Jump to content

Serpico

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Legobot (talk | contribs) at 22:01, 28 January 2021 (Adding Good Article icon). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

For other uses, see Serpico (disambiguation).
Serpico
Theatrical release poster
Directed bySidney Lumet
Screenplay by
Based onSerpico
by Peter Maas
Produced byMartin Bregman
StarringAl Pacino
CinematographyArthur J. Ornitz
Edited byDede Allen
Music byMikis Theodorakis
Production
companies
  • Artists Entertainments Complex, Inc.
  • Produzion De Laurentiis International Manufacturing Company S.P.A.
Distributed byParamount Pictures
Release date
  • December 5, 1973 (1973-12-05)
Running time
130 minutes[1]
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$3.3 million[2]
Box office$23.4 million[3] to $29.8 million[4]

Serpico is a 1973 biographical-crime film directed by Sidney Lumet and starring Al Pacino. The film was adapted by Waldo Salt and Norman Wexler from the book of the same name by Peter Maas, who wrote the book with the assistance of its subject, Frank Serpico. The story detailed Serpico's struggle with corruption within the New York City Police Department during his eleven years of service, and his work as a whistleblower that led to the investigation by the Knapp Commission.

Producer Dino De Laurentiis purchased the rights from Maas. Agent Martin Bregman joined the film as co-producer. Bregman suggested Pacino for the main part, and John G. Avildsen was hired to direct the film. Pacino gathered with Serpico to prepare for the role early in the summer of 1973. After Avildsen was dismissed, Lumet was hired as his replacement. On a short notice, he selected the shooting locations and organized the scenes; the production was filmed in July and August.

Upon its release, Serpico became a critical and commercial success. At the same time, the film drew criticism from police officers. It received nominations for the Academy Awards and BAFTA Awards. Pacino earned the Golden Globe Award for Best Actor – Motion Picture Drama, while Salt and Wexler received the Writers Guild of America Award for Best Adapted Screenplay.

Plot

NYPD Officer Frank Serpico is rushed to the hospital, having been shot in the face. Chief Sidney Green fears Serpico may have been shot by another cop. In a flashback, Serpico graduates from the police academy, and he becomes frustrated with his fellow officers' laxness. On patrol, he confronts three men raping a woman and apprehends one of the assailants. When the suspect is beaten during interrogation, Serpico declines to participate. He later persuades the suspect to give up the others. Serpico breaks protocol to arrest the suspect himself, but is coerced not to take credit. He is then assigned to the Bureau of Criminal Investigation. He moves to Greenwich Village and begins dating Leslie, a woman in his Spanish class. For his appearance, interests and a misunderstanding in the men's bathroom, he is accused of being homosexual. Serpico clarifies the situation to Captain McLain, and he requests a transfer.

At his new precinct, Serpico works in plain clothes. While chasing a burglar, he is nearly shot when other officers fail to recognize him. Serpico later befriends Bob Blair, who has been assigned to the Mayor's Office of Investigations. Meanwhile, Leslie leaves Serpico to marry another man in Texas. Serpico is offered a bribe and informs Blair, who arranges a meeting with a high-ranking investigator. He is told that he must either testify or “forget it”. He turns the bribe over to his sergeant. Serpico then requests a transfer, and begins recording his phone calls. At the time, he begins a romance with his neighbor, Laurie.

He is reassigned to the 7th Division, but he immediately discovers corruption. Forced to accompany fellow plainclothes officers as they perpetrate violence, extortion, and collect payoffs, he refuses to accept his share of the money. He informs McLain, who assures him that the police commissioner wants him to continue gathering evidence, and that he will be contacted by the chief's office. Serpico becomes impatient waiting for the promised contact, fearing for his life. Serpico and Blair go to the mayor's assistant, who promises a real investigation and support. Their efforts are stymied by political pressure, and Serpico dismisses Blair's suggestion go to other officials or the press.

Serpico's colleagues try to convince him to take the payoff money, but he declines. The strain takes a toll on him, and his relationship with Laurie. When Serpico discovers a suspect he arrested receiving special treatment, he brutalizes the man, whom he reveals served fifteen years for killing a cop. Frustrated after a year-and-a-half of inaction, Serpico informs McLain that he has gone to outside agencies with his allegations. In front of the squad, Serpico is sent to meet with division inspectors, who explain that his charges never made it up the chain of command. The inspectors inform the commissioner, who orders them to investigate the division themselves, and acknowledges that McLain told him of the allegations.

As the investigation proceeds, Serpico is threatened by the squad, and Laurie leaves him. The district attorney leads Serpico to believe that if he testifies in a grand jury, a major investigation into rampant department corruption will happen. During the grand jury, he is prevented by the DA from answering questions that point up the chain of command. Serpico becomes more frustrated. Knowing his life is in danger, he, Blair, and an honest division commander go to The New York Times. After his allegations are printed, he is reassigned to a dangerous narcotics squad in Brooklyn, where he finds even greater corruption.

During a drug arrest, Serpico is shot in the face when his backup fails to act. He recovers, though with lifelong effects from his wound. Serpico receives a detective's gold shield. He then testifies before the Knapp Commission, a government inquiry into NYPD police corruption. An epilogue reveals that he resigned from the NYPD on June 15, 1972, and that he was later awarded the NYPD Medal of Honor for “conspicuous bravery in action”. Its conclusion states that he moved to Switzerland.

Cast

Background

Following Frank Serpico's recovery from being shot, Peter Maas wrote with his assistance Serpico.[5][6] Detective David Durk, who also appeared in front of the Knapp Commission, planned to sell the rights of their story for a film adaptation. Early negotiations included Paul Newman in the role of Durk, and Robert Redford as Serpico.[7] Serpico distanced himself from the project, as he felt that he would be merely portrayed as a sidekick.[8] Script writer John Gregory Dunne turned down the project, as he felt "there was no story". Director Sam Peckinpah, as well as Newman and Redford left the project.[9]

After the success of several of his films in the 1960s, and the first years of the 1970s, producer Dino De Laurentiis decided to move from Italy to the United States. The change in financing laws further regulated the Italian film industry, and the producer settled in New York City. Following their collaboration on The Valachi Papers, De Laurentiis purchased the rights to Maas' book.[10] Maas received US$400,000 (equivalent to $2.7 million in 2023) and participation in the film, while the rights for his work were secured before the March 1973 publication of the book.[11] Initially, De Laurentiis' found resistance to the project from Paramount Pictures. The studio considered that "enough cop movies" had been made.[12] In turn, De Laurentiis was supported by Charles Bluhdorn, president of Gulf+Western who wanted the film to be made.[13] De Laurentiis later declared that "no American producer would have had the courage" to depict police corruption in a motion picture.[12]

Maas' agent, Sam Cohn, was approached by agent Martin Bregman. Bregman expressed his interest to also produce the film after reading an article on New York Magazine about the book. Bregman proposed one of his signed actors, Al Pacino to play the lead.[14] Waldo Salt was chosen to write the screenplay adaptation. The first draft did not impress Maas, De Laurentiis, nor Bregman. Bregman felt that the result was "very political", and that the story did not reflect what the producers desired to portray on the film. Bregman and Maas then directed Salt to the parts of the book they envisioned to be reflected on the screenplay. The second draft was considered a substantial improvement by the production team.[15] Bregman took the treatment to Pacino, who initially did not find the film interesting. Salt then visited Pacino with the re-worked script, that convinced him to consider the part.[16] A meeting with Serpico, Maas and Pacino was then arranged for the actor to meet the subject of the film. Upon meeting him, Pacino was fully convinced to accept the part.[17] John G. Avildsen was then chosen to direct the film.[18]

"One time we were out at my rented beach house in Montauk. We were sitting there looking at the water. And I thought, Well, I might as well be like everybody else and ask a silly question, which was, “Why, Frank? Why did you do it? He said, “Well, Al, I don’t know. I guess I have to say it would be because…if I didn’t, who would I be when I listened to a piece of music?” I mean, what a way of putting it! That’s the kind of guy he was. I enjoyed being with him. There was mischief in his eyes."
— Al Pacino[19]

Salt's work did not satisfy Avildsen, who threatened to leave the project unless he could bring Norman Wexler to write the screenplay. They had previously worked together in Avildsen's Joe. Both then traveled to Switzerland, to visit Serpico at home, and work the details.[20] Time to work on the production was constricted due to Pacino's commitment to The Godfather: Part II. Further disagreement arose between Avildsen and Bregman regarding the script, and then the selection of the filming locations. Upon finding resistance to his plans, Avildsen threatened Bregman of quitting multiple times. An aggravated Bregman then called for a meeting with the production team, in order to cause the director to quit in front of witnesses. Avildsen had insisted on a meeting with Bregman and De Laurentiis to shoot a scene in the real home of Serpico's parents for authenticity. The producers felt that the structure could not accommodate the production team and equipment efficiently.[20] The escalating tension on the meeting resulted in De Laurentiis firing Avildsen, and the director quit in return.[21] Avildsen's account for the reason of his dismissal was refusing to cast Cornelia Sharpe as Leslie. Sharpe was at the time dating Bregman. Avildsen would later declare that he should have treated the situation "with more finesse".[22] Sidney Lumet was then hired to complete the job for his reputation as an effective director under a tight schedule.[21]

Pacino was shortly distracted from the project by an offer to play the lead in Lenny, but ultimately he turned it down.[15] To prepare for Serpico, he rode with police officers for a night, but he decided it was not enough. A method actor, he felt that he needed to spend time with Serpico.[16] Pacino and Serpico met several times in Montauk, New York, where the actor rented a house for the summer season. Pacino was moved by Serpico's conviction to reform the NYPD, and became more committed to the project.[17] In character, Pacino often walked throughout areas of the city that were considered dangerous at the time.[23] While waiting in traffic, he attempted to arrest a truck driver, as he was enraged by the exhaust fumes.[24] He was refused service at a Manhattan restaurant for the appearance he kept for the film.[25]

Production

Lumet organized the 107 speaking parts that took place in 104 different locations.[26] The longest scenes comprehended two-and-a-half pages of the screenplay, while the average was one page.[27] A budget of $3.3 million (equivalent to $22.6 million in 2023) was assigned.[2] Two weeks of rehearsal were held. Pacino had learned Salt's screenplay, and he agreed with Lumet that Wexler's revised version improved the structure, but that the dialogue was impoverished.[28] Lumet allowed the actors to improvise certain dialogues, and he also allowed their creative input for the scenes.[26] The cast selected dialogues from both scripts as the filming progressed.[28] Though he had already a good knowledge of New York locations, Lumet considered the work "physically brutal, and emotionally tough".[25] The principal photography on Serpico began in early July. The film was planned to be released before Christmas, with four-and-a-half months for the crew to complete the movie.[29] Filming took place in July and August.[30] The story of the film encompassed eleven years, from 1960 through 1971.[31]

Pacino as Frank Serpico in a publicity portrait

To accommodate the scenes around Pacino's facial hair, the film was shot in reverse. Pacino started with long beard and hair. He was shaved to a mustache, and then eventually his hair was cut, and he was clean-shaven for the beginning of the film.[28] Lumet decided each day if Pacino was to be further shaven, and the crew prepared fake beards in case they were required.[32] Winter conditions were simulated, as the team had to defoliate trees and cut shrubs.[32] Special make-up was used to absorb the sweat, and to keep the actors' skin dry.[33] The cast wore winter coats, and their skin was made to look bluish, while their breath had to be visible.[32] The director followed Serpico's desire for the winter to look "cold and heavy", and the summer "idyllic and hazy".[30] The team had difficulty to find locations suitable for the scenes set in the 1960s, since graffiti did not become common until 1970.[31] Lumet shot up to thirty-five different setups daily.[26] The team had to move three times a day on an average. Each location had to be cleared of cars that did not belong to the particular period, and extras could not feature long hair, or non-period wardrobe. Hairdressers were present with the crew.[32] Multiple locations in the city including Harlem, South Bronx, Bedford–Stuyvesant, Brooklyn and Astoria, Queens were used.[25] Lewisohn Stadium was featured shortly before its demolition.[34] The party scene was shot at Sidney Kingsley's fifth avenue loft.[25] The NYPD cooperated with the director, and allowed him to film in four active police stations.[25]

Serpico's apartment had to be built by the crew. It featured a fixed ceiling, and movable walls.[35] As Serpico's original apartment, it was located in Greenwich Village.[36] Through lightning, Lumet and cinematographer Arthur Ornitz chose to maintain a "warm look" on the location. Different techniques were used to reflect moods, and the changes that the character went through throughout the years.[30] Lumet focused on portraying Serpico's struggle to balance his work and personal life, and his increased isolation and alienation, as his efforts produced slow results.[37] The director decided to portray him "darker and darker". As the film progressed, the cast costumes became darker in color, until the courtroom scene, where all the actors wore dark tones.[38] Lumet told Charles Champlin: "I was trying to negate color, to make a picture in color that was not colorful". Meanwhile, he desired Serpico's fellow officers to be "men with charm, who were all the more evil for being human and understandable".[39] Lumet finished shooting the film in fifty-one days, on budget.[25]

The film was edited by Dede Allen. Allen received the scenes from Lumet directly after they were shot. She had a limit of forty-eight hours to finish her work for its delivery to the sound department.[29] Lumet did not want to add a score to the picture, but he decided he would do it before De Laurentiis commissioned one. He learned that Mikis Theodorakis was released from prison in Greece.[38] He was able to locate him in Paris, as the composer quickly left his country of origin. Theodorakis accepted Lumet's offer, and flew to New York City the next day. He met with the director, who played the movie for him the day of his arrival. Theodorakis agreed that it should not have a soundtrack, but he offered a composition of his to add to the film. Theodorakis had arranged a tour of the United States with a Greek orchestra and told Lumet that he could not be present for the spotting session. Lumet offered the help of Bob James, who would sit with the director for the spotting. To inform of the progress of the sessions and possible changes on the arrangements, James flew to the cities where Theodorakis appeared in order to work the details together.[38]

Release

The film was released on December 5, 1973 in New York,[40] and on December 18 in Los Angeles.[11] The opening week in New York garnered $123,000.[41] Serpico was released nationwide on February 6, 1974.[42] The film was a critical and commercial success.[11] It grossed between $23.4 million and $29.8 million.[3][4]

Serpico attended the premiere of the film,[28] but he did not finish watching it.[43] Serpico felt "distant" from the end results.[44] On an interview with Pauline Kael for The New Yorker, he concluded that it "didn't give a sense of frustration you feel when you're not able to do anything".[45] According to Lumet's account, he met Serpico shortly before the production. The director asked him to stay clear of the set, to not make Pacino "self-conscious" regarding his portrayal.[28] Serpico watched the film in its entirety for the first time in 2010.[43] In a later interview, he declared that Lumet barred him from the set after he interrupted the shooting of a scene that "never happened". Serpico also criticized the dismissal of Avildsen by the production team. Serpico and Avildsen remained friends, and shared a property on Long Island for three years in the 1980s.[46] " New York City Police Commissioner Michael Codd stated that the film "tends to imply that Serpico was the only honest cop in the whole department".[47] Detective Durk was not pleased with Serpico. Durk, who was depicted in the character of Bob Blair, felt that the movie would deter other policemen to denounce corruption. On an interview with The New York Times, he considered that the movie was unfair to honest police officers. Durk stated that the end of the film conveyed that "the cost of honesty is martyrdom", and Serpico's departure for Switzerland showed him "wounded and frustrated". Meanwhile, Bronx district attorney Burton B. Roberts declared that it "bears absolutely no relationship to the truth". Lumet defended his artistic license on the portrayal of the story, as he felt he desired to make a film that "people believed in".[44] Bregman dismissed the critics, as he felt that the real names were not relevant for viewers in cities outside New York.[45] Maas rebuked Durk's comments regarding honest policemen, and in reference to Serpico being wounded he asked: "where were they?".[48]

Critical reception

Premiere reception

The New York Times felt that the film was "galvanizing" for Pacino's performance, and by the "tremendous intensity" of Lumet's direction. The publication considered the film at the same time "disquieting" for its use of fictional names, as the reviewer felt that it diminished the role of Durk. Meanwhile, it called Theodorakis' soundtrack "redundant and dumb".[49] The New York Daily News delivered a favorable review of the film. It rated it four stars out of five, and called it "a triumph of intelligence, compassion and style".[50] A follow-up critic by the publication deemed Pacino's acting a "masterful performance", as the reviewer remarked "he walks like a cop. He talks like a cop. He even seems to think as a cop". The review also praised Lumet and his "talent for achieving social realism".[51] The Record considered it "one of the finest films of the year". While it felt that the portrayal of Serpico was "too righteous and obsessive", the review favored Pacino, but felt that his performance was "sometimes a little too intense". It praised the photography of New York City as authentic, and credited Ornitz and Allen's work for it.[52] The Village Voice wrote a mixed review. It criticized the focus of the film on Serpico, and the minor role the screenplay writers gave to the character that represented Durk. The reviewer considered that Serpico was "worth seeing" for Pacino's performance.[53] Variety deemed Pacino's acting "outstanding", and Lumet's a combination of "gritty action and thought-provoking comment".[54] For Newhouse News Services it was an "exciting movie", but the review remarked that it was "weakened" by its focus on Serpico. The news agency attributed the minimization of the other characters to avoid "possible lawsuits".[55] The Los Angeles Times acclaimed Serpico. Charles Champlin called Pacino "one of the handful of genuine star actors in American films". Salt and Wexler's screenplay was hailed as "almost documentary reality",[56] and its treatment of the main character "a complex and evolving portrait". The reviewer also remarked that the romances and break-ups were presented with "unhackneyed honesty".[57] The contributions of the supporting cast were well noted.[58] Champlin felt that Allen's work was considered to be "high on the list" for an Academy Award nomination and deemed Theodorakis' music "effective".[59]

Wide release reception

The Chicago Tribune rated the film with two-and-a-half stars. The critic expressed that its treatment of corruption is its "principal strength and weakness", and added that Serpico "loses the perspective" that "corruption ... begins and ends with individuals making active and passive decisions".[60] The Philadelphia Inquirer celebrated the film's critic of police corruption, despite its "embellishments and omissions" on the story. Pacino's performance was called "riveting", and the piece praised the "sharply individualized characterizations" by Tony Roberts, Jack Kehoe, John Randolph, Biff McGuire, Barbara Eda-Young and Cornelia Sharpe.[61] Meanwhile, also for Philadelphia Inquirer, investigative journalist Greg Walter lamented its portrayal of police officers as "snarling, insipid ass(es)". Walter felt that Maas' book was "coldly objective", but that the director's work delivered characters that were "one-dimensional caricatures".[47] The Boston Globe welcomed Lumet's "melodramatic efficiency". The publication considered the story "heavily repetitious", but favored its "quick pace". It regarded Ornitz's camerawork as "the right documentary look", while it lamented Theodorakis' score as "disruptive" and "out of character".[62] Esquire further criticized Theodorakis, as the reviewer opined that his "composing voice ought to be silenced". Meanwhile, the piece praised Allen's work.[63]

Pacino sporting a beard and undercover outfit in a scene

The Miami Herald hailed the use of "street talk" instead of the "language of actors and actresses" by Salt, Wexler and Maas. It praised Lumet and Ornitz's photography that "generate the smells, sounds and styles of the city". It considered Pacino's acting "predictably excellent", and it favored Theodorakis' music.[64] The Detroit Free Press suggested that Serpico would be a breakthrough role for Pacino as an actor, and called his work "fascinating". The newspaper defined the film as an "encouraging morality tale".[65] Meanwhile, San Francisco Examiner observed Pacino's acting to be "a brilliant, solidly thought out performance". The publication added that the supporting cast's contributions "never satisfactorily fleshed out". Regarding Lumet, the reviewer felt that he directed the film with "skill and vigor".[66] The Cincinnati Enquirer attributed the commercial success of the film to Pacino's acting, and to the film's depiction of "hard, cold, grit and grime reality".[67]

For The Evening Sun reviewer Lou Cedrone expressed his doubts about Durk's "gratis talk of defamation of the police image". Cedrone considered that Durk "comes off very nicely" on the film, and defended Lumet's choice to "emphasize the action rather than the definition". Meanwhile, it viewed the use of "Neapolitan" music as "foolish perhaps, but not touching". It declared Pacino's contribution "a magnificent performance".[68] The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette found Serpico to be "meticulously crafted, intelligently written, unflinchingly honest". The publication noted the "fidelity" with which the director captured New York, and that the city "becomes more than just a background". It summed Pacino's acting as "naturalistic, flawlessly convincing".[69] The Honolulu Advertiser attributed Pacino's "brilliant portrayal" to turn an "ordinary cop movie" into "extraordinary". The review favored Lumet, the writers and the supporting cast.[70]

The Austin American-Statesman pointed that the film's "realiam" produced a "fascinating film".[71] The Fort Worth Star-Telegram celebrated Pacino's "towering performance". Roberts' performance was noted as a "standout". Sharpe and Eda Young's appearances as Serpico's love interests were deemed to be "played with restrained excellence". The newspaper opined that the film was "15 minutes too long", but that viewers would not "realize the length until you're outside looking at your watch".[72] The Kansas City Star detailed the criticism the film received from police officers, and Serpico's discontent with the production. The piece noted that despite the fictional additions, Serpico was a "superrealistic dramatization". Meanwhile, Wexler and Salt were praised for the authentic use of profanity in the dialogues.[73] The Times opened its review applauding Serpico's denunciation of police corruption, while it pointed that the film "exceeds (the) expectations" of the viewers for it to be "powerfully dramatic". Lumet's "accurate eye for surroundings" was remarked, and the reviewer hailed Pacino and the supporting cast.[74]

Later reviews

On the review aggregator Metacritic the movie garnered a score of eighty-seven, out of seven reviews from mainstream critics. The result indicated "universal acclaim".[75] Rotten Tomatoes rated it 90% "Fresh", based on reviews from forty-one critics. The website remarked Pacino's "ferocious performance". [76]

AllMovie gave Serpico five stars out of five. The review described the situation in the United States following the Watergate scandal, and how the "bureaucratic depravity touched a cultural nerve". It welcomed the film's "documentary-style realism".[77] The A.V. Club received it positively, the reviewer felt that Serpico expressed "artful, character-driven slices of life".[78] In its later review, The Village Voice declared that the "Watergate-era time capsule of hippie fashions" that the film presented "ought to look pretty dated", but that the story "feels depressingly relevant".[79]

Legacy

Serpico was released on VHS in 1991,[80] and on DVD in 2002.[81] The film was then made available in Blu-ray in 2013.[82] Masters of Cinema released Serpico in the United Kingdom on Blu-ray in 2014. It contained three video documentaries about the film, a photo gallery with an audio commentary by Lumet and a forty-four page booklet.[83]

A television series based on Maas' book and the motion picture was broadcast on NBC between September 1976 and January 1977, with David Birney playing the role of Serpico.[84] Fourteen episodes were broadcast, and one was never aired. The series was preceded by a pilot film, Serpico: The Deadly Game, which was broadcast in April 1976.[85]

The 1976 Italian film The Cop in Blue Jeans' main character was inspired by Serpico.[86] On the 1977 film Saturday Night Fever, a poster of Serpico is featured in the room of its main character, Tony Manero.[87] The film is referenced in 1994's Natural Born Killers by the character Scagnetti.[88] The poster of the film is featured in the room of the main character of 1997's Boogie Nights.[89] Serpico was referenced in a 2016 episode of El ministerio del tiempo as the reason for the nickname of one of its main characters, "Pacino".[90] Among other police films, Serpico influenced the Hong Kong action cinema.[91]

Accolades

The film received Academy Awards nominations for Best Actor (Al Pacino) and Best Adapted Screenplay. The script won the Writers Guild of America Award for Best Adapted Screenplay.[92] Theodorakis was nominated for both the Grammy Award for Best Score Soundtrack for Visual Media and the BAFTA Award for Best Film Music.[93][94] Sidney Lumet was nominated for the BAFTA Award for Best Direction and the Directors Guild of America Award.[95][92] The film was nominated for the Golden Globe Award for Best Motion Picture – Drama. Pacino won his first Golden Globe award for Best Actor in 1974. For his performance, he also received a BAFTA nomination for Best Actor in a Leading Role.[92]

Pacino's role as Frank Serpico ranked at number forty on the American Film Institute's AFI's 100 Years...100 Heroes & Villains.[96] Meanwhile, Serpico also ranked at number eighty-four on AFI's AFI's 100 Years...100 Cheers, a list of America's most inspiring films.[97]

Award Category Nominee Result Ref.
46th Academy Awards Best Actor Al Pacino Nominated [98]
Best Adapted Screenplay Waldo Salt and Norman Wexler Nominated
26th British Academy Film Awards Best Direction Sidney Lumet Nominated [99]
Best Actor in a Leading Role Al Pacino Nominated
Best Original Music Mikis Theodorakis Nominated
31st Golden Globe Awards Best Motion Picture – Drama Serpico Nominated [100]
Best Actor – Motion Picture Drama Al Pacino Won
26th Directors Guild of America Awards Outstanding Directing – Feature Film Sidney Lumet Nominated [101]
26th Writers Guild of America Awards Best Adapted Screenplay Waldo Salt and Norman Wexler Won [102]
17th Annual Grammy Awards Best Score Soundtrack for Visual Media Mikis Theodorakis Nominated [93]

References

  1. ^ Yule, Andrew 1992, p. 299.
  2. ^ a b Knoedelseder, William Jr. 1987, p. 2 (partIV).
  3. ^ a b Knoedelseder, William Jr. 1987, p. 2.
  4. ^ a b Box Office Mojo staff 2020.
  5. ^ Rayman, Graham 2013, p. 206.
  6. ^ Constantine, Peggy 1974, p. 6-C.
  7. ^ Levy, Shawn 2010, p. 450.
  8. ^ Conlon, Edward 2012, p. 252.
  9. ^ Dunne, John Gregory 2013, p. 182.
  10. ^ Morton, Ray 2005, p. 149.
  11. ^ a b c AFI Staff 2019.
  12. ^ a b De Laurentiis, Dino; Kezich, Tulio; Levantesi, Alessandra 2004, p. 206.
  13. ^ De Laurentiis, Dino; Kezich, Tulio; Levantesi, Alessandra 2004, p. 201.
  14. ^ Priggé, Steven 2004, p. 119.
  15. ^ a b Yule, Andrew 1992, p. 77.
  16. ^ a b Grobel, Lawrence 2006, p. 32.
  17. ^ a b Yule, Andrew 1992, p. 76.
  18. ^ Schoell, William 2016, p. 7.
  19. ^ Grobel, Lawrence 1979, p. 99.
  20. ^ a b Yule, Andrew 1992, p. 78.
  21. ^ a b Yule, Andrew 1992, p. 79.
  22. ^ Powell, Larry; Garrett, Tom 2013, p. 53.
  23. ^ Scorsese, Martin 2006, p. 60.
  24. ^ Grobel, Lawrence 2006, p. 39.
  25. ^ a b c d e f Yule, Andrew 1992, p. 80.
  26. ^ a b c Cunningham, Frank 2014, p. 216.
  27. ^ Sharples, Win Jr. 1974, p. 34.
  28. ^ a b c d e Spiegel, Maura 2019, p. 160.
  29. ^ a b Nixon, Rob 2020.
  30. ^ a b c Sharples, Win Jr. 1974, p. 33.
  31. ^ a b Sharples, Win Jr. 1974, p. 30.
  32. ^ a b c d Sharples, Win Jr. 1974, p. 31.
  33. ^ Associated Press staff 1973, p. 7-C.
  34. ^ Harlem World Magazine staff 2019.
  35. ^ Sharples, Win Jr. 1974, p. 32.
  36. ^ Schoell, William 1995, p. 74.
  37. ^ Cunningham, Frank 2014, p. 217.
  38. ^ a b c Schwartz, David 2005.
  39. ^ Champlin, Charles 1974, p. 26.
  40. ^ Kirshner, Jonathan 2012, p. 227.
  41. ^ Variety Staff 1973, p. 8.
  42. ^ Variety Staff 1974, p. 4.
  43. ^ a b Kilgannon, Corey 2010.
  44. ^ a b Kaufman, Michael 1973, p. 58.
  45. ^ a b Kramer, Carol 1974, p. Weekend 2.
  46. ^ D'Ambrosio, Antonino 2017.
  47. ^ a b Walter, Greg 1974, p. 1-I.
  48. ^ McCabe, Bruce 1974, p. 14.
  49. ^ Canby, Vincent 1973, p. 61.
  50. ^ Oster, Jerry 1973, p. 122.
  51. ^ Carroll, Kathleen 1973, p. 7.
  52. ^ Crittenden, John 1973, p. B-1, B-20.
  53. ^ Sarris, Andrew 1973, p. 91-92.
  54. ^ Variety staff 2 1973.
  55. ^ Taylor, Frances 1973, p. T-6.
  56. ^ Champlin, Charles 1973, p. C 1.
  57. ^ Champlin, Charles 1973, p. C 48.
  58. ^ Champlin, Charles 1973, p. C 49.
  59. ^ Champlin, Charles 1973, p. C 102.
  60. ^ Siskel, Gene 1974, p. 1 (Section 2).
  61. ^ Collins, William B. 1974, p. 8A.
  62. ^ Kelly, Kevin 1974, p. 35.
  63. ^ Esquire staff 1974, p. 70.
  64. ^ Huddy, John 1974, p. 7-D.
  65. ^ DeVine, Lawrence 1974, p. 5-C.
  66. ^ Eichelbaum, Stanley 1974, p. 27.
  67. ^ McElfresh, Tom 1974, p. 42.
  68. ^ Cedrone, Lou 1974, p. B6.
  69. ^ Anderson, George 1974, p. 8.
  70. ^ Harada, Wayne 1974, p. E-4.
  71. ^ Bustin, John 1974, p. 44.
  72. ^ Brooks, Elston 1974, p. 10-A.
  73. ^ Stack, Dennis 1974, p. 1E.
  74. ^ Montgomery, Jim 1974, p. 6B.
  75. ^ Metacritic staff 2004.
  76. ^ Rotten Tomatoes staff 2004.
  77. ^ Bozzola, Lucia 2012.
  78. ^ Murray, Noel 2013.
  79. ^ Strong, Benjamin 2004.
  80. ^ Weiner, David 1992, p. DL.
  81. ^ Hodgkins, John 2013, p. 157.
  82. ^ Paramount Pictures staff 2013.
  83. ^ Masters of Cinema staff 2014.
  84. ^ Hischak, Thomas 2014, p. 212.
  85. ^ Martindale, David 1991, p. 439.
  86. ^ Curti, Roberto 2013, p. 168.
  87. ^ Wlodarz, Joe 2010, p. 61.
  88. ^ Tarantino, Quentin 2000, p. 10.
  89. ^ Paasonen, Susanna; Nikunen, Kaarina; Saarenmaa, Laura 2007, p. 27.
  90. ^ Quirós, Paloma 2016.
  91. ^ Yau, Esther 2017, p. 110.
  92. ^ a b c Videohound Editors 1996, p. 358.
  93. ^ a b Grammy staff 2020.
  94. ^ Zervanos, Lydía 2015, p. 285.
  95. ^ Hischak, Thomas 2015, p. 667.
  96. ^ AFI Staff 2003.
  97. ^ AFI staff 2006.
  98. ^ Oscars staff 2020.
  99. ^ BAFTA staff 2020.
  100. ^ Golden Globes staff 2020.
  101. ^ DGA staff 2020.
  102. ^ WGA staff 2020.
Sources
Wikiquote has quotations related to Serpico.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Serpico&oldid=1003417677"