Manager. He didn't win but I imagine he will in the next couple of years.

Darden spent 5 years at FSU where he earned his doctorate in physical education under Professors Frances Hall(physical education), Robert Singer(motor learning) and Harold Schendel(nutrition). All his professors are dead now and Dr Darden himself is around 75 years old.

Dr Darden was an exceptional athlete and played football at Baylor University. He started bodybuilding seriously whilst at FSU and won 17 titles including Mr Oklahoma (1964), Mr Texas (1969), Mr Florida State (1969), Mr South (1970), and Collegiate Mr America (1972).

He has subsequently appeared on numerous television shows, been the development manager at Nautilus Fitness machines for 20 years, written over 400 articles and 75 books on weight loss, weightlifting, fitness and nutrition. He has lectured in the USA, Canada, Great Britain, Australian and Europe and attended 2 Olympics. In 1989 he was elected as one the top ten healthy American Fitness Leaders by the Presidents Council on Physical Fitness and Sports. He invented HIT or High Interval Training and has a website on the subject http://www.drdarden.com

Dr Darden has helped millions of people in their fitness goals and I hope you see to reinstate him as a distinguished alumni, perhaps using your skills as an editor, to include the right links.

Many Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agnesgerlach (talk • contribs) 15:55, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Retford_King_Edward_VI_Grammar_School

Hello, I think I've followed all your advice since you originally rejected https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Retford_King_Edward_VI_Grammar_School. I'm waiting patiently for it to be re-reviewed, read the guidance, tried the IRC - any other advice please on improvements I can make? ~~

Kwai Chai Hong review pending

hi,

could you please review my content? ive included more source based on the last revision since 2 months ago. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kschay (talk • contribs) 03:40, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

"Personal Attacks"

Cullen328 attacked me first by attacking my username and userpage. Am I not allowed to defend myself? --Vigilante Girl (talk) 09:59, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Sanyukta Kaza page resubmission.

Hey I re-edited the page, added more references and removed the flashy intro... could you please recheck and let me know as to what might be the issue with it or if there is none than kindly approve it.