Talk:International reactions to the Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 shootdown
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the International reactions to the Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 shootdown article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article was nominated for deletion on 15 November 2015. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Countries
Should this include all countries or just those with victims? Nathan121212 (talk) 04:53, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Whether a country had victims should not judge the significance of a response. The response itself should be the key factor there. Dustin (talk) 04:58, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on International reactions to the Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 shootdown. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FAQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://rusvesna.su/news/1405676334
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:46, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Does the consensus listed below which are formed from a discussion on the MH17 talk page apply to this International Reactions page as well?
Mamasanju has now been blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
I had a heated argument with User:Calton that whether a consensus formed from a discussion I made at MH17 talk page is applicable to International reactions to the Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 shootdown page. Calton insist that the consensus is only valid for MH17 page but as the discussion ended up with a consensus that the concerning edit be made on International Reactions page instead, I believe that thte consensus applied to the Reactions page too. Here's the discussion of MH17 talk page that I talked about: Talk:Malaysia_Airlines_Flight_17#Hacking_incident_that_arose_from_this_plane_shootdown_incident That just sound silly and archaic but since Calton refuse to back out from his edit war I have to take it here and ping all of you. As such, does the consensus listed list above which are formed from a discussion on the MH17 talk page apply to here as well? Mamasanju (talk) 15:30, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
At the meantime I have pinged all users including who had participated in the old discussion to here. Mamasanju (talk) 22:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
I remember User:MPS1992 said the following during our discussion on MH17 talk page when it was Trump's inauguration day:
@Ahunt: Regarding Mr Calton's insistence that our first consensus only applies to MH17 and not here, I think he is simply oblivious about the true meaning of Wikipedia has no firm rules of the Five Pillars of this encyclopaedia. I still assume that he reverted the edit under a misguiden good faith and hopes that he'll realize that one day. Mamasanju (talk) 12:58, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
@Pincrete: Remember this? Mamasanju (talk) 13:09, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Mamasanju (talk) 13:12, 5 June 2017 (UTC) * @Ahunt: @Stickee: @Pincrete: WP:COMMONSENSE dictates that it is acceptable to use common sense as you go about editing, and being too wrapped in rules can cause a loss of perspective. In light of this I think it's best to apply the consensus we made at MH17 discussion area to here by restoring that "brief mention" content and swiftly end this discussion. Any comments to raise so far? Mamasanju (talk) 13:27, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
One thing to remember, notability does not degrade over time and all I see is his one remains stale and constant for meantime. Mamasanju (talk) 23:34, 5 June 2017 (UTC) @Ahunt: @Martinevans123: @Stickee: From the WP:PRESERVE guideline.
Mamasanju (talk) 00:18, 6 June 2017 (UTC) @Ahunt: @Stickee: @Martinevans123: However, since a protracted argument over the inclusion of that edit sounds likely, I think we must find a compromise solution on this edit ASAP. Perhaps making the mention even more brief or translate & move it to other language Wikipedia whose inclusion rules are tad bit lenient? Wikipedia is not about winning and is not a battleground so it makes sense to find the compromise solutioon together.Mamasanju (talk) 00:21, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
|
- B-Class aviation articles
- B-Class Aviation accident articles
- Aviation accident task force articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- B-Class Disaster management articles
- Mid-importance Disaster management articles
- B-Class Death articles
- Mid-importance Death articles
- B-Class military history articles
- B-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
- Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
- B-Class Malaysia articles
- Mid-importance Malaysia articles
- WikiProject Malaysia articles
- B-Class Netherlands articles
- All WikiProject Netherlands pages
- B-Class Ukraine articles
- Mid-importance Ukraine articles
- WikiProject Ukraine articles
- B-Class Russia articles
- Mid-importance Russia articles
- Mid-importance B-Class Russia articles
- WikiProject Russia articles with no associated task force
- WikiProject Russia articles