Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 498: Line 498:
:{{re|Vesta82601}} who is "we"? [[WP:NOSHARE|Wikipedia accounts must not be shared]]. [[User:Victor Schmidt|Victor Schmidt]] ([[User talk:Victor Schmidt|talk]]) 16:40, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
:{{re|Vesta82601}} who is "we"? [[WP:NOSHARE|Wikipedia accounts must not be shared]]. [[User:Victor Schmidt|Victor Schmidt]] ([[User talk:Victor Schmidt|talk]]) 16:40, 31 December 2019 (UTC)


We meaning me and the reviewer.
{{re|Victor Schmidt}} We meaning me and the reviewer.

Revision as of 16:46, 31 December 2019

Main pageTalk pageSubmissions
Category, List, Sorting, Feed		ShowcaseParticipants
Apply, By subject		Reviewing instructions
Help deskBacklog
drives
Shortcuts
Welcome to the Articles for Creation help desk

  • This page is only for questions about article submissions—are you in the right place?
  • Do not provide your email address or other contact details. Answers will be provided on this page.
  • Watch out for scammers! If someone contacts you saying that they can get your draft published for payment, they are trying to scam you. Report such attempts here.
Ask a new question
Please check back often for answers.
Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions


December 24

08:37:58, 24 December 2019 review of submission by 140Macpherson


140Macpherson (talk) 08:37, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


We have refurbished the Etere article with more references and the sources. As Etere is a long standing company that is present at techonolgy shows, conferences, and news articles throughout the world, it is a liable topic to require a wikipedia page.

Hi 140Macpherson. Please clarify what you mean by "we". The policy on Wikipedia is "one user—one account". Usernames should not be shared by multiple individuals. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:15, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:31:07, 24 December 2019 review of draft by Ronmun


I have been revising the Draft:The ROADEX Project page in my Sandbox and wonder if there is a way to update the present Draft version to the Sandbox version. Any help that you can give will be appreciated. With best regards Ron

Ronmun (talk) 13:31, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ronmun. You are welcome to edit Draft:The Roadex Project and make it (below the comment "EDIT BELOW THIS LINE") as much like your sandbox as you care to. Editing the first draft really would have been the best thing to do in the first place. When editors create copies or second drafts under different names it frequently leads to confusion. --Worldbruce (talk) 02:06, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your guidance Worldbruce. I have moved the update from the Sandbox into the Draft page and will continue to work solely on the Draft page. Ronmun (talk) 16:28, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:32:50, 24 December 2019 review of submission by Moodmechanic96

I am a music producer so i want to publish my article Moodmechanic96 (talk) 15:32, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Moodmechanic96. You may use your user page to say a few words about yourself and your Wikipedia editing, but Wikipedia is not for advertising, public relations, or self-promotion. --Worldbruce (talk) 03:46, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:54:37, 24 December 2019 review of submission by Payalsingh0135

I was adding the reference of subject due to this all things are required

Payalsingh0135 (talk) 16:54, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Payalsingh0135, This is a nonsensical question, perhaps some of it got cut off? Could you clarify? Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 04:02, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Payalsingh0135, I took a look at your draft, and it seems to be about yourself or a non-notable person. Wikipedia only covers those who have been covered in reliable sources. We also strongly discourage autobiographies. WIkiepdia is also not a resume site. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 04:03, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


20:33:31, 24 December 2019 review of submission by Aureliojohn


Aureliojohn (talk) 20:33, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have created the Phemex Wikipedia page at my sandbox please let me know why it's not approved and what can I do for the approvall. I believe the page is important because its about a bitcoin futures and cryptocurrency derivatives trading platform.

Hi Aureliojohn. As stated at Draft:Phemex, it was declined because it fails to show that it is notable (suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). Considering Wikipedia's general sanctions on blockchain and cryptocurrency-related articles, you may wish to explore alternative outlets for anything you write on the subject. --Worldbruce (talk) 03:55, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

21:33:46, 24 December 2019 review of submission by Pritesh Lunkad

Can I please know the reason for rejection of article and how can i make the necessary changes to republish this article. Pritesh Lunkad (talk) 21:33, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


22:33:58, 24 December 2019 review of submission by Thanoscar21


Thanoscar21 (talk) 22:33, 24 December 2019 (UTC) But aren't users supposed to have their page...?[reply]

Thanoscar21 You can start your user page here User:Thanoscar21 you do not need to submit a draft version for review. Theroadislong (talk) 22:57, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thank you!

December 25

01:31:29, 25 December 2019 review of submission by 173.70.134.32

So I found this draft page. It doesn't seem like it was reviewed, or has anyone found it besides a couple of me. (I found it because I'm a fan of Battle For Dream Island) 173.70.134.32 (talk) 01:31, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have submitted it for review under the Articles for Creation process. A reviewer should get to it in an average of 8 weeks. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 04:00, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:24:10, 25 December 2019 review of submission by TabBytes

Hello moderator , I have edited the article and added valid references .I have added only media references. please review it. Thanks TabBytes (talk) 11:24, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:27:22, 25 December 2019 review of draft by AnuYog

Greetings! Kindly have a look & approve this page. AnuYog (talk)

AnuYog There are 3k+ drafts waiting to be reviewed it could take up to 6+ months for your article to be reviewed please be patient. Thank you. Whispering(t) 19:16, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:34:59, 25 December 2019 review of draft by CSIing


I am South Korean. I just want to know many global MMA fans want to know Da Un Jung. Therefore, I made an article about him with accurate information and references. What's the problem? What should I do to post Da Un Jung's article one more time? Hope get the answer ASAP.

CSIing (talk) 16:34, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CSIing. The deleting admin, Orangemike, noted: "Subject fails WP:MMABIO notability guidelines where by subject has only secure 2 fights under top tier promoter instead of 3." If and when you can document with reliable sources a third fight for a top tier promoter, you may attempt to create the article again. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:51, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 20:02:13, 25 December 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Nitishsinha17



Nitishsinha17 (talk) 20:02, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nitishsinha17 Your draft Draft:MicroPedia India Services got deleted because it was copied from elsewhere and consisted of advertising for the business. I suggest starting over, without copying their website also if you are being paid to create a Wikipedia page for the company you need to disclose that as well. Whispering(t) 19:12, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

20:31:19, 25 December 2019 review of submission by CheatCodes4ever


CheatCodes4ever (talk) 20:31, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I’m trying to show the fact that Tom Thum’s single “1955” charted, so the artist will have a charting single that will get it a page. What can I do? CheatCodes4ever (talk) 20:31, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

They aren't notable. There is nothing you can do. A musician charting (and in this case, contributing to a charting song) isn't particularly notable. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:27, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

23:23:48, 25 December 2019 review of submission by SteaminThomasTheTrain32

it Needs Nia, I Gave Criedit

SteaminThomasTheTrain32 (talk) 23:23, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SteaminThomasTheTrain32, the copyright isn't the problem here, as that wiki is licensed under CC BY-SA. (the attribution details are wrong, but that's not our main problem here)
The problem is that the article is completely unsourced (see WP:Verifiability), and that there is far too much detail for an encyclopedia.
Characters like this are nearly always included in a list of all characters in a series, as already occurs at List of Thomas & Friends railway engines. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 19:53, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 26

05:00:39, 26 December 2019 review of submission by Sarasota6

I would like to ask for assistance in writing an article about Sari Greene. Sari Greene is an information security practitioner, author, and entrepreneur. In 2003, Sari founded one of the first dedicated cybersecurity consultancies. She is notable for this reason. I took her online class so I dont know if that is a conflict or not Sarasota6 (talk) 05:02, 26 December 2019 (UTC) Sarasota6 (talk) 05:00, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sarasota6, If you can find reliable and independent sources that discuss her, she may be notable enough to have an article about her. Usually, at least three, and ideally more, sources are needed. Think coverage in newspapers, magazines, news sources. Her own websites and materials do not count. In terms of a conflict of interest, you are probably fine. If you wish to declare a COI, that would be fine, but I don't think you have to in this situation. Now if you know Greene personally, or have some other sort of relationship, or have been paid by her in anyway, then yes you would need to disclose. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 22:43, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 09:13:12, 26 December 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Krishnachandra,india



Krishnachandra,india (talk) 09:13, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Krishnachandra,india, This article needs inline citations, please see referencing for beginners. Also, since the film has yet to come out, this article may be premature. Please ensure you have enough reliable sources that cover the topic. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 22:40, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:28:01, 26 December 2019 review of submission by Mohsinmusta97


Mohsinmusta97 (talk) 13:28, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mohsinmusta97, for a musician to have an article here, they have to meet any one of the following criteria:
  1. Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself. Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopedia article. The published works must be someone else writing about the musician, ensemble, composer, or lyricist, or their works. (See the self-published sources policy for details about the reliability of such sources, and the conflict of interest policy for treatment of promotional, vanity material.) The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the subject itself have actually considered the musician, ensemble, composer, or lyricist notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works that focus upon it. The rationale for this is easy to see – someone simply talking about themselves in their own personal blog, website, book publisher, social networking site or music networking site, etc., does not automatically mean they have sufficient attention in the world at large to be notable. If that was so then everyone could have an article. Wikipedia is not a directory.
    • This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries. What constitutes a "published work" is deliberately broad except for the following:
      • Any reprints of press releases, other publications where the musician or ensemble talks about themselves, and all advertising that mentions the musician or ensemble, including manufacturers' advertising. For example, endorsement deal publicity (including sell sheets, promo posters, fliers, print advertising and links to an official company website) that lists the artist as an endorser or contains an "endorsement interview" with the artist.
      • Works consisting merely of trivial coverage, such as articles that simply report performance dates, release information or track listings, or the publications of contact and booking details in directories.
      • Articles in a school or university newspaper (or similar), in most cases.
  2. Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart.
  3. Has had a record certified gold or higher in at least one country.
  4. Has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country.
  5. Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable).
  6. Is an ensemble that contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles.
  7. Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability.
  8. Has won or been nominated for a major music award, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis award.
  9. Has won first, second or third place in a major music competition.
  10. Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc.
  11. Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network.
  12. Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or TV network.
You haven't demonstrated the subject of your article meets any of these criteria, thus it has been declined. At this point, it seems unlikely the subject meets these criteria. Please read Wikipedia:Too soon. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 19:45, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Just a note that these criteria outline additional considerations for GNG, not that meeting any of them automatically makes the topic notable. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK —Preceding undated comment added 20:17, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

22:12:44, 26 December 2019 review of submission by Cgerdeskcts9


Hello, I work for Cascade Public Media, the PBS affiliate for the Seattle area. Cascade Public Media owns KCTS 9, the local PBS televisions station, and Crosscut, a Seattle public media news website. Both of these brands have Wikipedia pages and are a popular part of the Seattle community. We are trying to show the relationship between companies and, as a nonprofit, we are trying to be as transparent as possible with our donors with our naming and relationships, which is why we are working to create a Cascade Public Media Wikipedia page that better connects our brands. We want to make sure information about Cascade Public Media, Crosscut and KCTS 9 is easy to find online. I have had the Cascade Public Media page turned down multiple times, and have edited it several times in the process. I am hoping to get some insight on what we can to do to publish this page.

Thank you, Caroline

Cgerdeskcts9 (talk) 22:12, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cgerdeskcts9, Hi Caroline! I would suggest merging the information that you have into KCTS-TV as previously mentioned. You can always make a new WP:SECTION on that page to help separate the information. Please let us know if you have any more questions. Happy Editing! Snowycats (talk) 01:24, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


December 27

00:34:39, 27 December 2019 review of draft by 86Bitt


Hi, it seems I don’t understand how to cite my sources using footnotes. I’ve tried twice. Could you please help me?

86Bitt (talk) 00:34, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

86Bitt, Hi! I would recommend reading WP:FOOTNOTES and using the Visual Editor option for additional help with adding footnotes. Happy editing! Snowycats (talk) 01:22, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

05:13:17, 27 December 2019 review of submission by 2601:14A:4502:1460:C1F4:23B7:2D87:8B8B

I made the changes asked

2601:14A:4502:1460:C1F4:23B7:2D87:8B8B (talk) 05:13, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that this subject is not independently notable. No matter what changes are made, this draft will not become an article. Any useful content should instead be added to the suggested page. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 05:54, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:00:34, 27 December 2019 review of submission by Streetmilitia


Please refer to the below report, if the other module companies (i.e. Gemalto, Sierra Wireless, SIMCom, Telit, etc.) are allowed for the Wikipedia paga creation, Fibocom & Quectel should also have their place in Wikipedia.

http://globalnewsreports24.com/9517/global-cellular-modules-market-insights-2019-fibocom-gemalto-quectel-sierra-wireless-simcom-telit-communications/

Streetmilitia (talk) 08:00, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Streetmilitia, Be careful about comparing your article to existing ones. Many of the articles on Wikipedia were created before we began the rigorous Article for Creation process. That means a lot of ...honestly junk articles were created, and many of them have slipped through the cracks. You can read more about the logical fallacies involved in article comparison at WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Looking at the linked articles, 3 are poorly written, promotional, and lack sources. SIMCom shouldn't even have an article. Gemalto is the only halfway decent one, but clearly has had some COI editing.
What I don't see is how this organization meets the company notability guidelines. Of your 8 sources, none are good enough to show notability. You would need more and better sources. But I doubt such sources exist, which is why the article has been rejected as not notable. You are likely better off improving existing articles about topics you enjoy, and getting a feel for how to edit and how our policies work.
One last note: if you have paid by Fibocom in any way, are an employee, or otherwise receive compensation from the company, you must disclose that fact by following the guidelines at WP:PAID. Not doing so is a violation of the terms of service. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 23:55, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi CaptainEek, thank you. I agree with you. Why does Wikipedia allow editor to remain anonymous? I am a SME in the wireless space, I edit Wiki with my free time when I see the content either not up-to-date or misleading with flaw info or advisement. Streetmilitia (talk) 09:07, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Streetmilitia, Anonymity has been a fundamental principle of Wikipedia. Thats why we let folks edit without being logged in, and prevent folks from outing other people's real identities. But that does of course have limits, especially in the realm of companies and conflicts of interest. Since you say you don't have a conflict of interest, or a paid issue, I'll accept that in good faith. If you still would like to improve the Fibocom article, and believe that reliable sources exist, you can find them and improve the article. But as I said above, my own search turned up quite little; such sources may not exist. In that case, I'd be happy to help point you at some other things you might enjoy editing. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:13, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12:02:18, 27 December 2019 review of submission by 27.5.128.137


27.5.128.137 (talk) 12:02, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has been deleted, so we cannot help you. Sorry. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 23:38, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Request on 12:06:11, 27 December 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by 49.207.50.66



49.207.50.66 (talk) 12:06, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article needs better sourcing. You do not have enough reliable and independent sources. Think coverage from quality newspapers, news outlets, books, etc. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 23:38, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:38:43, 27 December 2019 review of submission by TickForTack


TickForTack (talk) 14:38, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TickForTack, As I told an IP above, this article is not notable. It will not become a standalone article. Any useful content should be instead added to NBA 2k20. If you would like me to clarify about why it is not notable, ask on my talk page. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 23:35, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


the changes suggested were made.

14:38:47, 27 December 2019 review of submission by Evan Tobias Tanoni

please re-review this article. I did followed the guidelines and already get rid of the promotional and the possible advertisement content. Evan Tobias Tanoni (talk) 14:38, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Evan Tobias Tanoni, The draft has been deleted, so we cannot help you. Sorry. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 23:37, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 28

03:49:18, 28 December 2019 review of submission by Wantok Author


I have now had two photographs that I own the copyright to taken down because some random decided that I didn't own the copyright. I'm getting heartily sick of this. How on earth does anyone actually upload photos? How on earth do you prove to some random stranger that this is your photo? I asked permission of the subject in both cases and they provided the photo to me for the purposes of the entry. This is surely far preferable to me taking a photo of them without their permission or knowledge but uploading it successfully because I took the photo myself.

I'd be grateful for a discussion and reversion of this because it is making Wikipedia feel like a white male stronghold of bias and disdain.


Wantok Author (talk) 03:49, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wantok Author, Howdy hello! I understand that the photo process can be somewhat annoying. Any photo whose copyright status is suspect is usually taken down quickly, as there are serious legal implications if we host copyrighted material that is not properly licensed. So to help me help you, I wanna clarify the origin of the image. Did you take it, with your own camera? If not, who took it? If it is another person, you must have them email permission to use the photo to Wikipedia. I see that you have a talk page notice of an image deleted under fair use. Be aware that fair use, while broad in some countries, is quite narrow on Wikipedia, and usually does not cover photos of living people. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 06:31, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK - who do I email to? I did not take the photo but know the person who did and can get them to email wikipedia so I can reinstate the photo. Although I note that official photographs are paid for by the person in question and they then hold the copyright - I know both people so can get either to email permission. If someone can point me to where the email should go I can get this sorted out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wantok Author (talk • contribs) 06:48, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wantok Author, You ought read [1], and then email permissions-commons@wikimedia.org Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 07:06, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. It's not the easiest information to find. Help appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wantok Author (talk • contribs) 07:12, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:41:36, 28 December 2019 review of draft by Michaelmonet44


I was given feedback in October and and made the necessary edits at the top of November but am still waiting to receive feedback or approval. So I am not sure if my last edit has ever been reviewed. Please let me know if I did not submit it correctly or if there is anything else I need to do. Thank you. Michaelmonet44 (talk) 09:41, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Michaelmonet44 (talk) 09:41, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold pending paid editing disclosure, see User talk:Michaelmonet44#Declare any connection. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:31, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10:42:34, 28 December 2019 review of submission by Shanudeshmukh


Shanudeshmukh (talk) 10:42, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shanudeshmukh, Your draft had no sources, and no indication of notability. It appeared to exist only to promote its subject. Creating an article from scratch is one of the hardest things to do here. You might wish to edit in other areas of Wikipedia to get a a feel for how editing works first. You can ask questions about how to edit at the friendly Teahouse. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 09:14, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:21:50, 28 December 2019 review of submission by SteaminThomasTheTrain32

i gave credit

SteaminThomasTheTrain32 (talk) 17:21, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked user. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:34, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


20:52:01, 28 December 2019 review of draft by Prana1111

Hi, there might be a problem with the Draft:Chalkydri. It's not the article itself that seems be the issue. For some reason it redirects to another article called seraph. My article is not a duplicate though. The word chalkydri appears on a sub-section of the seraph article but only because chalkydri and seraph are both considered a species of angel in religious context. On the contrary, their portrayals in ancient texts are entirely different therefore they are not the same beings. If the draft is published I might be able to fix the redirect myself without help, unless it is automatically fixed as soon as it is published. I could give the article a temporary title before changing the link redirect if needed. Also I am not posting this message to make the page reviewer look at my page faster since I know it can take as long as months when I only created the draft yesterday, I just want to make sure my draft is visible to administrators and the like. If this helps, my draft was moved to Category:AfC submissions with the same name as existing articles. Thanks in advance.Prana1111 (talk) 20:52, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Prana1111 (talk) 20:52, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Prana1111: the reviewer will take care of the redirect for you. Nothing to worry about. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 07:40, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

22:56:33, 28 December 2019 review of submission by 68.103.78.155

Stop This. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 22:56, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Stop what? Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 08:59, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

68.103.78.155 (talk) 22:56, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 29

02:13:03, 29 December 2019 review of submission by Slasher2point1


Slasher2point1 (talk) 02:13, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I am trying to add an Infobox to the Tommy Nelson (actor) page after uploading a picture of him. I put all of the correct information in, but it will not allow me to create the Infobox. I was hoping someone could help fix this.

Also, there is a note saying I need "additional citations for verifications" because I listed imdb.com as the reference for his birthday. Someone commented saying that imdb was unreliable despite the information being correct and in my personal studies, I have found many other pages for actors use this reference and do not have the note. I would like to get this note removed, so could someone either remove it for me or recommend another website I could use for a citation to ensure this page meets the necessary standards? Thank you.

Sincerely, Slasher2point1

Hi Slasher2point1. I fixed the formatting of the infobox for you. IMDb, being user-generated, is not a reliable source, with a couple narrow exceptions that do not apply in this case. See Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources, Wikipedia:Citing IMDb, and Wikipedia:External links/Perennial websites. If many other articles are misusing IMDb, they should be fixed. There is a "needs additional citations for verification" tag on Tommy Nelson (actor) for many more reasons than the date of birth and IMDb. There are many other statements in the article that do not cite a source. Add sources for them, or remove the statements. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:27, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

04:55:41, 29 December 2019 review of submission by Acekard


Acekard (talk) 04:55, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Acekard, Youtube notability (of which you can read more about at WP:NYOUTUBE) is a tricky thing. Even channels with a million subs might not get articles. Mainly, we need news coverage of the channels. There seems to be little about their actual channel that is interesting/notable enough for Wikipedia. The fact that they are conservative does not make them more or less notable. A lot of people on YouTube are conservative. A lot aren't. In essence, you have failed to show how they are deserving of an article, which is why it has been rejected. Unless you can find many more good sources, I recommend you focus your efforts elsewhere. I know having a draft rejected doesn't feel good, but creating articles from scratch is quite hard. In the future, you may wish to ask for advice (either here, or at the Teahouse) about whether a particular subject may be notable. That will keep you from spending time on something that isn't actually notable. Smooth sailing, Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 09:10, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

07:25:56, 29 December 2019 review of submission by Themusicscholar101


Thank you so much for working so quickly on this. I have been following this young man in his music for a while. He has made a huge impact in the music industry as well as the make a wish foundation. Please help me recognize what he has done by accepting his article. If not please let me know what I can add to have the article accepted and if I can re-submit. Thanks so much... Themusicscholar101 (talk) 07:25, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Themusicscholar101, It doesn't actually appear that he has made a huge impact in the music industry. Where are the sources that say that? How has a 16 year old made a huge impact in music without even releasing a charting song or album? This seems to be a case of WP:TOOSOON. This kid seems destined for greatness, but he just ain't famous yet. In a few years, when he has done more, then he might be notable enough for an article. But at this time, hes just another kid. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:30, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

07:48:02, 29 December 2019 review of submission by Johhnyfrankie13


Johhnyfrankie13 (talk) 07:48, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Johhnyfrankie13, We have no article about the Millennium award, so no reason to have a template for it. As is, see the already extant Template:Billboard Music Award for Millennium Award. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:32, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


08:46:22, 29 December 2019 review of submission by 2400:1A00:B010:5F87:30C7:2D86:191D:9E59


2400:1A00:B010:5F87:30C7:2D86:191D:9E59 (talk) 08:46, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has no sources and is written like an advertisement. It also seems to be about an average person, thus no special reason for them to have a Wikipedia page. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 08:57, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:13:08, 29 December 2019 review of submission by Rohitmishra111


Rohitmishra111 (talk) 14:13, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yesterday, the article could easily be found out on Google. People are unable to find out article "Mahatma Gandhi Central University protest" from today. Why is this happening ? Could you please help me out ? Waiting for your reply.

Hi Rohitmishra111. The article is Mahatma Gandhi Central University protest. The behaviour of third-party search engines, such as Google, is outside our control here at Articles for Creation. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:40, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:57:48, 29 December 2019 review of submission by Jennagold2019

I have made all the suggested revisions -- including various references/sources and also making the content more factual. As one of the largest annual Veg festivals in the world -- attracting over 50K people every year -- and including the support of well-known authors, researchers, and civic leaders, I do believe this is a noteworthy page. Thank you...

Jennagold2019 (talk) 15:57, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jennagold2019, It is written like an advertisement, not like the factual and neutral content of an encyclopedia. It would need to be entirely re-written to comply with our standards. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:18, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


16:26:56, 29 December 2019 review of submission by Abdel fattah yusif


Abdel fattah yusif (talk) 16:26, 29 December 2019 (UTC) because is part of my personal life[reply]

Abdel fattah yusif, If you know this person, that means you have a conflict of interest, which must be declared. However, this person seems to be an average person like you or I. That means they are not notable enough to have a Wikipedia article. Only those who have been covered in multiple reliable and independent sources can be on Wikipedia. Furthermore, please stop creating additional drafts under different names. They will keep being deleted, and you risk being blocked from editing. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:25, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

20:50:11, 29 December 2019 review of draft by MaryKLynch


I traveled to Sharon Wisconsin this past July and interviewed Martha Hayden. I would like to know how to properly cite that interview in this article.

MaryKLynch (talk) 20:50, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unless your interview was published by a reliable source you cannot use it. Theroadislong (talk) 21:02, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Also, if you have written the interview, it's probably not a good idea for you to cite it regardless. Please see our policy on conflict of interest Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:49, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


December 30

03:21:35, 30 December 2019 review of submission by Esotericmagik


Esotericmagik (talk) 03:21, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] 

why was this declined

03:22:20, 30 December 2019 review of submission by Esotericmagik


why did this happen Esotericmagik (talk) 03:22, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Esotericmagik: You're going to want to try this tutorial to get a basic understanding of what this site is and how it works. After that, I've written a guide that explains how to write articles that will not be deleted.
Wikipedia is not a social media site, nor is it a place to promote anyone (or their social media accounts). You didn't cite any independent professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources to demonstrate notability (Youtube and Instagram are not reliable sources, and her own Youtube and Instragram accounts are not independent). Ian.thomson (talk) 03:43, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 05:06:24, 30 December 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by VishwaNayani


Hello, I am Vishwanath, I am here to know what is the issue with my draft as I cannot understand the reason for its decline. This is the draft link : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sri_Balaji_Educational_Society If there is a issue regarding the sources I am still collecting Also I cannot understand that there is a need for adding template on my talk page, If it is a necessity please provide me with step by step process The article is no way related to me or my personal interests.

VishwaNayani (talk) 05:06, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Answered on talk page.) — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 07:03, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

05:43:15, 30 December 2019 review of submission by Dkmohta

My article is rejected stating that it is not notable. I would like to draw the attention that "Sahitya Academy Award" itself is very renowned and is very prestigious award. Mr. Soni is awarded with Shitya Academy Yuwa Puruskar in the year 2016. I have given sufficient references of the same.

Apart from this he has authored/ translated more then 10 books.

I again request you to re-review my article and kindly approve the same.

Dkmohta (talk) 05:43, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


05:57:44, 30 December 2019 review of draft by Barryc25


Article should not have been rejected. Please review it again. Thank you.

Barryc25 (talk) 05:57, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Barryc25. The draft was declined (which allows you to improve and resubmit it), not rejected (which would not give you the option of resubmission). The bulk of any article should be based on independent, reliable sources. At first glance, about 90% of the draft is based on what the organization says about itself. As the reviewer indicated, you'll need to throw away most of the sources you've cited and the content they support, or radically condense it. The draft should mainly summarize what independent sources like the Vancouver Sun and The Globe and Mail say about the organization. Also, Wikipedia, being user-generated, is not a reliable source, and should not be used as a reference at all. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:00, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:06:05, 30 December 2019 review of submission by VishwaNayani

Hi Harshil, I am new to publishing article, can you advice any tips regarding my rejected article as well as the changes and additions that are required to be accepted by the Wikipedia. VishwaNayani (talk) 09:06, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

VishwaNayani, It has been rejected, as I am afraid that it is not notable. There is no amount of editing that can fix that. Instead I recommend you work on some existing articles, and improve those. Creating an article from scratch is one of the hardest things to do on WIkipedia. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:26, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:36:44, 30 December 2019 review of draft by Zxcmnb00


Hello. It said it will take 4 mouths or more to review my draft. It takes too much time. Can I withdraw it?

Zxcmnb00 (talk) 09:36, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Subsequently declined by Theroadislong. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:02, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:33:54, 30 December 2019 review of draft by Arjanhalili


Hello! Can someone help me with this article I've been working on? I added some references and made some changes to it but the draft still got declined and I'm not sure how to continue from here. Arjanhalili (talk) 14:33, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arjanhalili, The issue here is that the sources you have do not show how the subject is notable. We don't just write about everyone here on Wikipedia, otherwise it would be unwieldy. Thus we have a set of standards for inclusion, which we call notability. The relevant guideline is the creative professional notability standards. Any topic may also simply meet the general notability guideline. So to get this article accepted, you need to find sources that meet those requirements. If you can't do that, then the subject is not notable, and we cannot write about them. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:19, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:21:56, 30 December 2019 review of draft by Hescher88


Wondering if there are any edits I should make on this page or if it is ready for review.

Hescher88 (talk) 19:21, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hescher88 I have accepted your draft, it could do with some categories added. Theroadislong (talk) 19:30, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hescher88, I see that it has been accepted as a draft by Theroadislong, so congrats! But you can always keep working on, and improving, articles that you have created. With luck, you could take this article to Good Article quality, or even the vaunted Featured Article quality. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:35, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

20:34:52, 30 December 2019 review of submission by TabBytes

Hello Moderator , I did not recieve any message from you. I added a comment on 25 Dec for a draft. Please check ( 11:24:10, 25 December 2019 review of submission by TabBytes ) . Thanks TabBytes (talk) 20:34, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


21:54:48, 30 December 2019 review of submission by Bhavegaut


I am at a loss as to what the issue is. The page has many external references attesting to the importance of the field of matrix biology and then the history behind how the ASMB is a major organization promoting matrix biology. It also has significant information on the history of the organization including past presidents, past award winners, meetings, etc. When I compare it to existing Wiki pages for similar organizations such as the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Society_for_Biochemistry_and_Molecular_Biology) or the American Society for Cell Biology ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Society_for_Cell_Biology) I don't see large differences and thus cannot see why these have been accepted as Wiki pages while my submission has not.

Bhavegaut (talk) 21:54, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bhavegaut, Be careful about comparing your article to existing ones. Many of the articles on Wikipedia were created before we began the rigorous Article for Creation process. That means a lot of ...honestly junk articles were created, and many of them have slipped through the cracks. You can read more about the logical fallacies involved in article comparison at WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. One of the issues here is that the societies you have linked have 10+ times the membership as the ASMB, which means they are larger and more likely to be covered by reliable sources. Regardless, those articles are still quite poor.
What you need here is better sources. You need independent and reliable sources that give significant coverage to the subject, as per the general notability guidelines. The scientific papers you have are not the right sources here. If you remove those, then you only have the ASMB's own website, which is not independent. You need external coverage. If such external coverage does not exist, then the subject is not notable. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 00:07, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 21:56:39, 30 December 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Phil7strang


Lloyd Strang sang at the Metropolitan Opera Company in NY from 1959 thru 1970. he is referenced in several links by the Met and appears in one of your Wikipedia listings as well as someone who performed at the Met 170 times. I guess I do not know the proper way to list or link the references. He also sang and played with the Sammy Kaye Big Band from 1949-1955 and is on several of Sammy Kaye's albums listed as one of the three Kayedets. I would love it if someone other than me (his son) made the post but I would hate to see his notable contributions lost to history. He also was the lead singer for the Larry Clinton Orchestra hit in 1947 of "Ooh Looky there Ain't she Pretty"


Phil7strang (talk) 21:56, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Phil7strang, What you need here are reliable sources. Please see referencing for beginners. If you can link me 5 + news articles or other publications that are focused on him, please do so on my talkpage I can help you in going forward. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 23:47, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 31

04:46:10, 31 December 2019 review of submission by Fenojoy

Fenojoy (talk) 04:46, 31 December 2019 (UTC) I tried to publish an article about a hospital at Kochi, which is established in 1952 (Was started even before 1946). But the content was not published. It may be because my unawareness in posting. Kindly help me to resolve the issue and please post the Hospital information in the page, as it is one of the first charitable mission hospital in Kochi, Kerala.[reply]


Request on 05:21:12, 31 December 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Rahul1436


I am new for creating wiki pages. I am trying to create wiki page for Manjusha. She is host for many celebrity shows. Manjusha is inspirational figure and i want to know people know the same . I don't know the reason why my article got rejected. Initially i thought because of reference so i edited it and added her verified social media account. Still it got rejected. Can you help me creating this page. It's really helpful to me. Rahul1436 (talk) 05:21, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rahul1436: References need to be Independent, so her social media account(s) arent considered a Reliable source. Happy new Year, Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:44, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:33:57, 31 December 2019 review of submission by Furious Cadets


Furious Cadets (talk) 09:33, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


10:04:14, 31 December 2019 review of submission by Ksameer22

Hi,

This is about rejection of draft glByte, Could you please help/suggest me to improve the draft. This company is founded in mid year of 2019 and doesn't have any article, blog or news for notability.
I have gone through notability guide lines and still confused. How can I improve this draft ?

Any help is appreciated

Thanks
Ksameer22 (talk) 10:04, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ksameer22. Wikipedia is not a business directory. Its articles cover notable topics—those that have gained significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time. If there isn't significant coverage of the company in independent reliable sources, then there is nothing you can do to improve the draft because the topic doesn't belong in the encyclopedia. Most businesses aren't notable. You may find WP:BFAQ#Company informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:38, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:12:54, 31 December 2019 review of submission by Vesta82601


Trying to cover as part of civic engagement work, can we delete offending sections? Everything after career?

Vesta82601 (talk) 15:12, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vesta82601: who is "we"? Wikipedia accounts must not be shared. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:40, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Victor Schmidt: We meaning me and the reviewer.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&oldid=933386777"