Jump to content

Talk:Harry Potter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 143.44.165.184 (talk) at 06:38, 8 June 2022. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Good articleHarry Potter has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starHarry Potter is the main article in the Harry Potter novels series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 27, 2006Good article nomineeListed
October 7, 2006Good article reassessmentDelisted
January 23, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
June 29, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 1, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 28, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
March 8, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
April 13, 2008Good article nomineeListed
August 2, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
September 22, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
October 4, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 18, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
May 16, 2010Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 18, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
August 17, 2017Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article


Trimming

The article has a readable prose size of 12,500 words, exceeding the recommended 10,000 words in WP:Length. I think many sections, in particular the plot, can be trimmed down. What do people think? Olivaw-Daneel (talk) 03:20, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trim away! Along with Plot, Reception is a big issue. It warrants its own article, summarized back to here with one paragraph. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:47, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The "Cultural impact" section includes statements such as "those who read the books were significantly different from those who had not", based on just one paper: doi:10.1111/jasp.12279. Would this fall under WP:MEDRS (need for review articles)? Olivaw-Daneel (talk) 21:16, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, the kinds of statement being made based on that "study" can't be made based on Facebook responses--that fails the duck test even without MEDRS! Unless some better source can be found (meaning, not a Facebook survey), that paragraph should probably go. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:45, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see anything about Facebook; the study surveyed school children in Italy and the UK. It's not a review, however. Olivaw-Daneel (talk) 22:46, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We're now below 9500 words! Next on my list is a rewrite of Literary criticism from book sources. Olivaw-Daneel (talk) 00:54, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the article should be trimmed for the sake of clarity. I think there is room for trimming in the Literary Criticism part, as there are strong claims mentioned such as blaming the series for the result of the 2016 election that does not directly relate to the book series itself, but has more to do with the Harry Potter franchise or JK Rowling which are separate articles. I think this article can be more focused on the books themselves and their impact, instead of the impact of the entire franchise. Ekg34 (talk) 14:40, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Book Publisher

Harry Potter Books are published by Bloomsbury (India) in India, can I add this information on the wiki page. SadX (talk) 11:46, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Harry, Ron and Hermione" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Harry, Ron and Hermione and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 31#Harry, Ron and Hermione until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:40, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Harry potter subjects" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Harry potter subjects and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 31#Harry potter subjects until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:43, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Harry Potter Further Reading" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Harry Potter Further Reading and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 31#Harry Potter Further Reading until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:53, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Harry Potter trivia" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Harry Potter trivia and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 31#Harry Potter trivia until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:55, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Harry Potter mysteries" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Harry Potter mysteries and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 31#Harry Potter mysteries until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:12, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Magical Britain" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Magical Britain and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 31#Magical Britain until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:19, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 31 March 2022

Under the "Early years" subheading of the "Plot" heading, change "...house of the Dursleys, his aunt, uncle and cousin." to "...house of the Dursleys, his aunt Petunia, uncle Vernon and cousin Dudley."

This edit request is a part of an Outreachy'22 microtask linked here Diyawaghmare (talk) 22:18, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. The plot is already overlong, so naming minor characters is unnecessary. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:34, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Harry Potter censorship" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Harry Potter censorship and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 1#Harry Potter censorship until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 06:04, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested Edits to the controversies section

Should information be added about the certain controversy surrounding J.K. Rowling and the trans community? Loki friggason (talk) 19:40, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Loki friggason If you find information directly related to the series sure, but I think most of the controversy is already well covered in Political views of J. K. Rowling. Poirot09 (talk) 20:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I missed that page in my search! Thank you for pointing it out. Loki friggason (talk) 20:34, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]