User talk:Stilgar135

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style
• If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!

Zzyzx11 | Talk 00:36, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

NBA Draft (s)

If you look at the NBA Drafts that have been worked on already, there are only two formats going. All of the drafts done are the same except 1989 NBA Draft. The 1970 NBA Draft and the 1998-to-2004 Drafts only do the first two rounds and have this format:

Pick	Player	Nationality	NBA Team	College/HS/Club Team
1	Bob Lanier	USA	Detroit Pistons	St. Bonaventure University

Now, the table is "old" HTML, which should be converted to Wikistyle instead.

The 1989 draft only does round one and looks like this:

1. Sacramento Kings - Pervis Ellison, F/C, Louisville

I would vote for doing the first two rounds in a formal table, and then just list the other rounds like I entered them last night. What do you think? I also propose listing the PERSON first, it is what is most important, not the NBA team, which changes with every trade, people before teams, response? This looks like some project, with all of those teams, schools, and players, we need some kind of "bot" to convert at least the teams and schools to Wikilinki's, that would help.

(After you have read this, feel free to cut & paste it to the 1986 NBA Draft talk page. We should probable move it to the Talk page of List of NBA Drafts...???) WikiDon 20:26, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Sky Lopez VfD

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. I was poking thru VfD and I noticed that you nominated an article for deletion. I've got no opinion on the article or its deletion, but I noticed that you did not actually create the nomination and its vote page in the technically correct way, using templates. Please look at the bottom of Wikipedia:Votes for deletion for instructions on how to nominate a page using templates so that all the correct sub-pages and links are created. Happy editing. Soundguy99 16:04, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

Al Bruno III

I have placed a tag on the article Al Bruno III, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. I did this because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Al Bruno III is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Al Bruno III. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. Please do not just remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 04:05, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Anakin Solo

Hey, you added this bit to the 'Dead or Alive?' section:

Lucasarts has confirmed that a version of Anakin—either Solo or Skywalker—will appear in the forthcoming Legacy of the Force series. It has not been confirmed if this will be as a Force ghost, clone, or some other iteration.

Not saying you're lying, but can I see the source for this? I must see this with my own eyes...Probably Skywalker though. If it turns out to be Solo, it'll too good to be true... —Mirlen 17:45, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

I went back and looked for it, and it turns out that "confirmed" actually means "probably" (Force ghost) and "possibly" (Anakin). Time does strange things, I suppose. Stilgar135 01:03, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Request for edit summary

Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 7% for major edits and 12% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits in the article namespace.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear impolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 23:30, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Star Wars Collaboration of the week

File:Star Wars Tie-Fighter-Vaders.jpg

You showed support for the Star Wars Collaboration of the week. This week Splinter of the Mind's Eye was selected to be improved to featured article status. We hope you can contribute.

Hey there

Hey, welcome to the Star Wars WikiProject. If you know any fellow editors who may want to join, feel free to let them know :) Deckiller 23:50, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. It looks like a great project. Stilgar135 23:52, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Star Wars newsletter

Project updates Greetings, Star Wars editors! Deckiller here. It's the first edition of the WikiProject Star Wars newsletter, and yes, it's a semi-ripoff of the Esperenza newsletter. I think it's important to begin with some good news: Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones, Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith, and Jabba the Hutt have reached featured article status! Kudos to the editors who helped obtain these achievements! WikiProject Star Wars is also on a mission to improve Star Wars articles using the following ideas: An out of universe perspective versus an in universe perspective (see Wikipedia:Writing about fiction and the future ammendments to our manual of style) Evolving lists into regular articles Moving excess information and specifics to Wookieepedia (and providing links to Wookieepedia per the "see also" and/or "external links" sections) Enhanced communication amongst WikiProject members More to come These should provide the basic steps needed to improve and "encyclopedia-fy" the Star Wars series of articles. Things to do There are plenty of Wikipedia:WikiProject Star Wars/things to do. An update to the page is coming very soon, and it will represent the new and exciting changes that Star Wars pages will be receiving! Out-of-universe versus in-universe perspectives Although details are forthcoming, I would like to take this time to explain the gist of this concept. Wikipedia has generally agreed that fictional articles should write about the topic from a "real world" perspective, focusing on real world issues and topics, with a section or two for plot synopsis and so on. Jabba the Hutt is a solid character example, and Clone Wars (Star Wars) is quickly moving toward an out of universe perspective.

Article evolution As many of you know, lists of minor Star Wars-related themes are very common on Wikipedia; however, since these may be seen as violations of Wikipedia policy (and having seperate articles would breach even more policies), the tentative solution is to create general articles on a list's topic (for example, turning List of Star Wars devices into Technology of Star Wars, which allows us to cover everything from hyperspace to comlinks in a general encyclopedic fashion). This can be very tough for some broad topics, so the key is organization. I encourage all editors to list their ideas on the WikiProject talk page. It will be a very difficult — but tangible — effort. For an example, let me point you to the Final Fantasy WikiProject. Some of us over at that WikiProject decided to turn various components of Final Fantasy X, such as Pyreflies, Yevon, and the backstory — into an article describing the world of Spira. Location descriptions were given a List of locations in Spira article, and the details themselves were placed on the Spira (Final Fantasy X) page. This is a decent template to follow — however, we will need to place priority on out-of-universe, "real life" topics and perspectives in realtion to the article. Sounds confusing, eh? It won't, for examples will be popping up left and right in the near future! Signed... — Deckiller 03:19, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject ASOIAF

A new WikiProject on A Song of Ice and Fire has been created. If you're interested in helping define its methods and goals, check it out. Brendan Moody 06:48, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Lehigh FA

Now that I take a good look at the article keeping your suggestions in mind, I definately agree with you. I really appreciate the suggestions and feel free to jump in and help editing (if you have the time). If there's any other comments/suggestions to make, please go right ahead and let me know. Thanks! Plm209 16:48, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

I think I edited an artilce at the same time as you by accident

you might want to go back and fix that incase I messed something up for you, sorry about that.

Swarthmore clubs

could you move the swarthmore club stuff back? i moved that to other page because it's fairly trivial invormation that most people don't care about when they want to read about swarthmore college. if they want to see it, they can look at the clubs page. maybe that page should be retitled to "swarthmore college clubs and organizations" instead of "list of...", though.

thanks. -Easytoremember 02:13, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

nevermind. just read the deletion thing.

If you want to start a comprehensive "Student life at Swarthmore College" page, I don't think you'd get too much grief from other Wikipedians. Anything starting with "list of", however, is immediately suspect, and when people feel that the essential information can be put somewhere else, there's not too amenable to keeping it around. Stilgar135 02:20, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to the Military history WikiProject!

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated quite regularly. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
• Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

• Starting some new articles? Our article structure guidelines outline some things to include.
• Interested in working on a more complete article? The military history peer review and collaboration departments would welcome your help!
• Interested in a particular area of military history? We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, or periods.
• Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every military history article in Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill Lokshin 16:03, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

The Boys

Thanks for trying to clear up the sourcing of the Ennis quote but the link you added doesn't work. I tried a few variations and nosing through their site but I'm getting nothing. If you could double check it then that'd be great. Thanks (Emperor 14:18, 25 August 2006 (UTC))

That's rgeat - thanks for digging that out. It is the key quote and (as I suspected) it was probably dramed up as a promotional slogan (possibly for their pitch of the series) and so it was provngtricky to track down and that interview goes one better than just pinning down its first use - discusses their thinking behind it. It really helps. (Emperor 00:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC))

Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue VI - August 2006

The August 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 12:44, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Phaedriel/Soundtrack of Wikipedians

Yo, Stilgar135. I fixed you entry to Soundtrack of Wikipedians, so it aligns better. If you do not like this change however, feel free to contact me. Thanks, Dfrg.msc ^{1 . 2 . 3} 00:44, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Do you like this ACW task force "Userbox"?

new ACW task force Userbox!

Fix Bayonets! 13:08, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Capitalization for Jessica Drake

As you can see at k.d. lang and bell hooks, Wikipedia uses lower-case capitalization for proper nouns in cases where the subject chooses to be known in that way. An editor received an e-mail from a woman claiming to be drake [1]; her official website [2] and her production company's website [3] both list her that way. Stilgar135 18:05, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia generally uses whatever name most people would expect to find an article at. Three of the four external links in the article spell her name with capitals (admittedly I have no idea how reliable IAFD or AFDB are, but IMDB is usually pretty good and they spell her with capitals and kd lang in lowercase, for example) and most of the first couple of pages on Google do the same. But frankly it's entirely unimportant and if you want to change it it doesn't bother me at all. --Cherry blossom tree 18:21, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:HelpingtheWorldtoSee.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:HelpingtheWorldtoSee.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:08, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history Newsletter - Issue VII - September 2006

The September 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by Grafikbot - 20:05, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Nishkid64's RfA thanks

Thank you very much for participating in my RfA, which closed successfully earlier today with a result of (60/9/4). Although, I encountered a few problems in my RfA, I have peacefully resolved my conflicts and made amends with the people involved. If you have any further questions or suggestions, feel free talk to me. I hope I will live up to your expectations. --Nishkid64 22:14, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VIII - October 2006

The October 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:32, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Sherman Alexie clean-up

As well as tagging the article, you should really add something on the talk page saying why it's been tagged and what you'd hope other editors would do... Vizjim 16:10, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

regarding Something Awful

As you might imagine, the paragraph in question has a kernel of truth -- SA members have a large Eve presence, and they're pretty unpopular in the game. But the deleted stuff was baseless garbage. Even if the bit about the alliance's collapse were true, can you imagine a citation that would allow the article to fairly claim "bad online attitude and unsportsmanlike game play"? That's pure opinion. In short, don't worry so much about how it looks to keep the article factual; avoid false balance. Twinxor t 18:34, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Indiana University of Pennsylvania St. Patrick (TTC) Queen's Park (TTC) Malaspina University-College Eastern University Agganis Arena Manor College Dupont (TTC) St. Clair (TTC) College (TTC) Tyler School of Art Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics King (TTC) Moore College of Art and Design Boathouse Row Rosedale (TTC) Cabrini College The Needle and the Damage Done Brentwood College School

Cleanup Zen Gesner Mansfield University of Pennsylvania Electronic literature Merge Nightsisters Newark (PATH station) Food truck Add Sources Granoff School of Music Dana College List of Princeton University people Wikify Carlisle Area Science Advisory Committee Otto Liman von Sanders Bulworth Expand Delaware Valley College Edinboro University of Pennsylvania California University of Pennsylvania

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 03:47, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Lincoln article

• on this of yours, "A strict application of the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 could have required return of fugitive slaves to their masters. Initially this did not occur as the slaves were classified as contraband of war, though Lincoln was unhappy with this because it implied that the Confederacy was an enemy state and thus had legitimacy." what actually was Lincoln unhappy with? that the slaves were classified as contraband of war? if so, who classified them as such? further, what was it that implied that the Confederacy was an enemy state? if this whole thing is true, it needs a much better paraphrase or a direct quote from Guelzo. i dont know what you're trying to say, which is why i restored a previous version. Stevewk 21:57, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

• check my rewrite. if wrong, feel free to correct. Stevewk 03:12, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

• hold on. you wrote Guelzo as first major scholarly study, i know for a fact this is a major scholarly study, Franklin, John Hope, 1915- Title: The Emancipation proclamation / John Hope Franklin.

Published/Created: Wheeling, Ill. : Harlan Davidson, c1995. Description: xiv, 155 p. : ill. ; 20 cm. ISBN: 0882959077. check the LOC onlline catalog for others. Stevewk 03:26, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Thomas Menino.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Thomas Menino.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 03:01, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue IX - November 2006

The November 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Walter Jones December 2006

I noticed you included some trivia for Walter Jones on December 1st. Apparently he has 2 kids named Walterius or something. Anyway, tell the Sports Gal I'll be over at 3, so you might wanna be out at the time, cause its gonna get loud in your bedroom.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:14, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Areokinesis

It's not suspicious if 1. the article is spelled incorrectly, 2. the article contains almost no information, 3. the article doesn't follow the convention for other comic book-based kinetic abilities. --Htmlism 11:59, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: Five a day Project

Hey, I'm glad you like the idea. Actually, I haven't been keeping up with it in recent months as well as I should be. I say go for it. --Danaman5 02:45, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: Anthro Collaboration

Thanks, I'm actually nowadays just busy and not feeling too down. I could actually use some help on Talk:Plastic shaman since I'm getting tired of trying to debate with that person. I don't know much about Harris so I'm actually learning just by looking at the article. I also have finals starting next week, so not sure if I can do much with it right now. Maybe I'll try to do something though. Ungovernable Force^{Got something to say?} 02:39, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Glad to hear it. I had a look at the plastic shaman page, and even though I don't know much (ie, anything) about the topic, I see plenty of holes to poke in his argument. I'll have that up soon enough. Stilgar135 03:03, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. Ungovernable Force^{Got something to say?} 05:32, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - December 2006

The December 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:25, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

J. D. Drew

Thanks for the kind words on my talk page referring to my edit. It's nice to know that someone appreciated my stab at wiki-humor. I have to say further, however, that your comment in turn made *me* laugh at loud: "I know viscerally that Drew's sucking should not be a matter of debate, yet am committed to NPOV." That's the Wikpedia paradox, I suppose. -Phoenixrod 19:24, 10 January 2007 (UTC)